scholarly journals The state of PRRT and its sequencing amongst current therapeutic options for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M Raymond ◽  
Tetiana Korzun ◽  
Adel Kardosh ◽  
Kenneth J. Kolbeck ◽  
Rodney Pommier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Its Sequencing ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Reduce Tumor Burden ◽  
Spectrum Of Patients

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most common form of neuroendocrine neoplasia, but there is no current consensus for the sequencing of approved therapies, particularly with respect to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This comprehensive review evaluates the data supporting approved therapies for GEP-NETs and recommendations for therapeutic sequencing with a focus on how PRRT currently fits within sequencing algorithms. The current recommendations for PRRT sequencing restrict its use to metastatic, inoperable, progressive midgut NETs, however, this may change with emerging data to suggest PRRT might be beneficial as neoadjuvant therapy for inoperable tumors, is more tolerable than other treatment modalities following first-line standard dose somatostatin analogues, and can be used as salvage therapy after disease relapse following prior successful cycles of PRRT. PRRT has also been shown to reduce tumor burden, improve quality of life, and prolong the time to disease progression in a broad spectrum of patients with GEP-NETs. As the various potential benefits of PRRT in GEP-NET therapy continues to expand, it is necessary to review and critically evaluate our treatment algorithms for GEP-NETs.

scholarly journals GEP–NETs UPDATE: Radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 (1) ◽  
pp. R1-R8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter A van der Zwan ◽  
Lisa Bodei ◽  
Jan Mueller-Brand ◽  
Wouter W de Herder ◽  
Larry K Kvols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15–35% of patients. Also, outcome in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compares very favorably with that for somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, or new, ‘targeted’ therapies. They also compare favorably to PFS data for liver-directed therapies. Two decades after the introduction of PRRT, there is a growing need for randomized controlled trials comparing PRRT to ‘standard’ treatment, that is treatment with agents that have proven benefit when tested in randomized trials. Combining PRRT with liver-directed therapies or with targeted therapies could improve treatment results. The question to be answered, however, is whether a combination of therapies performed within a limited time-span from one another results in a better PFS than a strategy in which other therapies are reserved until after (renewed) tumor progression. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Impact of Blood-Based Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Commencing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Fiona Ohlendorf ◽  
Rudolf Werner ◽  
Christoph Henkenberens ◽  
Tobias Ross ◽  
Hans Christiansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Peptide Receptor

Tumor microenvironment inflammation contributes to the proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, metastasis, subversion of adaptive immunity, and reduced treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the early predictive and prognostic significance of markers of systemic inflammation in patients receiving somatostatin-receptor targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This retrospective observational cohort study included 33 patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with PRRT. Pretreatment blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, e.g., Creactive protein levels (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), were documented and inflammation indexes, e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet × CRP multiplier (PCM), were calculated. Tumor burden was determined using [68Ga]GaDOTATATE PET/CT before enrollment and every 2 cycles thereafter until progression. Therapy response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, including its volumetric modification. Inflammatory biomarkers and inflammatory indexes demonstrated marked heterogeneity among patients, and were significantly higher in non-responders (e.g., CRP (P < 0.001), ANC (P = 0.002), and PCM (P < 0.001)). Change in whole-body tumor burden after two cycles of PRRT was significantly associated with CRP (P = 0.0157) and NLR (P = 0.0040) in multivariate regression analysis. A cut-off of 2.5 mg/L for CRP (AUC = 0.84, P = 0.001) revealed a significant outcome difference between patients with adversely high vs. low CRP (median PFS 508 days vs. not yet reached (HR = 4.52; 95% CI, 1.27 to 16.18; P = 0.02)). Tumor-driven systemic inflammatory networks may be associated with treatment response, change in tumor burden, and prognosis in patients with GEPNETs receiving PRRT.

scholarly journals Indications of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Gastroenteropancreatic and Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Updated Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1267
Author(s):  
Baptiste Camus ◽  
Anne-Ségolène Cottereau ◽  
Lola-Jade Palmieri ◽  
Solène Dermine ◽  
Florence Tenenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Dose ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Phase Iii Study

Radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows the administration of targeted radionuclides into tumor cells that express a large quantity of somatostatin receptors. The two most commonly used radio-peptides for radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors are 90Y-DOTATOC and 177Lu-DOTATATE. Radio-peptides have been used for several years in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, the randomized Phase III study NETTER-1 compared177Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose (double-dose) octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors, and demonstrated its efficacy in this setting. Strong signals in favor of efficiency seem to exist for other tumors, in particular for pancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. This focus on radionuclide therapy in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors addresses the treatment modalities, the validated and potential indications, and the safety of the therapy.

scholarly journals Targeting Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Resistance Mechanisms

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pozas ◽  
San Román ◽  
Alonso-Gordoa ◽  
Pozas ◽  
Caracuel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Optimal Sequence

Despite being infrequent tumors, the incidence and prevalence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) has been rising over the past few decades. In recent years, rigorous phase III clinical trials have been conducted, allowing the approval of several drugs that have become the standard of care in these patients. Although various treatments are used in clinical practice, including somatostatin analogues (SSAs), biological therapies like sunitinib or everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or even chemotherapy, a consensus regarding the optimal sequence of treatment has not yet been reached. Notwithstanding, sunitinib is largely used in these patients after the promising results shown in SUN111 phase III clinical trial. However, both prompt progression as well as tumor recurrence after initial response have been reported, suggesting the existence of primary and acquired resistances to this antiangiogenic drug. In this review, we aim to summarize the most relevant mechanisms of angiogenesis resistance that are key contributors of tumor progression and dissemination. Furthermore, several targeted molecules acting selectively against these pathways have shown promising results in preclinical models, and preliminary results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited.

scholarly journals The Challenge of Evaluating Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Present and the Future

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1083
Author(s):  
Virginia Liberini ◽  
Martin W. Huellner ◽  
Serena Grimaldi ◽  
Monica Finessi ◽  
Philippe Thuillier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Morphological Response ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Standardized Parameters

The NETTER-1 study has proven peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to be one of the most effective therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), improving progression-free survival and overall survival. However, PRRT response assessment is challenging and no consensus on methods and timing has yet been reached among experts in the field. This issue is owed to the suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of clinical biomarkers, limitations of morphological response criteria in slowly growing tumors and necrotic changes after therapy, a lack of standardized parameters and timing of functional imaging and the heterogeneity of PRRT protocols in the literature. The aim of this article is to review the most relevant current approaches for PRRT efficacy prediction and response assessment criteria in order to provide an overview of suitable tools for safe and efficacious PRRT.

scholarly journals Asphericity of Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Innovative Predictor of Outcome in Everolimus Treatment?

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 732
Author(s):  
Christoph Wetz ◽  
Julian Rogasch ◽  
Philipp Genseke ◽  
Imke Schatka ◽  
Christian Furth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Risk Benefit Assessment ◽  
Octreotide Scintigraphy

Background: in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET), the mTOR inhibitor everolimus is associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). This study evaluated the lesional asphericity (ASP) in pretherapeutic somatostatin receptor (SSR) imaging as the first imaging-based prognostic marker for PFS. Methods: this retrospective bicentric cohort study included 30 patients (f = 13, median age, 66.5 (48–81) years) with pretherapeutic [111In-DTPA0]octreotide scintigraphy (Octreoscan®). ASP of functional volumes of up to three leading lesions per patient (n = 74) was calculated after semiautomatic, background-adapted segmentation. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression regarding PFS for clinical factors and the maximum ASP per patient was obtained. Results: all 30 patients showed metachronous or progressive liver metastases. ASP, primary tumor site, metastases pattern, and prior peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were significantly associated with PFS in univariable Cox regression. Only ASP > 12.9% (hazard ratio (HR), 3.33; p = 0.024) and prior PRRT (HR, 0.35; p = 0.043) remained significant in multivariable Cox. Median PFS was 6.7 months for ASP > 12.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1–11.4 months) versus 14.4 (12.5–16.3) months for ASP ≤ 12.9% (log-rank, p = 0.028). Conclusion: pretherapeutic ASP of SSR positive lesions independently predicted PFS for treatment with everolimus in GEP-NET. ASP may supplement risk-benefit assessment before patient inclusion to treatment.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastrointestinal tract: Patterns of management and experience at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 326-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Farhan Zafar ◽  
Dattatraya Hari Patil ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
Volkan Adsay ◽  
Edith Brutcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Emory University ◽  
Age Cohort ◽  
Basic Characteristics ◽  
Significant Factors

326 Background: NET are a group of diverse malignancies observed commonly in the gastrointestinal tract. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) have been reported to have worse outcomes as compared to neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (GNET). Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics, patterns of treatment and survival in PanNET and GNET. Methods: After IRB approval, we identified 379 patients (pts) from 1996-2011 in the Winship registry. A chart review was done. Patients were categorized in mutually exclusive groups of PanNET and GNET. Results: Demographic information and basic characteristics are listed in the table. Treatment modalities for PanNET included surgery (91%), chemotherapy (14%), biologics (sunitinib or everolimus)(6%) and somatostatin analogues (11%). Liver directed therapies were employed in 30 pts with PanNET. Most common modality was radiofrequency ablation (23 pts) followed by Yttrium-90 embolization (5 pts) and chemoembolization (2 pt).Treatment for GNET included surgery (78%), chemotherapy (11%) and somatostatin analogues (17%). Median survival for GNET (all stage) was 11.6 years and PanNET (all stage) was 10.5 years (p=0.063). Using multivariate analysis, only age at diagnosis (p<0.001 for age cohort of <55 yrs) and clinical stage (p=0.002, for local disease) were found to be significant factors. Conclusions: Pts with NET have good prognosis. In our series, both PanNET and GNET, had comparable survival outcomes even in advanced stage. [Table: see text]

Metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogues: Ten years experience in a third level hospital in Mexico City.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 514-514
Author(s):  
Alberto Pimentel ◽  
Abdel Karim Dip Borunda ◽  
Luis Jonathan Bueno Rosario ◽  
Gloria Martinez Martinez ◽  
Miguel Angel Pluma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Long Acting

514 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET´s) are infrequent tumors, with a variety of symptoms depending of the kind of peptide they secrete as well as the affected organs. Long acting somatostatin analogues have shown an adequate rate of symptom control in functional tumors, they also have demonstrated antiproliferative effect, which is translated in a significant improvement of progression free and overall survival Methods: In this retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic GEP NET treated with long acting somatostatin analogues as first line, treated between 2005 and 2015, we evaluated clinical and pathological features, symptoms, disease control and survival adjusted with OMS classification Results: Our cohort included 95 patients with a mean age of 53 years. Primary affected sites were midgut (29.4%), followed by pNET (17.%), stomach (14.7%), and primary unknown in 14%. 20% of cases were functional tumors with diarrhea as the most common symptom in 70% and flushing in 50%. Considering the whole cohort the most prevalent symptom was abdominal pain in the 50% of cases. The OMS classification showed low grade tumors in 65% and 35% intermediate grade. Most common metastatic organ sites were; liver only 35%, liver and other 30%, peritoneum 10% and lymph nodes in 6%, non-specified sites in 19%. Somatostatine analogues used in first line were octreotide in 80% and lanreotide in 20%. Survival results demonstrated a progression free survival for the whole cohort of 84months. No differences between lanreotide and octreotide were observed. Conclusions: This study represents the first Mexican cohort of patients with GEP NET’s treated with somatostatin analogues with a long follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document