scholarly journals ASPIRE-3-PREVENT: a cross-sectional survey of preventive care after a coronary event across the UK

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001196
Author(s):  
Catriona S Jennings ◽  
Kornelia Kotseva ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Agnieszka Adamska ◽  
David Wood

ObjectiveTo quantify the implementation of the third Joint British Societies’ Consensus Recommendations for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (JBS3) after coronary event.MethodsUsing a cross-sectional survey design, patients were consecutively identified in 36 specialist and district general hospitals between 6 months and 2 years, after acute coronary syndrome or revascularisation procedure and invited to a research interview. Outcomes included JBS3 lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management goals. Data were collected using standardised methods and instruments by trained study nurses. Blood was analysed in a central laboratory and a glucose tolerance test was performed.Results3926 eligible patients were invited to participate and 1177 (23.3% women) were interviewed (30% response). 12.5% were from black and minority ethnic groups. 45% were persistent smokers, 36% obese, 52.9% centrally obese, 52% inactive; 30% had a blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, 54% non-high-density lipoprotein ≥2.5 mmol/L and 44.3% had new dysglycaemia. Prescribing was highest for antiplatelets (94%) and statins (85%). 81% were advised to attend cardiac rehabilitation (86% <60 years vs 79% ≥60 years; 82% men vs 77% women; 93% coronary artery bypass grafting vs 59% unstable angina), 85% attended if advised; 69% attended overall. Attenders were significantly younger (p=0.03) and women were less likely to attend (p=0.03).ConclusionsPatients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are not being adequately managed after event with preventive measures. They require a structured preventive cardiology programme addressing lifestyle, risk factor management and adherence to cardioprotective medications to achieve the standards set by the British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation and JBS3 guidelines.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kotseva ◽  
G De Backer ◽  
D De Bacquer ◽  
D Grobbee ◽  
A Hoes ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction EUROASPIRE V was a cross-sectional survey carried out by the European Society of Cardiology, EURObservational Research Programme in 2016–2017 in 27 European countries Purpose To describe gender differences in lifestyle and risk factor management, and the use of cardioprotective drug therapies in patients with coronary heart disease in Europe. Methods Patients <80 years with coronary disease (CABG, PCI or an acute coronary syndrome) were identified from the hospital medical records and interviewed and examined by trained staff ≥6 months and ≤2 years later using standardized methods including central laboratory measurements. Results A total of 8,261 (25.8% females), mean age 63.6 (SD 9.6) were interviewed, with a median time between the index event and interview 1.12 years (IR 0.82–1.56). Women were older (mean age 65.4 years [SD 9.2] vs 63.0 [9.7] and had a lower level of education than men.Comparing women with men, the prevalence of the risk factors were as follows: current smoking 12.8% vs 20.7%,obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) 45.7% vs 34.9%, central obesity (waist circumference ≥102 cm in men or ≥88 cm in women) 78.0% vs 51.8%, raised blood pressure (BP ≥140/90 mmHg, ≥140/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes) 47.1% vs 46.0%, elevated LDL-cholesterol (≥1.8 mmol/l) 77.9% vs 68.5% and self reported diabetes 33.1% vs 28.0%. Reported use of prophylactic drug therapies for the same comparison was: antiplatelets 91.8% vs. 92.8%; beta-blockers 81.8% vs. 80.8%; ACE inhibitors/ARBs 75.0% vs. 75.3%; and statins 76.8% vs. 82.2%. The therapeutic control of blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and diabetes (HbA1c <7 mmol/L) was: 48.2% vs 49.9%; 25.7% vs 34.1% and 48.5% vs 56.7%, respectively. Conclusions The results show that women with coronary disease have higher prevalence of obesity, central obesity, elevated LDL-cholesterol and self-reported diabetes than men. There were no differences in terms of blood pressure management. All coronary patients require professional support to make lifestyle changes and manage risk factors more effectivelyin order to reduce their risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Acknowledgement/Funding ESC-EORP supported by Amgen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Ferrer and Novo Nordisk


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J Ampt ◽  
Cheryl Amoroso ◽  
Mark F Harris ◽  
Suzanne H McKenzie ◽  
Vanessa K Rose ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1242-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kornelia Kotseva ◽  
David Wood ◽  
Dirk De Bacquer

Aim The purpose of this study was to describe the proportions of patients referred to and attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes in Europe and to compare lifestyle and risk factor targets achieved according to participation in a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Methods The EUROASPIRE IV cross-sectional survey was undertaken in 78 centres from 24 European countries. Consecutive patients aged <80 years with acute coronary syndromes and/or revascularization procedures were interviewed at least six months after their event. Results A total of 7998 patients (24% females) were interviewed. Overall, 51% were advised to participate in a cardiac rehabilitation programme and 81% of them attended at least half of the sessions; being 41% of the study population. Older patients, women, those at low socio-economic status or enrolled with percutaneous coronary intervention and unstable angina, as well as those with a previous history of coronary disease, heart failure, hypertension or dysglycaemia were less likely to be advised to follow a cardiac rehabilitation programme. People smoking prior to the recruiting event were less likely to participate. The proportions of patients achieving lifestyle targets were higher in the cardiac rehabilitation programme group as compared to the non-cardiac rehabilitation programme group: stopping smoking (57% vs 47%, p < 0.0001), recommended physical activity levels (47% vs 38%, p < 0.0001) and body mass index<30 kg/m2 (65% vs 61%, p=0.0007). However, there were no differences in the blood pressure, lipids and glucose control. Patients who attended a cardiac rehabilitation programme had significantly lower anxiety and depression scores and better medication adherence. Conclusions Only half of all coronary patients were referred and a minority attended a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Those attending were more likely to achieve lifestyle targets, had lower depression and anxiety, and better medication adherence. There is still considerable potential to further reduce cardiovascular risk by increasing uptake and fully integrating secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation to provide a modern preventive cardiology programme.


2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Amoroso ◽  
Coletta Hobbs ◽  
Mark F Harris

The objective of this study is to examine current activities, barriers, and capacity needs for the assessment and management of smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity behavioural risk factors in rural and urban general practices. A cross-sectional survey of 287 general practitioners (GPs) was conducted in a rural and urban Division of General Practice in NSW. A total of 146 GPs responded yielding Divisional response rates of 51% rural and 61% urban. For each of the SNAP risk factors, between 37% and 46% of GPs report using guidelines. Verbal advice is given "very often" for smoking by 68% of GPs, for nutrition and alcohol by 48%, and physical activity by 60%. Guideline use is associated with increased frequency of advising patients. Patient compliance is the most frequently reported barrier to giving advice, especially for smoking and alcohol. GPs report that they "often" or "very often" refer patients due to nutritional risk factors (48%), with lower referral rates reported for physical activity and alcohol risk factors (28% and 27% respectively). Only 10% refer patients "often" or "very often" for smoking management, and referral for smoking management and physical activity increase as a result of training in these areas. There is considerable variability in smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity risk factor intervention and management in the general practice setting. A range of strategies is required to improve the systematic management of risk factors including training, use of guidelines, referral networks, and patient education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document