scholarly journals Infrastructure and Innovation: Emerging Priorities of EU and Chinese Aid in Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 511-531
Author(s):  
Meshach Ampwera

The international development cooperation system has long revolved around the notion of a North-South divide and reflected much of the systemic imbalances in global economic relations. It aimed mostly at increasing official development assistance rather than tackling other key development issues like priority infrastructure and innovation capacity. Over the past decade, Africa has experienced rapid growth and rising global prominence, which has profound implications for global development cooperation on the continent. The European Union and China, two major contributors to African development, have increasingly felt the need to put infrastructure development and innovation capacity at the core of their aid policies toward Africa. Recently, important factors, such as growing competition within the international development cooperation regime, search for new markets, increasing role of regional regimes, persistent poverty, the need to stabilize the world economy, and the responsibility to support international peace and stability are shaping Europe’s and China’s aid policies toward Africa. Priority infrastructure like highways, railways, energy, and technological innovation in pillar sectors such as agriculture and textile have been prioritized in Africa’s development cooperation with China and Europe. Although Brussels and Beijing have maintained a visible level of traditional development cooperation policies, this new form of cooperation is causing an embryonic policy shift from aid to investment within their development and cooperation policies.

2021 ◽  
pp. 351-373
Author(s):  
Nikolay Murashkin

This article revisits the post–World War II evolution of Japan’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) over the past 75 years, with a particular focus on the period starting from the 1980s and subsequent changes in Japan’s international development cooperation policies. I address cornerstones such as human security and quality growth, while examining the role of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), shifts and continuities in regional visions and sectoral priorities, such as infrastructure development. I argue that the threefold mix of key drivers behind Japan’s development cooperation has remained consistent, involving developmentalism stemming from Japan’s own experience of successful modernisation from a non–Western background, neo–mercantilism, as well as strategic and geopolitical considerations. The relative weight and interplay of these factors, however, fluctuated in different periods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 6485
Author(s):  
Gayoung Choi ◽  
Taeyoung Jin ◽  
Yoonjeong Jeong ◽  
Sue Kyoung Lee

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), also known as Global Goals, were adopted by the United Nations (UN) in 2015 with a universal call for action to achieve a better and global sustainable future by 2030. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been recognized as an innovative mechanism for achieving UN SDGs because they help the public sector provide basic goods and services by enabling the use of the experience and funds of the private sector. This study examines the PPP network by visualizing the relationship among stakeholders through social network analysis. Considering the case of the Partnership for Green Growth and Global Goals 2030 (P4G), this study investigates the actors and the relationship between the actors by stage and year. As a result, the study visualized the network of PPPs in P4G, thereby revealing that the partnerships were evolving since the participants’ relationships became stronger each year. Moreover, the role of each actor became clearer at each stage. The findings provide practical guidance for practitioners interested in promoting international development cooperation through PPPs in the future.


Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Li ◽  
Gubo Qi

AbstractThe Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) is regarded as being the twenty-first-century epitome of a partnership within a polycentric world in the arena of international development cooperation. The chapter argues that, among the group of emerging economies, the GPEDC is considered to be just another form of the DAC’s recent transformation. That is why the emerging powers are sceptical—they are not a part of it; hence, they are reluctant to join it. However, we also explain why the GPEDC is a valuable platform for continuing the role of development cooperation for global development and implementing the 2030 Agenda. The chapter suggests how different stakeholders—including the emerging ones, particularly China—can work together to make the GPEDC a genuine partnership.


Author(s):  
Rosana Corrêa Tomazini

AbstractOne of major changes the world politics has witnessed, during the past three decades, is related to the rising of non-state actors influence in different international domains, such as the international development cooperation system. These actors play now a key role in the global governance, influencing a variety of agendas. Some international organizations promote a significant relationship with non-state actors, such as the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO), from European Union (EU). Other institutions need improvements in this aspect, like the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (ABC – Agência Brasileira de Cooperação), from Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Brazil. In this context, the proposed article aims to analyze and compare the different sorts of non-state actors interactions within the international development cooperation system, mainly through DG DEVCO (EU) and ABC (Brazil). Were non-state actors able to change the architecture of international development cooperation agenda within these two referred institutions? What kinds of changes they have promoted so far? These are some of the questions the proposed article aims to answer.Key Words: International Cooperation, Non-State Actors, European Union, Brazil-----A ascensão de atores não-estatais no sistema de Cooperação Internacional para o Desenvolvimento: uma análise comparativa entre suas interações com a DG-DEVCO, da União Europeia, e a ABC, do Ministério das Relações Exteriores do BrasilResumoUm dos maiores desafios que a política mundial tem presenciado, durante as últimas três décadas, está relacionado à ascensão da influência de atores não-estatais em diferentes domínios do sistema internacional, como no sistema da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento. Esses atores têm agora um papel fulcral na governança global, influenciando uma variedade de agendas. Alguns organismos internacionais promovem significante relação com atores não-estatais, como a Direção Geral para a Cooperação Internacional e o Desenvolvimento (DG DEVCO), da União Europeia (UE). Outras instituições precisam de aprimoramentos, como a Agência Brasileira de Cooperação (ABC) do Ministério das Relações Exteriores do Brasil. Nesse contexto, o presente artigo se propõe analisar e comparar diferentes interações com atores não-estatais no sistema de cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento, notadamente por meio da DG DEVCO (UE) e ABC (Brasil). São os atores não-estatais capazes de mudar a arquitetura da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento no âmbito das duas instituições referidas? Que tipo de mudanças foram capazes de promover até o momento? Essas são algumas das questões que o presente artigo pretende responder. Palavras-Chave: Cooperação Internacional, Atores Não-Estatais, União Europeia, Brasil AbstractOne of major changes the world politics has witnessed, during the past three decades, is related to the rising of non-state actors influence in different international domains, such as the international development cooperation system. These actors play now a key role in the global governance, influencing a variety of agendas. Some international organizations promote a significant relationship with non-state actors, such as the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO), from European Union (EU). Other institutions need improvements in this aspect, like the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (ABC – Agência Brasileira de Cooperação), from Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Brazil. In this context, the proposed article aims to analyze and compare the different sorts of non-state actors interactions within the international development cooperation system, mainly through DG DEVCO (EU) and ABC (Brazil). Were non-state actors able to change the architecture of international development cooperation agenda within these two referred institutions? What kinds of changes they have promoted so far? These are some of the questions the proposed article aims to answer.Key Words: International Cooperation, Non-State Actors, European Union, Brazil   


Author(s):  
R. Melis Baydag

AbstractThis chapter analyses the foreign aid discourses of South Korea and Turkey in international development cooperation under the framework of middle-power theory. Korea and Turkey make use of their middle-power identity with the aim of increasing their presence around the globe, where foreign aid is used as an important foreign policy tool. They claim to be like-minded peers playing a bridging role between the developed and developing worlds. Despite opting for similar results in global politics, they show divergent strategic and ideational pathways in foreign aid. This creates significant implications for cooperation at the global level, especially because it questions the role of middle-power collaboration in facilitating possible rapprochement between traditional and emerging donors as well as within the Southern providers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21
Author(s):  
Monika Szynol

Abstract The European Union (EU) is the most generous donor of international development cooperation—it transfers more than a half of the world’s Official Development Assistance (ODA). In fact, the EU development policy is depending on three major contributors: France, Germany and the United Kingdom (UK), which are also among the top countries making the largest transfers to development cooperation. However, special attention should be paid to the UK, belonging to the avant-garde of international development cooperation. The United Kingdom is not only a part of the EU assistance wallet but also an important partner in shaping the development policy. This article attempts to answer the main research question: what impact will Brexit have on the EU development policy? The analysis covers the political plane, and the following elements will be taken into consideration: the impact of the UK’s withdrawal from the organisation on shaping the EU development policy (its geographical and thematic concentration), and the ability to fulfil development commitments, which were undertaken by the Member States and the organisation. Consequently, Brexit may lead to reshaping the EU partnership with the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP), as well as undermine the EU’s ability to meet its obligations in the development area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document