scholarly journals Frequency and Clinical Impact of Serious Adverse Events on Post-Stroke Recovery with NeuroAiD (MLC601) versus Placebo: The CHInese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke Recovery Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-199
Author(s):  
Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian ◽  
Rajesh B. Moorakonda ◽  
Qingshu Lu ◽  
Christopher L.H. Chen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stroke Recovery ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety Database ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Life Threatening

Background: Most comparative clinical trials are designed to assess the treatment effect for efficacy endpoints, with less emphasis on the analysis of safety outcomes. However, an extensive analysis of safety data could demonstrate beneficial results in terms of effectiveness by reducing serious adverse events (SAEs), and their unfavourable clinical impact on the study population. We aimed to conduct an exploratory analysis of the CHInese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke recovery (CHIMES) study safety database comparing the frequency of SAEs and their clinical impacts among subjects having received MLC601 or placebo during the first 3 months post-stroke. Methods: Analyses were performed by using the safety database of the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled CHIMES study of 3 months of NeuroAiD versus placebo in subjects with acute ischaemic stroke of intermediate severity in the preceding 72 h. SAEs as reported by investigators at any time-point during the 3-month study were analysed on their frequency and that of any of their outcomes (death, and life threatening, new and/or prolonged hospitalisation, disability, and medical importance, in surviving subjects), as well as their time to onset and resolution. Results: Of the 1,099 subjects in the CHIMES study, 1,087 were included in the safety analysis (MLC601 = 542) and (placebo = 545); the 12 who did not receive study treatment were excluded. There was a total of 135 subjects with SAEs (MLC601 = 60, placebo = 75). At baseline, overall, subjects with SAEs were older and had lower MMSE score. In the MLC601 group, they had higher NIHSS score, and more frequently a history of ischaemic heart disease and hyperlipidaemia. The number of SAEs per subjects was statistically significantly lower in the MLC601 group than placebo one, especially for subjects with ≥2 SAEs (6.7 vs. 29.3%; p < 0.001). This benefit was seen throughout the study period and during the initial hospitalisation. The main clinical impact of SAEs was an increase in hospitalisation time, reduced in the MLC601 arm with the rate of subjects hospitalised for a prolonged period being significantly threefold lower in surviving subjects (1.1 vs. 3.7%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This post hoc analysis of SAEs from the CHIMES study database shows that subjects receiving a 3-month course of MLC601 experienced fewer SAEs, with lower rates of harmful clinical impacts, especially in terms of hospitalisation duration. These findings could translate to a benefit in terms of reduction of both healthcare burden and additional medical costs.

scholarly journals Safety and Tolerability of Adjunctive Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Pediatric Patients (Aged 4-17 Years) With Focal Seizures

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mintz ◽  
Jesus E. Pina-Garza ◽  
Steven M. Wolf ◽  
Patricia E. McGoldrick ◽  
Sergiusz Józwiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Eslicarbazepine Acetate ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Focal Seizures ◽  
Clear Dose Response ◽  
Cluster Seizures

Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in pediatric patients (aged 4-17 years) with refractory focal seizures. Methods: Pooled safety data from patients aged 4-17 years in Study 208 (NCT01527513) and Study 305 (NCT00988156) were analyzed. Both were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of ESL as adjunctive treatment in pediatric patients with refractory focal seizures receiving 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of special interest were evaluated. Results: The safety population comprised 362 patients (placebo, n = 160; ESL, n = 202). The overall incidence of TEAEs was similar between the ESL (67.8%) and placebo groups (65.6%), with no clear dose-response relationship. The most frequently reported TEAEs with ESL were headache, somnolence, vomiting, and diplopia. Overall incidences of SAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation were higher with ESL versus placebo (9.9% vs 5.0% and 5.9% vs 2.5%, respectively). The majority of SAEs with ESL occurred in Study 305. Two deaths were reported, 1 with ESL (0.5%) due to cluster seizures (resulting in herniation of the cerebellar tonsils) and 1 with placebo (0.6%) due to asphyxia. TEAEs related to allergic reaction, hyponatremia, hypothyroidism, cytopenia, seizure exacerbation, cognitive dysfunction, psychiatric disorders, or suicide occurred infrequently (<9%). Conclusion: Adjunctive ESL was generally well tolerated in children aged 4-17 years with focal seizures. The safety profile of ESL in children was comparable to that observed in adults.

scholarly journals First-in-Human Phase 1 Study To Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Antifungal Drug, VL-2397, in Healthy Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mammen P. Mammen ◽  
Danielle Armas ◽  
Frank H. Hughes ◽  
Andrew M. Hopkins ◽  
Cindy L. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Antifungal Drug ◽  
Renal Elimination ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Time Curve

ABSTRACT VL-2397 is an antifungal drug with a novel mechanism of action, rapid fungicidal in vitro activity, and potent in vivo activity against Aspergillus fumigatus, including azole-resistant strains. VL2397-101, a phase 1 first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study, was conducted in healthy adults to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple ascending intravenous (i.v.) doses of VL-2397. All dosing cohorts were fully enrolled; all subjects completed the safety follow-up. A safety committee reviewed the safety data for each dosing cohort prior to recommending the initiation of each subsequent cohort. No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred; the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild and self-limited. The most common drug-related TEAEs were infusion site reactions. No clinically concerning trends were noted in vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, or safety laboratory results. Following single infusions of VL-2397, the overall and maximum exposures rose less than proportionally with increasing doses from 3 mg to 1,200 mg as indicated by area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC24) and maximum concentration (Cmax). No signs of VL-2397 accumulation were observed following i.v. infusions of 300, 600, and 1,200 mg every 24 h (q24h) for 7 days. Renal elimination played a major role in total body clearance, with up to 47% of unmetabolized drug in urine 24 h after administration at single doses of >30 mg. Overall, VL-2397 dosing in the study appeared to be safe and well tolerated in the healthy subjects. The safety profile, consistent PK, and lack of drug accumulation support further development of VL-2397 in patients with invasive aspergillosis.

scholarly journals 2724. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MenACYW-TT) Administered in Healthy Meningococcal Vaccine-Naïve Children (2–9 Years)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S958-S959
Author(s):  
Michael W Simon ◽  
Donald Brandon ◽  
Shane Christensen ◽  
Carmen Baccarini ◽  
Emilia Jordanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Conjugate Vaccine ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Meningococcal Vaccine ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Vaccination ◽  
Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine

Abstract Background MenACYW-TT is an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine that contains tetanus toxoid as carrier protein. The vaccine is intended for global use in individuals 6 weeks of age and older. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of MenACYW-TT compared with a licensed quadrivalent conjugate meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY-CRM [Menveo®]) in US children 2–9 years of age. Methods In a modified double-blind Phase III study (NCT03077438), 1000 children were randomized to receive one dose of either MenACYW-TT vaccine or MenACWY-CRM vaccine. Serum bactericidal assays with human (hSBA) and baby rabbit (rSBA) complement were used to measure antibodies against representative meningococcal serogroup strains at baseline and 30 days after vaccination. Safety data were collected up to 6 months post-vaccination. Results Non-inferiority of immune responses for all four serogroups, based on percentages of participants achieving hSBA vaccine seroresponse, was demonstrated for MenACYW-TT compared with MenACWY-CRM at Day 30 compared with baseline. The proportions of individuals with hSBA titers ≥ 1:8 following MenACYW-TT administration were higher than those after MenACWY-CRM administration for all four serogroups (A: 86.4% vs 79.3%; C: 97.8% vs 67.1%; W: 94.8% vs 86.3%; Y: 98.5% vs 90.8%). Similar results were observed in two age substrata (2 to 5 years and 6 to 9 years). Percentages of participants with post-vaccination rSBA titers ≥ 1:128 were comparable between both groups. The safety profiles of MenACYW-TT and MenACWY-CRM were comparable. Reactogenicity at the MenACYW-TT injection site was lower than at the MenACWY-CRM injection site. There were no immediate adverse events (AEs), no AEs leading to study discontinuation, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported in the study. Conclusion MenACYW-TT vaccine was well tolerated and demonstrated a non-inferior immune response compared with that for the licensed MenACWY-CRM vaccine when administered as a single dose to meningococcal vaccine-naïve children. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals OC 8582 A PHASE IA/B STUDY TO ASSESS SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF PLACENTAL MALARIA VACCINE CANDIDATE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE PRIMALVAC TRIAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A14.3-A15
Author(s):  
Amadou Konate ◽  
Laura Richert ◽  
Arnaud Chêne ◽  
Jean-Philippe Semblat ◽  
Gwenaelle Roguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Burkina Faso ◽  
Malaria Vaccine ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Placental Malaria ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Vaccine Trial ◽  
Adult Women ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind

BackgroundAdhesion of P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes (PEs) to placental chondroitin-4-sulfate (CSA) has been linked to severe placental malaria (PM) outcomes. Evidence strongly supports the VAR2CSA variant surface antigen mediating PEs CSA-binding phenotype as the leading candidate for a PM vaccine. This study was conducted to assess the safety and immunogenicity of 3 different dosages (20 µg, 50 µg and 100 µg) of the recombinant VAR2CSA protein (PRIMVAC), formulated with Alhydrogel or GLA-SE administered at days 0, 28 and 56.MethodsA randomised double-blind phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation vaccine trial was conducted in healthy adult women. Within 4 sequential cohorts, volunteers were randomised to 2 arms (PRIMVAC adjuvanted with Alhydrogel or GLA-SE) in the first phase conducted in France and then to 3 arms (PRIMVAC with Alhydrogel or GLA-SE or placebo) in Burkina Faso. Enrolled volunteers were observed for at least 1 hour following each vaccination then seen at 1 day and 7 days later for safety evaluations. Serious adverse events (SAE) were recorded throughout the study duration. Routine clinical laboratory safety analyses were performed prior to first injection and at each subsequent visit.ResultsA total of 68 subjects were recruited in the four study cohorts. No SAE was reported in any of the cohort A volunteers and enrolment in cohort B was started. A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the safety data for cohorts A (20 µg) and B (50 µg) before the trial was initiated in Burkina Faso. The DSMB also reviewed the safety data in Burkina to authorise the progression from the cohort C (50 µg) to cohort D (100 µg). The last vaccination of the last subject occurred in September 2017.ConclusionThis was the first placental malaria vaccine phase Ia/b clinical trial conducted in France and Burkina Faso. No serious adverse events have been recorded. Preliminary safety and immunogenicity results will be presented.

Inhibition of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Reverses Anemia In Patients with Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 640-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Schuster ◽  
James R Rigas ◽  
Sergey V Orlov ◽  
Branislav Milovanovic ◽  
Kumar Prabhash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cancer Related Anemia

Abstract Abstract 640 Background: ALD518 is a humanized, desialyated anti-IL-6 antibody being developed for the treatment of cancer-related anemia, cachexia and fatigue. The primary objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ALD518 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives examined hematologic parameters. Methods: 124 patients with NSCLC, ECOG 0–3, weight loss in the preceding 3 months of >5% body weight, hemoglobin (Hb) >7g/dL, and C-reactive protein (CRP) >10mg/L were dosed. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n~30/group). Placebo or ALD518 80mg, 160mg, or 320mg was administered intravenously every 8 weeks. Pts were followed up for 24 weeks. Data included hematologic parameters, clinical chemistry, CRP, D-dimer, lean body mass and adverse events (AEs). Quality of life data included the FACIT-F, FACT-L, and FAACT questionnaires. Data presented in this abstract relates to the safety and hematology results. Results: 29 pts completed the study treatments and evaluations, 38 failed to complete every visit, 52 died of progressive disease, and 5 withdrew because of adverse events. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), infusion reactions, or anti-idiotypic antibody responses to ALD518 observed in the study. 84 pts had serious AEs of which 1 was deemed to be possibly related to administration of ALD518 (rectal hemorrhage). The majority of the serious adverse events were due to progression of the NSCLC. Six patients had a CTC grade 4 change in laboratory safety data during the study. Four patients experienced a grade 4 hypercalcemia: 1 (3.6%), 2 (6.1%), and 1 (3.2%) in the ALD518 80mg, 160mg and placebo groups, respectively, and there was 1 patient with grade 4 GGT elevation (placebo) and 1 patient with grade 4 hypokalemia (ALD518 160mg). There were no treatment related differences in vitals sign or 12-lead ECG data. The mean (±SD) values for Hb, hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular Hb (MCH) and platelet counts are listed below: 38/93 pts treated with ALD518 and 10/31 given placebo had a pre-dose Hb =< 11g/dL. 24 of these pts on ALD518 and 7 of these pts on placebo remained in the study at week 4. 14/24 pts on ALD518 and 0/7 on placebo had raised their Hb from =< 11g/dL to >= 12g/dL. Conclusions: ALD518 increased Hb, Hct, MCH in NSCLC pts and raised Hb to >= 12g/dL in 58% of pts with a Hb =< 11g/dL at baseline. There was also a modest fall in platelet count observed in patients treated with ALD518 but no patients had a CTC grade 4 thrombocytopenia and only one patient (ALD518 160mg group) had a grade 3 thrombocytopenia at one time point. There were no major safety signals related to the administration of ALD518. Further study of ALD518 as a novel non-erythropoietic stimulating agent for cancer-related anemia is warranted. Disclosures: Schuster: Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Honoraria. Rigas: Alder Biopharmaceuticals inc: Honoraria. Smith:Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Analysis of serious adverse events in a paediatric fast breathing pneumonia clinical trial in Malawi

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000415
Author(s):  
Evangelyn Nkwopara ◽  
Robert Schmicker ◽  
Tisungane Mvalo ◽  
Melda Phiri ◽  
Ajib Phiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionPneumonia is the leading infectious killer of children. We conducted a double-blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing placebo to amoxicillin treatment for fast breathing pneumonia in HIV-negative children aged 2–59 months in Malawi. Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) during the trial were examined to assess disease progression, co-morbidities, recurrence of pneumonia and side effects of amoxicillin.MethodsEnrolled children with fast breathing for age and a history of cough <14 days or difficult breathing were randomised to either placebo or amoxicillin for 3 days, and followed for 14 days to track clinical characteristics and outcomes. Medical history, physical exam, laboratory results and any chest radiographs collected at screening, enrolment and during hospitalisation were evaluated. All SAE reports were reviewed for additional information regarding hospitalisation, course of treatment and outcome.ResultsIn total, 102/1126 (9.0%) enrolled children with fast breathing pneumonia were reported to have a SAE. Seventy-five per cent (n=77) of SAEs were pneumonia-related (p<0.01). Children<2 years of age represented the greatest proportion (61/77, 79.2%) of those with a pneumonia-related SAE. In the amoxicillin group, there were 46 SAEs and 5 (10.9%) cases were identified as possibly related to study drug (4 gastroenteritis and 1 fever). There were no life-threatening pneumonia SAEs or deaths in either group, and by the time of exit from the study, all children recovered without sequelae.DiscussionIn this fast breathing pneumonia clinical trial, SAEs occurred infrequently in both the amoxicillin and placebo groups, and amoxicillin was well tolerated.Trial registration numberNCT02760420. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02760420?term=ginsburg&rank=9.

scholarly journals Safety findings from Phase 3 lasmiditan studies for acute treatment of migraine: Results from SAMURAI and SPARTAN

Cephalalgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 957-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H Krege ◽  
Paul B Rizzoli ◽  
Emily Liffick ◽  
Erin G Doty ◽  
Sherie A Dowsett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Acute Therapy ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Migraine Pain ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Ischemic Events

Background We assessed the safety profile of lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist without vasoconstrictive activity being developed as an acute therapy for migraine. Methods SAMURAI and SPARTAN were Phase 3 double-blind studies of patients with migraine, randomized to oral lasmiditan 50 mg (SPARTAN only), 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo to be taken within 4 hours of onset of migraine pain. Safety data from the studies were integrated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring within 48 hours of first dose) were considered in the analyses. Results The safety population comprised 1262 patients assigned placebo, and 654, 1265, and 1258 assigned lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg, respectively. There were no deaths; serious adverse events were reported for seven patients (placebo, n = 2 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 50 mg, n = 1 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 100 mg, n = 1 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 200 mg, n = 3 [0.2%]). Patients reporting ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events were: Placebo, n = 174 (13.5%); lasmiditan 50 mg, n = 166 (25.4%); lasmiditan 100 mg, n = 458 (36.2%); and lasmiditan 200 mg, n = 510 (40.6%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, muscular weakness and hypoesthesia. There were no ischemic events. Conclusions As a centrally-penetrant drug, lasmiditan use was associated with neurologic treatment-emergent adverse events; most were mild or moderate in severity and self-limiting. Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174).

FDA analysis of grade 3-4 safety events.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2544-2544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Damiette Smit ◽  
Sandra J. Casak ◽  
Steven Lemery ◽  
Patricia Keegan ◽  
Amy E. McKee
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Inpatient Hospitalization ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Grade 3

2544 Background: In new drug/biologics applications, safety data provided to FDA include serious adverse events (SAEs), defined as adverse events (AEs) resulting in death, life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or congenital anomaly/birth defect. One limitation of the SAE definition is that hospitalization practices differ across localities and among medical practitioners. Therefore, a safety signal may not be adequately reflected when analyzing SAEs. We hypothesize that evaluating CTCAE Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life-threatening) AEs, independent of whether or not these were classified as serious, provides a more complete assessment of patient safety. Methods: We reviewed SAEs from all nine registrational trials for new molecular entities approved for the treatment of cancer by the FDA in 2014. Results: A total of 25,548 AEs were reported in 1,781 patients treated with an investigational agent. There were 2,943 Grade 3-4 AEs and 912 Grade 3-4 SAEs. Information regarding hospitalization was available in 62% of Grade 3-4 AEs. Fifty-five percent of Grade 3-4 SAEs vs. 5.5% of Grade 3-4 non-serious AEs resulted in hospitalization. Several clinically serious Grade 3-4 AEs, including sepsis and respiratory failure, were not classified as SAE. Conclusions: There is significant overlap in most common Grade 3-4 AEs and most common Grade 3-4 SAEs. Most AEs that are clinically serious were appropriately classified as SAE. However, some clinically serious AEs and some AEs resulting in hospitalization were not classified as SAE. With the exception of information regarding hospitalization, characterization of the reason why certain AEs were classified as SAEs was not possible. In this pooled analysis, data from the analysis of AEs by severity was more informative than the analyses by SAEs. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 1288. Phase 1 First-in-Human Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose Trial Demonstrates Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Tolerability of SPR720, an Oral DNA GyrB Inhibitor for Mycobacterial Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S659-S659
Author(s):  
Angela Talley ◽  
Archie Thurston ◽  
Grayson Moore ◽  
Myriah M Satterfield ◽  
Erika L Manyak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Healthy Elderly ◽  
Dose Proportional

Abstract Background SPR720 (phosphate pro-drug of SPR719) is a novel aminobenzimidazole bacterial DNA gyrase (GyrB) inhibitor in development for non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD) and pulmonary tuberculosis. SPR719 has broad-spectrum activity versus clinically relevant mycobacteria in vitro and in murine and hollow fiber (HF) infection models. In this first-in-human single ascending dose (SAD) /multiple ascending dose (MAD) study, the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SPR720/SPR719 were evaluated in healthy volunteers. Methods This was a Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 7 SAD cohorts (including a food effect cohort) and 5 MAD cohorts. Healthy volunteers (n=8/cohort, 3:1 randomization) received SPR720 or placebo in single oral doses of ranging from 100 mg to 2000 mg or repeat total daily doses ranging from 500 mg to 1500 mg for 7 or 14 days. Safety monitoring and PK sampling occurred throughout the trial. Plasma and urine concentrations of SPR720/SPR719 were measured by validated LC-MS/MS methods. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Results A total of 96 subjects (including 8 healthy elderly subjects, age ≥ 65 years) were randomized and received study drug. SPR720 was well-tolerated at daily doses up to 1000 mg for up to 14 days. Across SAD/MAD cohorts, the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) and headache, all of mild or moderate severity and dose dependent. No serious adverse events were reported. Across SAD cohorts, a dose proportional and greater-than-dose proportional increase in SPR719 plasma Cmax and AUC0-24, respectively were observed. SPR720 was rapidly absorbed with a mean SPR719 t1/2 of 2.9-4.5 h. Dosing with food decreased SPR719 plasma AUC by ~20%. No clinically meaningful effect of age on plasma AUC was observed. In the MAD cohorts, SPR719 plasma exposure declined approximately 40% between Day 1 and Day 7, suggesting induction of an elimination pathway. However, plasma AUC0-24 was similar at Days 7 and 14. Conclusion Together with HF pharmacodynamic data, human PK and safety data for SPR720 suggest that predicted therapeutic exposures can be attained with a well-tolerated once-daily dose. Further evaluation in a Phase 2 NTM-LD trial is planned. Disclosures Angela Talley, MD, Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Archie Thurston, Jr., PhD, Spero Therapeutics (Consultant) Grayson Moore, BA, RN, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Shareholder, Independent Contractor) Vipul Kumar, PhD, Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Suzanne Stokes, PhD, Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Aaron Dane, MSc, Spero theraputics (Consultant) David Melnick, MD, Spero Therapeutics (Employee)Spero Therapeutics (Employee)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document