scholarly journals Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?

Author(s):  
Valerio Faraoni ◽  
Jeremy Côté ◽  
Andrea Giusti

Abstract It is now established that, contrary to common belief, (electro-)vacuum Brans–Dicke gravity does not reduce to general relativity (GR) for large values of the Brans–Dicke coupling $$\omega $$ω. Since the essence of experimental tests of scalar–tensor gravity consists of providing lower bounds on $$\omega $$ω, in light of the misguided assumption of the equivalence between the limit $$\omega \rightarrow \infty $$ω→∞ and the GR limit of Brans–Dicke gravity, the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism on which these tests are based could be in jeopardy. We show that, in the linearized approximation used by the PPN formalism, the anomaly in the limit to general relativity disappears. However, it survives to second (and higher) order and in strong gravity. In other words, while the weak gravity regime cannot tell apart GR and $$\omega \rightarrow \infty $$ω→∞ Brans–Dicke gravity, when higher order terms in the PPN analysis of Brans–Dicke gravity are included, the latter never reduces to the one of GR in this limit. This fact is relevant for experiments aiming to test second order light deflection and Shapiro time delay.

Open Physics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhijit Biswas ◽  
Krishnan Mani

AbstractThe time delay experiment proposed by I.I. Shapiro in 1964 and conducted in the seventies was the most precise experiment of general relativity until that time. Further experimentation has improved the accuracy level of both the time delay and the light deflection experiments. A simulation model is proposed that involves only a simple mass and time transformation factor involving velocity of light. The light deflection and the time delay experiments are numerically simulated using this model that does not use the general relativistic equations. The computed values presented in this paper compare well with recent levels of accuracy of their respective experimental results.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Iorio

We investigate the effect of possible a priori “imprinting” effects of general relativity itself on satellite/spacecraft-based tests of it. We deal with some performed or proposed time-delay ranging experiments in the sun's gravitational field. It turns out that the “imprint” of general relativity on the Astronomical Unit and the solar gravitational constant , not solved for in the so far performed spacecraft-based time-delay tests, induces an a priori bias of the order of in typical solar system ranging experiments aimed to measure the space curvature PPN parameter . It is too small by one order of magnitude to be of concern for the performed Cassini experiment, but it would affect future planned or proposed tests aiming to reach a accuracy in determining .


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S261) ◽  
pp. 140-143
Author(s):  
Kai Tang ◽  
Tian-Yi Huang ◽  
Zheng-Hong Tang

AbstractEinstein-Aether gravity theory has been proven successful in passing experiments of different scales. Especially its Eddington parameters β and γ have the same numerical values as those in general relativity. Recently Xie and Huang (2008) have advanced this theory to a second post-Newtonian approximation for an N-body model and obtained an explicit metric when the bodies are point-like masses. This research considers light propagation in the above gravitational field, and explores the light deflection, time delay, frequency shift etc. The results will provide for future experiments in testing gravity theories.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (07) ◽  
pp. 2050034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuhina Manna ◽  
Farook Rahaman ◽  
Monimala Mondal

In this paper, we have investigated the classical tests of General Relativity like precession of perihelion, deflection of light and time delay by considering a phenomenological astrophysical object like Sun, as a neutral regular Hayward black hole in Rastall gravity. We have tabulated all our results for some appropriate values of the parameter [Formula: see text]. We have compared our values with [Formula: see text], which corresponds to the Schwarzschild case. Also the value of [Formula: see text] is of particular interest as it gives some promising results.


2019 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Steven Carlip

Given the spacetime geometry of the Solar System, the geodesic equation can be used to derive the motion of massive objects and light. In this chapter, starting with the Schwarzschild metric, the four “classical tests” of general relativity are derived: the precession of perihelia, the bending of light, the time delay of light, and the gravitational red shift. As a generalization, the parametrized post-Newtonian formalism is briefly discussed.


Author(s):  
Tuhina Manna ◽  
Bidisha Samanta ◽  
Amna Ali ◽  
Farook Rahaman

In the current paper we analyze the three classical tests of general relativity, viz. the precession of perihelion, deflection of light and time delay in Einstein Æther gravity. Einstein Æther gravity has two static, spherically symmetric, charged solutions of black hole solutions corresponding to different constraints on its coupling constants c<sub>14</sub>, and c<sub>123</sub>. We investigate the aforementioned tests for both these solutions, graphically and analytically. We also tabulate our results and discuss the outcome which is promising. We evaluate the results, when the coupling constants are varied over a vast range of values, both within the constraints set by the recent observational data, and also beyond, for a comparative study.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (12a) ◽  
pp. 2091-2105 ◽  
Author(s):  
SERGE REYNAUD ◽  
MARC-THIERRY JAEKEL

Experimental tests of gravity performed in the solar system show a good agreement with general relativity. The latter is, however, challenged by the Pioneer anomaly, which might be pointing at some modification of gravity law at ranges of the order of the size of the solar system. As this question could be related to the puzzles of "dark matter" or "dark energy," it is important to test it with care. There exist metric extensions of general relativity which preserve the well-verified equivalence principle while possibly changing the metric solution in the solar system. Such extensions have the capability to preserve compatibility with existing gravity tests while opening free space for the Pioneer anomaly. They constitute arguments for new mission designs and new space technologies as well as for having a new look at data of already-performed experiments.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1945-1948
Author(s):  
LORENZO IORIO

We investigate possible a priori "imprinting" of general relativity itself on spaceraft-based tests of it. We deal with some performed or proposed time-delay ranging experiments in the Sun's gravitational field. The "imprint" of general relativity on the Astronomical Unit and the solar gravitational constant GM⊙, not solved for in the spacecraft-based time-delay test performed so far, may induce an a priori bias of the order of 10-6 in typical solar system ranging experiments aimed to measuring the space curvature PPN parameter γ. It is too small by one order of magnitude to be of concern for the performed Cassini experiment, but it would affect future planned or proposed tests aiming to reach a 10-7–10-9 accuracy in determining γ.


Author(s):  
Steven Carlip

This work is a short textbook on general relativity and gravitation, aimed at readers with a broad range of interests in physics, from cosmology to gravitational radiation to high energy physics to condensed matter theory. It is an introductory text, but it has also been written as a jumping-off point for readers who plan to study more specialized topics. As a textbook, it is designed to be usable in a one-quarter course (about 25 hours of instruction), and should be suitable for both graduate students and advanced undergraduates. The pedagogical approach is “physics first”: readers move very quickly to the calculation of observational predictions, and only return to the mathematical foundations after the physics is established. The book is mathematically correct—even nonspecialists need to know some differential geometry to be able to read papers—but informal. In addition to the “standard” topics covered by most introductory textbooks, it contains short introductions to more advanced topics: for instance, why field equations are second order, how to treat gravitational energy, what is required for a Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. A concluding chapter discusses directions for further study, from mathematical relativity to experimental tests to quantum gravity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document