Phase 1 Study of Combined Chemotherapy of Nab-Paclitaxel, S-1, and Oxaliplatin for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (NSOX Study)

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Toshiyasu Ojima ◽  
Masahiro Katsuda ◽  
Keiji Hayata ◽  
Junya Kitadani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Tumor Tissues ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> A regimen of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) has been widely used as the first-line regimen for advanced gastric cancer. To further improve the antitumor efficacy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, we added nab-paclitaxel to the established SOX regimen (NSOX). Nab-paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) has effective transferability to tumor tissues and strong antitumor effects for peritoneal metastasis. We performed a phase 1 study of this regimen to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The NSOX regimen involved 21-day cycles with escalated doses of nab-paclitaxel (50 [level 1] to 80 [level 4] mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8) and fixed doses of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1) and S-1 (80 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day for 2 weeks). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Six patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be dose level 2, as 2 of 3 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), grade 4 non-hematological toxicities. One patient experienced acute myocardial infarction, and the other patient developed jejunal perforation. There were no treatment-related deaths. No patients experienced DLTs, so the RD was determined to be dose level 1. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NSOX regimen was shown to be a tolerable regimen and may be a promising triplet therapy for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Phase I study of biweekly intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
H. Ishigami ◽  
J. Kitayama ◽  
S. Kaisaki ◽  
H. Yamaguchi ◽  
H. Yamashita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Experienced Grade

139 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is promising for the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We previously verified the safety and efficacy of IP paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous (IV) PTX in phase I and phase II studies (Oncology. 2009; Ann Oncol. 2010). Secondly, we developed a new IP-containing chemotherapy regimen, IV PTX plus IP cisplatin (CDDP) and PTX, for patients who have failed S-1-based chemotherapy. We performed a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) in gastric cancer patients. Methods: A total of 9 gastric cancer patients were enrolled who had shown progression of peritoneal metastasis after S-1-based chemotherapy. PTX was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 and intraperitoneally over 1 hour with an initial dose of 20 mg/m2 (level 1), stepped up to 30 or 40 mg/m2 depending on observed toxicity. CDDP was subsequently administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 30 mg/m2 over 24 hours after PTX infusion. PTX and CDDP were administered on days 1 and 15 in 4-week cycles. Results: At dose level 1, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 2 of 3 patients. One patient experienced grade 4 leukopenia, and the other grade 3 vomiting. Because of higher toxicities than anticipated, the initial dose-escalation schedule was abandoned, and the doses of IV PTX and IP CDDP were reduced to 80 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2, respectively, while keeping the dose of IP PTX at 20 mg/m2 (level 0). At dose level 0, one of the first 3 patients experienced grade 3 nausea, and an additional 3 patients experienced no DLTs. Consequently, the MTD and RD were determined to be dose level 1 and dose level 0, respectively. No patients experienced complications related to the peritoneal access device or IP infusion. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of IV PTX plus IP CDDP and PTX was shown to be a safe regimen that should be further explored in clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals ACTR-63. PHASE I DOSE ESCALATION STUDY OF PROCASPASE ACTIVATING COMPOUND-1 (PAC-1) IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA OR GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi28-vi28
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Martin Nicholas ◽  
Richard Peterson ◽  
Oana Danciu ◽  
Stefania Maraka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Anaplastic Astrocytoma ◽  
Caspase 3 ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract BACKGROUND Procaspase activating compound -1 (PAC-1) is a small molecule that catalyzes conversion of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 which induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Glioblastoma (GBM) is among the tumors with high concentrations of procaspase-3 and low levels of caspase-3. PAC-1 crosses the blood brain barrier and has been shown to synergize with temozolomide (TMZ) in canine malignant glioma and meningioma that arise spontaneously. METHODS This is a multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PAC-1 administered days 1–21 in combination with TMZ days 8–12 at a dose of 150 mg/m2 of each 28 day cycle in subjects with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or GBM. A modified Fibonacci 3 + 3 design is used with up to 4 dose levels of PAC-1 (375, 500, 625 and 750 mg/day). Neurologic toxicity, including cognitive function, is closely monitored throughout the trial. INTERIM DATA: A total of 14 subjects have been enrolled to-date. Of these, 7 at dose level 1, PAC-1 375 mg/day (6 GBM, 1 AA; median age 58y, range 25–75) and 7 at dose level 2, PAC-1 500 mg/day (5 GBM, 2 AA; median age 51y, range 35–60). Best responses to-date were 2 subjects with a partial response and 2 with stable disease. Grade 3 (hepatotoxicity) and 4 (cerebral edema) was reported as possibly related to PAC-1 in 1 patient at dose level 1. The median number of cycles received was 4 (range, 1–12+) at dose level 1 and 2 (range, 1–3) at dose level 2. Enrollment to dose level 2 has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. Updated response and toxicity as well as pharmacokinetic data will be presented.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of S-1 Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 6957-6965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Josephine Faust ◽  
Kazumasa Ikeda ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
Hiroshi Anbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Advanced Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Purpose The conversion rate of tegafur (a component of S-1) to fluorouracil (FU) differs in Asians and whites because of polymorphic differences in the CYP2A6 gene. S-1 with cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric cancer patients. Therefore, we initiated a phase I pharmacokinetic study of this combination in our gastric cancer patients. Patients and Methods Patients received cisplatin intravenously on day 1 and S-1 orally, twice daily, on days 1 to 21 every 28 days. At level 1, the S-1 dose was 25 mg/m2/dose (50 mg/m2/d), but it was increased by 5 mg/m2/dose for the next level. Cisplatin was administered at 75 mg/m2 (for levels 1 and 2) but was then reduced to 60 mg/m2 (level 1A). At every level, a cohort of three patients, which could be expanded to six patients, was studied. Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle. Patients with histologic proof of gastric adenocarcinoma and near-normal organ function were studied. Results Sixteen patients were enrolled. No DLTs occurred at level 1. However, DLTs occurred at levels 2 and 1A. The area under the curve for FU correlated significantly with DLT (P = .006) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (P = .004). Six partial responses were confirmed, including three at the MTD. Conclusion At the established MTD of S-1 plus cisplatin, the S-1 dose (50 mg/m2/d for 21 days) is lower in our study than in the Japanese study (80 mg/m2/d for 21 days). A multi-institutional phase II study of this active combination is currently accruing patients.

Results Of a Phase 1 Study Of Quizartinib (AC220, ASP2689) In Combination With Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy In Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 623-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K Altman ◽  
James M. Foran ◽  
Keith W. Pratz ◽  
Denise Trone ◽  
Guy Gammon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are associated with early relapse after standard chemotherapy and poor survival. Quizartinib (AC220) is an oral FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown the highest level of single agent activity seen with a FLT3 targeted agent in FLT3+ relapsed AML to date. This Phase 1 dose escalation study is the first study to report data with quizartinib in combination with standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy in patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed AML, regardless of FLT3-ITD status. The dose escalation was conducted using a modified 3+3 design, where 6 pts were enrolled at each dose level. The pts were given cytarabine 200 mg/m2 x 7 days and daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 x 3 days (7+3) for induction and high dose cytarabine 3 g/m2(HiDAC) q12hours on days 1, 3, and 5 for consolidation. Quizartinib was administered daily for either 7 or 14 days, starting at Day 4 of induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy. Patients were allowed to proceed directly to a stem cell transplant after achieving a response or receive further quizartinib as maintenance therapy after consolidation if they were not transplant eligible. Three dose levels were tested; dose level 1 (DL1) at 60 mg for 7 days, dose level 2 (DL2) 60 mg for 14 days, and dose level -1 (DL-1), 40 mg for 14 days. Through May 31, 2013 18 pts were enrolled in the study, and the safety information at all 3 dose levels are presented. The median age of pts was 43 years (range 22 to 60). Of the 18 patients, 16 had the FLT-ITD mutation. At DL1, one of the 6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia). At DL2, two of the 6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 QTc prolongation and grade 4 pericarditis) which exceeded the pre-specified criteria so DL-1 was then explored. At DL-1, one of the 6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 constrictive pericarditis). The most common (20%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (42%), diarrhea (32%), anemia (26%), febrile neutropenia (26%), neutropenia (21%), fatigue (21%), pyrexia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). The most common (10%) Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs were febrile neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (21%) anemia (21%)), neutropenia (21%), leucopenia (16%), and nausea (11%). The data from this Phase 1 study demonstrates for the first time that quizartinib can be safely administered with induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed younger patients with AML. The MTD was identified as 40 mg for 14 days or 60 mg for 7 days. The efficacy results from this Phase 1 study will be available at the time of presentation. Based on these findings, multiple Phase 3 studies in newly diagnosed AML patients are planned. Disclosures: Altman: Novartis: Consultancy; Araid: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Foran:Astellas: Research Funding. Trone:Ambit: Employment. Gammon:Ambit: Employment. Cortes:Ambit: Research Funding.

Phase I trial of docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (TEX) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14051-14051 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Grothe ◽  
R. D. Hofheinz ◽  
L. Mantovani Loeffler ◽  
J. Böhme ◽  
D. Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14051 Background: Combination regimens of 3 active drugs have shown promising activity in treatment of metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Docetaxel (D) combined with cisplatin and 5-FU (CF) yielded superior overall survival and response rates when compared to standard CF. However, toxicity profile showed the need for development of less toxic modifications. In this phase I trial, D was combined with oxaliplatin (Ox) and capecitabine (Cape) in order to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in patients (pts) with metastatic GC. Methods: Pts had to have metastatic or locally advanced GC, adequate organ function, ECOG PS 0–2, no prior chemotherapy. Four dose levels were planned planned for the TEX regimen: D 35–40 mg/m2, Ox 70 mg/m2 d1 and d88, with Cape 800–1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 q d22. Toxicity was assessed 3-weekly whereas CT scans were repeated 9-weekly. Results: 14 pts were enrolled: 9m/5f, age 64 (42–76) yrs, ECOG PS 1 [0–2]. All pts. had distant metastatis, 10 no gastrectomy. On dose level 1 (D 35 mg/m2, Ox 70 mg/m2, Cape 800 mg/m2) 3 pts were included initially. 1 pt. had grade 4 bleeding from primary tumor site after 2nd administration and therefore was excluded. For safety reasons, 6 more pts. were enrolled - without further DLT. On dose level 2 (D 40 mg/m2, Ox 70 mg/m2, Cape 800 mg/m2), diarrhea and mucositis grade 3 occurred as DLT in 2/2 patients. Level 1 was determined as MTD and 5 more pts were included to a total of 12 with toxicity displayed at the table. Out of 10 pts with measurable disease, 3 had a PR, 4 more had disease stabilization. Median PFS of all pts (5 censored) is 3.9+ (1–9.3+) mos. whereas median OS is not yet reached. Conclusion: TEX can safely be administered without higher graded toxicity in pts with GC. Preliminary efficacy results indicate promising activity that merits further testing in a phase II trial. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study of ATOR-1017, a 4-1BB antibody, in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2646-2646
Author(s):  
Gustav J. Ullenhag ◽  
Jeffrey Yachnin ◽  
Ana Carneiro ◽  
Emma Elison ◽  
Malin Carlsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Choroidal Melanoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Solid Malignancies

2646 Background: ATOR-1017 is a human agonistic IgG4 antibody targeting the co-stimulatory receptor 4-1BB (CD137). It is developed to activate T cells and natural killer cells in the tumor environment, leading to immune-mediated tumor cell killing. This is a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1 study (NCT04144842). Methods: In this study, ATOR-1017 is administered intravenously every 21 days as a single agent to patients with solid malignancies. ATOR-1017 is administered until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose, assessed by adverse events (AEs) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy, assessed with CT scans using response criteria for use in studies testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST). The study uses a single cohort design for doses up to 40 mg, and thereafter a modified 3+3 design. Results: The first patient was dosed in December 2019; by 22 Jan 2021, twelve patients have been exposed to ATOR-1017. The following dose levels have been evaluated; 0.38 mg; 1.5 mg; 5 mg; 15 mg; 40 mg and 100 mg. Dose escalation is ongoing, and the 200 mg dose level is under evaluation. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. The following cancer types are included; ovarian cancer (n = 1), choroidal melanoma (n = 3), anal cancer (n = 1), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), breast cancer (n = 1), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), adenoid cystic cancer (n = 1), malignant melanoma (n = 1), colorectal cancer (n = 1). Drug-related AEs were reported in 5 out of 12 patients; one patient experienced a grade 3, all others were grade 1 or 2. There have been two episodes each of chest pain (grades 2 and 3) and headache (grades 1 and 2). Single cases of pyrexia, upper abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, nausea, leukopenia, neutropenia, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), arthralgia, neck pain, and rash were also reported. No DLTs have been observed in the study to date. The median age of the patients were 48.5 years (range 34-76). Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-4). The median time on study were 15 weeks (range 0.14-51). Six patients are on study, and six patients have discontinued treatment. Reasons for discontinuation include; investigator decision (n = 1), confirmed disease progression (n = 1), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), death due to disease progression (n = 1) and other reason (n = 2). Preliminary PK data show dose-proportional kinetics up to 100 mg. Best response has been stable disease. Conclusions: ATOR-1017 is safe and well-tolerated up to 100 mg. Dose escalation continues and the current dose level is 200 mg. Clinical trial information: NCT04144842.

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

scholarly journals Survival Benefit of Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine (A Herbal Formula for Invigorating Spleen) in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhao ◽  
Ai-Guang Zhao ◽  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Xiao-Hong Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Herbal Formula ◽  
First Line ◽  
Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Chinese Herbal ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Objective.We evaluated the efficiency of traditional Chinese herbal medicine (a compound herbal formula for invigorating spleen) as a complementary and alternative therapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.Methods.Between 2001 and 2012, 93 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled in this study. The effect of traditional Chinese herbal medicine on their long-term outcome was investigated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the difference in survival time, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.Result.First-line palliative chemotherapy plus traditional Chinese herbal medicine was performed in 47 patients and the other 46 patients received chemotherapy alone. The overall survival was different between patients with and without traditional Chinese herbal medicine (12.0 versus 10.5 months;P=0.046). According to the Cox proportional hazard model, first-line chemotherapy cycle (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.527; 95% CI = 0.323~0.860) and TCHM (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.644; 95% CI = 0.481~0.992) were selected as independent prognostic factors for survival.Conclusion.The results suggest that traditional Chinese herbal medicine could improve the prognosis of the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

scholarly journals Down-regulation of HIF-1α inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway and VEGF expression

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Zhang ◽  
Jun Xu ◽  
Yonghong Dong ◽  
Bo Huang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Akt Pathway ◽  
Migration And Invasion ◽  
Vegf Expression ◽  
Gastric Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Tissues ◽  
Sirna Silencing ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

In view of the high incidence of gastric cancer and the functions of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), our study aimed to investigate the functionality of HIF-1α in gastric cancer, and to explore the diagnostic and prognostic values of HIF-1α for this disease. Expression of HIF-1α in tumor tissues and adjacent healthy tissues as well as serum collected from both gastric cancer patients and normal healthy controls was detected by qRT-PCR. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier method. HIF-1α siRNA silencing cell lines were established. Effects of HIF-1α siRNA silencing as well as PI3K activator sc3036 on proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells were detected by Cell counting kit (CCK-8) assay, and Transwell migration and invasion assay. Effects of HIF-1α siRNA silencing on AKT and VEGF were detected by Western blot. Expression of HIF-1α was significantly down-regulated in tumor tissues than in adjacent healthy tissues in most gastric cancer patients. Serum levels of HIF-1α were also higher in gastric cancer patients than in normal healthy people. Serum HIF-1α showed promising diagnostic and prognostic values for gastric cancer. HIF-1α siRNA silencing inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells, while PI3K activator sc3036 treatment reduced those inhibitory effects. Down-regulation of HIF-1α can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer possibly by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway and VEGF expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document