scholarly journals Comparison of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Chun Wah Fong ◽  
Nicholas Ho Cheung Lee ◽  
Andrew T. Yan ◽  
Ming-Yen Ng
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Composite Endpoint ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: There has been inconsistent data on the direct comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarise the current available evidence. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO-registered CRD42020166810) of randomized trials up to Feb 2020 that compared prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome with respect to the composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiovascular death, and secondary endpoints including MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or above), stent thrombosis, all-cause death and other safety outcomes. Results: Of the 11 eligible RCTs with 6098 patients randomized to prasugrel (n=3050) or ticagrelor (n=3048), 180 and 207 had the composite endpoint events in the prasugrel arm and the ticagrelor arm respectively over a weighted mean follow up period of 11±2 months. Compared with prasugrel, the ticagrelor group had similar risk in the primary composite endpoint (Risk Ratio (RR)= 1.17; 95% CI=0.96-1.42; p=0.12, I2=0%). Compared to prasugrel, there was no significant difference associated with the use of ticagrelor groups with respect to stroke (RR=1.05; 95% CI=0.66-1.67; p=0.84, I2=0%); cardiovascular death (RR=1.01; 95% CI=0.75-1.36; p=0.95, I2=0%); BARC type 2 or above bleeding (RR=1.16; 95% CI =0.89-1.52; p=0.26, I2=0%); stent thrombosis (RR=1.58; 95% CI =0.90-2.76; p=0.11, I2=0%); all cause death (RR=1.10; 95% CI =0.86-1.43; p=0.45, I2=0%) except MI (RR=1.38; 95% CI=1.05-1.81; p=0.02, I2=0%) Conclusion: Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death at a weighted mean follow up of 11 months. There was no significant difference between the secondary outcomes except myocardial infarction.

Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor for patient with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.C.W Fong ◽  
N Lee ◽  
A.T Yan ◽  
M.Y Ng
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Composite Endpoint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both effective anti-platelet drugs for patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, there has been limited data on the direct comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor until the recent ISAR-REACT 5 trial. Purpose To compare the efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome with respect to the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiac cardiovascular death, and secondary endpoints including MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or above), and stent thrombosis within 1 year. Methods Meta-analysis was performed on randomised controlled trials (RCT) up to December 2019 that randomised patients with acute coronary syndrome to either prasugrel or ticagrelor. RCTs were identified from Medline, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov using Cochrane library CENTRAL by 2 independent reviewers with “prasugrel” and “ticagrelor” as search terms. Effect estimates with confidence intervals were generated using the random effects model by extracting outcome data from the RCTs to compare the primary and secondary clinical outcomes. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (Ver 2.0) was used for assessment of all eligible RCTs. Results 411 reports were screened, and we identified 11 eligible RCTs with 6098 patients randomised to prasugrel (n=3050) or ticagrelor (n=3048). The included trials had a follow up period ranging from 1 day to 1 year. 330 events on the prasugrel arm and 408 events on the ticagrelor arm were recorded. There were some concerns over the integrity of allocation concealment over 7 trials otherwise risk of other bias was minimal. Patients had a mean age of 61±4 (76% male; 50% with ST elevation MI; 35% with non-ST elevation MI; 15% with unstable angina; 25% with diabetes mellitus; 64% with hypertension; 51% with hyperlipidaemia; 42% smokers). There was no significant difference in risk between the prasugrel group and the ticagrelor group on the primary composite endpoint (Figure 1) (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.17; 95% CI=0.97–1.41; p=0.10, I2=0%). There was no significant difference between the use of prasugrel and ticagrelor with respect to MI (RR=1.24; 95% CI=0.81–1.90; p=0.31); stroke (RR=1.05; 95% CI=0.66–1.67; p=0.84); cardiovascular death (RR=1.01; 95% CI=0.75–1.36; p=0.95); BARC type 2 or above bleeding (RR=1.17; 95% CI =0.90–1.54; p=0.24); stent thrombosis (RR=1.58; 95% CI =0.90–2.76; p=0.11). Conclusion Compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death within 1 year. There was also no significant difference in the risk of MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding and stent thrombosis respectively. Figure 1. Primary Objective Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract P023: Relationship Between Vitamin D Status and Incidence of Macro-vascular Events in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT)

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy D Alele ◽  
Kelly J Hunt ◽  
Bruce W Hollis ◽  
Deirdre K Luttrell ◽  
Louis M Luttrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Vitamin D Status ◽  
Primary Composite Endpoint

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the relationship between vitamin D levels and incident cardiovascular events in large well-characterized type 2 diabetes cohorts. METHODS: We performed prospective analyses to determine associations between vitamin D status and vascular endpoints among 936 Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) participants (mean age 59.7 years; 96.7% male; 40.4% minority). 25 (OH)-vitamin D was measured a median of two years after entry into the VADT study and participants were subsequently followed an average of 3.7 years for outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for macrovascular endpoints in relation to vitamin D quartile. The primary composite endpoint included documented myocardial infarction; stroke; death from cardiovascular causes; new or worsening congestive heart failure; surgical intervention for cardiac, cerebrovascular, or peripheral vascular disease; inoperable coronary artery disease; and amputation for ischemic gangrene. RESULTS: On average VADT participants had high cardiovascular risk at entry into the study: 65.3% of the patients recruited were obese, 38.5% had previously had a vascular event, 78.7% had hypertension and 59.5% were using statins. During follow-up, 17.2%, 5.0%, 5.9%, 2.4% and 6.6% of participants had a primary composite endpoint, myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, cardiovascular death or all-cause death, respectively. After adjusting for age, minority status, treatment arm and history of prior event, individuals in the lowest quartile of vitamin D (i.e., 1 to 15.9 ng/ml) were at similar risk of the primary composite endpoint [HR=1.26 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.96)], myocardial infarction [HR=1.13 (95% CI: 0.53, 2.42)], congestive heart failure [HR=1.44 (95% CI: 0.67, 3.06)], cardiovascular death [HR=0.86 (95% CI: 0.28, 2.63)], and death from any cause [HR=1.04 (95% CI: 0.53, 2.04)] as individuals in the highest quartile of vitamin D (i.e., 29.9 to 77.2 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that vitamin D status had no significant impact on the incidence of macrovascular events in a cohort of high-risk veterans with type 2 diabetes mellitus in which traditional risk factors were managed according to current treatment guidelines. SUPPORT: This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid AHA0755466U and the Research Service of the Charleston SC VA Medical Center.

Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 1922-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Priya Pulipati ◽  
Venkatesh Ravi ◽  
Priyanjali Pulipati
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Primary Composite Endpoint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) are relatively newer anti-hyperglycemic agents, which have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Design We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of GLP1RAs compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. We performed an additional subgroup analysis to evaluate the role of GLP1RAs in patients with chronic kidney disease. Methods MEDLINE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to 15 July 2019. The authors extracted relevant information from articles and independently assessed the study quality. Results Compared to placebo, GLP1RAs demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.95; P < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81–0.96; P = 0.004), primary composite endpoint (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80–0.91; P < 0.001) and non-fatal stroke (OR 0.86, 95% 0.77–0.95; P = 0.004). There was no statistical difference in non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83–1.01; P = 0.09). In subgroup analyses of patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, there was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint. Conclusions GLP1RAs demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, primary composite endpoint and non-fatal stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. There was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1670-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Yajing Huang ◽  
Xiaoyun Ji ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Liyan Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Primary And Secondary Prevention ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Context The goal of the meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and renal adverse events in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pioglitazone with any control were identified through PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Cardiovascular outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, defined as the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death), hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Renal outcomes included change in urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and 24-hour urinary protein excretion. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Results A total of 26 studies with 19 645 participants were enrolled. Pioglitazone reduced the risk of MACE (RR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7–0.9]), with benefit only seen in patients with a history of established CVDs (0.8 [0.7–0.9]) and not in those without (1.0 [0.7–1.3]). Regarding the individual components, pioglitazone reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.8 [0.6–1.0]) and nonfatal stroke (0.8 [0.7–0.9]), which was confined to patients with a history of established CVDs, whereas no treatment effect was found on cardiovascular death (1.0 [0.7–1.2]) regardless of the presence of established CVDs. Pioglitazone increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (1.3 [1.1–1.6]) and had no treatment effect on all-cause mortality (1.0 [0.8–1.1]). Pioglitazone reduced albuminuria by 18.5% (WMD 18.5% [95% CI, 21.1-16.0]), with a similar benefit in patients with different renal function categories. Conclusions Pioglitazone should be considered in patients with or at high risk of T2DM for the prevention of cardiovascular endpoints, especially in those with a history of established CVD who might benefit the most. Robust reductions in progression of renal disease are seen regardless of baseline renal function degree.

Sex-specific pattern of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Zhen Wu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yu-Juan Yu ◽  
Zhe Zhen ◽  
Ying-Xian Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Diastolic Function ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Specific Pattern

Abstract Aims  Few prospective studies have evaluated sex-specific pattern, natural progression of left ventricular (LV) remodelling, and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The aim of this study was to study the sex-specific prevalence, longitudinal changes of LV remodelling, and diastolic dysfunction in patients with T2DM. Further, the prognostic value of diastolic function in women and men was also evaluated. Methods and results  A total of 350 patients with T2DM (mean age 61 ± 11 years; women, 48.3%) was recruited. Detailed echocardiography was performed at baseline and after 25 months. A major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or myocardial infarction. Despite a similar age, prevalence of hypertension and body mass index, women had a higher prevalence of LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction at baseline and follow-up compared with men. A total of 21 patients developed MACE (5 cardiovascular death, 9 hospitalization for heart failure, and 7 myocardial infarction) during a median follow-up of 56 months. Women with diastolic dysfunction had a higher incidence of MACE than those with normal diastolic function but this association was neutral in men. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis indicated that diastolic dysfunction was associated with MACE in women [hazard ratio = 6.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–37.54; P &lt; 0.05] but not men (hazard ratio = 2.29, 95% CI = 0.67–7.89; P = 0.19). Conclusion  LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction, both at baseline and follow-up, were more common in women than men. Pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction was independently associated with MACE only in women with T2DM but was neutral in men.

scholarly journals Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus and blood glucose admission levels in patients with myocardial infarction with non obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Paolisso ◽  
F Donati ◽  
L Bergamaschi ◽  
S Toniolo ◽  
E.C D'Angelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Type 2 Dm ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Age And Sex

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous clinically entity and represents 5% to 10% of all patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Besides type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), which is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome, high glucose levels (HGL) at admission are frequently observed in this context. The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome is increased in people with DM and HGL. However, evidence regarding diabetes and high glucose level among MINOCA patients is lacking. Purpose To examine the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in diabetic and non-diabetic MINOCA patients as well as according to HGL at presentation. Methods Among 1995 patients with acute MI admitted to our coronary care unit from 2016 to 2018, we enrolled 186 consecutive MINOCA patients according to the current ESC diagnostic criteria. HGL at admission was defined as serum glucose level above 180 mg/dl. All-cause mortality and a composite end-point of all-cause mortality and myocardial re-infarction were compared. The median follow-up time was 19.6±12.9 months. Results Diabetic MINOCA patients were older (mean age 75.5±9.6 vs 66.5±14.7; p=0.002) and with higher prevalence of hypertension (p=0.016). Conversely, there were no significant differences in gender, BMI, dyslipidemia and atrial fibrillation. Similarly, no significant differences were observed regarding clinical and ECG presentation, echocardiographic features and laboratory tests. The rates of death (30.8% vs 8.3%; p=0.013) and MACEs (22.2% vs 6.8%; p=0.025) were significantly higher in MINOCA-DM patients; conversely, no significant differences were observed for re-MI (p=0.58). At multivariate regression model adjusted for age and sex, type 2 DM was not an independent predictor of all cause deaths (p=0.36) and MACE (p=0.24). Patients with admission HGL had similar baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentations, echocardiographic features and troponin values as compared to patients with no-HGL. HGL at admission was associated with higher incidence of all-cause-death (p&lt;0.001) and MACE (p=0.003) during follow-up compared to patients with no HGL; conversely, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of re-MI (p=0.7). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex demonstrated that HGL was an independent predictor of death (HR 6.25; CI 1.64–23.85; p=0.007) and MACEs (HR 6.17; CI 1.79–21.23, p=0.004). Conclusion In MINOCA patients, HGL was an independent risk factor for both MACEs and death while type 2 DM was not correlated with these hard endpoints. As a consequence, HGL could have a still unexplored pathophysiological role in MINOCA. Properly powered randomized trials are warranted. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Series: Cardiovascular outcome trials for diabetes drugs Canagliflozin and the CANVAS Program, dapagliflozin and DECLARE-TIMI 58, ertugliflozin and VERTIS CV

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome Trials ◽  
Significant Difference

EMPA-REG OUTCOME was a landmark trial with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin, which demonstrated significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke) driven by reductions in cardiovascular deaths and accompanied by an early reduction in hospitalisation for heart failure. This was followed by cardiovascular outcome trials with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin. The CANVAS Program was an integrated analysis of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials with canagliflozin. It demonstrated a significant reduction in MACE, but not in any of the components, and there was an unexpected increase in amputations and fractures with canagliflozin. The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial with dapagliflozin had two co-primary endpoints. A composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure was significantly reduced, but there was no significant difference in MACE comparing dapagliflozin with placebo. Analysis of patients with a prior myocardial infarction, however, demonstrated significant reductions in MACE. The VERTIS CV trial with ertugliflozin was disappointing as there was no difference in MACE comparing ertugliflozin and placebo. In all four trials a reduction in hospitalisation for heart failure was observed in patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of whether they had existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or increased cardiovascular risk. Pre-specified renal outcomes were reduced with empagliflozin, canagliflozin and dapagliflozin, and these drugs are now commonly used in the management of people with type 2 diabetes. It is hard to envisage an ongoing role for ertugliflozin in routine clinical management as the evidence for its cardiovascular benefit is not convincing.

scholarly journals Markers of Poor Prognosis in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Revascularization: A 3-Year Survival Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e000139
Author(s):  
Alexander Parkhomenko ◽  
Natalia Dovgan ◽  
Yaroslav Lutay ◽  
Sergey Kozhukhov
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Silent Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
History Of

Introduction: The non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) account for more than 50% of the total number of patients with ACS. The mortality rates after NSTEMI are not significantly different when compared with patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the assessment of clinical, laboratory and instrumental data during hospital stay provide any additional independent information in predicting the 3-year major cardiac events after NSTE-ACS. Methods: We observed 490 consecutive patients, who were admitted to the emergency cardiology department with NSTE-ACS. The patients' baseline characteristics, blood analysis, left ventricle (LV) and renal function data were assessed and analyzed. The median follow‑up time was 36 months. The endpoint was cardiovascular death. Results: The results of our study show that the risk of cardiovascular death during the three years follow-up after multivariate adjustment increases with older age (> 64 years), history of diabetes, prior myocardial infarction and history of angina pectoris, lower ejection fraction (<50%), degree of myocardial hypertrophy (the thickness of the interventricular septum >1.25 mm) of the LV and the degree of diastolic dysfunction (E-wave deceleration time (DT) < 150 ms), silent myocardial ischemia during first 24-hours, high pulse pressure on Day 1 (>49 mm Hg), glucose level > 7.5 mmol/l on admission and moderate kidney dysfunction (CrCl <60 ml/min). Conclusion: In patients with NSTE-ACS, we report the cardiovascular death risk factors within the 3-year follow-up period in the present study. We thus conclude that it is important to identify the patients with high risk of future cardiovascular complications.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 874-882
Author(s):  
Huub H. de Klerk ◽  
Chantal L. Welsink ◽  
Anne J. Spaans ◽  
Lukas P. E. Verweij ◽  
Michel P. J. van den Bekerom
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Surgical Debridement ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Vas Scores

Primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the elbow can cause disabling symptoms of pain, locking, stiffness, and a limitation in the range of motion. There is no consensus regarding the role of open and arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of symptomatic primary elbow OA. The aim of this study is to systematically review the outcome of surgical debridement. A preoperative/postoperative comparison will be made between the two surgical procedures. All studies reporting on debridement as treatment for primary elbow OA with a minimum of one-year follow-up were included. Outcome parameters were functional results, complications, and performance scores. Data were extracted from 21 articles. The arthroscopic group consisted of 286 elbows with a weighted mean follow-up of 40 ± 17 months (range, 16–75). The open group consisted of 300 elbows with a weighted mean follow-up of 55 ± 20 months (range, 19–85). Both procedures showed improvement in Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM) flexion-extension, and ROM pronation-supination. Only in ROM flexion was a statistically significant difference in improvement seen between the groups in favour of the open group. The arthroscopic group showed improvement in pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Nothing could be stated about pain VAS scores in the open group due to a lack of data. In the arthroscopic group 18 complications (6%) were described, in the open group 29 complications (12%). Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:874-882. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document