Intraoperative vascular complications during 2278 cerebral endovascular procedures with multimodality IONM: relationship between signal change, complication, intervention and postoperative outcome

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016604
Author(s):  
W Bryan Wilent ◽  
Olga Belyakina ◽  
Eric Korsgaard ◽  
Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris ◽  
M Reid Gooch ◽  
...  

BackgroundIntraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is often used during cerebral endovascular procedures.ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between intraoperative vascular complications and IONM signal changes, and the impact of interventions on signal resolution and postoperative outcomes.MethodsA series of 2278 cerebral endovascular procedures conducted under general anesthesia and using electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring were retrospectively reviewed. A subset of 763 procedures also included motor evoked potentials (MEPs). IONM alerts were categorized as either a partial attenuation or complete loss of signal. Vascular complications were subcategorized as due to rupture, emboli, instrumentation, or vasospasm. Odds ratios (ORs) for new postoperative motor deficits were calculated and diagnostic accuracy was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.ResultsThe overall incidence of new postoperative motor deficit was 1.2%; 20.4% in cases with an IONM alert and 0.09% in cases without an alert. Relative to procedures with no alerts, odds of a new deficit increased if there was partial signal attenuation (OR=210.9, 95% CI 44.3 to 1003.5, p<0.0001) and increased further with complete loss of signal (OR=1437.3, 95% CI 297.3 to 6948.2, p<0.0001). Relative to procedures with unresolved alerts, odds of a new deficit decreased if the alert was fully resolved (OR=0.039, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.306, p<0.002). Procedures using MEPs had slightly higher sensitivity (92.3% vs 85.7%) but slightly lower specificity (96.7% vs 98.2%).ConclusionsAn IONM alert associated with an arterial complication is associated with a dramatic increase in odds of a new postoperative deficit; however, if there is resolution of the alert prior to closure, odds of a new deficit decrease significantly.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Giampiccolo ◽  
Cristiano Parisi ◽  
Pietro Meneghelli ◽  
Vincenzo Tramontano ◽  
Federica Basaldella ◽  
...  

Abstract Muscle motor-evoked potentials are commonly monitored during brain tumour surgery in motor areas, as these are assumed to reflect the integrity of descending motor pathways, including the corticospinal tract. However, while the loss of muscle motor-evoked potentials at the end of surgery is associated with long-term motor deficits (muscle motor-evoked potential-related deficits), there is increasing evidence that motor deficit can occur despite no change in muscle motor-evoked potentials (muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits), particularly after surgery of non-primary regions involved in motor control. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits and to identify the associated brain regions. We retrospectively reviewed 125 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peri-Rolandic lesions using intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. Intraoperative changes in muscle motor-evoked potentials were correlated with motor outcome, assessed by the Medical Research Council scale. We performed voxel–lesion–symptom mapping to identify which resected regions were associated with short- and long-term muscle motor-evoked potential-associated motor deficits. Muscle motor-evoked potentials reductions significantly predicted long-term motor deficits. However, in more than half of the patients who experienced long-term deficits (12/22 patients), no muscle motor-evoked potential reduction was reported during surgery. Lesion analysis showed that muscle motor-evoked potential-related long-term motor deficits were associated with direct or ischaemic damage to the corticospinal tract, whereas muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits occurred when supplementary motor areas were resected in conjunction with dorsal premotor regions and the anterior cingulate. Our results indicate that long-term motor deficits unrelated to the corticospinal tract can occur more often than currently reported. As these deficits cannot be predicted by muscle motor-evoked potentials, a combination of awake and/or novel asleep techniques other than muscle motor-evoked potentials monitoring should be implemented.


Author(s):  
Johannes Herta ◽  
Erdem Yildiz ◽  
Daniela Marhofer ◽  
Thomas Czech ◽  
Andrea Reinprecht ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Feasibility, reliability, and safety assessment of transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in infants less than 12 months of age. Methods A total of 22 patients with a mean age of 33 (range 13–49) weeks that underwent neurosurgery for tethered cord were investigated. Data from intraoperative MEPs, anesthesia protocols, and clinical records were reviewed. Anesthesia during surgery was maintained by total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Results MEPs were present in all patients for the upper extremities and in 21 out of 22 infants for the lower extremities. Mean baseline stimulation intensity was 101 ± 20 mA. If MEPs were present at the end of surgery, no new motor deficit occurred. In the only case of MEP loss, preoperative paresis was present, and high baseline intensity thresholds were needed. MEP monitoring did not lead to any complications. TIVA was maintained with an average propofol infusion rate of 123.5 ± 38.2 µg/kg/min and 0.46 ± 0.17 µg/kg/min for remifentanil. Conclusion In spinal cord release surgery, the use of intraoperative MEP monitoring is indicated regardless of the patient’s age. We could demonstrate the feasibility and safety of MEP monitoring in infants if an adequate anesthetic regimen is applied. More data is needed to verify whether an irreversible loss of robust MEPs leads to motor deficits in this young age group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (Vol.10, No.3) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana C. STANESCU ◽  
Angelo C. BULBOACA ◽  
Gabriela B. DOGARU ◽  
Gabriel GUSETU ◽  
Dana M. FODOR

Disability as a stroke consequence is reported by 3% males and 2% females in general population. Motor deficits are common in stroke patients, but their complete recovery is seen only in a minority of cases. Assessment of motor deficits uses clinical methods, especially standardized scales, but also electrophysiological and imagistic methods. The motor recovery is a continuous process, maximal in the first month after stroke, decreasing gradually over the first 6 months. Most powerful predictors for motor recovery are clinical parameters: severity of motor deficit, onset of first voluntary movements after stroke in the first 48-72 hours, a continuous improvement in motor function during the first 8 weeks, a good postural control during the first month, young age, male sex, left hemispheric stroke and absence of other neurological impairments are strong positive predictors. Presence of motor-evoked potentials in paretic muscles and imagistic parameters as location, stroke volume and motor pathways integrity are paraclinical predictors for recovery. There are no specific biomarker which is efficient in predicting recovery. In patients with poor chances for recovery according to actual predictors, the development of more precise algorithms to assess functional outcome is needed, in order to support the choice of appropriate methods and intensity of rehabilitation treatment. Key words: ischemic stroke rehabilitation, functional assessment, motor improvement, recovery predictors, prognostic factors,


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1600.2-1600
Author(s):  
S. Sciacca ◽  
C. Rotondo ◽  
A. Corrado ◽  
L. Giardullo ◽  
S. Stefania ◽  
...  

Background:Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Myocardial calcifications have been related with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) such as focal wall motion abnormalities and arrhythmias. The impact of vascular calcifications is under investigation in order to define the risk of cardiovascular events. The relationship between cardiac calcification and systemic sclerosis (SSc) has not been investigated.Objectives:The aim of the study is to evaluate the frequency of different patterns of cardiac calcification in SSc patients, and to correlate them to other CVD risk factors.Methods:We analyzed thoracic-CT scanners of 35 SSc patients (88% female, aged 47,8 ys ±12,9, disease duration 12,8 ys ±9) to determine the location and extension of vascular and cardiac calcification. All recruited patients fulfilled the 2013 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for SSc. No one patients had renal failure, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, history of cardiac surgery or radiotherapy.Results:We found myocardial vessels calcifications (MCv) in 37% SSc patients, aortic wall calcifications (ACw)in 60% SSc patients, cardiac valve calcifications (VC) in 28% SSc patient and heart wall calcifications (HCw) in 20%.The SSc patients with almost one calcification had older age (65±9,8 ys vs 50±8,8 ys; p=0,0001) and higher values of circulating NTproBNP (336,9±351,9 vs 144,2±107,8; p=0,04) compared to those without.In particular, the SSc patients with MCv had and uric acid (5,3 ±1,5 vs 4,1 ±1,3; p=0,05), higher rate of PAH (25% vs 0%; p=0,037), arrhythmia (38,5% vs 9%; p=0,036) and higher prevalence of CENP-B antibodies(46% vs 4%; p=0,01) compared to patients without MCv.Patients with HCw had lower C reactive protein (0,16 ±0,10 vs 0,7±0,7; p=0,008) compared to those without HCw. No differences in the rate of heart and vascular complications of SSc were observed.The SSc patients with ACw had higher frequency of arrhythmia (33% vs 0%; p=0,016) and longer disease duration (15,5 y ±9,9 vs 8,8 ±5,8; p=0,03).The SSc patients with VC had higher rate of PAH (33%vs0%; p=0,003) and uric acid (6±0,5vs3,8±1,2 p=0,0001).Regression analysis excluded any association with gender, BMI, systemic arterial hypertension, steroid therapy, hypovitaminosis D or smoke habit. No cardiovascular event was recorded in one year of observation.Conclusion:All patterns of calcifications may be related mostly with the older age. Myocardial vessels calcifications have been found in a high percentage of SSc patients and in particular in those with PAH and positive for anti CENP-B. Furthermore, myocardial vessels calcifications could be associated to the higher occurrence of arrhythmia. More studied are needed to assess the importance of vascular calcification as a part of the vascular involvement in SSc.References:[1]John W. Nance Jr. MD. Myocardial calcifications: Pathophysiology, etiologies, differential diagnoses, and imaging findings. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 9 (2015) 58 e 67.[2]Pagkopoulou E, Poutakidou M. Cardiovascular risk in systemic sclerosis: Micro- and Macro-vascular involvement. Indian J Rheumatol 2017;12, Suppl S1:211-7[3]Plastiras SC, Toumanidis ST. Systemic sclerosis: the heart of the matter. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2012;53(4):287–300.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2803
Author(s):  
Evridiki Asimakidou ◽  
Pablo Alvarez Abut ◽  
Andreas Raabe ◽  
Kathleen Seidel

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin M. Triplet ◽  
Isobel A. Scarisbrick

Abstract Study design We completed retrospective analysis of statin use in individuals with neurologically significant spinal cord injury in a historical cohort study. Objective Our objective was to establish the prevalence of cholesterol-lowering agent use following spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine the impact on recovery of motor function. Setting Patients enrolled in the Rochester Epidemiology Project in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA from 2005 to 2018 were included in analysis. Methods Exclusion criteria: age <18, comorbid neurological disease, prior neurological deficit, nontraumatic injury, survival <1 year, or lack of motor deficit. Demographics and cholesterol-lowering agent use in 83 individuals meeting all criteria were recorded. A total of 68/83 individuals were then assessed for change in function over the first 2 months after injury using the ISNCSCI motor subscore. Statistical comparison between control and statin groups was done by two-sided Chi-squared test or two-tailed Student’s t test. Generalized regression was performed to assess associations between independent variables and functional outcome. Results 30% of individuals with SCI had a prescription for a cholesterol-lowering agent. No significant differences were observed in severity of injury or demographic composition between groups. The change in motor subscore was reduced in the statin group compared to controls (p = 0.03, Mann–Whitney). Both severity of injury and statin were significant predictors of reduced motor recovery (p = 0.001, and p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions Both severity of SCI and statins were significant predictors of reduced motor recovery. Additional investigation is needed to address potential impact of statin-therapy in the context of CNS injury and repair.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirela V Simon ◽  
Daniel K Lee ◽  
Bryan D Choi ◽  
Pratik A Talati ◽  
Jimmy C Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Subcortical mapping of the corticospinal tract has been extensively used during craniotomies under general anesthesia to achieve maximal resection while avoiding postoperative motor deficits. To our knowledge, similar methods to map the thalamocortical tract (TCT) have not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE To describe a neurophysiologic technique for TCT identification in 2 patients who underwent resection of frontoparietal lesions. METHODS The central sulcus (CS) was identified using the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) phase reversal technique. Furthermore, monitoring of the cortical postcentral N20 and precentral P22 potentials was performed during resection. Subcortical electrical stimulation in the resection cavity was done using the multipulse train (case #1) and Penfield (case #2) techniques. RESULTS Subcortical stimulation within the postcentral gyrus (case #1) and in depth of the CS (case #2), resulted in a sudden drop in amplitudes in N20 (case #1) and P22 (case #2), respectively. In both patients, the potentials promptly recovered once the stimulation was stopped. These results led to redirection of the surgical plane with avoidance of damage of thalamocortical input to the primary somatosensory (case #1) and motor regions (case #2). At the end of the resection, there were no significant changes in the median SSEP. Both patients had no new long-term postoperative sensory or motor deficit. CONCLUSION This method allows identification of TCT in craniotomies under general anesthesia. Such input is essential not only for preservation of sensory function but also for feedback modulation of motor activity.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Kumar Sankaran ◽  
Sai Rakesh Rachakonda ◽  
Abraham Kocheril ◽  
Suraj Kapa ◽  
Thenkurussi Kesavadas

Introduction: Endovascular procedures are traditionally performed for a variety of indications. However, guidewire/catheter manipulation and hazardous radiation exposure are limitations to manual interventions. Thus, significant work has been done to develop robotic approaches to therapies. These devices have FDA clearance for performing procedures like cardiac arrhythmias, angioplasty, aneurysm repair and stenting etc. With the increasing usage of robotic assistance in endovascular procedures, it is essential to understand the adverse events that may occur. This study aims to provide an understanding of adverse events with currently available robotic systems. Methods: The analysis of adverse events is performed with the FDA MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database. MAUDE database is a collection of reports on medical devices reported by manufacturers, distributors, users, volunteers. In case of occurrence of adverse events, FDA regulations requires that event to be reported for further investigation. Based on the impact of events on the patient’s outcome, the reported events were grouped into 3 categories death (patient death), injury (patient injury) or device malfunction. Results: A total of 71 different events were reported collectively for all the four robotic devices (Hansen Medical- 37, Corindus Inc.-27, Stereotaxis Inc.-5 & Catheter Robotics Inc.-2). The major adverse events included death and common injuries such as perforation, pseudo-aneurysm / blockage/ tamponade/ clot, blood pressure dropped or an effusion, or hemodynamic instability. The table summarizes the events by brand of system. Conclusions: While robotic approaches to intervention reflect a potentially useful means to improve outcomes of endovascular procedures by optimizing catheter manipulation with finer robotic motions or limiting radiation exposure, there are potentially significant risks. Whether these reflect higher or lower risk than traditional manual approaches requires randomized studies. Use of robotic technologies may present additional risks in light of potential malfunctions that occur from system errors that a human system may not be prone to. Future studies will be needed to better understand incremental benefit.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 170660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Darvishi ◽  
Michael C. Ridding ◽  
Brenton Hordacre ◽  
Derek Abbott ◽  
Mathias Baumert

Restorative brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have been proposed to enhance stroke rehabilitation. Restorative BCIs are able to close the sensorimotor loop by rewarding motor imagery (MI) with sensory feedback. Despite the promising results from early studies, reaching clinically significant outcomes in a timely fashion is yet to be achieved. This lack of efficacy may be due to suboptimal feedback provision. To the best of our knowledge, the optimal feedback update interval (FUI) during MI remains unexplored. There is evidence that sensory feedback disinhibits the motor cortex. Thus, in this study, we explore how shorter than usual FUIs affect behavioural and neurophysiological measures following BCI training for stroke patients using a single-case proof-of-principle study design. The action research arm test was used as the primary behavioural measure and showed a clinically significant increase (36%) over the course of training. The neurophysiological measures including motor evoked potentials and maximum voluntary contraction showed distinctive changes in early and late phases of BCI training. Thus, this preliminary study may pave the way for running larger studies to further investigate the effect of FUI magnitude on the efficacy of restorative BCIs. It may also elucidate the role of early and late phases of motor learning along the course of BCI training.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document