scholarly journals MHC Class 1 and PDL-1 Status of Primary Tumor and Lymph Node Metastatic Tumor Tissue in Gastric Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Halil Erdogdu
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Tumor Escape ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumors

The prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer is poor. Despite the use of VEGF-, EGFR-, and HER2-targeting agents, prognosis is still poor in advanced gastric cancer. Although cancer immunotherapy responds well in some patients, clinical use is limited due to unanswered patients. For this reason, it is necessary to know the characteristics of primary and metastatic cancer cells for patient selection for immunotherapy and additional criteria are required. MHC-1 downregulation is most frequently observed in the tumor escape mechanism of cancer cells from the immune system. MHC-1 downregulation with increased PDL-1 expression of cancer cells has an important role in immune escape. MHC-1 downregulation and PDL-1 expression have been shown in many types of cancers. However, there is no study on the status of MHC-1 and PDL-1 in primary and metastatic tumor tissue. In this study, MHC-1 and PDL-1 score in primary and metastatic tumor cells was evaluated in 43 gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. According to our results, the primary tumor PDL-1 score was correlated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes (r=0.258; p=0.024) and primary tumor size (r=0.341; p=0.045). A similar correlation was found between the primary tumor PDL-1 score and the metastatic tumor PDL-1 score (r=0.213; p=0.015). In our study, MHC-1 was found to be higher in primary tumors than metastatic tumors, although not statistically significant (p=0.054). The results of our study showed high MHC-1 and low PDL-1 expression in primary tumors and low MHC-1 and high PDL-1 expression in metastatic tumors. These results reveal different biological characteristics of primary and metastatic tumor cells.

Relationship of Ki-67 proliferative index and metastatic tumor of breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22190-e22190
Author(s):  
Kokoro Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Akiko Ogiya ◽  
Naoya Gomi ◽  
Rie Horii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Labeling Index ◽  
Proliferation Index ◽  
Luminal Breast Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Primary Tumors

e22190 Background: The metastatic breast tumor tends to be more aggressive with high proliferation, but this has not been proven in clinical sampling of metastatic tumors. Methods: Forty-eight patients who had histological specimens of both primary and metastatic sites of luminal breast cancer (ER and/or PgR positive and HER2 negative) were examined. We classified them as luminal A (LA) with Ki-67 labeling index of less than 14% and as luminal B (LB) with Ki-67 labeling index of more than 14%. We analyzed their overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of 1st line treatment of each subtype of primary and metastatic tumors. Results: Subtypes of primary tumors and metastatic tumors were as follows; the primary tumor: LA; 34 patients (70.8%), LB; 14 (29.2%), metastatic tumors: LA; 21 (43.8%), LB; 27 (56.2%). Patients with LA of the primary tumor demonstrated statistically longer OS (LA; 72.5 months, LB 39.6 months, p=0.009). OS depended on the subtype of the primary tumor. In contrast, patients with LB of a metastatic tumor showed a statistically worse PFS (LA; 20.5 months, LB; 11.5 months, p=0.040). PFS of the 1st line treatment for MBC depended on the subtype of the metastatic tumor. Conclusions: The frequency of LB was increased on metastatic tumors and tended to acquire a higher proliferation index. This suggests that characterization of metastatic tumors could be better as an indicator of subsequent treatment for MBC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Features of tumor heterogeneity in regional metastasis of breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 716-725
Author(s):  
K K Konyshev ◽  
S V Sazonov
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Heterogeneity ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Regional Metastases

The review looked at the issues of tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer. Tumor heterogeneity is classified according to the main feature demonstrating regional differences within a tumor (for example, heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, histological heterogeneity, heterogeneity of protein expression, etc.) and by tumor regions (differences between primary tumors and metastases, differences between cell clones within a single tumor node, etc.). Temporal heterogeneity is also distinguished, which manifests itself in the clonal evolution of tumor cells. The review covers the heterogeneity in the expression of four biomarkers from the gold standard for immunohistochemical staining of breast cancer: estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, Her2/neu and Ki67 in primary tumor tissue and regional metastases. According to various studies, discordance in estrogen receptor status of primary tumor cells and metastases was observed with a frequency of 4 to 62%, progesterone receptors from 12 to 54%, Her2/neu from 0 to 24%, Ki67 from 4 to 39%. The results of studies of changes in the expression levels of individual markers in breast cancer metastases, as well as the heterogeneity of surrogate subtypes of tumor tissue in metastasis, are briefly described. Possible reasons for heterogeneity in the expression of key prognostic and predictive markers by primary tumor and metastatic cells, such as artificial factors at the preanalytic and analytic stages of the study, polyclonality of the primary tumor before metastasis, clonal evolution of tumor cells during metastasis, selection of tumor clones under the therapy are highlighted.

FGFR3 protein expression and gene mutation in primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4577-4577
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Lillian Werner ◽  
Aristotelis Bamias ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Fabio A. B. Schutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Therapeutic Target ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Copy Number Gain ◽  
Tissue Microarrays ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Fgfr3 Mutation

4577 Background: FGFR3 protein expression may represent a valid therapeutic target in metastatic UC. The prevalence of both mutation and overexpression is unknown in metastatic UC. Methods: Tissue microarrays of formalin fixed paraffin-embedded urothelial carcinomas (UC) were stained for FGFR3 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) [primary (n=250); metastatic (n=31); of which (n=14) were paired]. FGFR3 immunostaining was scored as negative or positive based on previously reported scoring systems. FGFR3 mutation in primary tumors was assessed by iPlex and confirmed by hME sequencing (n=141) or Affymetrix OncoScan FFPE Express 2.0 (primary: n=17; metastases n=31). Results: FGFR3 IHC positivity was present in 48% of metastases (95% CI=32-65%) and 26% of primary tumors, (95%=CI 21-32%), though strong staining was rare (<1%). Paired primary and metastatic tumors were both negative in 50% of cases, with 14% positive only in the metastasis, 14% positive only in the primary tumor, and 21% positive in both. If the primary tumor showed staining, 71% of the metastases showed staining. FGFR3 IHC staining did not impact overall survival (p=0.8). FGFR3 mutations were observed in 9.6% of metastatic tumors (95% CI=3.3-25%), compared to 3.5% of primary tumors (95% CI=1.5%-8%). Co-occurrence of mutation and FGFR3 DNA copy number gain was observed in one specimen. Conclusions: FGFR3 IHC staining is present 26 % of primary tumors of patients who go on to develop metastatic disease, and nearly half of metastatic tumor sites. FGFR3 mutation frequency in primary and metastatic tumor specimens is low. Further investigation of the frequency of FGFR3 protein expression in metastases is needed. The presence of FGFR3 protein by IHC staining in primary and metastatic specimens suggests that FGFR3 may represent a therapeutic target even in the absence of mutation. Further functional studies are needed.

scholarly journals Self-targeting of TNF-releasing cancer cells in preclinical models of primary and metastatic tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (8) ◽  
pp. 2223-2228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Dondossola ◽  
Andrey S. Dobroff ◽  
Serena Marchiò ◽  
Marina Cardó-Vila ◽  
Hitomi Hosoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Mammary Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Lung Carcinoma Cells

Circulating cancer cells can putatively colonize distant organs to form metastases or to reinfiltrate primary tumors themselves through a process termed “tumor self-seeding.” Here we exploit this biological attribute to deliver tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF), a potent antitumor cytokine, directly to primary and metastatic tumors in a mechanism that we have defined as “tumor self-targeting.” For this purpose, we genetically engineered mouse mammary adenocarcinoma (TSA), melanoma (B16-F10), and Lewis lung carcinoma cells to produce and release murine TNF. In a series of intervention trials, systemic administration of TNF-expressing tumor cells was associated with reduced growth of both primary tumors and metastatic colonies in immunocompetent mice. We show that these malignant cells home to tumors, locally release TNF, damage neovascular endothelium, and induce massive cancer cell apoptosis. We also demonstrate that such tumor-cell–mediated delivery avoids or minimizes common side effects often associated with TNF-based therapy, such as acute inflammation and weight loss. Our study provides proof of concept that genetically modified circulating tumor cells may serve as targeted vectors to deliver anticancer agents. In a clinical context, this unique paradigm represents a personalized approach to be translated into applications potentially using patient-derived circulating tumor cells as self-targeted vectors for drug delivery.

scholarly journals Brain metastasis PD-L1 and CD8 expression is dependent on primary tumor type and its PD-L1 and CD8 status

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000597
Author(s):  
Florian Camy ◽  
Georgia Karpathiou ◽  
Jean Marc Dumollard ◽  
Nicolas Magne ◽  
Jean Luc Perrot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Product Limit ◽  
Simple Regression Analysis ◽  
Primary Tumor Type

BackgroundBrain metastases (Bmets) are frequent; however, limited data exist on the efficacy of immunotherapy in these lesions. The aims of the study were to analyze the immunohistochemical expressions of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CD8 in Bmets and to compare them with their expressions in paired primary tumors, as well as correlate the results with clinicopathological features.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 233 patients with Bmets and 111 paired primaries. Clinical, histological, and molecular data were recorded and compared with the immunohistochemical results of PD-L1 and CD8 expressions. The statistical analysis included χ2 test, Cramer’s V test, factorial analyses of variance, simple regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank product limit estimation.ResultsPD-L1 expression was found in 23.6% of Bmets and in 29.0% of primary tumors with concordant expression between them in 75.5% of cases. Bmets PD-L1 expression was associated with primary tumor PD-L1 expression and the primary tumor type. Significant CD8 peritumoral expression was found in 68.6% of Bmets and in 87.7% of primary tumors. CD8 expression was concordant between primary and metastatic tumors in 73.3% of cases. Bmets CD8 expression was associated with primary tumor CD8 expression and primary tumor type. PD-L1 expression was associated with CD8 expression in both primary and metastatic tumors. The concordance between primary and metastatic tumor PD-L1 expression was independent of all factors studied. The concordance between primary and metastatic CD8 expressions was marginally associated to the time of Bmets development. No prognostic role for PD-L1 and CD8 expression in Bmets was found.ConclusionPD-L1 and CD8 Bmets expressions are associated with the primary tumor type and its PD-L1 and CD8 expressions. No factor predicts the discordance for PD-L1 expression, while time to Bmets development is associated with CD8 expression discordance.

Systematic assessment of intra- and peri-metastatic tumor budding in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 626-626
Author(s):  
Annika Blank ◽  
Sandra Burren ◽  
Inti Zlobec ◽  
Heather Dawson ◽  
Alessandro Lugli
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Tumor Budding ◽  
Primary Tumors

626 Background: Tumor budding is a strong independent prognostic factor in primary colorectal cancer (CRC). The prognosis of stage IV CRC is still poor and there is need for biomarkers to facilitate the clinical management. Data on tumor budding in colorectal cancer distant metastases (CRDM) are still missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze its role in tumor progression. Methods: 73 stage IV CRC with clinico-pathological data were retrieved from a cohort of 331 CRC patients, surgically treated between 2002 and 2013 at the University Hospital of Bern. Tumor budding was visualized immunohistochemically by pan-cytokeratin staining. Tumor budding was defined as intra- and peri-tumoral budding in the primary tumor (ITB = buds in the tumor center; PTB = buds at the tumor margin), intra- and perinodal budding (INB and PNB) and intra- and peri-metastatic tumor budding (IMB and PMB). Overall tumor budding was defined as tumor buds independent of the center and margin (OTB, ONB, OMB). The tumor bud count was assessed by calculating the mean number of tumor buds in 10 high power fields. For survival analysis a cut off of 10 tumor buds was applied to subdivide the tumors with low and high numbers of tumor buds. Results: In lymph nodes and CRDM, the tumor bud count was lower compared to primary tumors (PNB: 13; INB: 18; ONB: 21 vs PMB: 10; IMB: 21; OMB: 22 vs PTB: 23; ITB: 24; OTB: 33). For PTB/PNB and OTB/ONB, there were significant differences between primary tumor and lymph node metastasis (PTB/PNB: p < 0.001; OTB/ONB: 0.008) and primary tumor and distant metastases (PTB/PMB: p < 0.001; OTB/OMB: 0.007). The presence of PMB was predicted by INB, PNB and V1 (p = 0.032, p = 0.001 and p = 0.003). A trend towards a worse prognosis in patients with a high OMB number was observed. Conclusions: Tumor budding is present in lymph node and distant metastases of CRC, but its number is lower compared to the corresponding primary tumor. As tumor budding in local and distant metastases seems to be a predictor of tumor progression, these novel data should be considered as a basis for further analysis in large and multicentric clinical trials.

scholarly journals Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma Cells Exhibit Reduced Adhesion Strength and Enhanced Thermogenesis

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1213
Author(s):  
Zihe Huo ◽  
Mariana Sá Santos ◽  
Astrid Drenckhan ◽  
Stefan Holland-Cunz ◽  
Jakob R. Izbicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Adhesion Strength ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Carcinoma Cell ◽  
Metastatic Potential ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Metastatic Cell ◽  
Carcinoma Cell Lines

Despite continuous improvements in multimodal therapeutic strategies, esophageal carcinoma maintains a high mortality rate. Metastases are a major life-limiting component; however, very little is known about why some tumors have high metastatic potential and others not. In this study, we investigated thermogenic activity and adhesion strength of primary tumor cells and corresponding metastatic cell lines derived from two patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. We hypothesized that the increased metastatic potential of the metastatic cell lines correlates with higher thermogenic activity and decreased adhesion strength. Our data show that patient-derived metastatic esophageal tumor cells have a higher thermogenic profile as well as a decreased adhesion strength compared to their corresponding primary tumor cells. Using two paired esophageal carcinoma cell lines of primary tumor and lymph nodes makes the data unique. Both higher specific thermogenesis profile and decreased adhesion strength are associated with a higher metastatic potential. They are in congruence with the clinical patient presentation. Understanding these functional, biophysical properties of patient derived esophageal carcinoma cell lines will enable us to gain further insight into the mechanisms of metastatic potential of primary tumors and metastases. Microcalorimetric evaluation will furthermore allow for rapid assessment of new treatment options for primary tumor and metastases aimed at decreasing the metastatic potential.

Genetic and immune divergence in pancreatic cancer lesions at the time of metastatic relapse compared to primary tumor.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4140-4140
Author(s):  
Bereket Gebregziabher ◽  
Derek A. Oldridge ◽  
Emma E. Furth ◽  
Michael D. Feldman ◽  
Andrew J. Rech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Metastatic Relapse ◽  
Resected Tumor ◽  
First Relapse

4140 Background: Relapse of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is common even after complete resection and adjuvant therapy. Compared to the resected tumor, the biological characteristics of metastatic tumors at the time of first relapse are poorly understood. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) (250x) and bulk RNA sequencing were performed on samples from 30 patients with PDA. Paired primary tumor samples were obtained after R0 or R1 resection, and metastatic tumor samples were obtained by biopsy at the time of first relapse. 74.1% of patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, 7.4% had received adjuvant chemotherapy only, and 3.7% had received adjuvant radiation therapy only. Most common metastatic sites were liver and lung. The cohort was 60% male with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years. The vast majority of patients had stage IIA or IIB disease at diagnosis. Median disease-free survival was 481 days. Analysis used Freebayes (somatic variant calling), Kallisto (transcript quantification), Danaher et al. (cell type deconvolution), and antigen.garnish (neoantigen prediction). Results: High-quality WES and/or RNA sequencing were available for 27/30 patients. Among these were 16 pairs of primary and metastatic samples for WES and 15 paired samples for RNA sequencing. Median tumor purity was 32% (primary) and 42% (metastatic). KRAS mutations were present in 43/48 evaluable samples, with conserved KRAS mutations in 14/16 primary-metastatic pairs. Tumors were otherwise highly variable, with 13/16 patients developing oncogenic mutations in metastatic tumors that were undetected in primary tumors (BRCA1 [3/16], AKT3 [3/16], TP53 [2/16], ROS1 [2/16]). Overall, primary and metastatic tumors had similar tumor mutation burden and neoantigen production rate. However, neoantigens were highly variable at the peptide and gene level, with conservation rates of 2.73% and 11.57%, respectively, across primary-metastatic pairs. PDA transcriptomic subtype also differed across primary-metastatic pairs in all cases. Furthermore, metastatic tumors contained lower immune suppressive signal by transcripts and deconvolution (CTLA4: p = 0.0012, FOXP3: p = 0.0026, PDCD11: p = 0.012, regulatory T cells: p = 0.012), while myeloid cells were higher (CD33: p = 0.0067). Conclusions: With the exception of KRAS, metastatic PDA tumors at relapse contain new oncogenes, distinct neoantigens, and lower immune-suppressive signal compared to primary PDA tumors. These data suggest a potential clinical utility for tumor biopsies at the time of first metastatic relapse and caution against clinical decisions for relapsed, metastatic patients based solely on sequencing of the originally resected tumor.

scholarly journals TTF1 is a differentially expressed gene in both lymph node and brain metastases in human breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Differentially Expressed Gene ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
The Brain

Metastasis to the brain is a clinical problem in patients with breast cancer (1-3). We mined published microarray data (4, 5) to compare primary and metastatic tumor transcriptomes for the discovery of genes associated with brain metastasis in humans with metastatic breast cancer. We found that transcription termination factor 1, encoded by TTF1, was among the genes whose expression was most quantitatively different in the brain metastases of patients with metastatic breast cancer. TTF1 mRNA was present at decreased quantities in brain metastatic tissues as compared to primary tumors of the breast. Importantly, expression of TTF1 in primary tumors was significantly correlated with patient distant metastasis-free survival in patients with breast cancer. Modulation of TTF1 expression may be relevant to the biology by which tumor cells metastasize from the breast to the brain. These data are one piece of evidence suggesting a common ancestor or tumor clone for brain and lymph node metastases that originate from the primary tumor, alluding to patterns in developmental origin and migratory pathways through the lymph node in human brain metastatic breast cancer.

scholarly journals Mitochondria Targeting as an Effective Strategy for Cancer Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poorva Ghosh ◽  
Chantal Vidal ◽  
Sanchareeka Dey ◽  
Li Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Mitochondrial Respiration ◽  
Mitochondrial Dynamics ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Atp Production ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Mitochondrial Alterations ◽  
Mitochondria Targeting

Mitochondria are well known for their role in ATP production and biosynthesis of macromolecules. Importantly, increasing experimental evidence points to the roles of mitochondrial bioenergetics, dynamics, and signaling in tumorigenesis. Recent studies have shown that many types of cancer cells, including metastatic tumor cells, therapy-resistant tumor cells, and cancer stem cells, are reliant on mitochondrial respiration, and upregulate oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity to fuel tumorigenesis. Mitochondrial metabolism is crucial for tumor proliferation, tumor survival, and metastasis. Mitochondrial OXPHOS dependency of cancer has been shown to underlie the development of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that elevated heme synthesis and uptake leads to intensified mitochondrial respiration and ATP generation, thereby promoting tumorigenic functions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Also, lowering heme uptake/synthesis inhibits mitochondrial OXPHOS and effectively reduces oxygen consumption, thereby inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, migration, and tumor growth in NSCLC. Besides metabolic changes, mitochondrial dynamics such as fission and fusion are also altered in cancer cells. These alterations render mitochondria a vulnerable target for cancer therapy. This review summarizes recent advances in the understanding of mitochondrial alterations in cancer cells that contribute to tumorigenesis and the development of drug resistance. It highlights novel approaches involving mitochondria targeting in cancer therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document