Abstract. Anthropogenic and natural emissions influence the tropospheric ozone budget, thereby affecting air-quality and climate. To study the influence of different emission sources on the ozone budget, often source apportionment studies with a tagged tracer approach are performed. Studies investigating air quality issues usually rely on regional models with a high spatial resolution, while studies focusing on climate related questions often use coarsely resolved global models. It is well known that simulated ozone concentrations depend on the resolution of the model and the resolution of the emission inventory. Whether the contributions simulated by source apportionment approaches also depend on the model resolution, however, is still unclear. Therefore, this study is a first attempt to analyse the impact of the model, the model resolution, and the emission inventory resolution on simulated ozone contributions diagnosed with a tagging method. The differences of the ozone contributions caused by these factors are compared with differences which arise due to different emission inventories. To do so we apply the MECO(n) model system which on-line couples a global chemistry-climate model with a regional chemistry-climate model equipped with a tagging scheme for source apportionment. The results of the global model (300 km resolution) are compared with the results of the regional model at 50 km (Europe) and 12 km (Germany) resolution. Averaged over Europe the simulated contributions of land transport emissions to ground-level ozone differ by 10 % at maximum. For other anthropogenic emission sources the differences are in the same order of magnitude, while the contribution of stratospheric ozone to ground level ozone differs by up to 30 % on average. This suggests that ozone contributions of anthropogenic emission sources averaged on continental scale are rather robust with respect to different models, model and emission inventory resolutions. On regional scale, however, we quantified differences of the contribution of land transport emissions to ozone of up to 20 %. Depending on the region the largest differences are either caused by inter model differences, or differences of the anthropogenic emission inventories. Clearly, the results strongly depend on the compared models and emission inventories and cannot necessarily be generalised, however we show how the inclusion of source apportionment methods can help in analysing inter-model differences.