scholarly journals An Expert System for the Validation and Interpretation of X-ray Residual Stress Data

1990 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 601-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Tricard ◽  
Robert W. Hendricks ◽  
Marc Guillot
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Expert System ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Database Access ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Know How ◽  
Computer Assistance ◽  
Technical Features ◽  
Non Destructive

AbstractAlthough widely recognized in the research community as one of the most accurate non-destructive methods for the determination of . residual stress in polycrystalline structural materials, x-ray diffraction has not been widely adopted in the field. This is partly due to the fact that such measurements require, most often, a well trained user with knowledge in both materials and mechanical sciences in addition to the specific know-how of the instrument. We believe that computer assistance could contribute to the promotion of this technique by increasing the productivity and accuracy of these measurements. We have developed a prototype expert system, using Nexpert Object's shell, to assist a non-trained operator in the validation and interpretation of X-ray diffraction residual stress data.The present work describes this prototype which has been designed to confirm the feasibility of the concept. Its knowledge base contains relevant examples of the rules necessary for data validation. The prototype has also confirmed most of the concepts required for the implementation of a full-scale version by evaluating all of the major technical features such as graphics representation, external routines and database access.

X-Ray Diffraction Determination of Metallurgical Damage in Turbo Blower Rotor Shafts

1988 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Porter ◽  
Dan O. Morehouse ◽  
Mike Brauss ◽  
Robert R. Hosbons ◽  
John H. Root ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Turbo Blower ◽  
Diffraction Determination ◽  
Defence Research ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Non Destructive

AbstractStudies have been ongoing at Defence Research Establishment Atlantic on the evaluation of non-destructive techniques for residual stress determination in structures. These techniques have included neutron diffraction, x-ray diffraction and blind-hole drilling. In conjunction with these studies, the applicability of these procedures to aid in metallurgical and failure analysis investigations has been explored. The x-ray diffraction technique was applied to investigate the failure mechanism in several bent turbo blower rotor shafts. All examinations had to be non-destructive in nature as the shafts were considered repairable. It was determined that residual stress profiles existed in the distorted shafts which strongly indicated the presence of martensitic microstuctures. These microstructures are considered unacceptable for these shafts due to the potential for cracking or in-service residual stress relaxation which could lead to future shaft distortion.

Standardisation of X-Ray Powder Diffraction Methods

2004 ◽  
Vol 443-444 ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Giovanni Berti ◽  
Rob Delhez ◽  
S. Norval ◽  
B. Peplinski ◽  
E. Tolle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Technical Committee ◽  
Non Destructive Testing ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Destructive Testing ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Standard Documents ◽  
And Control ◽  
Non Destructive ◽  
Research Centres

This paper outlines the standardisation process for the XRPD method that is currently being considered by a Working Group (WG10) of Technical Committee 138 "Non-destructive Testing" of the European Committee for Standardisation CEN. Several Standard Documents are on the verge of being released. These documents concern the general principles of (X-ray) diffraction, its terminology, and the basic procedures applied. Another document concerns the instruments used and it offers procedures to characterise and control the performance of an X-ray diffractometer properly. It is intended to issue Standard Documents on specific methods, e.g. determination of residual stresses. In fact work is in progress on this subject. The Standard Documents can be used by industry, government organisations, and research centres with activities related to safety, health and the environment, as well as for educational purposes.

Non-destructive Surface Residual Stress Profiling by Multireflection Grazing Incidence X-Ray Diffraction: a 7050 Al Alloy Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-480
Author(s):  
V. A. N. Righetti ◽  
T. M. B. Campos ◽  
L. B. Robatto ◽  
R. R. Rego ◽  
G. P. Thim
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Grazing Incidence ◽  
Al Alloy ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Surface Residual Stress ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Non Destructive

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Steel with Oxidised Surface Layer

2016 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Lukáš Zuzánek ◽  
Ondřej Řidký ◽  
Nikolaj Ganev ◽  
Kamil Kolařík
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Surface Layer ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Diffraction Analysis ◽  
Oxide Surface ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Electrolytic Polishing ◽  
Small Depth

The basic principle of the X-ray diffraction analysis is based on the determination of components of residual stresses. They are determined on the basis of the change in the distance between atomic planes. The method is limited by a relatively small depth in which the X-ray beam penetrates into the analysed materials. For determination of residual stresses in the surface layer the X-ray diffraction and electrolytic polishing has to be combined. The article is deals with the determination of residual stress and real material structure of a laser-welded steel sample with an oxide surface layer. This surface layer is created during the rolling and it prevents the material from its corrosion. Before the X-ray diffraction analysis can be performed, this surface layer has to be removed. This surface layer cannot be removed with the help of electrolytic polishing and, therefore, it has to be removed mechanically. This mechanical procedure creates “technological” residual stress in the surface layer. This additional residual stress is removed by the electrolytic polishing in the depth between 20 and 80 μm. Finally, the real structure and residual stresses can be determined by using the X-ray diffraction techniques.

Experimental determination of residual stress in silicon nitride diffusion bonds obtained by high-energy X-ray diffraction

2004 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vila ◽  
M.L. Martínez ◽  
C. Prieto ◽  
P. Miranzo ◽  
M.I. Osendi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Silicon Nitride ◽  
Experimental Determination ◽  
High Energy ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Diffusion Bonds

The Measurement of Elastic Constants for the Determination of Stresses by X-Rays

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 159-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Perry ◽  
I.C. Noyan ◽  
P.J. Rudnik ◽  
J.B. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Interplanar Spacing ◽  
Measuring System ◽  
Laboratory System ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Measured Change ◽  
Non Destructive ◽  
Applied Stresses

Residual and applied stresses (σij) are often measured via X-ray diffraction, by calculating the resultant elastic strains (ϵij) from the measured change in interplanar spacing (“d”). This method is non-destructive, reasonably reproducible (typically ±14 MPa), can be carried out in the field, and is readily automated to give values to an operator-specified precision , Let Li represent the axes of the measuring system with L3 normal to the diffracting planes, and Pi represent the sample axes. These axes are illustrated in Figure 1. In what follows, primed stresses and strains are in the laboratory system, while unprimed values are in the sample system.

An expert system for the structural characterization of kaolinites

Clay Minerals ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Plançon ◽  
C. Zacharie
Keyword(s):  
Expert System ◽  
Defect Structure ◽  
Defect Structures ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Diffraction Profile ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Diffraction Patterns ◽  
Xrd Patterns

AbstractUntil recently, the determination of the defect structures (previously referred to incorrectly as “crystallinity”) of kaolinites has been obtained in one of two ways: (1) measurement of the Hinckley index, or (2) by comparing calculated X-ray diffraction patterns based on a model of the defect structure (including types of defects and abundances) with experimental diffraction profiles. The Hinckley method is simple and easy to perform but contains no real information about the defect structure. Calculated XRD patterns are based on real defects but these calculations are time consuming and require some skill in application. Another approach is proposed: an expert system which will accurately describe the defect structure of kaolinites based on a few measurements taken from a normal powder diffraction profile. This system has been verified for nine kaolinite samples for which the defect structure was previously determined by comparison of calculated and observed diffraction profiles. The expert system reproduced the correct defect structure for each of the samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document