scholarly journals Bortezomib Induced Hepatitis B Reactivation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salwa Hussain ◽  
Ruby Jhaj ◽  
Samira Ahsan ◽  
Muhammad Ahsan ◽  
Robert E. Bloom ◽  
...  

Background. It has recently been reported that hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation often occurs after the use of rituximab and stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative. However, clinical data on HBV reactivation in multiple myeloma (MM) is limited to only a few reported cases. Bortezomib and lenalidomide have remarkable activity in MM with manageable toxicity profiles, but reactivation of viral infections may emerge as a problem. We present a case of MM that developed HBV reactivation after bortezomib and lenalidomide therapy.Case Report. A 73-year-old female with a history of marginal cell lymphoma was monitored without requiring therapy. In 2009, she developed MM, presenting as a plasmacytoma requiring vertebral decompression and focal radiation. While receiving radiation she developed renal failure and was started on bortezomib and liposomal doxorubicin. After a transient response to 5 cycles, treatment was switched to lenalidomide. Preceding therapy initiation, her serology indicated resolved infection. Serial monitoring for HBV displayed seroconversion one month after change in therapy.Conclusion. Bortezomib associated late HBV reactivation appears to be a unique event that requires further confirmation and brings to discussion whether hepatitis B core positive individuals would benefit from monitoring of HBV activation while on therapy.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5025-5025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Niscola ◽  
Maria Ilaria Del Giudice ◽  
Luca Maurillo ◽  
Mariacarmela Solmone ◽  
Maria Rosaria Capobianchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Concerns about safety of rituximab in hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers have risen at the light of reported cases of HBV reactivation following the administration of this agent. We recently observed a patient affected by B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) who developed this complication without any serological evidence of HBsAg expression. Case report: the patient, a 51 old year’s male, was diagnosed as having B-CLL in November 1998 and followed until his death due to acute liver failure due to HBV reactivation of a mutant HBV strain in September 2004 (Table). At diagnosis of B-CLL no risk factors regarding liver diseases or viral infections were reported; serum HBsAg and HBeAg, antibodies against the B-core antigen (HBcAb), HBe (HBeAB), HBsAg (HBsAb), HCV, hepatitis A and Delta virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Epstein Barr virus were negative while HBcAb alone were positive. He presented stable disease until November 2001, when fludarabine was started because of progressive disease. A good partial response (GPR) was achieved so that he received four weekly standard doses (375 mg/m2) of rituximab as consolidation therapy (July 2002). A complete remission (CR) was obtained and he was then closely followed-up until about two years later (February 2004) when, for a disease recurrence, rituximab was given again. At that time all the above hepatitis markers remained unmodified. After four weekly standard doses of rituximab a GPR was recorded, and then six monthly courses (150 mg/m2) of the same agent were administered as maintenance therapy. In September 2004, being the patient in CR, he was admitted with acute hepatitis. HBV DNA strains (200,000 copies/mL) and HbcAb IgM were detected, whereas HbsAg-negative status persisted. The viral form was characterized as having D genotype and ayw3 serotype respectively. Sequence analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products amplified from the S region revealed 5 remarkable mutations in the major antigenic regions (C124Y, A128V, G130D, P135R and G145R). These mutations were associated with the lack of HbsAg production and were compatible with an escape of a rare HBV strain from the patient’s own HbsAb. Despite treatment with lamivudine, the patient died of fulminant hepatic failure. Conclusion: our experience indicates that patients receiving rituximab who are negative for HBsAg but positive for anti-HBc are still at risk for reactivation of latent HBV and should be considered for HBV DNA testing and prophylaxis with lamivudine. Patient clinical features Clinical features Diagnosis (November 1998) Disease Progression (November 2001) Disease Recurrence (February 2004) B Hepatitis onset (September 2004) *D genotype, ayw3 serotype; C124Y, A128V, G130D, P135R and G145R mutations in the S region. NA:not available. Rai Clinical Stage I II II 0 CD38 Negative Negative Negative Negative Zap 70 Positive Positive Positive Negative CD4/CD8 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 Beta 2 microglobulin (mcg/L) 1503 1825 1844 1325 Serum Ig level (gr/L) 0,980 0,790 0,660 0,620 HBsAg Negative Negative Negative Negative HBsAb Negative Negative Negative Negative HBcAb Positive Positive Positive Positive HBeAg Negatrive Negative Negative Positive HBeAb Positive Positive Positive Positive HBV DNA* NA NA NA 200.000/μL


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (34) ◽  
pp. 5097-5100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
Yuki Hagiwara ◽  
Ken Tanae ◽  
Mika Kohri ◽  
Naoki Takahashi

Purpose Recently, there have been reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after rituximab combination chemotherapy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) –negative patients with B-cell lymphoma. In this prospective study, the frequency of and risk factors for HBV reactivation in patients who were receiving rituximab chemotherapy were examined. Patients and Methods A total of 314 HBsAg-negative patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were treated with rituximab chemotherapy. Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) tests were performed in all patients. In patients who were positive for anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc, serum HBV-DNA was measured. Results Of the 314 patients, 51 (16.2%) were HBV carriers. HBV reactivation occurred during or after rituximab chemotherapy in six patients (12%). All six patients who developed HBV reactivation were anti-HBc positive, and three of them were also anti-HBs positive. In these six patients, the pretreatment anti-HBs titer was low. Entecavir administration was started when serum HBV DNA became positive, and serum HBV-DNA became negative within 1 to 3 weeks. Rituximab chemotherapy was then continued. Risk factors for HBV reactivation were being male and having a low anti-HBs titer. Conclusion HBV reactivation occurred in some patients who had been anti-HBs negative or had a low anti-HBs level. In addition, HBV reactivation occurred at an early stage of rituximab chemotherapy, but rituximab chemotherapy could be continued after entecavir administration reduced the serum HBV-DNA level. Entecavir (BMS 200495) prophylaxis was not performed when rituximab chemotherapy was started, and it was thought that entecavir could be started when serum HBV-DNA increased.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 204993612098212
Author(s):  
Rocío González ◽  
Luisa Barea ◽  
Ana Arruga ◽  
Alberto Richart ◽  
Vicente Soriano

Background: The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections is very low in developed countries. Recent massive migration flows from highly hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or HIV endemic regions to Europe may have changed this scenario. Methods: During 2017 and 2018, a total of 491,753 blood donations (291,762 donors) were evaluated at the Madrid Regional Transfusion Center. All were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV and anti-HIV, as well as for HBV-DNA, HCV-RNA and HIV-RNA. Results: Overall, 35 donors were positive for HIV-RNA and 26 for HCV-RNA. HBV markers were found in 111 (0.022%) donors, split out into three categories: HBsAg+ ( n = 93; 0.019%), occult B infection (OBI) ( n = 17; 0.003%), and acute HBV window period ( n = 1; 0.0002%). All 17 OBI donors were positive for anti-HBc and confirmed as viremic in repeated testing. Viral load amounts were uniformly below 100 IU/mL. Ten OBI donors were repeated donors and look-back studies could be completed for eight of them. Fortunately, none of all prior recipients experienced transfusion transmitted hepatitis B. Compared with HBsAg+ donors, OBI donors were more frequently native Spaniards (76% versus 40%) and older (median age 52 versus 42 years old). Conclusion: Active HBV infection is currently found in 0.022% of blood donations (0.038% of donors) in Madrid. This rate is 3-fold greater than for HIV and/or HCV. On the other hand, HBsAg+ donors are 3-fold more frequent than OBI donors and more often immigrants than native Spaniards. No transfusion-transmitted HBV infections were identified during the study period, including retrospective checking of former recipients of OBI donors.


Author(s):  
Roshan Mathew ◽  
Ritin Mohindra ◽  
Ankit Sahu ◽  
Rachana Bhat ◽  
Akshaya Ramaswami ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Occupational hazards like sharp injury and splash exposure (SISE) are frequently encountered in health-care settings. The adoption of standard precautions by healthcare workers (HCWs) has led to significant reduction in the incidence of such injuries, still SISE continues to pose a serious threat to certain groups of HCWs. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study which examined the available records of all patients from January 2015 to August 2019 who self-reported to our emergency department with history of sharp injury and/or splash exposure. Details of the patients, mechanism of injury, the circumstances leading to the injury, status of the source (hepatitis B surface antigen, human immunodeficiency virus, and hepatitis C virus antibody status), and the postexposure prophylaxis given were recorded and analyzed. Data were represented in frequency and percentages. Results During the defined period, a total of 834 HCWs reported with SISE, out of which 44.6% were doctors. Majority of the patients have SISE while performing medical procedures on patients (49.5%), while 19.2% were exposed during segregation of waste. The frequency of needle stick injury during cannulation, sampling, and recapping of needle were higher in emergency department than in wards. More than 80% of HCWs received hepatitis B vaccine and immunoglobulin postexposure. Conclusion There is need for periodical briefings on practices of sharp handling as well as re-emphasizing the use of personal protective equipment while performing procedures.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100578
Author(s):  
Irene Cacciola ◽  
Concetta Pitrone ◽  
Maria S. Franzè ◽  
Carmelo Mazzeo ◽  
Marco Muscianisi ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fen Tsai ◽  
Ching-I Yang ◽  
Jeng-Shiun Du ◽  
Ming-Hui Lin ◽  
Shih-Hao Tang ◽  
...  

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation with a hepatitis flare is a common complication in lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Anti-HBV prophylaxis is suggested for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients undergoing rituximab therapy, even those with resolved HBV infection. Since anti-HBV prophylaxis for patients with resolved HBV infection is not covered by national health insurance in Taiwan, a proportion of these patients receive no prophylaxis. In addition, late HBV reactivation has emerged as a new issue in recent reports, and no consensus has been reached for the optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis. Thus, the aim of our study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of HBV reactivation in NHL patients in a real-world setting and to study the frequency of late HBV reactivation. Materials Non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received rituximab and/or chemotherapy at our institute between January 2011 and December 2015 and who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 388 patients were screened between January 2011 and December 2015. In total, 196 patients were excluded because HBsAg was not assessed, HBcAb was negative or not assessed, or they were not treated with immunosuppressive therapy. Finally, the retrospective study included 62 HBsAg-positive NHL patients and 130 NHL patients with resolved HBV infection (HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive). During a median 30.5-month follow-up period, seven patients experienced HBV reactivation, five of whom had a hepatitis flare. The incidence of HBV reactivation did not significantly differ between the HBsAg-positive patients and the resolved HBV infection population without anti-HBV prophylaxis (4.8% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.683). All patients with HBV reactivation were exposed to rituximab. Notably, late HBV reactivation was not uncommon (two of seven patients with HBV reactivation events, 28.6%). Hepatitis B virus reactivation did not influence the patients’ overall survival. An age ≥65 years and an advanced disease stage were independent risk factors for poorer overall survival. Conclusion The incidence of HBV reactivation was similar between the HBsAg-positive patients with antiviral prophylaxis and the resolved HBV infection population without anti-HBV prophylaxis. All HBV reactivation events occurred in NHL patients exposed to rituximab. Late reactivation was not uncommon. The duration of regular liver function monitoring for more than 1 year after immunosuppressive therapy or after withdrawal of prophylactic antiviral therapy should be prolonged. Determining the exact optimal duration of anti-HBV prophylaxis is warranted in a future prospective study for NHL patients treated with rituximab-containing therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 2765-2772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsiang Huang ◽  
Liang-Tsai Hsiao ◽  
Ying-Chung Hong ◽  
Tzeon-Jye Chiou ◽  
Yuan-Bin Yu ◽  
...  

Purpose The role of antiviral prophylaxis in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation before rituximab-based chemotherapy in patients with lymphoma and resolved hepatitis B is unclear. Patients and Methods Eighty patients with CD20+ lymphoma and resolved hepatitis B were randomly assigned to receive either prophylactic entecavir (ETV) before chemotherapy to 3 months after completing chemotherapy (ETV prophylactic group, n = 41) or to receive therapeutic ETV at the time of HBV reactivation and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reverse seroconversion since chemotherapy (control group, n = 39). Results Fifty-eight patients (72.5%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, and HBV DNA was undetectable in 50 patients (62.5%). During a mean 18-month follow-up period, one patient (2.4%) in the ETV prophylactic group and seven patients (17.9%) in the control group developed HBV reactivation (P = .027). The cumulative HBV reactivation rates at months 6, 12, and 18 after chemotherapy were 8%, 11.2%, and 25.9%, respectively, in the control group, and 0%, 0%, and 4.3% in the ETV prophylactic group (P = .019). Four patients (50%) in the control group had HBsAg reverse seroconversion after HBV reactivation. The cumulative HBsAg reverse seroconversion rates at months 6, 12, and 18 since chemotherapy were 0%, 6.4%, and 16.3% in the control group, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the ETV prophylactic group (P = .032). Patients with detectable or undetectable viral load could develop HBV reactivation and HBsAg reverse seroconversion. Conclusion Undetectable HBV viral load before chemotherapy did not confer reactivation-free status. Antiviral prophylaxis can potentially prevent rituximab-associated HBV reactivation in patients with lymphoma and resolved hepatitis B.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481876787
Author(s):  
Matthew Kelling ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
Samir Dalia

Chronic active hepatitis B infection (HBV) has been implicated in lymphomagenesis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Treatment of cancer including NHL with chemotherapy or immunotherapy can lead to HBV reactivation in previously infected patients. Serological testing of HBV prior to initiation of this therapy is recommended by several national and international medical agencies and expert panels. Patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc ab) need to start antiviral therapy with entecavir or tenofovir prior to initiation of chemotherapy or immunotherapy and continue this treatment for 6 to 12 months after completion of cancer therapy to avoid late HBV reactivation. Monitoring of HBV DNA viral load and liver function tests should be done during cancer therapy in infected patients. Hepatitis B infection vaccination resulted in decreases prevalence of HBV virus carriers and decreased incidence of virus-induced malignancies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document