Abstract 15024: Efficacy of Bretylium in Termination of Treatment Resistant Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janos Molnar ◽  
John C Somberg

Bretylium is the only drug approved by the FDA specifically to terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF). It has also been approved to treat life threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT) as a second line agent. Due to shortage of drug substance, bretylium became unavailable for clinical use and has been dropped from ACLS guidelines in 2000. Recently, intravenous (IV) bretylium became available again in the U.S. This study evaluated the efficacy of bretylium IV in the termination of treatment resistant VT and VF. In 4 studies, a total of 85 patients with sustained VT and/or VF were administered IV bretylium 5 mg/kg: 23 patients had VT and 62 had VF. Resistant VT/VF was defined as VT or VF that could not be terminated by shock or other anti-arrhythmics or recurred before bretylium was administered. All patients received IV lidocaine; 71 received between 1 to 5 additional antiarrhythmics, and all patients with VF received DC shocks and failed all pharmacologic therapies prior to bretylium administration. Overall, 61 patients (72%) were successfully treated with IV bretylium and 31 survived to discharge from the hospital (36%). A meta-analysis of these studies indicates that the weighted conversion rate across the studies was 70% (see figure). The only study that compared IV bretylium and amiodarone did not find superiority of amiodarone in the suppression of hemodynamically destabilizing VT or VF. In patients with resistant VT or VF bretylium is reported to be effective in acute termination of the VT or VF that otherwise was not responsive to shock or other anti-arrhythmic drugs. These results suggest that bretylium should be employed in the pharmacotherapy of VT and VF when DC shock or other anti-arrhythmic drugs fail. The studies this report is based on are small studies and thus there is a need for a large controlled clinical trial to provide a better understanding of bretyliums effectiveness and if a higher than 30 mg/kg dose of bretylium would be more effective.

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-343
Author(s):  
Cynthia A. Sanoski

Despite the use of conventional treatment modalities, the probability of survival for patients experiencing cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains quite poor. Therefore, the management of cardiac arrest remains a challenge. The most recent Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) guidelines have adopted an evidence-based approach toward the treatment of pulseless VT/VF. A number of evidence-based changes have been made in the treatment algorithms for these life-threatening arrhythmias, including the new recommendations for using vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone. This article will provide an overview of the evidence-based approach that was used in the development of the 2000 ACLS guidelines and will summarize the key trials that were used to support the inclusion of vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone in the pulseless VT/VF treatment algorithm. Additionally, dosing and administration issues for these agents will be discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arwa Younis ◽  
Mehmet K. Aktas ◽  
Spencer Rosero ◽  
Valentina Kutyifa ◽  
Bronislava Polonsky ◽  
...  

Background Sex differences in outcome have been reported in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. We aimed to report on the incidence of time‐dependent life‐threatening events in male and female patients with long QT syndrome with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Methods and Results A total of 60 patients with long QT syndrome received an ICD for primary or secondary prevention indications. Life‐threatening events were evaluated from the date of ICD implant and included ICD shocks for ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or death. ICDs were implanted in 219 women (mean age 38±13 years), 46 girls (12±5 years), 55 men (43±17 years), and 40 boys (11±4 years). Mean follow‐up post‐ICD implantation was 14±6 years for females and 12±6 years for males. At 15 years of follow‐up, the cumulative probability of life‐threatening events was 27% in females and 34% in males (log‐rank P =0.26 for the overall difference). In the multivariable Cox model, sex was not associated with significant differences in risk first appropriate ICD shock (hazard ratio, 0.83 female versus male; 95% CI, 0.52–1.34; P =0.47). Results were similar when stratified by age and by genotype: long QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1), long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2), and long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3). Incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks was higher in males versus females (4.2 versus 2.7 episodes per 100 patient‐years; P =0.018), predominantly attributed to atrial fibrillation. The first shock did not terminate ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 48% of females and 62% of males ( P =0.25). Conclusions In patients with long QT syndrome with an ICD, the risk and rate of life‐threatening events did not significantly differ between males and females regardless of ICD indications or genotype. In a substantial proportion of patients with long QT syndrome, first shock did not terminate ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2275-2278
Author(s):  
Leonard Ganz

Electrical storm is a condition in which there are recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation or sustained and/or poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia that occurs within a short period and requires aggressive intervention to prevent imminent mortality and other adverse outcomes. The condition may be related to precipitating factors, such as ischaemia or electrolyte disturbances, or may be part of an underlying cardiac disorder (e.g. cardiomyopathy, ischaemic heart disease, and channelopathies) that, often for uncertain reasons, culminates in recurrent episodes of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Frequently, sympathetic activation plays a role in precipitating episodes. Here, electrical storm is characterized and an approach to management is discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 4628
Author(s):  
T. G. Vaikhanskaya ◽  
L. N. Sivitskaya ◽  
O. D. Levdansky ◽  
T. V. Kurushko ◽  
N. G. Danilenko

Aim. To study the diagnostic significance of genetic testing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), identify predictors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) and assess adverse clinical outcomes in different genetic groups.Material and methods. The study included 126 unrelated patients with verified DCM as follows: 70 (55,6%) probands with criteria for familial DCM and 56 (44,4%) individuals with a probable hereditary component. All patients (age, 43,1±11,3 years; men, 92 (73%); left ventricular ejection fraction, 30,6±8,43%; left ventricular enddiastolic diameter, 68,3±8,36 mm; follow-up period — median, 49 months) receive a complex of diagnostic investigations, including genetic screening using nextgeneration sequencing, followed by verification of variants by the Sanger method.Results. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic variants were found in 61 (48,4%) of 126 patients with DCM. The dominant mutations were titin-truncating variants (TTNtvs), identified in 16 individuals (12,7%), and variants of lamin A/C (LMNA), identified in 13 probands (10,3%). Mutations in the other 19 genes were found in 32 (25,4%) patients. The following primary endpoints were assessed: sudden cardiac death (SCD), episodes of VTA (sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) and appropriate shocks of implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)/cardioverter defibrillators (CVD) devices. As a result of ROC analysis, the following independent risk factors for SCD were identified: mutations in the LMNA gene (AUC, 0,760; p=0,0001) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (cut-off heart rate ≥161 bpm: AUC, 0,788; p=0,0001). When comparing the phenotypes and genotypes of DCM, TTNtv genotype was associated with a lower prevalence of complete left bundle branch block (χ2=7,46; p=0,024), a lower need for CRT/CVD implantation (χ2=5,70; p=0,017) and more rare episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (χ2=30,1; p=0,0001) compared with LMNA carriers. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the worst prognosis in carriers of LMNA mutations both in relation to life-threatening VTA (log rang χ2=88,5; p=0,0001) and in achieving all unfavorable outcomes (χ2=27,8; p=0,0001) compared with groups of genenegative individuals, carriers of TTNtv and other genotypes.Conclusion. The phenotypes of DCM with TTNtv did not significantly differ in the incidence of VTAs and adverse outcomes compared with the gene-negative group and other genotypes (with the exception of LMNA). The contribution of the associations of LMNA mutations with VTAs on prognosis was confirmed, which shows the important role of LMNA genotype diagnosis for SCD risk stratification in patients with DCM.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiho Sato ◽  
Yoshito Zamami ◽  
Toru Imai ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
Toshihiro Koyama ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2275-2278
Author(s):  
Leonard Ganz

Electrical storm is a condition in which there are recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation or sustained and/or poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia that occurs within a short period and requires aggressive intervention to prevent imminent mortality and other adverse outcomes. The condition may be related to precipitating factors, such as ischaemia or electrolyte disturbances, or may be part of an underlying cardiac disorder (e.g. cardiomyopathy, ischaemic heart disease, and channelopathies) that, often for uncertain reasons, culminates in recurrent episodes of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Frequently, sympathetic activation plays a role in precipitating episodes. Here, electrical storm is characterized and an approach to management is discussed.


1984 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1268-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Benditt ◽  
D.Woodrow Benson ◽  
Ann Dunnigan ◽  
Jolene M. Kriett ◽  
Marc R. Pritzker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document