On the Potential Role of the Corticospinal Tract in the Control and Progressive Adaptation of the Soleus H-Reflex During Backward Walking

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 1133-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roth-Visal Ung ◽  
Marie-Andrée Imbeault ◽  
Christian Ethier ◽  
Laurent Brizzi ◽  
Charles Capaday
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Large Amplitude ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Voluntary Activity ◽  
Backward Walking

When untrained subjects walk backward on a treadmill, an unexpectedly large amplitude soleus H-reflex occurs in the midswing phase of backward walking. We hypothesized that activity in the corticospinal tract (CST) during midswing depolarizes the soleus α-motoneurons subliminally and thus brings them closer to threshold. To test this hypothesis, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the leg area of the motor cortex (MCx) during backward walking. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the soleus and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in untrained subjects at different phases of the backward walking cycle. We reasoned that if soleus MEPs could be elicited in midswing, while the soleus is inactive, this would be strong evidence for increased postsynaptic excitability of the α-motoneurons. In the event, we found that in untrained subjects, despite the presence of an unexpectedly large H-reflex in midswing, no soleus MEPs were observed at that time. The soleus MEPs were in phase with the soleus electromyographic (EMG) activity during backward walking. Soleus MEPs increased more rapidly as a function of the EMG activity during voluntary activity than during backward walking. Furthermore, a conditioning stimulus to the motor cortex facilitated the soleus H-reflex at rest and during voluntary plantarflexion but not in the midswing phase of backward walking. With daily training at walking backward, the time at which the H-reflex began to increase was progressively delayed until it coincided with the onset of soleus EMG activity, and its amplitude was considerably reduced compared with its value on the first experimental day. By contrast, no changes were observed in the timing or amplitude of soleus MEPs with training. Taken together, these observations make it unlikely that the motor cortex via the CST is involved in control of the H-reflex during the backward step cycle of untrained subjects nor in its progressive adaptation with training. Our observations raise the possibility that the large amplitude of H-reflex in untrained subjects and its adaptation with training are mainly due to control of presynaptic inhibition of Ia-afferents by other descending tracts.

scholarly journals Transspinal stimulation decreases corticospinal excitability and alters the function of spinal locomotor networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 2331-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Pulverenti ◽  
Md. Anamul Islam ◽  
Ola Alsalman ◽  
Lynda M. Murray ◽  
Noam Y. Harel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Surface Emg ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Descending Volleys ◽  
Period Duration

Locomotion requires the continuous integration of descending motor commands and sensory inputs from the legs by spinal central pattern generator circuits. Modulation of spinal neural circuits by transspinal stimulation is well documented, but how transspinal stimulation affects corticospinal excitability during walking in humans remains elusive. We measured the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at multiple phases of the step cycle conditioned with transspinal stimulation delivered at sub- and suprathreshold intensities of the spinally mediated transspinal evoked potential (TEP). Transspinal stimulation was delivered before or after transcranial magnetic stimulation during which summation between MEP and TEP responses in the surface EMG was absent or present. Relationships between MEP amplitude and background EMG activity, silent period duration, and phase-dependent EMG amplitude modulation during and after stimulation were also determined. Ankle flexor and extensor MEPs were depressed by suprathreshold transspinal stimulation when descending volleys were timed to interact with transspinal stimulation-induced motoneuron depolarization at the spinal cord. MEP depression coincided with decreased MEP gain, unaltered MEP threshold, and unaltered silent period duration. Locomotor EMG activity of bilateral knee and ankle muscles was significantly depressed during the step at which transspinal stimulation was delivered but fully recovered at the subsequent step. The results support a model in which MEP depression by transspinal stimulation occurs via subcortical or spinal mechanisms. Transspinal stimulation disrupts the locomotor output of flexor and extensor motoneurons initially, but the intact nervous system has the ability to rapidly overcome this pronounced locomotor adaptation. In conclusion, transspinal stimulation directly affects spinal locomotor centers in healthy humans. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Lumbar transspinal stimulation decreases ankle flexor and extensor motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during walking. The MEP depression coincides with decreased MEP gain, unaltered MEP threshold changes, and unaltered silent period duration. These findings indicate that MEP depression is subcortical or spinal in origin. Healthy subjects could rapidly overcome the pronounced depression of muscle activity during the step at which transspinal stimulation was delivered. Thus, transspinal stimulation directly affects the function of spinal locomotor networks in healthy humans.

Changes in interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine-motor manipulation task

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 3086-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Morishita ◽  
Kazumasa Uehara ◽  
Kozo Funase
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Inhibitory Circuit ◽  
Task Conditions

The effect of performance of a sensorimotor task on the interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) induced from the active primary motor cortex (M1) to the resting M1 was examined in 10 right-handed subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed to produce motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the resting right (Rt)-first dorsal interosseous (FDI). For the paired-TMS paradigm, a conditioning stimulus (CS) was delivered to the Rt-M1, and its intensity was adjusted from 0.6 to 1.4 times the resting motor threshold of the MEP in the left (Lt)-FDI in 0.2 steps. The test stimulus was delivered to the Lt-M1, and its intensity was adjusted to evoke similar MEP amplitudes in the Rt-FDI among the task conditions. The interstimulus interval was fixed at 10 ms. As a sensorimotor task, a fine-motor manipulation (FM) task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) was adopted. In addition, an isometric abduction (IA) task was also performed as a control task. These tasks were carried out with the left hand. The IHI from the active to the resting M1 observed during the FM task was markedly increased compared with that induced during the IA task, and this effect was not dependent on the MEP amplitude evoked in the active Lt-FDI by the CS. The present findings suggest that the increased IHI from the active to the resting M1 observed during the FM task was linked to reductions in the activity of the ipsilateral intracortical inhibitory circuit, as we reported previously.

scholarly journals Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Capaday ◽  
Brigitte A. Lavoie ◽  
Hugues Barbeau ◽  
Cyril Schneider ◽  
Mireille Bonnard
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Human Walking ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Motor Circuits ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stimulation Of

Capaday, Charles, Brigitte A. Lavoie, Hugues Barbeau, Cyril Schneider, and Mireille Bonnard. Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 129–139, 1999. Experiments were done to determine the extent to which the corticospinal tract is linked with the segmental motor circuits controlling ankle flexors and extensors during human walking compared with voluntary motor tasks requiring attention to the level of motor activity. The motor cortex was activated transcranially using a focal magnetic stimulation coil. For each subject, the entire input-output (I-O) curve [i.e., the integral of the motor evoked-potential (MEP) versus stimulus strength] was measured during a prescribed tonic voluntary contraction of either the tibialis anterior (TA) or the soleus. Similarly, I-O curves were measured in the early part of the swing phase, or in the early part of the stance phase of walking. The I-O data points were fitted by the Boltzmann sigmoidal function, which accounted for ≥80% of total data variance. There was no statistically significant difference between the I-O curves of the TA measured during voluntary ankle dorsiflexion or during the swing phase of walking, at matched levels of background electromyographic (EMG) activity. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the relation between the coefficient of variation and the amplitude of the MEPs measured in each task, respectively. In comparison, during the stance phase of walking the soleus MEPs were reduced on average by 26% compared with their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion. Furthermore, during stance the MEPs in the inactive TA were enhanced relative to their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion and in four of six subjects the TA MEPs were larger than those of the soleus. Finally, stimulation of the motor cortex at various phases of the step cycle did not reset the cycle. The time of the next step occurred at the expected moment, as determined from the phase-resetting curve. One interpretation of this result is that the motor cortex may not be part of the central neural system involved in timing the motor bursts during the step cycle. We suggest that during walking the corticospinal tract is more closely linked with the segmental motor circuits controlling the flexor, TA, than it is with those controlling the extensor, soleus. However, during voluntary tasks requiring attention to the level of motor activity, it is equally linked with the segmental motor circuits of ankle flexors or extensors.

Origin of Facilitation of Motor-Evoked Potentials After Paired Magnetic Stimulation: Direct Recording of Epidural Activity in Conscious Humans

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1765-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Di Lazzaro ◽  
F. Pilato ◽  
A. Oliviero ◽  
M. Dileone ◽  
E. Saturno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Direct Recording ◽  
Magnetic Stimulus ◽  
Descending Volleys ◽  
Set Up ◽  
High Cervical ◽  
The Brain

A magnetic transcranial conditioning stimulus given over the motor cortex at intensities below active threshold for obtaining motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) facilitates EMG responses evoked at rest in hand muscles by a suprathreshold magnetic stimulus given 10–25 ms later. This is known as intracortical facilitation (ICF). We recorded descending volleys produced by single and paired magnetic motor cortex stimulation through high cervical epidural electrodes implanted for pain relief in six conscious patients. At interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 10 and 15 ms, although MEP was facilitated, there was no change in the amplitude or number of descending volleys. An additional I wave sometimes was observed at 25 ms ISI. In one subject, we also evaluated the effects of reversing the direction of the induced current in the brain. At 10 ms ISI, the facilitation of the MEPs disappeared and was replaced by slight suppression; at 2 ms ISI, there was a pronounced facilitation of epidural volleys. Subsequent experiments on healthy subjects showed that a conditioning stimulus capable of producing ICF of MEPs had no effect on the EMG response evoked by transmastoidal electrical stimulation of corticospinal tract. We conclude that ICF occurs because either 1) the conditioning stimulus has a (thus far undetected) effect on spinal cord excitability that increases its response to the same amplitude test volley or 2) that it can alter the composition (but not the amplitude) of the descending volleys set up by the test stimulus such that a larger proportion of the activity is destined for the target muscle.

Central nervous adaptations following 1 wk of wrist and hand immobilization

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Lundbye-Jensen ◽  
Jens Bo Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Corticomuscular Coherence ◽  
Reduced Physical Activity ◽  
Static Contractions

Plastic neural changes have been documented in relation to different types of physical activity, but little is known about central nervous system plasticity accompanying reduced physical activity and immobilization. In the present study we investigated whether plastic neural changes occur in relation to 1 wk of immobilization of the nondominant wrist and hand and a corresponding period of recovery in 10 able-bodied volunteers. After immobilization, maximal voluntary contraction torque decreased and the variability of submaximal static contractions increased significantly without evidence of changes in muscle contractile properties. Hoffmann (H)-reflex amplitudes and the ratios of H-slope to M-slope increased significantly in flexor carpi radialis and abductor pollicis brevis at rest and during contraction without changes in corticospinal excitability, estimated from motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Corticomuscular coherence measures were derived from EEG and EMG obtained during static contractions. After immobilization, corticomuscular coherence in the 15- to 35-Hz range associated with maximum negative cumulant values at lags corresponding to MEP latencies decreased. One week after cast removal, all measurements returned to preimmobilization levels. The increased H-reflex amplitudes without changes in MEPs may suggest that presynaptic inhibition or postactivation depression of Ia afferents is reduced following immobilization. Reduced corticomuscular coherence may be caused by changes in afferent input at spinal and cortical levels or by changes in the descending drive from motor cortex. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed increased spinal excitability and reduced coupling between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal activity following immobilization.

Discharge Characteristics of Neurons in the Red Nucleus During Voluntary Gait Modifications: A Comparison with the Motor Cortex

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1791-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Lavoie ◽  
Trevor Drew
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Maximal Activity ◽  
Swing Phase ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Step Over ◽  
Increased Activity

We have examined the contribution of the red nucleus to the control of locomotion in the cat. Neuronal activity was recorded from 157 rubral neurons, including identified rubrospinal neurons, in three cats trained to walk on a treadmill and to step over obstacles attached to the moving belt. Of 72 neurons with a receptive field confined to the contralateral forelimb, 66 were phasically active during unobstructed locomotion. The maximal activity of the majority of neurons (59/66) was centered around the swing phase of locomotion. Slightly more than half of the neurons (36/66) were phasically activity during both swing and stance. In addition, some rubral neurons (14/66) showed multiple periods of phasic activity within the swing phase of the locomotor cycle. Periods of phasic discharge temporally coincident with the swing phase of the ipsilateral limb were observed in 7/66 neurons. During voluntary gait modifications, most forelimb-related neurons (70/72) showed a significant increase in their discharge activity when the contralateral limb was the first to step over the obstacle (lead condition). Maximal activity in nearly all cells (63/70) was observed during the swing phase, and 23/63 rubral neurons exhibited multiple increases of activity during the modified swing phase. A number of cells (18/70) showed multiple periods of increased activity during swing and stance. Many of the neurons (35/63, 56%) showed an increase in activity at the end of the swing phase; this period of activity was temporally coincident with the period of activity in wrist dorsiflexors, such as the extensor digitorum communis. A smaller proportion of neurons with receptive fields restricted to the hindlimbs showed similar characteristics to those observed in the population of forelimb-related neurons. The overall characteristics of these rubral neurons are similar to those that we obtained previously from pyramidal tract neurons recorded from the motor cortex during an identical task. However, in contrast to the results obtained in the rubral neurons, most motor cortical neurons showed only one period of increased activity during the step cycle. We suggest that both structures contribute to the modifications of the pattern of EMG activity that are required to produce the change in limb trajectory needed to step over an obstacle. However, the results suggest an additional role for the red nucleus in regulating intra- and interlimb coordination.

scholarly journals Neurophysiological Changes After Paired Brain and Spinal Cord Stimulation Coupled With Locomotor Training in Human Spinal Cord Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Pulverenti ◽  
Morad Zaaya ◽  
Monika Grabowski ◽  
Ewelina Grabowski ◽  
Md. Anamul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Training Session ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Locomotor Training ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Human Spinal Cord ◽  
Cord Injury

Neurophysiological changes that involve activity-dependent neuroplasticity mechanisms via repeated stimulation and locomotor training are not commonly employed in research even though combination of interventions is a common clinical practice. In this randomized clinical trial, we established neurophysiological changes when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex was paired with transcutaneous thoracolumbar spinal (transspinal) stimulation in human spinal cord injury (SCI) delivered during locomotor training. We hypothesized that TMS delivered before transspinal (TMS-transspinal) stimulation promotes functional reorganization of spinal networks during stepping. In this protocol, TMS-induced corticospinal volleys arrive at the spinal cord at a sufficient time to interact with transspinal stimulation induced depolarization of alpha motoneurons over multiple spinal segments. We further hypothesized that TMS delivered after transspinal (transspinal-TMS) stimulation induces less pronounced effects. In this protocol, transspinal stimulation is delivered at time that allows transspinal stimulation induced action potentials to arrive at the motor cortex and affect descending motor volleys at the site of their origin. Fourteen individuals with motor incomplete and complete SCI participated in at least 25 sessions. Both stimulation protocols were delivered during the stance phase of the less impaired leg. Each training session consisted of 240 paired stimuli delivered over 10-min blocks. In transspinal-TMS, the left soleus H-reflex increased during the stance-phase and the right soleus H-reflex decreased at mid-swing. In TMS-transspinal no significant changes were found. When soleus H-reflexes were grouped based on the TMS-targeted limb, transspinal-TMS and locomotor training promoted H-reflex depression at swing phase, while TMS-transspinal and locomotor training resulted in facilitation of the soleus H-reflex at stance phase of the step cycle. Furthermore, both transspinal-TMS and TMS-transspinal paired-associative stimulation (PAS) and locomotor training promoted a more physiological modulation of motor activity and thus depolarization of motoneurons during assisted stepping. Our findings support that targeted non-invasive stimulation of corticospinal and spinal neuronal pathways coupled with locomotor training produce neurophysiological changes beneficial to stepping in humans with varying deficits of sensorimotor function after SCI.

Short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibitions are additive in human motor cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 2955-2962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Ghosh ◽  
Arpan R. Mehta ◽  
Guan Huang ◽  
Carolyn Gunraj ◽  
Tasnuva Hoque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Neural Circuits ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Interhemispheric Inhibition ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Inhibitory Processes ◽  
Long Latency ◽  
The Right

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) at suprathreshold strength results in inhibition of M1 in the opposite hemisphere, a process termed interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). Two phases of IHI, termed short-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI) and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (LIHI), involving separate neural circuits, have been identified. In this study we evaluated how these two inhibitory processes interact with each other. We studied 10 healthy right-handed subjects. A test stimulus (TS) was delivered to the left M1, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Contralateral conditioning stimuli (CCS) were applied to the right M1 either 10 ms or 50 ms prior to the TS, inducing SIHI and LIHI, respectively, in the left M1. The effects of SIHI and LIHI alone, and SIHI and LIHI delivered together, were compared. The TS was adjusted to produce 1-mV or 0.5-mV MEPs when applied alone or after CCS. SIHI and LIHI were found to be additive when delivered together, irrespective of the strength of the TS. The interactions were affected neither by varying the strength of the conditioning stimulus producing SIHI nor by altering the current direction of the TS. Small or opposing interactions, however, may not have been detected. These results support previous findings suggesting that SIHI and LIHI act through different neural circuits. Such inhibitory processes may be used individually or additively during motor tasks and should be studied as separate processes in functional studies.

Effects of Red Nucleus Microstimulation on the Locomotor Pattern and Timing in the Intact Cat: A Comparison With the Motor Cortex

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2297-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Josée Rho ◽  
Sylvain Lavoie ◽  
Trevor Drew
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Step Cycle ◽  
Rubrospinal Tract ◽  
Locomotor Pattern ◽  
Train Duration ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Cathodal Current

Effects of red nucleus microstimulation on the locomotor pattern and timing in the intact cat: a comparison with the motor cortex. To determine the extent to which the rubrospinal tract is capable of modifying locomotion in the intact cat, we applied microstimulation (cathodal current, 330 Hz; pulse duration 0.2 ms; maximal current, 25 μA) to the red nucleus during locomotion. The stimuli were applied either as short trains (33 ms) of impulses to determine the capacity of the rubrospinal tract to modify the level of electromyographic (EMG) activity in different flexors and extensors at different phases of the step cycle or as long trains (200 ms) of pulses to determine the effect of the red nucleus on cycle timing. Stimuli were also applied with the cat at rest (33-ms train). This latter stimulation evoked short-latency (average = 11.8–19.0 ms) facilitatory responses in all of the physiological flexor muscles of the forelimb that were recorded; facilitatory responses were also common in the elbow extensor, lateral head of triceps but were rare in the physiological wrist and digit extensor, palmaris longus. Responses were still evoked in most muscles when the current was decreased to near threshold (3–10 μA). Stimulation during locomotion with the short trains of stimuli evoked shorter-latency (average = 6.0–12.5 ms) facilitatory responses in flexor muscles during the swing phase of locomotion and, except in the case of the extensor digitorum communis, evoked substantially smaller responses in stance. The same stimuli also evoked facilitatory responses in the extensor muscles during swing and produced more complex effects involving both facilitation and suppression in stance. Increasing the duration of the train to 200 ms modified the amplitude and duration of the EMG activity of both flexors and extensors but had little significant effect on the cycle duration. In contrast, whereas stimulation of the motor cortex with short trains of stimuli during locomotion had very similar effects to that of the red nucleus, increasing the train duration to 200 ms frequently produced a marked reset of the step cycle by curtailing stance and initiating a new period of swing. The results suggest that whereas both the motor cortex and the red nucleus have access to the interneuronal circuits responsible for controlling the structure of the EMG activity in the step cycle, only the motor cortex has access to the circuits responsible for controlling cycle timing.

Differential effects of a flexor nerve input on the human soleus H-reflex during standing versus walking

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Capaday ◽  
B. A. Lavoie ◽  
F. Comeau
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Presynaptic Inhibition ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Background Level ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Difference

A conditioning (C) stimulus at group I strength was delivered during standing to the common peroneal (CP) nerve before a test (T) stimulus at several C–T intervals ranging from 0 to 150 ms. At sufficiently long C–T intervals (100–120 ms) the soleus H-reflex was strongly inhibited despite little, or no change, in the background level of EMG activity. This finding indicates that a significant portion of the inhibition occurs at a premotoneuronal level, likely via presynaptic inhibition of the Ia-afferent terminals. During standing, at C–T intervals of 100–120 ms (optimal C–T interval) a conditioning stimulus to the CP nerve of 1.5 times motor threshold (MT) intensity reduced the soleus H-reflex by an average of 45.8% (n = 14 subjects). The conditioning stimulus always produced a clear inhibition of the H-reflex during standing at these C–T intervals. The effects of this conditioning stimulus on the soleus H-reflex were then determined in the early part of the stance phase of walking. In contrast to standing, the conditioning stimulus produced little or no inhibition during the early part of the stance phase of walking (average inhibition 45.8 vs. 11.6%, n = 14 subjects). The soleus background EMG, and the soleus and tibialis anterior M-waves were essentially the same during standing and walking. Furthermore, there was no shift of the optimal C–T interval during walking. The difference in the effects of the conditioning stimulus was not due to differences in the size of the test H-reflex in each task. It appears to be due to a genuine task-dependent change in the input–output properties of the underlying spinal cord circuits. There are at least two, mutually compatible, explanations of these results. Firstly, during walking the intraspinal terminals of the afferent fibres (group Ia and Ib) conducting the conditioning volley may be presynaptically inhibited, or their input gated at the interneuronal level. Secondly, on the assumption that the conditioning stimulus is acting via the presynaptic inhibitory network in the spinal cord, it is possible that during walking this network is saturated as a result of increased central or peripheral synaptic inputs. Finally, it seems unlikely that differences in the refractoriness of the CP nerve between the tasks may be involved; the reasons for this are presented in the discussion.Key words: Ia afferents, motoneurons, presynaptic inhibition, EMG, posture, locomotion, spinal cord.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document