Zheng He: Its Diasporic Historical Narratives, Deification Folklores, and Material Heritage Symbolisms in East Asia

2022 ◽  
pp. 113-146
Author(s):  
Tai Wei Lim
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
LEIGH K. JENCO ◽  
JONATHAN CHAPPELL

Abstract This article argues for a ‘history from between’ as the best lens through which to understand the construction of historical knowledge between East Asia and Europe. ‘Between’ refers to the space framed by East Asia and Europe, but also to the global circulations of ideas in that space, and to the subjective feeling of embeddedness in larger-than-local contexts that being in such a space makes possible. Our contention is that the outcomes of such entanglements are not merely reactive forms of knowledge, of the kind implied by older studies of translation and reception in global intellectual history. Instead they are themselves ‘co-productions’: they are the shared and mutually interactive inputs to enduring modes of uses of the past, across both East Asian and European traditions. Taking seriously the possibility that interpretations of the past were not transferred, but rather were co-produced between East Asia and Europe, we reconstruct the braided histories of historical narratives that continue to shape constructions of identity throughout Eurasia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 151-178
Author(s):  
Aike P. Rots

Abstract The category “heritage” is quickly gaining importance for the study of religion, not least in East Asia. Since the 1990s, Japanese governments, entrepreneurs, and NGO s have invested heavily in heritage preservation, production, and promotion, and other East Asian countries have followed suit. UNESCO recognition is sought after by various state and private actors, who see it as a useful tool for validating and popularising select historical narratives and for acquiring national and international legitimacy. These developments have led to far-reaching transformations in worship sites and ritual practices. Drawing on recent Japanese examples, and comparing these to cases elsewhere in the region, this article constitutes a first step towards a theory of the heritagisation of religion in East Asia. It argues that the heritagisation of worship sites often entails a process of deprivatisation, turning them into public properties that are simultaneously secular and sacred. The article distinguishes between three patterns, which many worship sites and ritual practices that have been inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage or Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists, in Japan and beyond, follow: 1) heritage-making constitutes a type of secularisation, 2) it gives rise to new processes of sacralisation, and 3) this enables mass tourism that can lead to far-reaching transformations. Focusing on the first two patterns, the article shows how heritage-making leads to the reconfiguration of sites and practices as national, public, and secular sacred properties.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-247
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lind

Abstract In relations between Japan and South Korea, as well as between other former adversaries, observers frequently argue that “history stands in the way” of better relations. They expect that hostile historical narratives will prevent leaders from pursuing potentially advantageous cooperation. To evaluate this claim, in this article I define narratives and their elements, noting that they range from more hostile to more friendly. I outline and theoretically develop two perspectives: the view of history as an obstacle, and a view more optimistic about the potential for cooperation and narrative transformation. Evidence from Franco-German relations after World War II, as well as other cases across time and space, supports the latter, more optimistic, view. Finally, I hypothesize different strategic and domestic conditions that make cooperation and narrative change more or less likely. Ultimately, I argue that observers have exaggerated the constraining power of narratives and thus underestimated the potential for cooperation between former enemies. This has important implications for relations between longtime rivals all over the world, and particularly in East Asia, where a conventional wisdom expects historical memories to impede balancing against China's rise.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Saiful Akram Che Cob @ Ab Ghafar ◽  
Mohammad Rusdi Mohd Nasir

AbstrakPenulisan ini akan membicarakan fungsi kartun sebagai satu medium dalam usaha penyebaranpropaganda sewaktu pendudukan Jepun selama 3 tahun 8 bulan di Malaya. Penyelidikan terhadapkartun-kartun bercorak propaganda yang pro kepada pemerintahan Jepun (Dai Nippon) masih belumdianalisis secara kritis dalam konteks sumbangannya sebagai salah satu kaedah indoktrinasi yangberkesan selain daripada kaedah propaganda melalui tetuang udara (siaran radio), risalah bertulis danfilem-filem propaganda. Kartun-kartun yang tersiar di akhbar-akhbar seperti Malai Sinpo, The Malay Mail,Syonan Times dan Penang Daily News memberi gambaran kepada penduduk Malaya pada waktu itumengenai doktrin romantik pembebasan ’Asia untuk Asia’ dan ’Lingkungan Kemakmuran Bersama AsiaTimur Raya’ (kempen Dai Toa Senso) yang dicanang megah oleh Kerajaan Dai Nippon. Kartun-kartunpropaganda turut tersiar di majalah-majalah utama seperti Semangat Asia, Fajar Asia dan Suara Timor.Sumbangan kartun sebagai salah satu sumber perekodan sejarah pendudukan Jepun di Malaya dilihatsignifikan seperti mana rekod-rekod dan laporan-laporan bertulis. Tambahan pula, hal-hal yang kurangdiperkatakan dalam dokumentasi persejarahan negara, iaitu propaganda yang pro kepada pemerintahanJepun menjadi inti kepada penyelidikan ini. Lebih istimewa, dokumentasi tersebut menggunakan kuasavisual (kartun) sebagai daya tarik naratif pensejarahannya. Abstract This paper will discuss the function of cartoons as a medium for the efforts to spread propaganda duringthe occupation of Japan for 3 years and 8 months in Malaya. The study on the cartoons designedspecifically for the propaganda to support the reign of Japanese (Dai Nippon), besides the propagandamethods used, have not been critically analyzed in the context of its contribution as one of the effectivemethods of indoctrination through the air-cast (radio broadcast), writing leaflets and propaganda films.The cartoons were published in newspapers such as Malai Sinpo, The Malay Mail, Syonan Times andDaily News gave the pictures to the people of Malaya at the time of the release of the romantic doctrine‘Asia for Asia’ and ‘Prosperity Ring with Great East Asia’ (Dai Toa Senso campaign) that are bandiedstately by the Government Dai Nippon. Propaganda cartoons also appeared in major magazines suchas The Spirit of Asia, Fajar Asia and Suara Timor. Contributions of the cartoons as a source of recordedhistory of the Japanese occupation in Malaya are seen as significant as other records and writing reports.Furthermore, things are less talked about in the historical documentation of the country, namely proJapanese government propaganda became the core of this research. Exceptionally, the documentationuses the visual power (cartoons) as an attraction of historical narratives.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Holcombe
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document