Adaptation and Validation of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination in Dementia in Arabic Speakers in Egypt

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-616
Author(s):  
Tarik Qassem ◽  
Mohamed S. Khater ◽  
Tamer Emara ◽  
Doha Rasheedy ◽  
Heba M. Tawfik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cutoff Score ◽  
Arabic Speakers ◽  
Dementia Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Addenbrooke’S Cognitive Examination

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (m-ACE) is a brief cognitive battery that assesses 5 subdomains of cognition (attention, memory, verbal fluency, visuospatial abilities, and memory recall). It is scored out of 30 and can be administered in under 5 min providing a quick screening tool for assessment of cognition. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> We aimed to adapt the m-ACE in Arabic speakers in Egypt and to validate it in dementia patients to provide cutoff scores. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included 37 patients with dementia (Alzheimer’s disease [<i>n</i> = 25], vascular dementia [<i>n</i> = 8], and dementia with Lewy body [<i>n</i> = 4]) and 43 controls. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) on the total m-ACE score between dementia patients (mean 10.54 and standard deviation [SD] 5.83) and controls (mean 24.02 and SD 2.75). There was also a statistically significant difference between dementia patients and controls on all sub-score domains of the m-ACE (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Performance on the m-ACE significantly correlated with both the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III). Using a receiver operator characteristic curve, the optimal cutoff score for dementia on the m-ACE total score was found to be 18 (92% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 94% accuracy). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We adapted the m-ACE in Arabic speakers in Egypt and provided objective validation of it as a screening tool for dementia, with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Validation of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination in Mild Cognitive Impairment in Arabic Speakers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Tarik Qassem ◽  
Mohamed S. Khater ◽  
Tamer Emara ◽  
Doha Rasheedy ◽  
Heba M. Tawfik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Arabic Speakers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Addenbrooke’S Cognitive Examination

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a target for early detection and intervention in dementia, yet there is a shortage of validated screening tools in Arabic to diagnose MCI. The mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (m-ACE) is a brief cognitive battery that is scored out of 30 and can be administered in under 5 min providing a quick screening tool for assessment of cognition. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We aimed to validate the m-ACE in Arabic speakers in Egypt with MCI to provide cut-off scores. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included 24 patients with MCI and 52 controls and administered the Arabic version of the m-ACE. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) on the total m-ACE score between MCI patients (mean 18.54, SD 3.05) and controls (mean 24.54, SD 2.68). There was also a statistically significant difference between MCI patients and controls on the total score and the fluency, visuospatial, and memory recall sub-scores of the m-ACE (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Performance on the m-ACE significantly correlated with both the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III). Using a receiver operator characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off score for MCI on the m-ACE total score was 21 out of 30 (87.5% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, and 85.5% accuracy). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We validated the Arabic m-ACE in Egyptian patients with MCI and provided objective validation of it as a screening tool for MCI, with good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy that is comparable to other translated versions of the m-ACE in MCI.

Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III in Mild Cognitive Impairment in Arabic Speakers in Egypt

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Tarik Qassem ◽  
Mohamed S. Khater ◽  
Tamer Emara ◽  
Doha Rasheedy ◽  
Heba M. Tawfik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Egyptian Arabic ◽  
Arabic Speakers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Addenbrooke’S Cognitive Examination

<b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents an important point on the pathway to developing dementia and a target for early detection and intervention. There is a shortage of validated cognitive screening tools in Arabic to diagnose MCI. The aim of this study was to validate Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) (Egyptian-Arabic version) in a sample of patients with MCI, to provide cut-off scores in Egyptian-Arabic speakers. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 24 patients with MCI and 54 controls were included in the study and were administered the Egyptian-Arabic version of the ACE-III. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) in the total ACE-III score between MCI patients (mean 75.83, standard deviation (SD) 8.1) and controls (mean 86.26, SD 6.74). There was also a statistically significant difference between MCI patients and controls in the memory, fluency, and visuospatial sub-scores of the ACE-III (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05) but not in attention and language sub-scores. Using a receiver operator characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off score for diagnosing MCI on the ACE-III total score was 81, with 75% sensitivity, 82% specificity, and 80% accuracy. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of this study provide objective validation of the Egyptian-Arabic version of the ACE-III as a screening tool for MCI, with good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy that are comparable to other translated versions of the ACE-III in MCI.

scholarly journals 0588 Ring Pulse Oximeter for Screening of Moderate to Severe OSA: A Pilot Study

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A225-A225
Author(s):  
J Xue ◽  
R Zhao ◽  
J Li ◽  
L Zhao ◽  
B Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Pulse Oximeter ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Oxygen Desaturation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acceptance Range ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Two Parameters

Abstract Introduction To evaluate the utility of the ring pulse oximeter for screening of OSA in adults. Methods 87 adults were monitored by a ring pulse oximeter and PSG simultaneously during a nocturnal in-lab sleep testing. 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI3); Mean oxygen saturation(MSpO2), Saturation impair time below 90% (SIT90) derived from an automated algorithm of the ring pulse oximeter. Meanwhile, the parameters of PSG were scored manually according to the AASM Manual. Correlation and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were used to measure the accuracy of ring pulse oximeter and its diagnostic value for moderate to severe OSA (AHI≥15). Results Among the 87 participants, 18 cases were AHI&lt;5, 17 cases were diagnosed with mild OSA (AHI:5-14.9), 25 cases were diagnosed with moderate OSA (AHI:15-29.9) and 27 cases were diagnosed with severe OSA (AHI≥30). There was no significant difference between PSG and ring pulse oximeter in regard to ODI3 (23.4±23.5 vs 24.7 ± 21.7), and SIT90 (1.54%, range 0.14%-8.99% vs. 3.20%, range 0.60%, 12.30%) (P&gt;0.05], Further analysis indicated that two parameters from the oximeter correlated well with that derived from PSG (r=0.889, 0.567, respectively, both p&lt;0.05). Although MSpO2 correlated significantly (r=0.448, P&lt;0.05), the difference was remarkable [95.9%, range 94.0% to 97.0% vs. 94.5%, range 93.3% to 95.7%, p&lt;0.05]. Bland-Altman plots showed that the agreement of these three parameters was within the clinical acceptance range. The ROC curve showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the ring pulse oximeter when the oximeter derived ODI3 ≥12.5 in the diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA were 82.7% and 74.3%, respectively. Conclusion The pilot study indicated that ring pulse oximeter can detect oxygen desaturation events accurately, therefore to be used as a screening tool for moderate to severe OSA. Support The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81420108002 and NO. 81570083).

scholarly journals Validation of the efficacy of the NUTRISCORE for the nutritional screening of cancer patients in China

BMC Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junren Kang ◽  
Hailong Li ◽  
Xiaodong Shi ◽  
Enling Ma ◽  
Wei Chen
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Clinical Teaching ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Malnutrition is common in cancer patients. The NUTRISCORE is a newly developed cancer-specific nutritional screening tool and was validated by comparison with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in Spain. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the NUTRISCORE, MST, and PG-SGA in estimating the risk of malnutrition in Chinese cancer patients. Methods Data from an open parallel and multicenter cross-sectional study in 29 clinical teaching hospitals in 14 Chinese cities were used. Cancer patients were assessed for malnutrition using the PG-SGA, NUTRISCORE, and MST. The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were estimated for the NUTRISCORE and MST using the PG-SGA as a reference. Results A total of 1000 cancer patients were included. The mean age was 55.9 (19 to 92 years), and 47.5% were male. Of these patients, 450 (45.0%) had PG-SGA B and C, 29 (2.9%) had a NUTRISCORE ≥5, and 367 (36.7%) had an MST ≥ 2. Using the PG-SGA as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of the NUTRISCORE were found to be 6.2, 99.8%, and 0.53, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve values of the MST were 50.9, 74.9%, and 0.63, respectively. The kappa index between the NUTRISCORE and PG-SGA was 0.066, and that between the MST and PG-SGA was 0.262 (P < 0.05). Conclusions The NUTRISCORE had an extremely low sensitivity in cancer patients in China compared with the MST when the PG-SGA was used as a reference.

Vaginal examination vs. cervical length – which is superior in predicting preterm birth?

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Merav Sharvit ◽  
Reut Weiss ◽  
Yael Ganor Paz ◽  
Keren Tzadikevitch Geffen ◽  
Netanella Danielli Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Cervical Length ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractObjective:To compare the predictive value of preterm birth (PTB) by transvaginal sonographic cervical length (CL) measurement to digital examination of the cervix (Bishop score – BS), in patients with premature contractions (PC) and intact membranes.Design:A retrospective case-control study.Setting:Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.Population:Women at 24–34 weeks of gestation who were hospitalized with PC and intact membranes.Methods:All patients underwent CL and BS measurements upon admission. Power analysis revealed that 375 patients were needed to show a significant difference between the two methods for predicting PTB. Each one served as her own control.Main outcome measures:PTB<37 and<34 weeks.Results:Receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and logistic regression analyses indicated a correlation between both shortened CL and increased BS to PTB (P<0.001). Neither test offered an advantage in predicting PTB. Areas under the curve for BS and CL ROC were similar for PTB before 37 weeks gestation (0.611 vs. 0.640, P=0.28). For nulliparous women, CL predicted PTB better that BS (0.642 vs. 0.724, P=0.03). For singleton and multiple pregnancy pregnancies, BS and CL did not differ significantly in predicting PTB (P=0.9, P=0.2, respectively). For nulliparous with multiple pregnancy, the BS and CL ROC curves differ nearly significantly (0.554 vs. 0.709, P=0.07), with better predictive ability for CL.Conclusions:CL and BS have similar value in predicting PTB in patients with PC. For nulliparous women, CL is superior over the BS.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Usefulness of CO-RADS for Chest CT in Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Fujioka ◽  
Marie Takahashi ◽  
Mio Mori ◽  
Junichi Tsuchiya ◽  
Emi Yamaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Radiological Society ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

The purpose of this study was to use the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) to evaluate the chest computed tomography (CT) images of patients suspected of having COVID-19, and to investigate its diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement. The Dutch Radiological Society developed CO-RADS as a diagnostic indicator for assessing suspicion of lung involvement of COVID-19 on a scale of 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). We investigated retrospectively 154 adult patients with clinically suspected COVID-19, between April and June 2020, who underwent chest CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The patients’ average age was 61.3 years (range, 21–93), 101 were male, and 76 were RT-PCR positive. Using CO-RADS, four radiologists evaluated the chest CT images. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by comparing the individual reader’s score to the median of the remaining three radiologists. The average sensitivity was 87.8% (range, 80.2–93.4%), specificity was 66.4% (range, 51.3–84.5%), and AUC was 0.859 (range, 0.847–0.881); there was no significant difference between the readers (p > 0.200). In 325 (52.8%) of 616 observations, there was absolute agreement among observers. The average ICC of readers was 0.840 (range, 0.800–0.874; p < 0.001). CO-RADS is a categorical taxonomic evaluation scheme for COVID-19 pneumonia, using chest CT images, that provides outstanding performance and from substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement for predicting COVID-19.

scholarly journals Penilaian gizi sederhana: alat penilaian praktis untuk menentukan status gizi pasien rawat inap di rumah sakit

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Ida Mardalena ◽  
Bambang Suprapto ◽  
Widarto Widarto ◽  
Bhisma Murti
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Efficient Screening

Background: Absence of effective and efficient screening tool for assessment of nutritional status have lead to high incidence of malnutrition among hospitalized patients.Objective: To develope practical screening tool for assessing nutritional status of hospitalized patients.Method: A simple method of nutritional assessment, called The Simple Nutritional Assessment, was compared to albumin serum as the gold standard. This study involved 50 nurses and 50 hospitalized patients in Dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta.Result: There was significant concordance of nutritional status assessed by the Simple Nutritional Assessment and the level of albumin serum (k=0,92). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio of the Simple Nutritional Assessment compared to serum albumin were 92%, 67–75%, and 3.8, respectively. Internal consistence of the Simple Nutritional ssessment is high (Alpha=0.80). Average time required for doing the assessment was only 5 minutes.Conclusion: The Simple Nutritional Assessment can be used for quick screening of nutritional status of hospitalized patients with high sensitivity and reliability.

When Time is of the Essence: Preliminary Findings for a Quick Administration of the Dot Counting Test

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Chase Bailey ◽  
Troy A Webber ◽  
Jacob I Phillips ◽  
Lindsay D R Kraemer ◽  
Janice C Marceaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Performance Validity ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Validity Measures ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Objective Performance validity research has emphasized the need for briefer measures and, more recently, abbreviated versions of established free-standing tests to minimize neuropsychological evaluation costs/time burden. This study examined the accuracy of multiple abbreviated versions of the Dot Counting Test (“quick” DCT) for detecting invalid performance in isolation and in combination with the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 (TOMMT1). Method Data from a mixed clinical sample of 107 veterans (80 valid/27 invalid per independent validity measures and structured criteria) were included in this cross-sectional study; 47% of valid participants were cognitively impaired. Sensitivities/specificities of various 6- and 4-card DCT combinations were calculated and compared to the full, 12-card DCT. Combined models with the most accurate 6- and 4-card combinations and TOMMT1 were then examined. Results Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were significant for all 6- and 4-card DCT combinations with areas under the curve of .868–.897. The best 6-card combination (cards, 1-3-5-8-11-12) had 56% sensitivity/90% specificity (E-score cut-off, ≥14.5), and the best 4-card combination (cards, 3-4-8-11) had 63% sensitivity/94% specificity (cut-off, ≥16.75). The full DCT had 70% sensitivity/90% specificity (cut-off, ≥16.00). Logistic regression revealed 95% classification accuracy when 6-card or 4-card “quick” combinations were combined with TOMMT1, with the DCT combinations and TOMMT1 both emerging as significant predictors. Conclusions Abbreviated DCT versions utilizing 6- and 4-card combinations yielded comparable sensitivity/specificity as the full DCT. When these “quick” DCT combinations were further combined with an abbreviated memory-based performance validity test (i.e., TOMMT1), overall classification accuracy for identifying invalid performance was 95%.

The value of hepatic ultrasound and biochemical liver tests in screening for liver metastases.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Tempero ◽  
C A Williams ◽  
J C Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Lactic Dehydrogenase ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Additional Advantage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Liver Tests ◽  
Metastatic Liver

The records of 92 patients with a known diagnosis of extrahepatic cancer who had undergone hepatic ultrasound, biochemical liver tests (alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, lactic dehydrogenase, and bilirubin levels), and subsequent liver biopsy or autopsy within a 6-week period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound and biochemical tests in the detection of metastatic liver disease were calculated. Although there was no significant difference in the sensitivity of either examination, the ultrasound demonstrated higher specificity and accuracy than the biochemical liver tests. The high sensitivity of hepatic ultrasound prevailed even in patients with normal biochemical liver tests. The sensitivity of hepatic ultrasound was significantly lower in patients with lymphoma compared with patients with colorectal cancer (50% v 100%, P less than .05). Notable incidental extrahepatic findings were reported in 25% of the ultrasound examinations. In institutions skilled in sonography, hepatic ultrasound may be a superior tool in the detection of liver metastases in most solid tumors, excluding lymphoma, and offers the additional advantage of simultaneous biliary tract and perihepatic visualization.

Validating the Pediatric Symptoms Checklist–17 in the Preschool Environment

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-474
Author(s):  
Jin Liu ◽  
Yin Burgess ◽  
Christine DiStefano ◽  
Fan Pan ◽  
Ning Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Behavioral Disorder ◽  
Cutoff Score ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Pediatric Symptom Checklist ◽  
School Based ◽  
Teacher Report Form

In the Response to Intervention framework, a psychometrically sound screening tool is essential for identification of children with emotional and behavioral risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist–17 (PSC-17) screener in school-based settings. Forty-four teachers rated 738 preschoolers using the PSC-17; children were later assessed using long forms of the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2) Preschool form or the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) Caregiver–Teacher Report Form to identify emotional and behavioral disorder. Validity evidence including examinations of a multilevel factor structure, internal consistency, and criterion-related validity supported the conclusion that the PSC-17 is a high-quality universal screening tool in school-based settings. Finally, to identify emotional and behavioral risk with young children, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses with the PSC-17 yielded a lower cutoff score (i.e., 7) than the original cutoff score (i.e., 15) based on a clinical sample.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document