scholarly journals Intervention of WeChat Group Guidance in Rapid Rehabilitation after Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Yingying Lin ◽  
Ying Wei ◽  
Xiuying Chen ◽  
Yuping Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Quality Score ◽  
Quality Rating ◽  
And Child Health ◽  
Group Guidance

Gynecological laparoscopic surgery is the current routine treatment. Although the injury is relatively small, it is still a traumatic operation and also increases the recovery speed of patients. This paper mainly explores the intervention effect of rapid rehabilitation after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by means of WeChat group guidance based on the information adoption model and UTAUT model. Gynecological patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and met the inclusion and exclusion conditions in a provincial maternal and child health hospital were selected as the research objects. The WeChat intervention group was compared with the nonintervention group, and the oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), and 40-item recovery quality rating scale (QoR-40) were used as the scoring criteria. The results showed that the postoperative VRS and BCS scores in the WeChat intervention group were significantly lower than those in the nonintervention group. The total score of QoR-40 in both groups decreased compared with that before operation, reached the lowest on the first day after operation, and began to rise from the second day. This result is consistent with the patient’s postoperative recovery process. After operation, the total score of the WeChat intervention group on days 1 and 2 was higher than that of the non-WeChat intervention group. By comparing the results of the patient’s postoperative oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40), etc., it can be shown that the overall recovery quality of the WeChat intervention group was better during these two days. In each section, the oral description score (VRS) and the 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40) indicated that the pain sensation and emotional state scores of patients in the WeChat intervention group were higher than those in the nonintervention group, while the comfort score (BCS) was lower, indicating better comfort in the WeChat intervention group.

Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS) and Associated Patient Characteristics (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Lambrecht ◽  
Nicolas Vuillerme ◽  
Christina Raab ◽  
David Simon ◽  
Eva-Maria Messner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
End Users ◽  
Quality Score ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Subjective Quality ◽  
Ehealth Literacy ◽  
Rheumatic Patients

BACKGROUND Mobile applications promise to improve current health care. A growing number app quality studies exist to help patients and physicians choose appropriate, helpful and useful applications. However, current mobile app quality ratings are mostly physician-based. They exclude patients although as end-users, patients are able to provide the most relevant feedback. In a recent physician-based review of rheumatic apps, Rheuma Auszeit received the best overall rating (4.2/5), however this app has never been systematically evaluated by the intended end-users, rheumatic patients. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was (1) to assess the quality of Rheuma Auszeit by rheumatic patients and (2) to evaluate the association between uMARS (User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale) scores and patients’ characteristics. METHODS Consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis were seen at the rheumatology clinic at university hospital Erlangen, Germany. They were asked to evaluate the app Rheuma Auszeit using the uMARS and to complete a paper-based survey evaluating the individual preferences, attitudes and ehealth literacy. uMARS assesses the dimensions of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, and subjective quality on 5-point scales. The association between uMARS scores and patients’ characteristics was further explored. RESULTS Between December 2018 and January 2019, a total of 126 patients evaluated Rheuma Auszeit using uMARS and filled out the paper-based survey. The median uMARS score was 3.9, IQR 0.7. Functionality was the domain with the highest rating (median 4.8, IQR 0.8), followed by aesthetics (median 4.0, IQR 0.7), information (median 3.5, IQR 0.8), and engagement (median 3.2, IQR 1.0). Subjective quality was average (median 3.0, IQR 1.0). The lowest scoring individual item was customization with a median of 2.5/5. Lower functionality scores were reported among older female rheumatic patients (P<.004). Older male rheumatic patients reported a higher subjective quality score (P<.024). Perceived disease activity and disease duration did not significantly correlate with any uMARS subdomain scores. eHealth literacy significantly correlated with functionality uMARS subdomain ratings (Rho=0.18; P<.042). Preferred time of app usage significantly correlated with engagement (Rho=0.20; P<.024), functionality (Rho=0.19; P<.029), total uMARS score (Rho=0.21; P<.017) and subjective quality score (Rho=0.21; P<.017). The vast majority of rheumatic patients would consider recommending Rheuma Auszeit to other patients (117/126; 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS Rheuma Auszeit was well accepted by patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondyloarthritis. Lacking customization could lead to low app compliance and should be improved. The study highlights the potential and feasibility of therapeutic complementary digital solutions in rheumatology.

scholarly journals Extended Duration Regional Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Five Days to Three Days of Continuous Adductor Canal Ropivacaine Infusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Sargant ◽  
M. J. Lennon ◽  
R. J. Khan ◽  
D. Fick ◽  
H. Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Numeric Rating

There is a growing body of evidence in favour of continuous adductor canal block (CACB) for total knee arthroplasty. However, there are no studies describing the optimal duration of the infusion. At our institution the usual practice was to stop the infusion on day three. Our hypothesis was that extending the infusion to five days would improve analgesia and quality of recovery. A prospective, non-blinded, randomised trial was undertaken. Patients received a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine via an adductor canal catheter for either three or five days. Primary outcome was pain while walking during the 24-hour period up to day five (numeric rating scale from 0 to 10). The minimum clinically important difference was set at 1.5 on the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcome measures included quality of recovery, mobility, pain while walking on postoperative day six, Oxford Knee Scores, and complications. Eighty-six patients were recruited with 43 randomised to each group. Seventy-eight were analysed. Median pain scores reported on day five were significantly better in the intervention group (1 versus 3, P=0.003). Furthermore, quality of recovery (QOR-15) scores were significantly better in the intervention group (133.6 versus 123.4, P=0.017). No statistically significant difference between groups was identified for other secondary outcome measures. CACB prolonged to five days provides superior analgesia and a higher quality of recovery on postoperative days four and five compared to a three-day infusion. This benefit did not extend beyond the period of infusion.

Occupational Performance, Self-Esteem, and Quality of Life in Substance Addictions Recovery

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Martin ◽  
Michelle Bliven ◽  
Rosemary Boisvert
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Occupational Performance ◽  
Therapy Services ◽  
Version 2.0 ◽  
Recovery Program

A non-randomized pretest—posttest design was used to evaluate changes in occupational performance, self-esteem, and quality of life among clients completing a substance abuse recovery program that included occupational therapy services addressing life skills. Seventy-five clients participated in intake and discharge assessment (4- to 6-month interval) that used the Occupational Performance History Interview (Version 2.0), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Quality of Life Rating scale. A limited number of follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months were also conducted. Marked improvement with significant differences and large effect sizes were found between intake and discharge scores for all measures. Most clients scored in the range of moderate occupational dysfunction at discharge, when their highest performance level was seen. Follow-up data revealed that occupational performance declined at 3 months and improved again at 6 months. Change in occupational performance is clearly reflected in the recovery process, but recovery is challenged when clients leave the supportive halfway house environment.

Effects of Helichrysum Psudoplicatum supplementation on pruritus intensity, fatigue, quality of life and anorexia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Mohajeranirad ◽  
Naser Saeidi ◽  
Mohammad Kamali Nejad ◽  
Amir Almasi-Hashiani ◽  
Mehdi Salehi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Abstract Objectives Anorexia, fatigue and pruritus are common complications of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Today, the use of medicinal plants is more than synthetic drugs due to their safety. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of Helichrysum psudoplicatum (H. psudoplicatum) supplementation on biochemical parameters, pruritus intensity, fatigue, quality of life and anorexia in HD patients. Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed on 50 subjects with, aged 55–65 years old. HD patients were randomly divided into two groups. Intervention group received 250 mg/day of H. psudoplicatum supplement capsule for 6 weeks (n=25), and the placebo group was given placebo capsule for the same time duration and dosage (n=25). The serum concentrations of urea, creatinine, albumin and hemoglobin were measured enzymatically methods. Anorexia, pruritus intensity, quality of life the dialysis patients with pruritus and fatigue score was measured using a Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ), Numerical rating scale (NRS), Fatigue severity scale (FSS) and ItchyQoL questionnaire, respectively. Shapiro–Wilk and independent-samples t-test or Mann–Whitney test were used for the analysis of the data. Results The results showed that the H. psudoplicatum supplementation significantly improved the pruritus intensity, quality of life the dialysis patients with pruritus and fatigue in HD patients, for 6 weeks (p<0.001). However, it did not significantly effect on the anorexia, albumin, hemoglobin, urea, creatinine, arm circumference, and body mass index (p>0.05). Conclusions According to the results of this study, H. psudoplicatum supplementation can be effective as an adjunct therapy to improve pruritus intensity, quality of life, fatigue and relative improvement of anorexia in HD patients.

scholarly journals Evaluation of teaching an integrated case formulation approach on the quality of case formulations: randomised controlled trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 140-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abbas ◽  
Ruth Walton ◽  
Allan Johnston ◽  
Millicent Chikoore
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Formulation ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Aims and methodThis paper introduces a new approach to producing case formulations, the integrated case formulation (ICF) approach, and a rating scale, the Case Formulation Scale (CFS). Twenty-four psychiatrists participated in a single-blind randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching using this new approach. The intervention group (n = 12) received teaching about using ICF, whereas the control group (n = 12) received teaching as usual. The scores on the CFS were compared before and after teaching.ResultsPrior to teaching, psychiatric trainees had poor scores on the CFS. The CFS score for the group taught the ICF approach improved five times more than the control group.Clinical implicationsThis study demonstrates that case formulation skills can be taught. With further improvements, the ICF approach might be useful in the teaching of case formulation.

scholarly journals Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Patient-Based Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Lambrecht ◽  
Nicolas Vuillerme ◽  
Christina Raab ◽  
David Simon ◽  
Eva-Maria Messner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Quality Score ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Subjective Quality ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ehealth Literacy ◽  
Rheumatic Patients

Introduction: Mobile applications promise to improve current health care. However, current mobile app quality ratings are mostly physician-based. The aim of this study was (1) to assess the quality of the self-management app Rheuma Auszeit using the validated uMARS (User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale) app quality assessment tool and (2) to evaluate the association between uMARS scores and patients' characteristics.Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis were seen at the rheumatology clinic at university hospital Erlangen, Germany. They were asked to test Rheuma Auszeit, evaluate its quality using uMARS and complete a paper-based survey evaluating the individual preferences, attitudes and ehealth literacy. The association between uMARS scores and patients' characteristics was further explored.Results: Between December 2018 and January 2019, a total of 126 patients evaluated Rheuma Auszeit using uMARS and filled out the paper-based survey. The median uMARS score was 3.9, IQR 0.7. Functionality was the domain with the highest rating (median 4.8, IQR 0.8), followed by aesthetics (median 4.0, IQR 0.7), information (median 3.5, IQR 0.8), and engagement (median 3.2, IQR 1.0). Subjective quality was average (median 3.0, IQR 1.0). The lowest scoring individual item was customization with a median of 2.5/5. Lower functionality scores were reported among older female rheumatic patients (P &lt; 0.004). Older male rheumatic patients reported a higher subjective quality score (P &lt; 0.024). Perceived disease activity and disease duration did not significantly correlate with any uMARS subdomain scores. eHealth literacy significantly correlated with functionality uMARS subdomain ratings (Rho = 0.18; P &lt; 0.042). Preferred time of app usage significantly correlated with engagement (Rho = 0.20; P &lt; 0.024), functionality (Rho = 0.19; P &lt; 0.029), total uMARS score (Rho = 0.21; P &lt; 0.017) and subjective quality score (Rho = 0.21; P &lt; 0.017). The vast majority of rheumatic patients would consider recommending Rheuma Auszeit to other patients (117/126; 92.9%).Conclusion: Rheuma Auszeit was well-accepted by German patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondyloarthritis. Lacking customization could lead to low app compliance and should be improved. Lower functionality scores among older female rheumatic patients highlight the need for patient education. The study underlines the potential and feasibility of therapeutic complementary digital solutions in rheumatology.

scholarly journals The Effects of Brain Gym on Quality of Sleep, Anxiety in Elderly at Nursing Home Care Case Medan

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (16) ◽  
pp. 2595-2598
Author(s):  
Elmeida Efffendy ◽  
Novi Prasanty ◽  
Nurul Utami
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Nursing Home Care ◽  
Cellular Damage ◽  
Quality Of Sleep ◽  
Brain Gym ◽  
Post Test

BACKGROUND: The ageing process of human will cause changes in anatomy and physiology. Biologically, ageing is associated with the gradual accumulation of various molecular and cellular damage. Disorders of sleep quality are influenced by several factors, such as the medical condition of illness, stress, anxiety, and others. Brain gym is a collection of simple movements that aim to connect or unite the mind and body. AIM: To find out the effect of brain gym in the quality of sleep and anxiety in the elderly at nursing home Karya Kasih Medan. SETTING AND DESIGN: This is an experimental pre and post-test design with non-probability consecutive sampling. METHODS: This study involved 68 elderly who undergone brain gym for eight weeks. These patients were recruited from the nursing home Karya Kasih Medan, Indonesia. This study was conducted in July-November 2018. This study was approved by the local ethical committee. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is used to assess sleep quality. Anxiety is assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HARS). Data were analysed by paired t-test of SPSS version 22. RESULTS: PSQI score pre-test [mean (SD); 16.39 (0.68)] and post-test [mean (SD); 8.99 (0.89)], (p < 0.001). HARS score pre-test [mean (SD); 20.4 (6.7)] after post-test [mean (SD); 10.7 (5.2)], (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Brain gym increased the score level of the PSQI and HARS in the intervention group (p < 0.001).

scholarly journals Effect of chewing gum on the postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
Binti Bhatiyani ◽  
Pandeeswari . ◽  
Dolly Bhasani ◽  
Shrikant Dhumale
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Chewing Gum ◽  
Control Group ◽  
End Points ◽  
Bowel Motility ◽  
Bowel Sounds ◽  
Gum Chewing ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The incidence of postoperative ileus (POI) after gynaecological surgery is 10-15%. Chewing gum following general surgery improves outcomes, including early flatus, early bowel sounds, and shortening of the hospitalisation period. This study aims to investigate the effect of postoperative gum chewing on bowel motility after laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery.Methods: 101 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological conditions under general anaesthesia were recruited. 50 patients received sugar free chewing gum post operatively and the outcomes were compared with the control group. The study’s primary end points were the time to first regular bowel sounds and time to passage of flatus after surgery. Secondary end points were the time to first defecation, patient satisfaction, and potential side effects of postoperative gum chewing.Results: We found a significantly shorter interval between surgery and passage of flatus in the intervention group (median 10 hours compared with 13 hours p=0.0151) and a significantly higher rate of regular bowel sounds 3 hours (74% compared with 45%; p= 0.003) and 5 hours after surgery (91% compared with 78%; p=0.01). There was no significant difference in time to first defecation between groups (median 18 hours compared with 20 hours; p=0.222).Conclusions: Gum chewing seems to have beneficial effects on bowel motility when used in postoperative care after minimally invasive surgery. Gum chewing should be recommended to patients after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document