scholarly journals One-Year Results of an Algorithmic Approach to Managing Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 313-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín Avellanal ◽  
Gonzalo Diaz-Reganon ◽  
Alejandro Orts ◽  
Silvia Soto
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

BACKGROUND: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a major clinical problem. Different etiologies with different incidence rates have been proposed. There are currently no standards regarding the management of these patients. Epiduroscopy is an endoscopic technique that may play a role in the management of FBSS.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an algorithm for management of severe FBSS including epiduroscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool.METHODS: A total of 133 patients with severe symptoms of FBSS (visual analogue scale score ≥7) and no response to pharmacological treatment and physical therapy were included. A six-step management algorithm was applied. Data, including patient demographics, pain and surgical procedure, were analyzed. In all cases, one or more objective causes of pain were established. Treatment success was defined as ≥50% long-term pain relief maintained during the first year of follow-up. Final allocation of patients was registered: good outcome with conservative treatment, surgical reintervention and palliative treatment with implantable devices.RESULTS: Of 122 patients enrolled, 59.84% underwent instrumented surgery and 40.16% a noninstrumented procedure. Most (64.75%) experienced significant pain relief with conventional pain clinic treatments; 15.57% required surgical treatment. Palliative spinal cord stimulation and spinal analgesia were applied in 9.84% and 2.46% of the cases, respectively. The most common diagnosis was epidural fibrosis, followed by disc herniation, global or lateral stenosis, and foraminal stenosis.CONCLUSIONS: A new six-step ladder approach to severe FBSS management that includes epiduroscopy was analyzed. Etiologies are accurately described and a useful role of epiduroscopy was confirmed.

scholarly journals Factors Predicting the Success of Adhesiolysis Using a Steerable Catheter in Lumbar Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 913
Author(s):  
Ji Yeong Kim ◽  
Yong Ho Lee ◽  
Subin Yoo ◽  
Ji Young Kim ◽  
Mina Joo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Response ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Outer Diameter ◽  
Lumbar Surgery ◽  
First Line ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Reasonable Evidence ◽  
Reduction Effect

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a commonly encountered disease after lumbar surgery. There are many cases where it is difficult to choose a treatment because no specific cause can be found. Nevertheless, according to recent reports, adhesiolysis has shown reasonable evidence. However, considering its poor cost-effectiveness, adhesiolysis cannot be used as the first line of treatment. FBSS patients often suffer from chronic pain; accordingly, they become frustrated when this treatment produces a poor response. Therefore, before the procedure, the target group must be selected carefully. We sought to identify the pre-procedure factors predicting the effect of adhesiolysis in FBSS. A total of 150 patients were evaluated and analyzed retrospectively. Of these 150 patients, 69 were classified as responders three months after the procedure (46%). The outer diameter of the catheter during the procedure and grade of foraminal stenosis were correlated with the procedure effect. In conclusion, of the 2.1 mm diameter of the catheter, 1.7 mm of it was used during the procedure, and the milder the foraminal stenosis, the greater the pain reduction effect was three months after the procedure.

Efficacy of Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulator for the Relief of Chronic Low Back Pain from Failed Back Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 3;11 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
Asokumar Buvanendran
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common clinical entity for which spinal cord stimulation has been found to be an effective mode of analgesia, but with variable success rates. Objective: To determine if focal stimulation of the dorsal columns with a transverse tripolar lead might achieve deeper penetration of the electrical stimulus into the spinal cord and therefore provide greater analgesia to the back. Design: Case report. Methods: We describe a 42-year-old female with failed back surgery syndrome that had greater back pain than leg pain. The tripolar lead configuration was achieved by placing percutaneously an octapolar lead in the spinal midline followed by 2 adjacent quadripolar leads, advanced to the T7-T10 vertebral bodies. Results: Tripolar stimulation pattern resulted in more than 70% pain relief in this patient during the screening trial, while stimulation of one or 2 electrodes only provided 20% pain relief. After implantation of a permanent tripolar electrode system with a single rechargeable battery, the pain relief was maintained for one year. Conclusion: This is case report describing a case of a patient with chronic low back pain with a diagnosis of failed back surgery syndrome in which transverse tripolar stimulation using an octapolar and 2 quadripolar leads appeared to be beneficial. The transverse tripolar system consists of a central cathode surrounded by anodes, using 3 leads. This arrangement may contribute to maximum dorsal column stimulation with minimal dorsal root stimulation and provide analgesia to the lower back. Key words: Epidural, low back pain, spinal cord stimulation, failed back surgery syndrome, tripolar stimulation

scholarly journals Determining the Minimal Clinical Important Difference for Medication Quantification Scale III and Morphine Milligram Equivalents in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3747
Author(s):  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Ann De Smedt ◽  
Patrice Forget ◽  
Maarten Moens
Keyword(s):  
Negative Impact ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Change Score ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Percentage Change ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Minimal Clinical Important Difference ◽  
A Value ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

The Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS) is a tool to represent the negative impact of medication. A reduction in medication can serve as an indicator to evaluate treatment success. However, no cut-off value has yet been determined to evaluate whether a decrease in medication is clinically relevant. Therefore, the objective is to estimate the thresholds for the MQS and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) that best identify a clinically relevant important improvement for patients. Data from the Discover registry, in which patients with failed back surgery syndrome were treated with high-dose spinal cord stimulation, were used. Patient satisfaction was utilized to evaluate a clinically important outcome 12 months after stimulation. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were applied to determine the minimal clinical important difference (MCID). Distribution-based methods revealed a value of 4.28 for the MQS and 33.61 for the MME as MCID. Anchor-based methods indicated a percentage change score of 41.2% for the MQS and 28.2% for the MME or an absolute change score of 4.72 for the MQS and 22.65 for the MME. For assessing a treatment outcome, we recommend using the percentage change score, which better reflects a clinically important outcome and is not severely influenced by high medication intake at baseline.

scholarly journals Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome With Failed High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Salvaged With Arthrodesis Revision Surgery and Burst Therapy

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin McCormack ◽  
Mansour H Mathkour ◽  
Lora Wallis Kahn ◽  
Maged Guirguis ◽  
Gassan Chaiban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Foot Pain ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract INTRODUCTION Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling form of constant and intense chronic pain involving a limb. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is chronic back pain following back surgery. Burst stimulation is a novel concept applied recently to treat chronic pain through spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The impulses are thought to travel to the thalamus to treat sensory, affective, and attentional components of neuropathic pain by targeting both the somatosensory cortex and the limbic system. METHODS A 50-yr-old female presented 1 yr after L5-S1 posterior instrumentation and posterolateral arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis with disabling Type I CRPS of her left foot and back pain. Postoperative improvement in back pain was noted but her left leg pain became worse despite SCS reprogramming. Two months later, she underwent placement of a different paddle lead at T12 and a new pulse generator using burst therapy. This resulted in complete resolution of foot pain. She remains pain-free 5 mo postoperatively. RESULTS Our patient underwent a T9-T10 high frequency (10 kHz) SCS trial followed by permanent paddle lead placement at T9-10 which provided more than 50% foot pain relief resulting in improved range of motion. However, worsening back pain and pseudoarthrosis mandated a revision of her prior arthrodesis 6 mo after SCS surgery. CONCLUSION In selected patients with FBSS and CRPS, revision of arthrodesis combined with SCS may be needed to achieve adequate pain relief. Burst therapy may be superior to high frequency stimulation in select patients.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF AN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
JOSÉ EDUARDO NOGUEIRA FORNI ◽  
ANA MARCIA RODRIGUES CUNHA ◽  
CARLOS EDUARDO D'AGLIO ROCHA ◽  
LILIAN CHESSA DIAS ◽  
MARCO HENRIQUE D'ALL AGLIO FOSS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Interdisciplinary Program ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the results of an interdisciplinary program administered to patients with failed back surgery syndrome, aiming at functional improvement, modulation of pain, reduction of anxiety symptoms and depression, and improvement of quality of life. Method: This is a non-randomized prospective study with a sample of patients with failed back surgery pain syndrome diagnosed with persistent or recurrent pain after surgery to the lumbar spine (laminectomy and arthrodesis) referred to liaison in the Pain Clinic (n= 26). The instruments used were Brief Pain Inventory, Roland-Morris Questionnaire and Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories. The generic WHOQOL-bref13 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life and the fear of moving was assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Results: There was a predominance of females, the mean age was 42.3 ± 5.8 years, 43% were married and average schooling was 7 ± 4.5 years. The mean time of pain reported was 8 ± 6.8 months in addition to high levels of anxiety, depression and kinesiophobia. After the intervention, there was a significant improvement in the perception of quality of life and of all parameters evaluated (p<0.05), with functional gains as well as decreased pain threshold. Conclusion: The interdisciplinary intervention in patients with failed back surgery syndrome provides better functional performance, decreases the intensity of pain, anxiety and depression symptoms, and improves quality of life. The inclusion of this intervention associated with drug therapy may the patient develop an active and independent lifestyle.

Long-Term Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 20 Years of Experience With 224 Consecutive Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1011-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Nissen ◽  
Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo ◽  
Jukka Huttunen ◽  
Ville Leinonen ◽  
Mikael von und zu Fraunberg
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract BACKGROUND Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a challenging condition that lacks a curative treatment. In selected patients, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has provided a satisfactory outcome. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term outcome of SCS in FBSS, as measured by (1) the explantation rate, (2) complications, and (3) patient satisfaction with the global perceived effect (GPE). METHODS We studied 224 consecutive FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial with surgically implanted leads at our hospital between January 1996 and December 2014. The patients’ satisfaction with the GPE of treatment was measured through a postal questionnaire at the end of follow-up. RESULTS Based on a 1-wk trial, permanent SCS was implanted in 175 (78%) patients. Out of these patients, 153 (87%) reported satisfactory outcomes after 2 mo. During the mean follow-up of 6 yr, 34 (19%) of SCS devices were permanently explanted due to inadequate pain relief, and 11 (6%) were explanted for other reasons. Electrode revision due to inadequate pain relief was done for 22 patients. In total, 26 complications were reported due to: 7 deep infections, 11 hardware malfunctions, 1 subcutaneous hematoma, 4 instances of discomfort due to the pulse generator, and 3 electrode migrations. One hundred thirty patients (74%) continued with SCS until the end of follow-up. Of them, 61 (47%) returned the questionnaire, and 42 (69%) reported substantially improved or better GPE. CONCLUSION SCS can provide a good outcome in the treatment of FBSS. Patient selection could be further improved by developing novel predictive biomarkers.

scholarly journals Factors related to Quality of Life of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
Yu Sun Jang ◽  
Sun Young Jung
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Family Support ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Intervention Programs ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Stepwise Multiple Regression ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
One Way Anova

Purpose: This study was done to investigate factors related to quality of life of patients with failed back surgery syndrome.Methods: One hundred and eighty four patients were recruited from a hospital pain clinic. Data were collected from March 12 to April 9, 2018 using structured questionnaires which included questions about quality of life, hope, and family support. Data analysis was done with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis with SPSS version 25.0.Results: The factors related to quality of life were hope, family support, and frequency of pain. These three factors accounted for 53.1% of the total variance in quality of life.Conclusion: In order to increase quality of life of patients with failed back surgery syndrome, it is necessary to design intervention programs that effectively manage hope, family support, and frequency of pain.

scholarly journals Narcotic Addiction in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Chuan Chen ◽  
Ching-Yi Lee ◽  
Shiu-Jau Chen
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Narcotic Addiction ◽  
Over Time

Back pain is a common health problem that reduces the quality of life for human beings worldwide. Several treatment modalities have been reported as effective for pain relief. Generally, patients often undergo surgical interventions as pain becomes intractable, after conservative treatment. With advances in surgical techniques, those choosing spinal surgery as an option have increased over time, and instrumentation is more popular than it was years ago. However, some patients still have back pain after spinal operations. The number of patients classified as having failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) has increased over time as has the requirement for patients receiving long-term analgesics. Because pain relief is regarded as a human right, narcotics were prescribed more frequently than before. Narcotic addiction in patients with FBSS has become an important issue. Here, we review the prevalence of FBSS, the mechanism of narcotic addiction, and their correlations. Additionally, several potentially effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of narcotic addiction in FBSS patients are evaluated and discussed.

scholarly journals Predicting the Response of High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4131
Author(s):  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Jean-Pierre Van Buyten ◽  
Ann De Smedt ◽  
Iris Smet ◽  
Marieke Devos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Linear Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Linear Discriminant ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Despite the proven clinical value of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), factors related to a successful SCS outcome are not yet clearly understood. This study aimed to predict responders for high frequency SCS at 10 kHz (HF-10). Data before implantation and the last available data was extracted for 119 FBSS patients treated with HF-10 SCS. Correlations, logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, random forest, bagging, and boosting were applied. Based on feature selection, trial pain relief, predominant pain location, and the number of previous surgeries were relevant factors for predicting pain relief. To predict responders with 50% pain relief, 58.33% accuracy was obtained with boosting, random forest and bagging. For predicting responders with 30% pain relief, 70.83% accuracy was obtained using logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, boosting, and classification trees. For predicting pain medication decrease, accuracies above 80% were obtained using logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis. Several machine learning techniques were able to predict responders to HF-10 SCS with an acceptable accuracy. However, none of the techniques revealed a high accuracy. The inconsistent results regarding predictive factors in literature, combined with acceptable accuracy of the currently obtained models, might suggest that routinely collected baseline parameters from clinical practice are not sufficient to consistently predict the SCS response with a high accuracy in the long-term.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document