Abstract 12346: Reduced Diuretic Response With Fluid Retention is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soichiro Aoki ◽  
Takahiro Okumura ◽  
Masaki Sakakibara ◽  
Akinori Sawamura ◽  
Ryota Morimoto ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diuretic response (DR) has been proposed as a prognostic factor in heart failure patients. The presence of leg edema or jugular venous distention reflects fluid retention (FR) and patients are treated with diuretics under the guide of FR. However, the prognostic value of DR and FR has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation of DR and FR to the mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: We enrolled 188 consecutive acute heart failure inpatients survived to discharge (mean age of 78 years, 101 females). DR was calculated by the formula; in-hospital Δbody weight kg / 80mg oral furosemide (or equivalent loop diuretic dose). FR on admission was simply evaluated by the presence of leg edema or jugular venous distention. All patients were divided into 4 groups based on the median of DR and FR; Group-A (DR≤-0.49 with FR, n=65), Group-B (DR≤-0.49 without FR, n=29), Group-C (DR>-0.49 with FR, n=47) and Group-D (DR>-0.49 without FR, n=47). We followed all patients up to one year after discharge. Cardiac events were defined as cardiac deaths and re-hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Results: The mean of LVEF was 44% and plasma BNP level was 960 pg/mL. The median length of stay was 18 days, the dose of furosemide was 570 mg, and the Δbody weight was -3.6 kg. The blood urea nitrogen level (p=0.001), creatinine level (p=0.004) and the prior exposure to loop diuretics (p<0.001) was significantly higher in the Group-C and D. The probability of cardiac events in the Group-C was significantly higher than that in any other groups (Figure). Adjusted multivariate analysis identified the Group-C as an independent predictor of cardiac events (HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.43-3.78; p=0.001). Conclusion: Reduced DR with FR is a poor prognostic factor in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Seo ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Tetsuya Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Morita ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging provides prognostic information in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, there is little information available on the prognostic role of cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), especially relating to reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt; 40%], mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF; 40% ≤ LVEF &lt; 50%) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; LVEF ≥ 50%). Methods and results We studied 349 patients admitted for ADHF and discharged with survival. Cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging, echocardiography, and venous blood sampling were performed just before discharge. The cardiac 123I-MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio (late H/M) was measured on the chest anterior view images obtained at 200 min after the isotope injection. The endpoint was cardiac events defined as unplanned HF hospitalization and cardiac death. During a follow-up period of 2.1 ± 1.4 years, 128 patients had cardiac events (45/127 in HFrEF, 28/78 in HFmrEF, and 55/144 in HFpEF). On multivariable Cox analysis, late H/M was significantly associated with cardiac events in overall cohort (P = 0.0038), and in subgroup analysis of each LVEF subgroup (P = 0.0235 in HFrEF, P = 0.0119 in HFmEF and P = 0.0311 in HFpEF). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with low late H/M (defined by median) had significantly greater risk of cardiac events in overall cohort (49% vs. 25% P &lt; 0.0001) and in each LVEF subgroup (HFrEF: 48% vs. 23% P = 0.0061, HFmrEF: 51% vs. 21% P = 0.0068 and HFpEF: 50% vs. 26% P = 0.0026). Conclusion Cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction was associated with poor outcome in ADHF patients irrespective of HFrEF, HFmrEF, or HFpEF.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Suzuki ◽  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Takayoshi Yamaki ◽  
Koichi Sugimoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Kunii ◽  
...  

Background.Diuresis is a major therapy for the reduction of congestive symptoms in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. We previously reported the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan compared to carperitide in hospitalized patients with ADHF. There were some reports of cardio- and renal-protective effects in carperitide; therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the long-term effects of tolvaptan and carperitide on cardiorenal function and prognosis.Methods and Results.One hundred and five ADHF patients treated with either tolvaptan or carperitide were followed after hospital discharge. Levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide, serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were measured before administration of tolvaptan or carperitide at baseline, the time of discharge, and one year after discharge. These data between tolvaptan and carperitide groups were not different one year after discharge. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that the event-free rate regarding all events, cardiac events, all cause deaths, and rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure was not significantly different between tolvaptan and carperitide groups.Conclusions.We demonstrated that tolvaptan had similar effects on cardiac and renal function and led to a similar prognosis in the long term, compared to carperitide.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kanai ◽  
H Motoki ◽  
T Okano ◽  
K Kimura ◽  
M Minamisawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Polypharmacy would be associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods In 863 patients who discharged after treatment for HF were prospectively enrolled. Number of tablets prescribed at discharge was counted. Death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalization for HF were tracked. Results In our study cohort (median age, 78), 447 patients experienced adverse events during median 503 days follow-up. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, a greater number of prescribed tablets was associated with future adverse cardiac events in the crude population. Although patients with the greater number of non-HF medications showed worse outcome, those of HF medications were not associate with the outcome (Figure). Furthermore, the number of tablets was an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events after adjustment for age, gender, B-type natriuretic peptide, hemoglobin, albumin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 95% CI: 1.295 (1.066–1.573), p=0.009). Conclusions Polypharmacy was associated with poor prognosis. Although the numbers of tablets and non-HF medications were significantly associated with worse out come in HF patients, the number of HF medications was not. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4207
Author(s):  
Alberto Palazzuoli ◽  
Gaetano Ruocco ◽  
Paolo Severino ◽  
Luigi Gennari ◽  
Filippo Pirrotta ◽  
...  

Background: Advanced heart failure (HF) is a condition often requiring elevated doses of loop diuretics. Therefore, these patients often experience poor diuretic response. Both conditions have a detrimental impact on prognosis and hospitalization. Aims: This retrospective, multicenter study evaluates the effect of the addition of oral metolazone on diuretic response (DR), clinical congestion, NTproBNP values, and renal function over hospitalization phase. Follow-up analysis for a 6-month follow-up period was performed. Methods: We enrolled 132 patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in advanced NYHA class with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 40%) taking a mean furosemide amount of 250 ± 120 mg/day. Sixty-five patients received traditional loop diuretic treatment plus metolazone (Group M). The mean dose ranged from 7.5 to 15 mg for one week. Sixty-seven patients continued the furosemide (Group F). Congestion score was evaluated according to the ESC recommendations. DR was assessed by the formula diuresis/40 mg of furosemide. Results: Patients in Group M and patients in Group F showed a similar prevalence of baseline clinical congestion (3.1 ± 0.7 in Group F vs. 3 ± 0.8 in Group M) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (51% in Group M vs. 57% in Group F; p = 0.38). Patients in Group M experienced a better congestion score at discharge compared to patients in Group F (C score: 1 ± 1 in Group M vs. 3 ± 1 in Group F p > 0.05). Clinical congestion resolution was also associated with weight reduction (−6 ± 2 in Group M vs. −3 ± 1 kg in Group F, p < 0.05). Better DR response was observed in Group M compared to F (940 ± 149 mL/40 mgFUROSEMIDE/die vs. 541 ± 314 mL/40 mgFUROSEMIDE/die; p < 0.01), whereas median ΔNTproBNP remained similar between the two groups (−4819 ± 8718 in Group M vs. −3954 ± 5560 pg/mL in Group F NS). These data were associated with better daily diuresis during hospitalization in Group M (2820 ± 900 vs. 2050 ± 1120 mL p < 0.05). No differences were found in terms of WRF development and electrolyte unbalance at discharge, although Group M had a significant saline solution administration during hospitalization. Follow-up analysis did not differ between the group but a reduced trend for recurrent hospitalization was observed in the M group (26% vs. 38%). Conclusions: Metolazone administration could be helpful in patients taking an elevated loop diuretics dose. Use of thiazide therapy is associated with better decongestion and DR. Current findings could suggest positive insights due to the reduced amount of loop diuretics in patients with advanced HF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document