Stable isotope constraints on the role of graphite in the genesis of unconformity-type uranium deposits

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Kyser ◽  
M. R. Wilson ◽  
G. Ruhrmann
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Stable Isotope ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Hydrothermal Fluids ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Ore Zones

The Key Lake unconformity-type uranium deposit occurs in a shear zone where it intersects the unconformity between Archean and Aphebian gneisses and the overlying Proterozoic Athabasca Group sandstones. The roots of the Key Lake and many other unconformity-type uranium deposits in the Athabasca basin are close to gneisses rich in graphite and most deposits have small amounts of carbonaceous materials (bitumen and hydrocarbon buttons) within and around altered basement and sandstone ore zones. In many Athabasca uranium deposits, hydrothermal fluids have destroyed graphite disseminated in the strongly altered gneisses in the vicinity of the deposits, prompting some to suggest that graphite was converted to CH4, which reduced and precipitated the uranium and partially condensed to form bitumen. The δ13C values of graphite collected from unaltered and altered gneisses around the Key Lake deposit have a limited range (−25 ± 5) and are not a function of distance from the mineralization or the intensity of alteration or deformation. The uniformity of these δ13C values suggests that the destruction of graphite was due predominantly to oxidation by basinal fluids from the sandstone and that the graphite near the deposits did not react to form substantial amounts of 12C-rich phases such as CH4. Most of the bitumen samples, which have higher H/C ratios than the graphite, have δ13C values identical to those of the graphite (−25 ± 5). The similarity in the isotopic compositions of carbon in the bitumen and in the graphite indicates that the bitumen formed from degradation of graphite as a result of reactions with no significant isotopic fractionations, such as ones involving radiolysis of graphite. The hydrocarbon buttons and a few samples of bitumen have petrographic relations and 13C/12C ratios (δ13C values less than −30) that are indicative of reduction of graphite by H2 produced from water by radiolysis. Graphite in these deposits did not play a central role as a reducing agent for uranium, rather it represents a critical structural factor by providing shear zones along which fluid flow can be focussed.

scholarly journals Structural Controls of Uranium Mineralization in the Basement of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Antonio Benedicto ◽  
Maher Abdelrazek ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Cameron MacKay ◽  
Dwayne Kinar
Keyword(s):  
Regional Scale ◽  
Structural Data ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Controls ◽  
The Right ◽  
Drill Holes

The occurrence of unconformity-related uranium mineralization requires the combination of three components: fluids with the right composition, geochemical traps with the right agents that produce precipitation, and structural traps with the right geometry. In the Athabasca Basin unconformity-related uranium deposits, while basinal brines are commonly accepted as the principal mineralized fluids and graphite and gases (CH4, CO2, and H2S) are well known as the reductants, only few case studies describing structural traps are published. A number of recent works, including numerical modelling, have improved the understanding of the role of inherited shear zones on fluid flow and the development of uranium deposits at a micro- and regional-scale. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of knowledge about the meso- or deposit-scale structural controls that lead to the present (and potentially predictive) localization of uranium deposits along a given shear zone. The present work examines new structural data from drill holes and deals with (i) the identification of mesoscale structural traps that lead to the formation of the Athabasca unconformity-related uranium deposits hosted within the basement and (ii) with the understanding of the role and mode of reactivation of the inherited shear zones. The Sue deposits (McClean Project), the Tri-Island showing (Martin Lake Project) in the Eastern Athabasca, and the Spitfire prospect (Hook Lake Project) in the Western Athabasca have been selected for a detailed analysis of structures and related uranium mineralization. The structural analysis performed brings new insights about the mesoscale structural controls, the role the inherited ductile fabric had on the mode of brittle reactivation and to trap mineralization, and the tectonic regime to which basement-hosted uranium deposits may be associated in the Athabasca Basin.

scholarly journals Paragenetic and petrographic study of uranium mineralization along the Midwest Trend, Northeastern Athabasca Basin

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Ferguson ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Odile Maufrais-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mineral Resource ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Mining District ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Technical Report ◽  
Petrographic Study

The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan is host to many world-class uranium deposits associated with the unconformity between the Paleoproterozoic sandstone of the basin and the underlying crystalline basement (Jefferson et al., 2007).  While the style and tonnage of these deposits vary, the current genetic model for unconformity-related uranium deposits has been a practical tool for exploration in the Athabasca Basin. However, the factors which control the location and formation of these deposits is still not fully understood. A paragenetic and petrographic study of mineralization along the Midwest Trend, located on the northeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin, aims to refine the current model and to address the general problem: What are the factors which control mineralization and non-mineralization? The Midwest Trend will be used as a "modèle réduit" for uranium mineralization, as it displays many features characteristic of unconformity type deposits. The Midwest Trend comprises three mineral leases that encompass two uranium deposits, the Midwest Main and Midwest A (Allen et al., 2017a, b). Mineralization occurs along a NE-trending graphitic structure, and is hosted by the sandstone, at the unconformity, and in much lesser amounts in the underlying basement rocks. Petrographic observations aided by the use of RAMAN spectroscopy and SEM-EDS, have been used to create a paragenetic sequence of mineralization (Fig.1). Future work will focus on fluid inclusion studies using microthermometry, LA-ICP-MS, and mass spectrometry of contained gases. References:Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017a). Midwest A Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017b). Midwest Main Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Jefferson, C.W., Thomas, D.J., Gandhi, S.S., Ramaekers, P., Delaney, G., Brisbin, D., Cutts, C., Portella, P., and Olson, R.A., 2007: Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, p. 23–67.

Geological environment of the Cigar Lake uranium deposit

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bruneton
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Metamorphic Basement ◽  
Basement Ridge ◽  
Archean Basement ◽  
East West

The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic rocks of the Wollaston Group. The Athabasca Group was deposited in an intra-continental sedimentary basin that was filled by fluviatile terrestrial quartz sandstones and conglomerates. The group appears undeformed and its actual maximum thickness is about 1500 m. On the eastern side of the basin, the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny (1800–1900 Ma), the group underwent polyphase deformation and upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. The Hudsonian orogeny was followed by a long period of erosion and weathering and the development of a paleoweathering profile.On the Waterbury Lake property, the Manitou Falls Formation is 250–500 m thick and corresponds to units MFd, MFc, and MFb. The conglomeratic MFb unit hosts the Cigar Lake deposit. However, the basal conglomerate is absent at the deposit, wedging out against an east–west, 20 m high, pre-Athabasca basement ridge, on top of which is located the orebody.Two major lithostructural domains are present in the metamorphic basement of the property: (1) a southern area composed mainly of pelitic metasediments (Wollaston Domain) and (2) a northern area with large lensoid granitic domes (Mudjatik Domain). The Cigar Lake east–west pelitic basin, which contains the deposit, is located in the transitional zone between the two domains. The metamorphic basement rocks in the basin consist mainly of graphitic metapelitic gneisses and calcsilicate gneisses, which are inferred to be part of the Lower Pelitic unit. Graphite- and pyrite-rich "augen gneisses," an unusual facies within the graphitic metapelitic gneisses, occur primarily below the Cigar Lake orebody.The mineralogy and geochemistry of the graphitic metapelitic gneisses suggest that they were originally shales. The abundance of magnesium in the intercalated carbonates layers indicates an evaporitic origin.The structural framework is dominated by large northeast–southwest lineaments and wide east–west mylonitic corridors. These mylonites, which contain the augen gneisses, are considered to be the most favourable features for the concentration of uranium mineralization.Despite the presence of the orebody, large areas of the Waterbury Lake property remain totally unexplored and open for new discoveries.

Fluid processes during the exhumation of high-P metamorphic belts

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Miller ◽  
I. S. Buick ◽  
I. Cartwright ◽  
A. Barnicoat
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Partial Melting ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Detachment Faults ◽  
Dehydration Reactions ◽  
Exhumation History

AbstractFluids can play a direct role in exhumation by influencing exhumation mechanisms and the driving processes for these mechanisms. In addition, the process of exhumation leads to the development of fluid-related features that in themselves may not drive exhumation. Fluids involved in exhumation are generally derived from dehydration reactions occurring during decompression, but at shallower crustal levels may also involve the introduction of exotic fluids. The composition of fluids attending exhumation are generally saline – CO2 mixtures, but N2, CH4, H2O mixtures have also been recorded. Studies of fluid features related to exhumation have found that fluids may contribute to density changes and the initiation of partial melting during decompression, as well as the development of extensive vein systems. However, the preservation of geochemical signatures related to fluid processes occurring prior to high-P and ultrahigh-P metamorphism indicates that large-scale pervasive fluid flow systems, in general, do not operate at any stage during the exhumation history. Large-scale channelled fluid flow may have operated in detachment faults and shear zones related to exhumation, and this requires further study. The most significant role of fluids during exhumation appears to be their controlling influence on the preservation of high-P or ultrahigh-P rocks.

Feldspars and fluids in cooling plutons

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (321) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Stable Isotope ◽  
Experimental Work ◽  
Structural State ◽  
Hydrothermal Fluids ◽  
Igneous Rocks ◽  
Magmatic Evolution ◽  
Cooling History ◽  
Isotope Studies ◽  
Alkali Feldspars

SummaryAlkali feldspars in plutonic igneous rocks vary both in their exsolution textures and in the structural state of their components. The primary factor leading to this diversity is the availability of hydrothermal fluids during their cooling history. In many plutons feldspar variation is related to degree of fractionation as indicated by rock chemistry. The variation reflects build-up of water with magmatic evolution and implies that fluids did not circulate freely in the intrusives in the temperature range of unmixing and ordering. Experimental work bearing on the role of fluids in subsolidus changes in feldspars is reviewed, and points of overlap between crystallographic studies of feldspars and stable isotope studies are discussed.

Mineralogy and U/Pb, Pb/Pb, and Sm/Nd geochronology of the Key Lake uranium deposit, Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Carl ◽  
E. von Pechmann ◽  
A. Höhndorf ◽  
G. Ruhrmann
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Time Span ◽  
Radiometric Dating ◽  
Age Difference ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Isotopic Data ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
The Past ◽  
Preparation Techniques

The Key Lake deposit is one of several large, high-grade, unconformity-related uranium deposits located at the eastern margin of the Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. The deposit consists of the Gaertner orebody, now mined out, and the Deilmann orebody, which is presently being mined. In the past, radiometric dating efforts yielded an age of oldest ore-forming event of 1250 ± 34 Ma at the Gaertner orebody and 1350 ± 4 Ma at the Deilmann orebody. This unlikely age difference called for further investigation. Innovative preparation techniques were used to separate the paragenetically oldest U mineral, an anisotropic uraninite. Ore microscopy and U/Pb isotopic data show that the oldest event of uranium emplacement occurred simultaneously at the two orebodies, at 1421 ± 49 Ma. The primary ore-forming phase was followed by younger generations of U mineralization and periods of remobilization. Sm/Nd data of Key Lake uraninite form an isochron corresponding to an age of 1215 Ma. This is interpreted as the age of a uranium remobilization or a new mineralizing event. The lead found in the Athabasca Group above the Deilmann deposit and in galena appears to be a mixture of a common lead and radiogenic lead mobilized from the orebody over a time span of at least 1000 Ma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document