scholarly journals Annexin A3 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhou ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Tiantian Tang ◽  
Lina Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Lymphatic Metastases ◽  
Tumor Node Metastasis Stage

To validate the correlation between ANXA3 expression and prognosis in breast cancer, a retrospective study encompassing 309 breast cancer patients was performed. The expression of ANXA3 was determined by the immunohistochemical examination of tissue sections by the Max Vision™ method. The ANXA3 levels in the patient samples were validated for the prognosis based on age, menopause status, tumor size, tumor node, metastasis stage, the number of lymphatic metastases, oncology grade, and molecular subtyping. An elevated expression of ANXA3 was detected in breast cancer samples, compared to adjacent tissue samples, and significant correlation depending on the number of lymphatic metastases (P=0.001) and histological grade (P=0.004) was observed. The number of lymphatic metastases and ANXA3 expression were identified as independent risk factors affecting the disease-free survival and overall survival. Significantly (P<0.002) higher level of ANXA3 was detected in triple-negative breast cancer compared to other subtypes. There was no significant (P>0.05) change in the expression of ANXA3 with respect to age, menopausal status, tumor size, and clinical stage. The findings implicate the expression of ANXA3 with the natural progression of breast cancer and associate it with increased lymphatic metastasis. The study validates the use of ANXA3 as a potential prognosis biomarker for breast cancer.

scholarly journals ALDH1 Expression and Vasculogenic Mimicry Are Positively Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Xing ◽  
Huiting Dong ◽  
Qun Liu ◽  
Tingting Zhao ◽  
Fan Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Vasculogenic Mimicry ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Double Positive ◽  
The Status ◽  
Aldh1 Expression

Background/Aims: This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) expression and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) in patients with breast cancer. Methods: ALDH1 expression and the presence of VM were examined by immunohistochemistry and CD31/PAS double staining, respectively, using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 202 breast cancer patients. The mean follow-up period ranged from 15 to 115 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves. Prognostic values were assessed by multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model. Results: ALDH1 expression was strongly associated with VM (P = 0.005). ALDH1 expression was positively correlated with histological grade (P = 0.011). Both ALDH1 expression and VM were negatively related to the status of the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and were statistically increased in triple-negative breast cancer. Patients with ALDH1 expression or VM displayed poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than ALDH1-negative or VM-negative patients, with the worst OS and DFS observed in ALDH1/VM-double-positive patients. ALDH1-positive and VM-positive were independent survival risk factors for DFS and OS. Conclusion: ALDH1 expression and VM are correlated with the survival rate of patients with breast cancer. ALDH1 and VM, either alone or together, are prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer.

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11532-e11532
Author(s):  
Hee-Chul Shin ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

scholarly journals Postmastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cT1-2N+ breast cancer patients: a single center experience and review of current literature

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Luo ◽  
Huihui Chen ◽  
Hao Deng ◽  
Yao Jin ◽  
Gui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract PurposePostmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after NAC in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage cT1−2N+, especially for those who achieved ypT1−2N0, is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of cT1−2N+ patients after NAC with or without PMRT, and to discuss the selection of patients who may omit PMRT.Patients and MethodsFrom January 2005 to December 2017, 3055 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 215 patients of cT1−2N+ stage, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 72.6 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival. Comparison was conducted between PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups.ResultsOf the 215 eligible patients, 35.8% (77/215) cT1−2N+ patients achieved ypT0−2N0 after NAC while 64.2% (138/215) of the patients remained nodal positive (ypT0−2N+). The 5-year DFS of ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT was 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.4-95.6%). No statistically significant difference was observed between the ypT0−2N0 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year DFS (78.5% vs 79.5%, p = 0.673) and OS (88.8% vs 90.8%, p = 0.721). The 5-years DFS didn’t obviously differ between the ypT0−2N0 non-PMRT subgroup and cT1−2N0 subgroup (79.5% vs 93.3%, p = 0.070). By using Cox regression model in multivariate analyses of prognosis in ypT0−2N+ PMRT subgroup, HER2 overexpression and triple-negative breast cancer were significantly poor predictors of DFS and OS, while ypN stage was significant independent predictors of OS.ConclusionAn excellent response to NAC (ypT0−2N0) indicates a sufficiently favorable prognosis, and PMRT might be omitted for cT1−2N+ breast cancer patients with ypT0−2N0 after NAC.

scholarly journals Impact of clinical-pathological factors on locoregional recurrence in mastectomy patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: who can omit adjuvant radiotherapy?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofang Wang ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Xiaomeng Zhang ◽  
Jurui Luo ◽  
Xuanyi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Purpose Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in T1–T2 tumors with 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is controversial. This study was to identify prognostic factors of locoregional control (LRC) following mastectomy with or without PMRT for patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer and to discuss the selection of patients who might omit PMRT. Materials and methods Between January 2006 and December 2012, the data of 1474 postmastectomy patients staged pT1-2N1 were analyzed. PMRT was applied in 663 patients. LRC and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression model was applied in the univariate and multivariate analyses to recognize the recurrence risk factors. Results With the median follow-up duration of 93 months (range, 5–168 months), 78 patients (5.3%) failed to secure LRC and 220 patients (14.9%) experienced any recurrence. The 7.7-year LRC and DFS was 94.9% and 85.4% respectively in the entire cohort. PMRT significantly improved 7.7-year LRC from 93.4% to 96.6% (p = 0.005), but not the DFS (p = 0.335). Multivariate analysis revealed that PMRT was an independent prognostic factor of LRC (p < 0.001), meanwhile, age ≤ 40 years (p = 0.012), histological grade 3 (p = 0.004), 2–3 positive nodes (p < 0.001) and tumor size of 3–5 cm (p = 0.045) were significantly associated with decreased LRC. The 7.7-year LRC for patients with 0, 1, and 2–4 risk factors was 97.7% / 98.9% (p = 0.233), 95.3% / 98.0% (p = 0.092), and 80.3% / 94.8% (p < 0.001) in the non-PMRT and PMRT group, respectively. Conclusions In patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer, clinical-pathological factors including young age, histological grade 3, 2–3 positive nodes, and tumor size of 3–5 cm were identified to be predictors of a poorer LRC following mastectomy. Patients with 0–1 risk factor might consider the omission of PMRT.

scholarly journals Relationship between red cell distribution width and prognosis in patients with breast cancer after operation: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deshun Yao ◽  
Zhiwu Wang ◽  
Haifeng Cai ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Baosheng Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cell Distribution ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract We retrospectively enrolled 825 breast cancer patients, who was primarily diagnosed in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2014 and explored the relationship between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and long-term prognosis in patients with breast cancer. There were 412 patients with high RDW (RDW > 13.82) and 413 patients with low RDW (RDW ≤ 13.82). Compared with low RDW group, the high w group has large tumor size (the rate of tumor size >2 cm: 60.7 vs 44.8%, P=0.013). The rate of lymph node metastases was higher in the high RDW group thaten that in the low RDW group (62.1 vs 45.8%, P=0.000). RDW was positively associated with tumor stage. The high RDW tended to be advanced stage (P=0.000). Compared with low RDW group, the high RDW group tended to be higher lymphocyte count (P=0.004), elevated fibrinogen (P=0.043), and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P=0.000). The Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated elevated RDW was positively associated with disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.004) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.011). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the high RDW group had poorer OS (Hazard risk [HR] = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.62–3.21; P=0.024) and DFS (HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.28–3.62; P=0.000) compared with low RDW group. The present study found that high pretreatment RDW levels in breast cancer patients were associated with poor OS and DFS. RDW could be a potential predictive factor in differential diagnosis of poor prognosis from all patients.

scholarly journals Synchronous and Metachronous Breast Malignancies: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambrogio P. Londero ◽  
Sergio Bernardi ◽  
Serena Bertozzi ◽  
Vito Angione ◽  
Giuliana Gentile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Unilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective. There is increasing interest in patients with metachronous (MBC) and synchronous breast cancer (SBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and outcome of MBCs and SBCs.Methods. A retrospective study on women operated in our department for breast cancer between 2002 and 2005 was carried out. Patients were divided into three groups: women with MBC, SBC, and unilateral breast cancer (UBC). Moreover, we performed a meta-analysis of the English literature about multiple breast cancers between 2000 and 2011 taking into consideration their prevalence and overall survival (OS).Results. We identified 584 breast cancer patients: 16 women (3%) presented SBC and 40 MBC (7%, second cancer after 72-month follow-up IQR 40–145). Although the meta-analysis showed significant OS differences between MBC or SBC and UBC, we did not observe any significant OS difference among the three groups of our population. Anyway, we found a significant worse disease-free survival in MBC than UBC and a significant higher prevalence of radical surgery in MBC and SBC than UBC.Conclusions.Despite the low prevalence of MBC and SBC, the presence of a long time risk of MBC confirms the crucial role of ipsi- and contralateral mammographies in the postoperative follow-up.

scholarly journals Outcome of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Doxorubicin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy As a Function ofHER2andTOP2AStatus

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (24) ◽  
pp. 3881-3886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Tubbs ◽  
William E. Barlow ◽  
G. Thomas Budd ◽  
Eric Swain ◽  
Peggy Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Amplification Ratio

PurposeAmplification and deletion of the TOP2A gene have been reported as positive predictive markers of response to anthracycline-based therapy. We determined the status of the HER2 and TOP2A genes in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C).Patients and MethodsTOP2A/CEP17 and HER2/CEP17 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from 2,123 of the 3,125 women with moderate-risk primary breast cancer who received equivalent doses of either concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy with A plus C (n = 1,592) or sequential A followed by C (n = 1,533).ResultsAn abnormal TOP2A genotype was identified for 153 (9.4%) of 1,626 patients (4.0% amplified; 5.4% deleted). An abnormal HER2 genotype was identified for 303 (20.4%) of 1,483 patients (18.8% amplified; 1.6% deleted). No significant differences in either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were identified for TOP2A. In univariate analysis, OS and DFS rates were strongly and adversely associated only with higher levels of HER2 amplification (ratio ≥ 4.0). Survival was not associated with low-level HER2 amplification (ratio ≥ 2; OS hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; P = .39; DFS HR, 1.07; P = .62), but it was associated for a ratio ≥ 4 (OS HR, 1.45; P = .03; DFS HR, 1.38; P = .033), in which analysis was adjusted for menopausal status, hormone receptor status, treatment, number of positive nodes, and tumor size.ConclusionIn this population of patients with early-stage breast cancer who were treated with adjuvant AC chemotherapy, TOP2A abnormalities were not associated with outcome. HER2 high-level amplification was a prognostic marker in anthracycline-treated patients.

scholarly journals Comparison between the american joint committee on cancer (ajcc) anatomic and prognostic stages for breast cancer

Mastology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Soares Cardoso ◽  
Marcelo Antonini Matheus de Paula Solino
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Genomic Test

Introduction: The knowledge regarding the biology of breast cancer has grown substantially and resulted in the identification of different breast cancer subtypes based on their molecular profile, which led to an important change in treatment, from a standardized therapy to a personalized one. A panel of experts and AJCC representatives were responsible for preparing the most recent Cancer Staging Manual. The panel recognized the clinical usefulness of biological factors such as histological grade, expression of hormone receptors (HR; estrogen and progesterone) and overexpression and/or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in predicting patient survival7 and incorporated data regarding these biomarkers in the new staging system. In addition, for eligible cases, the ‘Recurrence score’ was also incorporated, generated by the analysis of OncotypeDx (genomic test). The new manual, therefore, started to use 3 stagings. Anatomical staging – based on the classic TNM; clinical prognostic staging and pathological prognosis – association of TNM with prognostic biomarkers (using clinical data in the first and data after surgical treatment in the second). Objective: To verify the agreement between anatomical staging from the 7th edition of the AJCC manual and the prognosis from its 8th edition in a cohort of breast cancer patients at the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. Methodology: Observational and cross-sectional study, which evaluated patients undergoing surgical treatment at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual from March, 2014 to March, 2019. Information was collected regarding age, menopausal status, tumor characteristics, anatomical and clinical staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and type of surgery performed. Patients were staged using the digital platform “TNM8 Breast Cancer Calculator”. Results: 805 patients were included in the analysis. All patients were females aged between 29 and 97 years, mostly in the post-menopausal period (78.88%). 74.04% of cases were positive for ER, 66.21% PR-positive, and 88.07% HER2-negative. Prognostic staging downgraded a total of 285 out of 805 patients (35.4%). Almost all of the cases that decreased in staging were ER and/or PR+ (283 of 285). Most of those who went up were Triple Negatives (100 out of 111). Conclusion: Prognostic Staging changes the staging in almost half of the cases and there was a greater number of decreased staging in total and an association of increased staging with tumors considered to have a worse prognosis, which is in agreement with several studies already carried out since the new manual came out.

Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị ung thư biểu mô tuyến vú ở phụ nữ lớn tuổi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuc Huan Nguyen Tran
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Elderly Woman ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Younger Women

Background: Increasing age is the most prevalent, primary risk factor for breast cancer. However, the treatment of breast cancer in older women were less active than younger women and there is a relative lack of evidence-based guidelines to inform the treatment of breast cancer in elderly woman. In this study, we evaluated the results of treatment of breast cancer in elderly woman based on the tumor characteristics. Material and methods: This study was designed with 60 breast cancer patients older than 65 years old. Evaluation of clinical, subclinical characteristics and treatment results initially (disease-free survival and total survival after 2 years) of this group. Results: We conducted a study of 60 elderly woman with breast cancer. The majority of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (90%), histological grade I, II (76,3%) and the patients with stage I, II disease were 80,4%. The older patients have been found to have a greater frequency of molecular subtypes: luminal A and B (34% and 22%), however the triple-negative/basal-like was 28%. The rate of modified radical mastectomy was 93,3%, only 46,4% of patients received adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy and antibody therapy). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were 11,7% and 18,3%, mortality was 16,7% with a median follow-up of 28,03 months. Conclusions: Breast carcer in older patients has better prognosis factors than younger women. However, current adjuvant systemic therapy options for older women with breast cancer was not clear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document