Prolonged Response to Regorafenib in a Patient with Iodine Refractory Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid cancer is the most common type of endocrine malignancy. Cornerstones of thyroid cancer treatment include surgery, radioactive iodine ablation, and thyroid stimulating hormone suppression. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend two tyrosine kinase inhibitors for thyroid cancer patients who are non-responsive to iodine: sorafenib and lenvatinib. Another oral kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, is not considered standard of care treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer. The chemical structures of regorafenib and sorafenib differ by a single fluorine atom. Given the significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) of sorafenib compared to placebo demonstrated in the phase 3 DECISION trial, we report on a patient with iodine-refractory follicular thyroid cancer treated with regorafenib as part of a phase 1 clinical trial. A 75 year old woman was diagnosed with follicular thyroid carcinoma in 2006 and initiated on treatment with regorafenib in 2011. She has completed 76 cycles with stable disease and pulmonary metastases 34% smaller than baseline.

Download Full-text

Brigatinib (BRG) in ALK+ crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Final results of the phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9071 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9071-9071

Author(s):

Scott N. Gettinger ◽

Rudolf M. Huber ◽

Dong-Wan Kim ◽

Lyudmila Bazhenova ◽

Karin Holmskov Hansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Long Term Follow Up

9071 Background: BRG is a kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with ALK+ metastatic NSCLC; specific details for BRG use vary by indication and country. We report long-term efficacy and safety results of the Phase 1/2 and Phase 2 (ALTA) trials of BRG. Methods: The Phase 1/2 study was a single-arm, open-label trial (NCT01449461) of BRG 30–300 mg/d in pts with advanced malignancies. ALTA (NCT02094573) randomized pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to receive BRG at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 180 mg qd with 7-d lead-in at 90 mg (arm B). For the Phase 1/2 study, investigator assessments of confirmed objective response rate (cORR; RECIST v1.1), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in pts with ALK+ NSCLC are reported. The primary endpoint of ALTA was cORR per investigator; secondary endpoints included cORR per independent review committee (IRC), DoR, PFS, and OS. Results: In the Phase 1/2 study, 137 pts received BRG; of these, 79 pts had ALK+ NSCLC (71/79 had prior CRZ; 28/79 received 180 mg qd [7-d lead-in at 90 mg]; 14/79 received 90 mg qd). In ALTA, 222 pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC were randomized (n = 112/110, arm A/B). At the end of the Phase 1/2 study (Feb 18, 2020), with median 27.7 mo follow-up (̃67 mo after last pt enrolled), 4 pts remained on BRG. At the end of ALTA (Feb 27, 2020), with median 19.6/28.3 mo follow-up in arm A/B (̃53 mo after last pt enrolled), 10/17 pts in arm A/B were still on treatment. Table shows efficacy results from final analyses with long-term follow-up. In ALTA, the IRC-assessed intracranial cORR in pts with measurable baseline brain metastases was 50% (13/26) in arm A and 67% (12/18) in arm B; Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated median intracranial DoR was 9.4 mo (95% CI, 3.7, not reached [NR]) in arm A and 16.6 mo (3.7, NR) in arm B. With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to dose interruption (Phase 1/2: 59%; ALTA arm A/B: 49%/61%), dose reduction (13%; 8%/33%), or discontinuation (10%; 4%/13%). Conclusions: BRG showed sustained long-term activity, PFS, and manageable safety in pts with CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC. The 180 mg/d dose after 7-d lead-in at 90 mg/d led to numerically higher median PFS and OS. Final results are similar to those reported for other approved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01449461, NCT02094573. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

New therapeutic advances in the management of progressive thyroid cancer

Endocrine Related Cancer ◽

10.1677/erc-08-0335 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. 715-731 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Jennifer A Woyach ◽

Manisha H Shah

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Medullary Thyroid Cancer ◽

Radioactive Iodine ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer ◽

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽

Thyroid Cancers ◽

Standard Of Care Treatment ◽

Systemic Therapies

The spectrum of thyroid cancers ranges from one of the most indolent to one of the most aggressive solid tumors identified. Conventional therapies for thyroid cancers are based on the histologic type of thyroid cancers such as papillary or follicular thyroid cancer (differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC)), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), or anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). While surgery is one of the key treatments for all such types of thyroid cancers, additional therapies vary. Effective targeted therapy for DTC is a decades-old practice with systemic therapies of thyroid stimulating hormone suppression and radioactive iodine therapy. However, for the iodine-refractory DTC, MTC, and ATC there is no effective systemic standard of care treatment. Recent advances in understanding pathogenesis of DTC and development of molecular targeted therapy have dramatically transformed the field of clinical research in thyroid cancer. Over the last five years, incredible progress has been made and phases I–III clinical trials have been conducted in various types of thyroid cancers with some remarkable results that has made an impact on lives of patients with thyroid cancer. Such history-making events have boosted enthusiasm and interest among researchers, clinicians, patients, and sponsors and we anticipate ongoing efforts to develop more effective and safe therapies for thyroid cancer.

Download Full-text

Kinase-Inhibitors in Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer—Focus on Occurrence, Mechanisms, and Management of Treatment-Related Hypertension

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms222212217 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (22) ◽

pp. 12217

Author(s):

Anne Christine Kaae ◽

Michael C. Kreissl ◽

Marcus Krüger ◽

Manfred Infanger ◽

Daniela Grimm ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Tyrosine Kinases ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Good Prognosis ◽

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽

Short Treatment ◽

Line Of Therapy

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) usually has a good prognosis when treated conventionally with thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine (RAI) and thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression, but some tumors develop a resistance to RAI therapy, requiring alternative treatments. Sorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib are multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) approved for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC. The drugs have been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) via the inhibition of different receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that are involved in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Both sorafenib and lenvatinib have been approved irrespective of the line of therapy for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC, whereas cabozantinib has only been approved as a second-line treatment. Adverse effects (AEs) such as hypertension are often seen with MKI treatment, but are generally well manageable. In this review, current clinical studies will be discussed, and the toxicity and safety of sorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib treatment will be evaluated, with a focus on AE hypertension and its treatment options. In short, treatment-emergent hypertension (TE-HTN) occurs with all three drugs, but is usually well manageable and leads only to a few dose modifications or even discontinuations. This is emphasized by the fact that lenvatinib is widely considered the first-line drug of choice, despite its higher rate of TE-HTN.

Download Full-text

Thyroid Cancers: From Surgery to Current and Future Systemic Therapies through Their Molecular Identities

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22063117 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (6) ◽

pp. 3117

Author(s):

Loredana Lorusso ◽

Virginia Cappagli ◽

Laura Valerio ◽

Carlotta Giani ◽

David Viola ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Therapeutic Option ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Thyroid Cancers ◽

Poorly Differentiated ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancers ◽

Approved Drugs ◽

New Generation ◽

Systemic Therapies

Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) are commonly and successfully treated with total thyroidectomy plus/minus radioiodine therapy (RAI). Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is only treated with surgery but only intrathyroidal tumors are cured. The worst prognosis is for anaplastic (ATC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC). Whenever a local or metastatic advanced disease is present, other treatments are required, varying from local to systemic therapies. In the last decade, the efficacy of the targeted therapies and, in particular, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated. They can prolong the disease progression-free survival and represent the most important therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced and progressive thyroid cancer. Currently, lenvatinib and sorafenib are the approved drugs for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC and PDTC while advanced MTC can be treated with either cabozantinib or vandetanib. Dabrafenib plus trametinib is the only approved treatment by FDA for BRAFV600E mutated ATC. A new generation of TKIs, specifically for single altered oncogenes, is under evaluation in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the current and future treatments of thyroid cancer with regards to the advanced and progressive cases that require systemic therapies that are becoming more and more targeted on the molecular identity of the tumor.

Download Full-text

Cabozantinib As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II International Thyroid Oncology Group Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.73.0226 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (29) ◽

pp. 3315-3321 ◽

Cited By ~ 39

Author(s):

Maria E. Cabanillas ◽

Jonas A. de Souza ◽

Susan Geyer ◽

Lori J. Wirth ◽

Michael E. Menefee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Objective Response ◽

Evaluation Criteria ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Multikinase Inhibitor

Purpose Sorafenib and lenvatinib are oral multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and approved for radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no approved second- or third-line therapies. MET is implicated in resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET in addition to VEGFR and is approved for medullary thyroid cancer. In a phase I study of cabozantinib, five of eight patients with DTC previously treated with a VEGFR-targeted therapy had an objective response to cabozantinib. Patients and Methods Patients with RAI-refractory disease with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) measurable disease and evidence of progression on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy were enrolled in this single-arm phase II study. The cabozantinib starting dose was 60 mg/day orally but could be escalated to 80 mg if the patient did not experience a response. Patients underwent tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks. In this study, if at least five of 25 response-evaluable patients had an objective response, cabozantinib would be considered a promising agent in this patient population. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 64% of patients were men. Twenty-one patients had received only one prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (sorafenib, pazopanib, or cediranib), and four patients had received two such therapies. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hypertension. One drug-related death was noted. Of the 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a partial response, 13 (52%) had stable disease, and two (8%) had nonevaluable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.7 months and 34.7 months, respectively. Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically significant, durable objective response activity in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who experienced disease progression while taking prior VEGFR-targeted therapy.

Download Full-text

Bosutinib is active in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib and dasatinib and/or nilotinib therapy failure

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2011-11-390120 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 119 (15) ◽

pp. 3403-3412 ◽

Cited By ~ 191

Author(s):

H. Jean Khoury ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Michele Baccarani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Abl Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Kaplan Meier

Bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown potent activity against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This phase 1/2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily bosutinib 500 mg in leukemia patients after resistance/intolerance to imatinib. The current analysis included 118 patients with chronic-phase CML who had been pretreated with imatinib followed by dasatinib and/or nilotinib, with a median follow-up of 28.5 months. In this subpopulation, major cytogenetic response was attained by 32% of patients; complete cytogenetic response was attained by 24%, including in one of 3 patients treated with 3 prior TKIs. Complete hematologic response was achieved/maintained in 73% of patients. On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in 5 patients. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier–estimated progression-free survival was 73% and estimated overall survival was 83%. Responses were seen across Bcr-Abl mutations, including those associated with dasatinib and nilotinib resistance, except T315I. Bosutinib had an acceptable safety profile; treatment-emergent adverse events were primarily manageable grade 1/2 gastrointestinal events and rash. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events (> 2% of patients) included diarrhea (8%) and rash (4%). Bosutinib may offer a new treatment option for patients with chronic-phase CML after treatment with multiple TKIs. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00261846.

Download Full-text

Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who have progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Results from the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.6001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6001-6001

Author(s):

Marcia S. Brose ◽

Bruce Robinson ◽

Steven I. Sherman ◽

Barbara Jarzab ◽

Chia-Chi Lin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Objective Response ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Phase 3

6001 Background: Cabozantinib (C), an inhibitor of VEGFR2, MET, AXL, and RET, showed clinical activity in patients (pts) with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in phase 1/2 studies (Cabanillas 2017; Brose 2018). This phase 3 study (NCT03690388) evaluated the efficacy and safety of C vs placebo (P) in pts with RAI-refractory DTC who had progressed during/after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy for whom there is no standard of care. Methods: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive C (60 mg QD) or P, stratified by prior lenvatinib treatment (L; yes, no) and age (≤65, > 65 yr). Pts with RAI-refractory DTC must have received L or sorafenib for DTC and progressed during or following treatment with ≤ 2 prior VEGFR inhibitors. Pts randomized to P could cross over to open-label C upon disease progression per blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in the first 100 randomized pts and progression-free survival (PFS) in all randomized pts. PFS and ORR were assessed by BIRC per RECIST v1.1. The study was designed to detect an ORR for C vs P (2-sided α = 0.01) and a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of 0.61 (90% power, 2-sided α = 0.04). A prespecified interim PFS analysis was planned for the ITT population at the time of the primary ORR analysis. Results: As of 19 Aug 2020,125 vs 62 pts had been randomized to the C and P arms, respectively; median age was 66 yr, 55% were female and 63% received prior L. Median (m) follow-up was 6.2 months (mo). At the planned interim analysis, the trial met the primary endpoint of PFS with C demonstrating significant improvement over P (HR 0.22, 96% CI 0.13–0.36; p < 0.0001). mPFS was not reached for C vs 1.9 mo for P; PFS benefit was observed in all prespecified subgroups including prior L (yes, HR 0.26; no, HR 0.11) and age (≤65 yr, HR 0.16; > 65 yr, HR 0.31). ORR was 15% for C vs 0% for P (p = 0.0281) but did not meet the prespecified criteria for statistical significance (p < 0.01). A favorable OS trend was observed for C vs P (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.27–1.11). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade with higher occurrences in the C vs P arm included diarrhea (51% vs 3%), hand-foot skin reaction (46% vs 0%), hypertension (28% vs 5%), fatigue (27% vs 8%), and nausea (24% vs 2%); grade 3/4 AEs were experienced by 57% of pts with C vs 26% with P. Dose reductions due to any grade AEs occurred in 57% of pts with C vs 5% with P. Treatment discontinuations due to AEs not related to disease progression occurred in 5% of pts with C vs 0% with P. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either arm. Conclusions: C showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in PFS over P in pts with RAI-refractory DTC after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy with no unexpected toxicities. C may represent a new standard of care in pts with previously treated DTC. Clinical trial information: NCT03690388.

Download Full-text

Salvage immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e16567 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e16567-e16567

Author(s):

Anish B. Parikh ◽

Sarah P. Psutka ◽

Yuanquan Yang ◽

Katharine Collier ◽

Abdul Miah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Combination Therapy ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Free Survival ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Combination Regimens

e16567 Background: ICI/TKI combinations are a new standard of care for the initial treatment (tx) of mRCC. Efficacy and toxicity of such combination regimens beyond the first-line (1L) setting remain unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts for adult patients (pts) receiving an ICI/TKI combination in any line of tx for mRCC of any histology at one of two academic centers as of May 1, 2020. ICIs included pembrolizumab (Pm), nivolumab (Ni), ipilimumab (Ip), or avelumab (Av); TKIs included sunitinib (Su), axitinib (Ax), pazopanib (Pz), lenvatinib (Ln), or cabozantinib (Ca). Clinical data including pt demographics, histology, International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, tx history, and ICI/TKI tx and toxicity details were recorded. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and safety, analyzed via descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 85 pts, 69 (81%) were male and 67 (79%) had clear cell histology. IMDC risk was favorable (24%), intermediate (54%), poor (20%), and unknown (2%). 39% had ICI/TKI tx in the 1L setting. ICI/TKI regimens included Pm/Ax (33%), Ni/Ca (25%), Ni/Ax (20%), Av/Ax (11%), Ni/Ip/Ca (8%), Ni/Su (2%), and Ni/Ln (1%). ORR and mPFS stratified by line of tx and prior tx are shown in the table. Of 52 pts who received ICI/TKI tx as salvage (after 1L), 52% had a grade 3 or higher (≥G3) adverse event (AE), of which the most common were anorexia (13.5%), diarrhea and hypertension (11.5% each), and fatigue (9.6%). 65% of pts on salvage ICI/TKI tx stopped tx for progression/death, while 16% stopped tx for ≥G3 AE. ≥G3 AE rates by line of tx were 62.5% (2L), 50% (3L), and 45% (≥4L). Conclusions: ICI/TKI combination therapy is effective and safe beyond the 1L setting. Prior tx history appears to impact efficacy but has less of an effect on safety/tolerability. These observations will need to be confirmed in prospective studies.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

P14.90 Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide - real-world study

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noab180.192 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. ii55-ii55

Author(s):

M J Sousa ◽

J Magalhães ◽

R Basto ◽

C Costa ◽

A Pego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Rank Test ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Current Standard ◽

Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽

Standard Of Care Treatment ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumour in adults. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM is maximal surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes and identify predictors of survival among these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis of GBM patients treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant TMZ from 2013 to 2020. The analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), each one evaluated starting from initial diagnosis, were performed. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan- Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were identified. The median age was 61 years (range 18- 80), 51 (88%) patients were in ECOG-PS 0–1, 6 (10%) patients had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 53 (91%) of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 21 months, median OS was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7–15.9), whereas median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5–10.5). The 1-year survival rate was 42% and the 2-year survival rate was 10%. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 11 (19%) patients. Twenty-five (42%) patients completed at least 6 cycles of TMZ monotherapy with statistically significant differences between this sub-group and those who weren’t able to continue TMZ monotherapy [median OS 19.3 months (95% CI 14.4–24.2) vs 10.6 months (95% CI 7.8–13.4) p<0.001]. ECOG-PS = 0 [median OS 16.7 months (95% CI 13.4–20.0, p=0.001)] and patients under 65 years of age [median OS 15.6 months (95% CI 12.3–18.9, p=0.02) were associated with significantly better median OS. CONCLUSION The current standard of care treatment for GBM remains poor. An important factor predictor of survival is the completion of the 6 maintenance cycles of TMZ. At baseline, ECOG PS and the patient’s age could be used to define patient prognosis.

Download Full-text

Surgery of locally advanced and metastatic kidney cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy: single institute experience

Tumori Journal ◽

10.5301/tj.5000596 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 104 (5) ◽

pp. 388-393

Author(s):

Alberto De Gobbi ◽

Davide Biasoni ◽

Mario Catanzaro ◽

Nicola Nicolai ◽

Luigi Piva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Target Therapy ◽

Tnm Classification ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Metastatic Tumor ◽

Grade Ii

Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common tumor of the kidney. Considering the TNM classification of 2009, locally advanced and metastatic diseases are included in the groups stage III and IV. The surgical treatment of these tumors could be divided into 3 categories: (1) curative (nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy), (2) cytoreductive, and (3) palliative. Targeted agents showed impressive antitumor efficacy and prolongation of progression-free survival. The integration between target therapy and surgery in patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC has sometimes facilitated surgery. We aimed to evaluate patients’ response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and the feasibility of surgery after that and to observe complications related to surgery. Methods: From February 2007 to September 2014 in the Istituto Tumori of Milan, IRCCS, we selected patients with locally advanced or metastatic diseases, treated with target therapy before surgery (which comprised nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, cytoreductive surgery, and metastasectomy) and cryoablation. Results: We selected 33 patients who underwent surgery after TKI therapy. As for response to TKIs, 20 patients (60%) had stable disease, 9 patients (28%) had a partial response, and 4 patients (12%) had progressive disease. A total of 17 patients (51%) presented complications directly or indirectly related to surgery and most of those were classified as grade II Clavien-Dindo score. Conclusions: The association between TKI and surgery seems to have no contraindications. Our dataset provides an example of how surgery after TKI is possible in locally advanced metastatic tumor and does not have an excessive rate of postoperative complications.

Download Full-text