scholarly journals Arginase inhibition: a new treatment for preventing progression of established diabetic nephropathy

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (5) ◽  
pp. F447-F455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanning You ◽  
Ting Gao ◽  
Timothy K. Cooper ◽  
Sidney M. Morris ◽  
Alaa S. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Thiobarbituric Acid ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Macrophage Infiltration ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Histological Changes ◽  
Late Treatment ◽  
New Treatment

Our previous publication showed that inhibition of arginase prevents the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, identification of targets that retard the progression of established DN–which is more clinically relevant–is lacking. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that arginase inhibition would prevent the progression of established DN. Effects of arginase inhibition were compared with treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril, a current standard of care in DN. Experiments were conducted in Ins2 Akita mice treated with the arginase inhibitor S-(2-boronoethyl)-l-cysteine (BEC) or captopril starting at 6 wk of age for 12 wk (early treatment) or starting at 12 wk of age for 6 wk (late treatment). Early and late treatment with BEC resulted in protection from DN as indicated by reduced albuminuria, histological changes, kidney macrophage infiltration, urinary thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, and restored nephrin expression, kidney nitrate/nitrite, kidney endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation, and renal medullary blood flow compared with vehicle-treated Ins2 Akita mice at 18 wk of age. Interestingly, early treatment with captopril reduced albuminuria, histological changes, and kidney macrophage infiltration without affecting the other parameters, but late treatment with captopril was ineffective. These findings highlight the importance of arginase inhibition as a new potential therapeutic intervention in both early and late stages of diabetic renal injury.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy of glioblastoma 15 years after the landmark Stupp’s trial: more controversies than standards?

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Kazda ◽  
Adam Dziacky ◽  
Petr Burkon ◽  
Petr Pospisil ◽  
Marek Slavik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Integrated Boost ◽  
Hippocampal Sparing ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Personalized Approach

Abstract Background The current standard of care of glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has remained unchanged for over a decade. Nevertheless, some improvements in patient outcomes have occurred as a consequence of modern surgery, improved radiotherapy and up-to-date management of toxicity. Patients from control arms (receiving standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide) of recent clinical trials achieve better outcomes compared to the median survival of 14.6 months reported in Stupp’s landmark clinical trial in 2005. The approach to radiotherapy that emerged from Stupp’s trial, which continues to be a basis for the current standard of care, is no longer applicable and there is a need to develop updated guidelines for radiotherapy within the daily clinical practice that address or at least acknowledge existing controversies in the planning of radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to provoke critical thinking about potentially controversial aspects in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, including among others the issue of target definitions, simultaneously integrated boost technique, and hippocampal sparing. Conclusions In conjunction with new treatment approaches such as tumor-treating fields (TTF) and immunotherapy, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy will be further defined. The personalized approach in daily radiotherapy practice is enabled with modern radiotherapy systems.

scholarly journals The Tumor Microenvironment and Immunotherapy of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marij J. P. Welters ◽  
Saskia J. Santegoets ◽  
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Preclinical Phase ◽  
New Findings ◽  
New Treatment

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) develops as a consequence of several mutations in the tumor suppressor pathways or after a progressive infection with high risk human papillomavirus (HPV). The dismal side effects of the current standard of care and the clear involvement of the immune system has led to a surge in clinical trials that aim to reinforce the tumor-specific immune response as a new treatment option. In this review, we have focused on the most recent literature to discuss the new findings and insights on the role of different immune cells in the context of OPSCC and its etiology. We then applied this knowledge to describe potential biomarkers and analyzed the rationale and outcomes of earlier and ongoing immunotherapy trials. Finally, we describe new developments that are still at the preclinical phase and provide an outlook on what the near future may bring, now that several new and exciting techniques to study the immune system at the single cell level are being exploited.

scholarly journals Recent advances in managing and understanding diabetic nephropathy

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydney C.W. Tang ◽  
Gary C.W. Chan ◽  
Kar Neng Lai
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Developed Economies ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Diabetic nephropathy is the commonest cause of end-stage renal disease in most developed economies. Current standard of care for diabetic nephropathy embraces stringent blood pressure control via blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and glycemia control. Recent understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy has led to the development of novel therapeutic options. This review article focuses on available data from landmark studies on the main therapeutic approaches and highlights some novel management strategies.

scholarly journals Effects of Low-Dose and Early versus Late Perindopril Treatment on the Progression of Severe Diabetic Nephropathy in (mREN-2)27 Rats

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 684-692
Author(s):  
Sally A. Mifsud ◽  
Sandford L. Skinner ◽  
Mark E. Cooper ◽  
Darren J. Kelly ◽  
Jennifer L. Wilkinson-Berka
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Diabetic Rats ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Citrate Buffer ◽  
Late Intervention ◽  
Kidney Hypertrophy

ABSTRACT. It was previously reported that transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus progressively develop advanced nephropathy in 12 wk. These lesions are largely prevented when the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril is administered from the time of induction of diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to determine the lowest dose of early perindopril treatment required for substantial improvement of renal function and structure and to investigate whether late intervention prevents or reverses the progression of established renal lesions. At 6 wk of age, female heterozygous Ren-2 rats were randomized to receive either streptozotocin (diabetic) or citrate buffer (control). Rats were gavaged, beginning early after the induction of diabetes mellitus or the administration of control vehicle, with 0, 0.02, 0.2, or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril for 12 wk. A separate group of diabetic Ren-2 rats received late treatment with 2 mg/kg per d perindopril throughout week 8 to week 12, when rats were hypertensive and albuminuric and exhibited increased kidney weight and glomerulosclerotic index (GSI). Among diabetic rats, early 0.02 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining but had no effect on albuminuria or kidney hypertrophy. Early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment further reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining and decreased albuminuria and kidney hypertrophy. Late intervention was as antihypertensive and antialbuminuric as early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment but did not prevent a moderate increase in GSI. In conclusion, early treatment with 0.2 mg/kg per d perindopril was the lowest dosage to largely prevent severe diabetic nephropathy in transgenic Ren-2 rats. Late-onset perindopril treatment of diabetic rats with established nephropathy was as efficacious as early treatment with respect to various renal parameters, such as albuminuria, but was associated with moderate progression of glomerulosclerosis.

scholarly journals Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): novel biological insights and development of early treatment strategies

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 5573-5581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Korde ◽  
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson ◽  
Ola Landgren
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Molecular Events ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Risk Of Progression

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic plasma cell dyscrasias, with a propensity to progress to symptomatic MM. In recent years there have been improvements in risk stratification models (involving molecular markers) of both disorders, which have led to better understanding of the biology and probability of progression of MGUS and SMM. In the context of numerous molecular events and heterogeneous risk of progression, developing individualized risk profiles for patients with MGUS and SMM represents an ongoing challenge that has to be addressed by prospective clinical monitoring and extensive correlative science. In this review we discuss the current standard of care of patients with MGUS and SMM, the use of risk models, including flow cytometry and free-light chain analyses, for predicting risk of progression. Emerging evidence from molecular studies on MGUS and SMM, involving cytogenetics, gene-expression profiling, and microRNA as well as molecular imaging is described. Finally, future directions for improving individualized management of MGUS and SMM patients, as well as the potential for developing early treatment strategies designed to delay and prevent development of MM are discussed.

Acute Rejection Following Kidney Transplantation: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3468-3496
Author(s):  
Emilio Rodrigo ◽  
Marcio F. Chedid ◽  
David San Segundo ◽  
Juan C.R. San Millán ◽  
Marcos López-Hoyos
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rejection Rate ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection ◽  
Cellular Rejection

: Although acute renal graft rejection rate has declined in the last years, and because an adequate therapy can improve graft outcome, its therapy remains as one of the most significant challenges for pharmacists and physicians taking care of transplant patients. Due to the lack of evidence highlighted by the available metaanalyses, we performed a narrative review focused on the basic mechanisms and current and future therapies of acute rejection in kidney transplantation. : According to Kidney Disease/Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, both clinical and subclinical acute rejection episodes should be treated. Usually, high dose steroids and basal immunosuppression optimization are the first line of therapy in treating acute cellular rejection. Rabbit antithymocytic polyclonal globulins are used as rescue therapy for recurrent or steroid-resistant cellular rejection episodes. Current standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is the combination of plasma exchange with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Since a significant rate of AbMR does not respond to SOC, different studies have analyzed the role of new drugs such as Rituximab, Bortezomib, Eculizumab and C1 inhibitors. Lack of randomized controlled trials and heterogenicity among performed studies limit obtaining definite conclusions. Data about new direct and indirect B cell and plasma cell depleting agents, proximal and terminal complement blockers, IL-6/IL-6R pathway inhibitors and antibody removal agents, among other promising drugs, are reviewed.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Glycine Re-Uptake: A Potential Approach for Treating Pain by Augmenting Glycine-Mediated Spinal Neurotransmission and Blunting Central Nociceptive Signaling

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 864
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Cioffi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Glycine Transporters ◽  
Pathological Pain

Among the myriad of cellular and molecular processes identified as contributing to pathological pain, disinhibition of spinal cord nociceptive signaling to higher cortical centers plays a critical role. Importantly, evidence suggests that impaired glycinergic neurotransmission develops in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in inflammatory and neuropathic pain models and is a key maladaptive mechanism causing mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia. Thus, it has been hypothesized that pharmacological agents capable of augmenting glycinergic tone within the dorsal horn may be able to blunt or block aberrant nociceptor signaling to the brain and serve as a novel class of analgesics for various pathological pain states. Indeed, drugs that enhance dysfunctional glycinergic transmission, and in particular inhibitors of the glycine transporters (GlyT1 and GlyT2), are generating widespread interest as a potential class of novel analgesics. The GlyTs are Na+/Cl−-dependent transporters of the solute carrier 6 (SLC6) family and it has been proposed that the inhibition of them presents a possible mechanism by which to increase spinal extracellular glycine concentrations and enhance GlyR-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission in the dorsal horn. Various inhibitors of both GlyT1 and GlyT2 have demonstrated broad analgesic efficacy in several preclinical models of acute and chronic pain, providing promise for the approach to deliver a first-in-class non-opioid analgesic with a mechanism of action differentiated from current standard of care. This review will highlight the therapeutic potential of GlyT inhibitors as a novel class of analgesics, present recent advances reported for the field, and discuss the key challenges associated with the development of a GlyT inhibitor into a safe and effective agent to treat pain.

scholarly journals Updated Insights on EGFR Signaling Pathways in Glioma

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Alexandru Oprita ◽  
Stefania-Carina Baloi ◽  
Georgiana-Adeline Staicu ◽  
Oana Alexandru ◽  
Daniela Elise Tache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Egfr Amplification ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
New Diagnosis ◽  
Clear Clinical Benefit

Nowadays, due to recent advances in molecular biology, the pathogenesis of glioblastoma is better understood. For the newly diagnosed, the current standard of care is represented by resection followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide administration, but because median overall survival remains poor, new diagnosis and treatment strategies are needed. Due to the quick progression, even with aggressive multimodal treatment, glioblastoma remains almost incurable. It is known that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification is a characteristic of the classical subtype of glioma. However, targeted therapies against this type of receptor have not yet shown a clear clinical benefit. Many factors contribute to resistance, such as ineffective blood–brain barrier penetration, heterogeneity, mutations, as well as compensatory signaling pathways. A better understanding of the EGFR signaling network, and its interrelations with other pathways, are essential to clarify the mechanisms of resistance and create better therapeutic agents.

A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongwook Oh ◽  
Joonseog Kong ◽  
Sung Woo Ko ◽  
Seung-Mo Hong ◽  
Hoonsub So ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Fine Needle

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) are the current standard of care for sampling pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. Recently, a 22G EUS-FNB needle with Franseen geometry was developed, and this device was also introduced in a 25G platform. We compared the performance of the 25G and 22G Franseen needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic solid masses. Methods We conducted a parallel-group randomized non-inferiority trial at a tertiary-care center from November 2018 to May 2019. The primary outcome was the quality of the histologic core assessed using the Gerke score. The optimal histologic core is indicated by a Gerke score of 4 or 5, which enables optimal histologic interpretation. The overall diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate were also evaluated. Results 140 patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to the 25G and 22G groups. Tissue acquisition by EUS-FNB was successful in all patients. The optimal histologic core procurement rate was 87.1 % (61/70) for the 25G needle vs. 97.1 % (68/70) for the 22G; difference −10 % (95 % confidence interval −17.35 % to −2.65 %). High quality specimens were more frequently obtained in the 22G group than in the 25G group (70.0 % [49/70] vs. 28.6 % [20 /70], respectively; P < 0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ between the groups (97.4 % for 25G vs. 100 % for 22G). Conclusions The 25G Franseen needle was inferior to the 22G needle in histologic core procurement. Therefore, for cases in which tissue architecture is pivotal for diagnosis, a 22G needle, which procures relatively higher quality specimens than the 25G needle, should be used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document