scholarly journals Effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on energy expenditure and physical activity

1997 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludo M. L. A. Van Etten ◽  
Klaas R. Westerterp ◽  
Frans T. J. Verstappen ◽  
Bart J. B. Boon ◽  
Wim H. M. Saris

Van Etten, Ludo M. L. A., Klaas R. Westerterp, Frans T. J. Verstappen, Bart J. B. Boon, and Wim H. M. Saris. Effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on energy expenditure and physical activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(1): 298–304, 1997.—The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on average daily metabolic rate (ADMR). Before the intervention and in weeks 8 and 18(T0, T8, and T18, respectively) data on body composition, sleeping metabolic rate (SMR), food intake, energy cost of the weight-training program (EEex), and nontraining physical activity (accelerometer) were collected in the exercise group (EXER, n = 18 males). ADMR was determined in a subgroup (EX12, n = 12) by using doubly labeled water. At T0 and T18, data (except ADMR) were also collected in a control group (Con, n = 8). Body mass did not change in EXER or Con. Fat-free mass increased only in EXER with 2.1 ± 1.2 kg, whereas fat mass decreased in EXER as well as Con (2.0 ± 1.8 and 1.4 ± 1.0 kg, respectively). Initial ADMR (12.4 ± 1.2 MJ/day) increased at T8 (13.5 ± 1.3 MJ/day, P < 0.001) with no further increase at T18 (13.5 ± 1.9 MJ/day). SMR did not change in EXER (4.8 ± 0.5, 4.9 ± 0.5, 4.8 ± 0.5 kJ/min) or Con (4.7 ± 0.4, 4.8 ± 0.4 kJ/min). Energy intake did not change in EXER (10.1 ± 1.8, 9.7 ± 1.8, 9.2 ± 1.9 MJ/day) or Con (10.2 ± 2.6, 9.4 ± 1.8, 10.1 ± 1.5 MJ/day) and was systematically underreported in EX12 (−21 ± 14, −28 ± 18, −34 ± 14%, P < 0.001). EEex (0.47 ± 0.20, 0.50 ± 0.18 MJ/day) could only explain 40% of the increase in ADMR. Nontraining physical activity did not change in both groups. In conclusion, although of modest energy cost, weight-training induces a significant increase in ADMR.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Mullie ◽  
Pieter Maes ◽  
Laurens van Veelen ◽  
Damien Van Tiggelen ◽  
Peter Clarys

ABSTRACT Introduction Adequate energy supply is a prerequisite for optimal performances and recovery. The aims of the present study were to estimate energy balance and energy availability during a selection course for Belgian paratroopers. Methods Energy expenditure by physical activity was measured with accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+, ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA) and rest metabolic rate in Cal.d−1 with Tinsley et al.’s equation based on fat-free mass = 25.9 × fat-free mass in kg + 284. Participants had only access to the French individual combat rations of 3,600 Cal.d−1, and body fat mass was measured with quadripolar impedance (Omron BF508, Omron, Osaka, Japan). Energy availability was calculated by the formula: ([energy intake in foods and beverages] − [energy expenditure physical activity])/kg FFM−1.d−1, with FFM = fat-free mass. Results Mean (SD) age of the 35 participants was 25.1 (4.18) years, and mean (SD) percentage fat mass was 12.0% (3.82). Mean (SD) total energy expenditure, i.e., the sum of rest metabolic rate, dietary-induced thermogenesis, and physical activity, was 5,262 Cal.d−1 (621.2), with percentile 25 at 4,791 Cal.d−1 and percentile 75 at 5,647 Cal.d−1, a difference of 856 Cal.d−1. Mean daily energy intake was 3,600 Cal.d−1, giving a negative energy balance of 1,662 (621.2) Cal.d−1. Mean energy availability was 9.3 Cal.kg FFM−1.d−1. Eleven of the 35 participants performed with a negative energy balance of 2,000 Cal.d−1, and only five participants out of 35 participants performed at a less than 1,000 Cal.d−1 negative energy balance level. Conclusions Energy intake is not optimal as indicated by the negative energy balance and the low energy availability, which means that the participants to this selection course had to perform in suboptimal conditions.


2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1357-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C. Mâsse ◽  
Janet E. Fulton ◽  
Kathleen L. Watson ◽  
Matthew T. Mahar ◽  
Michael C. Meyers ◽  
...  

This study investigated the influence of two approaches (mathematical transformation and statistical procedures), used to account for body composition [body mass or fat-free mass (FFM)], on associations between two measures of physical activity and energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water (DLW). Complete data for these analyses were available for 136 African American (44.1%) and Hispanic (55.9%) women (mean age 50 ± 7.3 yr). Total energy expenditure (TEE) by DLW was measured over 14 days. Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) was computed as 0.90 × TEE - resting metabolic rate. During week 2, participants wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days and completed a 7-day diary. Pearson's product-moment correlations and three statistical procedures (multiple regressions, partial correlations, and allometric scaling) were used to assess the effect of body composition on associations. The methods-comparison analysis was used to study the effect of body composition on agreement. The statistical procedures demonstrated that associations improved when body composition was included in the model. The accelerometer explained a small but meaningful portion of the variance in TEE and PAEE after body mass was accounted for. The methods-comparison analysis confirmed that agreement with DLW was affected by the transformation. Agreement between the diary (transformed with body mass) and TEE reflected the association that exists between body mass and TEE. These results suggest that the accelerometer and diary accounted for a small portion of TEE and PAEE. Most of the variance in DLW-measured energy expenditure was explained by body mass or FFM.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3394
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Purcell ◽  
Ryan J. Marker ◽  
Marc-Andre Cornier ◽  
Edward L. Melanson

Many breast cancer survivors (BCS) gain fat mass and lose fat-free mass during treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) and estrogen suppression therapy, which increases the risk of developing comorbidities. Whether these body composition alterations are a result of changes in dietary intake, energy expenditure, or both is unclear. Thus, we reviewed studies that have measured components of energy balance in BCS who have completed treatment. Longitudinal studies suggest that BCS reduce self-reported energy intake and increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Although some evidence suggests that resting metabolic rate is higher in BCS than in age-matched controls, no study has measured total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) in this population. Whether physical activity levels are altered in BCS is unclear, but evidence suggests that light-intensity physical activity is lower in BCS compared to age-matched controls. We also discuss the mechanisms through which estrogen suppression may impact energy balance and develop a theoretical framework of dietary intake and TDEE interactions in BCS. Preclinical and human experimental studies indicate that estrogen suppression likely elicits increased energy intake and decreased TDEE, although this has not been systematically investigated in BCS specifically. Estrogen suppression may modulate energy balance via alterations in appetite, fat-free mass, resting metabolic rate, and physical activity. There are several potential areas for future mechanistic energetic research in BCS (e.g., characterizing predictors of intervention response, appetite, dynamic changes in energy balance, and differences in cancer sub-types) that would ultimately support the development of more targeted and personalized behavioral interventions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Rachel Silver ◽  
Sai Das ◽  
Michael Lowe ◽  
Susan Roberts

Abstract Objectives There is persistent controversy over the extent to which different components of energy expenditure disproportionately decrease after weight loss and contribute to weight regain through decreased energy requirements. We conducted a secondary analysis of the CALERIE I study to test the hypothesis that decreased resting metabolic rate (RMR) and energy expenditure for physical activity (EEPA) after a 6-month calorie restriction intervention would predict weight regain at 12 months, with a greater decrease in RMR than EEPA. Methods Participants (n = 46) received all food and energy-containing beverages for 6 months. Outcome measures included total energy expenditure by doubly labeled water, RMR by indirect calorimetry, and body composition by BOD POD. Predictions for RMR and EEPA were derived from baseline linear regression models including age, sex, fat mass, and fat free mass. Baseline regression coefficients were used to calculate the predicted RMR and EEPA at 6 months. Residuals were calculated as the difference between measured and predicted values and were adjusted for body weight. The presence of metabolic adaptation was evaluated by a paired t-test comparing measured and predicted RMR at 6 months. Differences between 6-month RMR and EEPA residuals were evaluated by the same method. Linear regression was used to assess the association between 6-month residuals and weight loss maintenance (% weight change, 6 to 12 months). Results Mean weight loss was 6.9% at 6 months with 2.1% regain from 6 to 12 months. No adaptation in RMR was observed at 6 months (mean residual: 19 kcal; 95% confidence interval: −9, 48; P = 0.18). However, significant adaptation was observed in EEPA (mean residual: −199 kcal; −126, −272; P &lt; 0.0001). In addition, the mean 6-month RMR residual was significantly greater than the mean 6-month EEPA residual (218 kcal; 133, 304; P &lt; 0.0001). There was no significant association between 6-month RMR or EEPA residuals and weight regain at 12 months (P = 0.56, 0.34). Conclusions There was no measurable decrease in RMR with weight loss after adjusting for changes in fat free mass and fat mass, but there was a decrease in EEPA. Changes in RMR and EEPA with weight loss over 6 months did not predict weight regain at 12 months. Funding Sources Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging Doctoral Scholarship; USDA agreement #8050–51000-105–01S


2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (6) ◽  
pp. E1426-E1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
James N. Roemmich ◽  
Pamela A. Clark ◽  
Kim Walter ◽  
James Patrie ◽  
Arthur Weltman ◽  
...  

We determined whether activity energy expenditure (AEE, from doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry) or physical activity [7-day physical activity recall (PAR)] was more related to adiposity and the validity of PAR estimated total energy expenditure (TEEPAR) in prepubertal and pubertal boys ( n = 14 and 15) and girls ( n = 13 and 18). AEE, but not physical activity hours, was inversely related to fat mass (FM) after accounting for the fat-free mass, maturation, and age (partial r = −0.35, P ≤ 0.01). From forward stepwise regression, pubertal maturation, AEE, and gender predicted FM ( r 2 = 0.36). Abdominal visceral fat and subcutaneous fat were not related to AEE or activity hours after partial correlation with FM, maturation, and age. When assuming one metabolic equivalent (MET) equals 1 kcal · kg body wt−1 · h−1, TEEPARunderestimated TEE from doubly labeled water (TEE bias) by 555 kcal/day ± 2 SD limits of agreement of 913 kcal/day. The measured basal metabolic rate (BMR) was >1 kcal · kg body wt−1 · h−1 and remained so until 16 yr of age. TEE bias was reduced when setting 1 MET equal to the measured (bias = 60 ± 51 kcal/day) or predicted (bias = 53 ± 50 kcal/day) BMR but was not consistent for an individual child (± 2 SD limits of agreement of 784 and 764 kcal/day, respectively) or across all maturation groups. After BMR was corrected, TEE bias remained greatest in the prepubertal girls. In conclusion, in children and adolescents, FM is more strongly related to AEE than activity time, and AEE, pubertal maturation, and gender explain 36% of the variance in FM. PAR should not be used to determine TEE of individual children and adolescents in a research setting but may have utility in large population-based pediatric studies, if an appropriate MET value is used to convert physical activity data to TEE data.


1998 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond D. Starling ◽  
Michael J. Toth ◽  
William H. Carpenter ◽  
Dwight E. Matthews ◽  
Eric T. Poehlman

Determinants of daily energy needs and physical activity are unknown in free-living elderly. This study examined determinants of daily total energy expenditure (TEE) and free-living physical activity in older women ( n = 51; age = 67 ± 6 yr) and men ( n = 48; age = 70 ± 7 yr) by using doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry. Using multiple-regression analyses, we predicted TEE by using anthropometric, physiological, and physical activity indexes. Data were collected on resting metabolic rate (RMR), body composition, peak oxygen consumption (V˙o 2 peak), leisure time activity, and plasma thyroid hormone. Data adjusted for body composition were not different between older women and men, respectively (in kcal/day): TEE, 2,306 ± 647 vs. 2,456 ± 666; RMR, 1,463 ± 244 vs. 1,378 ± 249; and physical activity energy expenditure, 612 ± 570 vs. 832 ± 581. In a subgroup of 70 women and men, RMR andV˙o 2 peakexplained approximately two-thirds of the variance in TEE ( R 2 = 0.62; standard error of the estimate = ±348 kcal/day). Crossvalidation of this equation in the remaining 29 women and men was successful, with no difference between predicted and measured TEE (2,364 ± 398 and 2,406 ± 571 kcal/day, respectively). The strongest predictors of physical activity energy expenditure ( P < 0.05) for women and men were V˙o 2 peak( r = 0.43), fat-free mass ( r = 0.39), and body mass ( r = 0.34). In summary, RMR andV˙o 2 peak are important independent predictors of energy requirements in the elderly. Furthermore, cardiovascular fitness and fat-free mass are moderate predictors of physical activity in free-living elderly.


2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1280-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Ades ◽  
Patrick D. Savage ◽  
Martin Brochu ◽  
Marc D. Tischler ◽  
N. Melinda Lee ◽  
...  

Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) is a determinant of prognosis and fitness in older patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). PAEE and total energy expenditure (TEE) are closely related to fatness, physical function, and metabolic risk in older individuals. The goal of this study was to assess effects of resistance training on PAEE, TEE, and fitness in older women with chronic CHD and physical activity limitations ( N = 51, mean age: 72 + 5 yr). The study intervention consisted of a progressive, 6-mo program of resistance training vs. a control group condition of low-intensity yoga and deep breathing. The study interventions were completed by 42 of the 51 participants. The intervention group manifested a 177 ± 213 kcal/day (+9%) increase in TEE, pre- to posttraining, measured by the doubly labeled water technique during a nonexercise 10-day period ( P < 0.03 vs. controls). This was due to a 50 ± 74 kcal/day (4%) increase in resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry ( P < 0.01, P < 0.05 vs. controls) and a 123 ± 214 kcal/day (9%) increase in PAEE ( P < 0.03, P = 0.12 vs. controls). Resistance training was associated with significant increases in upper and lower body strength, but no change in fat-free mass, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry, or left ventricular function, measured by echocardiography and Doppler. Women in the control group showed no alterations in TEE or its determinants. There were no changes between groups in body composition, aerobic capacity, or measures of mental depression. These results demonstrate that resistance training of 6-mo duration leads to an increase in TEE and PAEE in older women with chronic CHD.


1991 ◽  
Vol 260 (2) ◽  
pp. E257-E261 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. O. Schulz ◽  
B. L. Nyomba ◽  
S. Alger ◽  
T. E. Anderson ◽  
E. Ravussin

The effect of endurance training on 24-h energy expenditure (EE), basal metabolic rate (BMR), sleeping metabolic rate (SMR), and the thermic effect of food (TEF) was assessed in a respiratory chamber where only spontaneous physical activity (SPA) was allowed. Results from 20 highly trained male endurance athletes (25 +/- 5 yr, 178 +/- 7 cm, 70 +/- 8 kg body wt, 64 +/- 7 kg fat-free mass) were compared with those of 43 untrained males who were matched for age (28 +/- 6 yr), height (175 +/- 5 cm), weight (73 +/- 13 kg), and fat-free mass (62 +/- 8 kg). Subjects were admitted to a metabolic ward, fed a weight-maintenance diet, and refrained from physical activity for at least 2 days before measurements. No significant differences were found with respect to 24-h EE (2,126 +/- 186 vs. 2,154 +/- 245 kcal), BMR (1,808 +/- 342 vs. 1,709 +/- 329 kcal), SMR (1,523 +/- 120 vs. 1,555 +/- 188 kcal), or TEF (24.9 +/- 9.2 vs. 21.3 +/- 6.7% of ingested calories; these values included the energy cost of arousal) between trained and untrained subjects, respectively, before or after adjusting for differences in body composition. Neither the 24-h respiratory quotient nor the level of SPA differed between the two groups. No relationship was found between maximal aerobic capacity and metabolic rate adjusted for differences in fat-free mass and fat mass. These results do not support an effect of fitness level on EE measured under sedentary conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 2489-2496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darcy L. Johannsen ◽  
Nicolas D. Knuth ◽  
Robert Huizenga ◽  
Jennifer C. Rood ◽  
Eric Ravussin ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: An important goal during weight loss is to maximize fat loss while preserving metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM). Massive weight loss typically results in substantial loss of FFM potentially slowing metabolic rate. Objective: Our objective was to determine whether a weight loss program consisting of diet restriction and vigorous exercise helped to preserve FFM and maintain resting metabolic rate (RMR). Participants and Intervention: We measured body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, RMR by indirect calorimetry, and total energy expenditure by doubly labeled water at baseline (n = 16), wk 6 (n = 11), and wk 30 (n = 16). Results: At baseline, participants were severely obese (×± sd; body mass index 49.4 ± 9.4 kg/m2) with 49 ± 5% body fat. At wk 30, more than one third of initial body weight was lost (−38 ± 9%) and consisted of 17 ± 8% from FFM and 83 ± 8% from fat. RMR declined out of proportion to the decrease in body mass, demonstrating a substantial metabolic adaptation (−244 ± 231 and −504 ± 171 kcal/d at wk 6 and 30, respectively, P &lt; 0.01). Energy expenditure attributed to physical activity increased by 10.2 ± 5.1 kcal/kg·d at wk 6 and 6.0 ± 4.1 kcal/kg·d at wk 30 (P &lt; 0.001 vs. zero). Conclusions: Despite relative preservation of FFM, exercise did not prevent dramatic slowing of resting metabolism out of proportion to weight loss. This metabolic adaptation may persist during weight maintenance and predispose to weight regain unless high levels of physical activity or caloric restriction are maintained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document