Abstract 15615: Eligibility for Lipid Lowering Therapy Based on AHA/ACC Risk Score, Coronary Artery Calcification, and CVD Events- National Implications for the Appropriate Use of Preventive Pharmacotherapy: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khurram Nasir ◽  
Marcio Bittencourt ◽  
Michael J Blaha ◽  
Matthew J Budoff ◽  
Ron Blankstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Event Rate ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
New Guidelines

Background: It is estimated that according to ACC-AHA guidelines for cholesterol management an additional 12.8 million adults including 10.4 million for primary prevention are considered for moderate-high intensity statin therapy. We sought to determine whether coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing might identify individuals who are expected to derive the most, and the least, benefit from the prescribed pharmacotherapy. Methods: MESA is a longitudinal, population-based study of 6,814 men and women aged 45-84 without clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) at enrollment. The following participants were excluded from the analysis: 1100 (16%) on lipid lowering medication, 87 individuals (1.3%) with absent LDL levels, 26 (0.4%) with missing risk factors for calculation of 10-yr risk of ASCVD based on the new pooled-cohort equations as well as 634 (9.3%) aged >75 years. Results: The final study population consisted of 4,967 individuals (59±9 years, 47% males). Overall 255 (5.1%) hard CVD events were noted in follow-up of median 10.3 years (IQR=9.7-10.8). Based on the new guidelines (figure), 2449 (49%) were considered candidates for moderate-high intensity statin therapy at baseline. Of these, 41% had CAC=0 and had 5.2 CVD events/1000 person-years and 29% had CAC>100 and they had 15.2 events/1000 person-years. Among the 610 individuals who would be considered candidates for moderate intensity statin , 350 (57%) had a CAC=0 and an event rate of 1.5/1000 person year. CAC testing was similarly able to risk stratify individuals across increasing levels (quartiles) of ASCVD risk >7.5% (figure). Conclusion: Within MESA, nearly half of patients considered for statin therapy based on the new guidelines had CAC=0, and experienced a very low event rate and subsequent high number needed to treat to prevent one event. Our study findings suggest that CAC further refines the estimate of CVD risk and may facilitate informed shared decision-making regarding statin treatment.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in outpatients with coronary artery disease living in a large industrial center of Eastern Siberia

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 3135
Author(s):  
N. G. Gogolashvili ◽  
R. A. Yaskevich
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Target Level ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Artery Disease

Aim. To study the prescription rate of lipid-lowering therapy and achieving the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values in outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) living in Krasnoyarsk.Material and methods. The study included all patients with CAD hospitalized in the cardiology department of the clinic of the Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North (Krasnoyarsk) in 2018-2019. The analysis included data from 1671 patients (men, 770; women, 901). During hospitalization, an in-depth survey of patients was carried out on the subject of prescribing and taking lipid-lowering drugs. On admission, lipid profile was assessed in all patients.Results. At the time of admission, only 51,4% of patients received lipidlowering therapy. The majority received statin monotherapy (99,2%). Only 0,8% of patients received combination therapy (statin+ezetimibe). The most frequently prescribed statin in the study was atorvastatin — 74,6%. Rosuvastatin was received by 17,1% of patients. In most cases, the doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin corresponded to the moderate-intensity statin therapy regimen. The frequently prescribed dose of atorvastatin was 20 mg/day — 54,4%, rosuvastatin — 10 mg/day — 68,7%. The target level of LDL-C <1,8 mmol/L was reached by 16,3%, <1,5 mmol/L — by 9,0%, <1,4 mmol/L — only 6,5% of patients. Most often, the target LDL-C levels were achieved by patients receiving high-intensity statin (HIS) therapy. The target level of LDL-C <1,8 mmol/L was reached by 37,5%, <1,5 mmol/L — 23,9%, LDL cholesterol <1,4 mmol/L — 20,7% of patients, receiving HIS.Conclusion. In patients with CAD living in Krasnoyarsk, the most commonly prescribed statins were atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but only 32% of patients received HIS. Combination lipid-lowering therapy has been used extremely rarely. Among the surveyed patients, the current target level of LDL-C for patients with CAD (<1,4 mmol/L) was achieved only in 6,5% of patients. In the group of patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy, this target level was achieved in 20,7% of patients, which indicates the need for strict adherence to current clinical guidelines.

Combined lipid-lowering therapy from standpoint of modern guidelines for management of dyslipidaemias

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
O. D. Ostroumova ◽  
A. I. Kochetkov ◽  
A. I. Listratov
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Residual Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Density Lipoproteins ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Wide Range

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death, and its prevalence is projected to increase in the near future. Dyslipidemia is one of the most important risk factors for CAD, and special attention is currently being paid to improving approaches to its correction. In the new revision of the Russian Guidelines for the Management of Patients with dyslipidemia (2020), priorities are given to high-intensity statin therapy: new more strict target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL–C) are introduced. Experts also emphasize the important role of the cholesterol fraction of non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL–C), primarily triglycerides, and introduce their target levels. The concept of residual risk, which remains despite effective statin therapy and achievement of the target level of LDL–C, is closely related to non-HDL–C. Here, hypertriglyceridemia is of crucial importance, contributing to an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, combined lipid-lowering therapy in the form of a combination of high-intensity statin and fenofibrate is an effective approach to significantly improve the prognosis and reduce the residual risk. According to research data, rosuvastatin provides a reduction in LDL–C by ≥ 50 %, has a wide range of pleiotropic effects in combination with an optimal safety profile. Fenofibrate allows you to effectively reduce the level of triglycerides and implements additional protective effects on the cardiovascular system. The logical continuation of the principle of combined lipid-lowering therapy was the appearance of a fixed combination (FC) of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate, which already has its own evidence base of studies indicating a complex and complementary effect on the disturbed blood lipid spectrum, a good safety profile of therapy, and the form of ‘single-pill’ significantly increases patients adherence to treatment. It can be expected that the widespread use of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate in clinical practice will effectively reduce the residual cardiovascular risk and thus provide an improved prognosis for patients.

Abstract 15576: Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Familial Hypercholesterolemia Individuals Attending a Cascade Screening Program

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
elaine coutinho ◽  
Marcio H Miname ◽  
Viviane Z Rocha ◽  
Marcio S Bittencourt ◽  
Cinthia Jannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cascade Screening

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with early onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Lipid lowering treatment (LLT) may change the natural history of FH, however there is scant information about elderly individuals (older than 60 years) with FH. This study describes characteristics of elderly FH individuals presenting or not CVD. Hypothesis: Monogenic defects are important markers of CVD risk and initiation and long-term use of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) is relevant to minimize this risk. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of clinical and laboratory of molecularly proven elderly FH (FH+) and non-affected (FH-) individuals attending a cascade screening program. FH+ were divided in those presenting or not CVD (defined as previous myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, carotid or coronary revascularization and angina with stenosis ≥50% on angiography). Results: From 4,111 genotyped individuals, 462 (11.2%) elders were included (198 FH+ and 264 FH-). There was predominance of females in either groups, however with more men in FH+ 37.4% vs. 24.2%, p=0.002. No differences were seen between FH+ and FH- regarding age, [median (%25;75%)] 66 (62;71) and 66 (63;71) years, p=0.68; use of LLT 88.5% vs. 91.5%, p=0.29 and high intensity LLT 61.7 % vs. 55.8%, p=0.20, respectively. Despite longer LLT duration in FH+ 11(7;20) vs. 7 (3;13) years, p<0.001, in either groups LLT was started late, at 54 (47;61) and 59 (52;64) years, p <0.001, respectively in FH+ and FH-. FH+ had higher LDL-C at diagnosis, 243 (179;302) vs. 228 (209;251) mg/dL, p=0.013, as well as greater frequencies of previous CVD 40.9% vs. 27.3%, p=0.002, and early CVD 22.2% vs. 9.0%, p<0.001. In FH+, male sex [OR (95%CI)] 5.29 (2.25-12.45), p<0.001, and use of high intensity LLT 2.51 (1.08-5.87), p=0.03, were independently associated with CVD. Conclusions: The genetic diagnosis of FH was associated with higher rates of CVD and early CVD vs. FH- hypercholesterolemics. Elders with FH+ who survived despite late LLT initiation have a worse CVD history than FH- elders, emphasizing the relevance of a monogenic defect as cause of long-lasting hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, particularly in men.

P828Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering therapy and target level attainment after a recent myocardial infarction - nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Allahyari ◽  
T Jernberg ◽  
D Lautsch ◽  
P Lundman ◽  
E Hagstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Target Level ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Esc Guidelines

Abstract Background Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease after a myocardial infarction (MI). The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend lipid lowering therapy to reach LDL-C treatment targets after an MI. Purpose To assess LDL-C target level attainment according to the ESC guidelines among patients with a recent MI in Sweden. Methods We used data from nationwide registers in Sweden and included patients aged 18–74 years admitted to a hospital with MI (1 January 2013–1 October 2016). Among patients who were alive and had LDL-C data available, we assessed LDL-C target achievement at 6–10 weeks (n=21,505) and 12–14 months (n=17,957) after the MI by category of lipid lowering therapy (no statin; low/moderate-intensity statins; high-intensity statins; any statin plus ezetimibe). The target was defined as an LDL-C of <1.8 mmol/L and a ≥50% reduction from the baseline if LDL-C was 1.8–3.5 mmol/L and the patient was not already receiving statins. Results Most patients were treated with high-intensity statin monotherapy (84.2% and 72.0%) or any statin with ezetimibe (2.1% and 10.4%) at 6–10 weeks and 12–14 months after the MI, respectively. In total, 37.7% (6–10 weeks) and 38.3% (12–14 months) had attained their LDL-C target. The proportion of patients attaining their LDL-C target at 6–10 weeks was 12% (no statin), 30% (low/moderate-intensity statins), 39% (high-intensity statins), and 49% (any statin plus ezetimibe). The corresponding numbers at 12–14 months were 16% (no statin), 29% (low/moderate-intensity statins), 39% (high-intensity statins), and 58% (any statin plus ezetimibe). A total of 11.8% at 6–10 weeks and 12.3% at 12–14 months reached an LDL-C level of <1.8 mmol/L, but did not reach their LDL-C target level due to the ≥50% reduction criteria. (Figure 1) Figure 1 Conclusions In this large population-based study using nationwide data, more than half of patients with a recent MI did not achieve the ESC guidelines LDL-C target levels, despite a large proportion with high-intensity statin therapy. In patients treated with statins and ezetimibe, four out of ten did not reach the ESC LDL-C target level. Our findings indicate that there may be a need for additional LDL-C lowering therapy if the target level is to be attained in all patients. Acknowledgement/Funding This project was supported by funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Management of Dyslipidaemia for the Prevention of Stroke: Clinical Practice Recommendations from the Lipid Association of India

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raman Puri ◽  
Vimal Mehta ◽  
S S Iyengar ◽  
Padma Srivastava ◽  
Jamal Yusuf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Extreme Risk

Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide. The rates of stroke are increasing in less affluent countries predominantly because of a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors. The Lipid Association of India (LAI) has provided a risk stratification algorithm for patients with ischaemic stroke and recommended low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for those in a very high risk group and extreme risk group (category A) of <50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) while the LDL-C goal for extreme risk group (category B) is ≤30 mg/dl (0.8 mmol/l). High intensity statins are the first-line lipid lowering therapy. Non-statin therapy like ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors may be added as an adjunct to statins in patients who do not achieve LDL-C goals statins alone. In acute ischaemic stroke, high intensity statin therapy improves neurological and functional outcomes regardless of thrombolytic therapy. Although conflicting data exist regarding increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) with statin use, the overall benefit risk ratio favors long-term statin therapy necessitating detailed discussion with the patient. Patients who have statins withdrawn while being on prior statin therapy at the time of acute ischaemic stroke have worse functional outcomes and increased mortality. LAI recommends that statins be continued in such patients. In patients presenting with ICH, statins should not be started in the acute phase but should be continued in patients who are already taking statins. ICH patients, once stable, need risk stratification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Abstract 12119: Class I Indication for Statin Therapy in Primary Prevention by Three Cholesterol Guidelines and Prevalence of Coronary Artery Calcium in Asymptomatic Adults: Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Flueckiger ◽  
Waqas Qureshi ◽  
Michael Blaha ◽  
Gregory Burke ◽  
Veit Sandfort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Coronary Artery Calcium ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Class I ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cholesterol Guidelines

Introduction:Statin therapy for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events provides greater relative risk reduction compared with primary prevention. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) identifies individuals with established but subclinical ASCVD disease. Identifying a population with a higher prevalence of CAC may improve the benefit and efficacy of statin therapy in the primary prevention of ASCVD. We assessed the accuracy of class I statin eligibility criterion for primary prevention by the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines for the presence of CAC and compared it with class I criterion for lipid lowering therapy eligibility by the 2004 NCEP/ATP III and 2011 ESC/EAS cholesterol guidelines. Methods:4723 out of the 6814 total participants not taken statins during the baseline exam and with complete data including CAC were included in analysis. We evaluated the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of class I recommendation for lipid lowering therapy (high risk designation) by the three cholesterol guidelines for three categories of prevalent CAC [CAC present/absent; CAC ≥ 100; CAC ≥300 Agatston] in participants of the Multi Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Results:Mean age 59±9 years, 47% male, 37% white, 28% black, 23% Hispanic, 12% Asian, 7.5% with diabetes, 35% current/former smokers, mean glomerular filtration rate of 83±18 ml/min and mean BMI of 28±6 kg/m2. 1978(41.9%), 816(17.3%) and 392(8.3%) had CAC present, CAC ≥100 and CAC ≥300 respectively. Table 1 shows the results. Conclusions:The SN, SP, PPV and NPV of class I statin eligibility criteria by the 3 guidelines for subclinical ASCVD depends significantly on the definition of CAC. The 2013 ACC/AHA class I statin eligibility has a higher SN, lower SP, and higher NPV when compared with the 2004 NCEP/ATP III and 2011 ESC/EAS class I criterion for statin therapy across all three CAC categories.

scholarly journals Lipid lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention in Austria: are LDL-C goals achieved?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Siostrzonek ◽  
Helmut Brath ◽  
Robert Zweiker ◽  
Heinz Drexel ◽  
Robert Hoelzl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lipid Management ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Statin Monotherapy

Summary Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent cause of death in Austria. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT) in patients at high or very high CV risk. Lipid management and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in Austria have not recently been assessed. Methods Subgroup analysis for Austria of a European 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study. Patients received LLT for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP). Data including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL‑C were collected during a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018. Achievement of the risk-based 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL‑C goal while receiving stabilized LLT was assessed. Results A total of 293 patients were enrolled from 8 Austrian sites, of which 200 (PP = 104, SP = 96) received stabilized LLT at the LDL‑C measurement date. Overall, 58% (71% PP, 43% SP) and 38% (52% PP, 23% SP) achieved the risk-based 2016 and 2019 goals, respectively. Most patients received moderate-intensity statin monotherapy (46%), while 34% used high-intensity statin monotherapy. Combination therapy of moderate/high-intensity statin with ezetimibe (12%), or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors with statin ± ezetimibe (1%), was used infrequently. Conclusion The current Austrian routine lipid management using mainly moderate-intensity or high-intensity statin monotherapy is insufficient to attain ESC/EAS guideline goals, in particular the more stringent 2019 recommendations, a situation comparable to other participating European countries. In addition to switching to and optimizing doses of high-intensity statins, a combination with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors will be needed in many cases.

Abstract 13249: European and American Blood Cholesterol Guidelines Result in Similar Rates of Statin Recommendations when Applied to a Country with High Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M Navar-Boggan ◽  
Tomasz Zdrojewski, ◽  
Adam Wyszomirski ◽  
Mateusz Lachacz ◽  
Grzegorz Opolski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Blood Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
European Guidelines ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cholesterol Guidelines

Introduction: The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) recently released updated guidelines for management of blood cholesterol, which differ from current European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines. How these differences affect the overall number of individuals recommended for statin therapy in a country with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains unclear. Hypothesis: Due to the lower threshold for statin recommendations for primary prevention based on 10-year CVD risk under the AHA/ACC guidelines, more adults overall would be recommended for statin therapy under American compared to European guidelines. Methods: Using 2011 data from a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Poland (NATPOL), we estimated the number and characteristics of adults aged 40-65 recommended for lipid lowering therapy under the ESC/EAS and AHA/ACC guidelines. The survey sample of 1060 adults represented 13.5 million adults in Poland aged 40-65. Results: Under ESC/EAS guidelines, 47.6% of adults (44.6-50.7%) aged 40-65 were recommended for immediate statin therapy, compared to 49.9% (46.9-52.9%) under AHA/ACC guidelines. Among adults free of cardiovascular disease (CVD), 10.5% had discordant recommendations between guidelines. Individuals recommended for statin therapy under ACC/AHA but not ESC/EAS guidelines had less chronic kidney disease, higher HDL cholesterol, higher 10-year (AHA/ACC calculator) risk, and higher 30-year (Framingham) risk than adults recommended under ESC/EAS but not under ACC/AHA guidelines. Ten-year CVD mortality risk estimated by the SCORE algorithm was similar between the two groups. Conclusions: In spite of differences between current European and American cholesterol guidelines, when applied to a nationwide representative sample from a country with high CVD risk, the number of adults aged 40-65 recommended for cholesterol lowering therapy under each guideline was nearly identical. Although more adults met criteria for primary prevention based on 10-year CVD risk under new American guidelines, the impact of this is offset by additional criteria for statin therapy in current European guidelines.

Abstract 15632: The Implications of the Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol on a Rural Community: The Heart of New Ulm Project

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Miedema ◽  
Abbey C Sidebottom ◽  
Arthur Sillah ◽  
Gretchen Benson ◽  
Jackie Boucher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
Census Data ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Blood Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The impact of the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) cholesterol guidelines on the volume of statin-eligible patients requires further analysis, particularly in rural communities who are rarely included in traditional large observational cohorts. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis using data from the Heart of New Ulm Project, a population-based program aimed at reducing modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in rural New Ulm, MN. According to 2010 census data, there were 7,855 adults aged 40-79 years in the target population at that time. The community is served by one health and electronic health records (EHR) system. EHR-based demographics, diagnoses, and medications were analyzed in residents aged 40-79 years in 2012-2013. The prevalence of indications for statin therapy and of use of statins and other lipid-lowering medications were analyzed according to the ACC/AHA guidelines. Results: There were 6,357 residents with a visit during the study period, of which 4,281 had adequate data and were included in the analysis (mean age 59.4 [10.2] years, 52.7% female). In our study sample, 2,529 (59%) met one of the 4 major indications for statin therapy (Table). Of those with an indication, 65% were on a statin, 11% were on a high-intensity statin, and 5% on other lipid-lowering agents. An age stratified analysis demonstrated that 86% of individuals 60-79 years old (n=2,036) are now statin-eligible compared to 35% of individuals 40-59 years old (n=2,245). Conclusion: Using contemporary EHR data from a rural Midwest community, approximately 3 in 5 middle-age residents qualify for statin therapy according to the new guidelines, but only two-thirds of those individuals were taking a statin. Full compliance with the new guidelines will require a significant increase in statin utilization, including more frequent use of high-intensity statins.

Abstract 14: Statin Use Before and After the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Management Guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yashashwi Pokharel ◽  
Fengming Tang ◽  
Vijay Nambi ◽  
Vera Bittner ◽  
Ravi Hira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Statin Use

Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA guideline, first published in 11/2013, recommends moderate to high intensity statin therapy in 4 specific patient groups (Table). Whether this guideline has impacted clinical practice is not known. Methods: We examined statin use and dose intensity before (9/2012-10/2013) and after (2/2014-3/2015) the guideline in the 4 specific groups from cardiology practices participating in the ACC NCDR®’s PINNACLE Registry after excluding practices with missing data from either period. To assess the guidelines’ effect on statin use, using a hierarchical logistic model, we examined interaction between guideline publication and time to allow different slopes and intercepts during the 2 periods. Results: There was a small increase in statin and a similar decrease in non-statin lipid lowering therapy use after the guideline in all 4 groups (overall change <6%, Table), mostly accounted for by a modest increase in high intensity statin use. Although there was significant interaction between guideline publication and time (p=0.034) with steeper slope in the post guideline period, the difference was only modest. For example, in 9/2014 the projected overall statin use was 68.6% without and 71.3% with the interaction the term, respectively. Conclusion: There is suboptimal implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines in cardiology practices. Most high-risk patients are not receiving high intensity statin therapy. More efforts are needed for effective guideline implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document