scholarly journals Diverse Racial/Ethnic Group Underreporting and Underrepresentation in High-Impact Cholesterol Treatment Trials

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (24) ◽  
pp. 2409-2411
Author(s):  
Ashish Sarraju ◽  
Areli Valencia ◽  
Joshua W. Knowles ◽  
David J. Maron ◽  
Fatima Rodriguez
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
rhow not provided ◽  
Vidhya Gunaseelan ◽  
mbicket not provided

This retrospective cohort study will investigate the timeliness of surgery based on the racial/ethnic group of patients who under colorectal surgery for cancer. Patients are included if they underwent surgical procedures for colon cancer between January 1, 2015 and April 30, 2020. The primary exposure of interest is the racial/ethnic group of the patient. The primary outcome is the the timeliness of surgery, defined as having urgent/emergent surgery (less timely) vs. elective surgery (more timely). Secondary outcomes relate to comprehensiveness of surgery, and include performance of preoperative staging tests, preoperative lab testing, and preoperative teaching of patients, as well as length of stay and additional clinical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models will be used to adjust for other demographic and clinical differences between study groups.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe W. Eng ◽  
Medellena Maria Glymour ◽  
Paola Gilsanz ◽  
Dan M. Mungas ◽  
Elizabeth R. Mayeda ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1011-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libby Ellis ◽  
Renata Abrahão ◽  
Meg McKinley ◽  
Juan Yang ◽  
Ma Somsouk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofen Yan ◽  
Jenny I. Shen ◽  
Rubette Harford ◽  
Wei Yu ◽  
Robert Nee ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesIn the United States mortality rates for patients treated with dialysis differ by racial and/or ethnic (racial/ethnic) group. Mortality outcomes for patients undergoing maintenance dialysis in the United States territories may differ from patients in the United States 50 states.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThis retrospective cohort study of using US Renal Data System data included 1,547,438 adults with no prior transplantation and first dialysis treatment between April 1, 1995 and September 28, 2012. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of death for the territories versus 50 states for each racial/ethnic group using the whole cohort and covariate-matched samples. Covariates included demographics, year of dialysis initiation, cause of kidney failure, comorbid conditions, dialysis modality, and many others.ResultsOf 22,828 patients treated in the territories (American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands), 321 were white, 666 were black, 20,299 were Hispanic, and 1542 were Asian. Of 1,524,610 patients in the 50 states, 838,736 were white, 444,066 were black, 182,994 were Hispanic, and 58,814 were Asian. The crude mortality rate (deaths per 100 patient-years) was lower for whites in the territories than the 50 states (14 and 29, respectively), similar for blacks (18 and 17, respectively), higher for Hispanics (27 and 16, respectively), and higher for Asians (22 and 15). In matched analyses, greater risks of death remained for Hispanics (HR, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 1.70; P<0.001) and Asians (HR, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.78 to 2.27; P<0.001) living in the territories versus their matched 50 states counterparts. There were no significant differences in mortality among white or black patients in the territories versus the 50 states.ConclusionsMortality rates for patients undergoing dialysis in the United States territories differ substantially by race/ethnicity compared with the 50 states. After matched analyses for comparable age and risk factors, mortality risk no longer differed for whites or blacks, but remained much greater for territory-dwelling Hispanics and Asians.


Sexual Abuse ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Fix ◽  
Melissa A. Cyperski ◽  
Barry R. Burkhart

The overrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within the criminal justice system relative to their population percentage, a phenomenon termed disproportionate minority contact, has been examined within general adult and adolescent offender populations; yet few studies have tested whether this phenomenon extends to juvenile sexual offenders (JSOs). In addition, few studies have examined whether offender race/ethnicity influences registration and notification requirements, which JSOs are subject to in some U.S. states. The present study assessed for disproportionate minority contact among general delinquent offenders and JSOs, meaning it aimed to test whether the criminal justice system treats those accused of sexual and non-sexual offenses differently by racial/ethnic group. Furthermore, racial/ethnic group differences in risk, legal classification, and sexual offending were examined for JSOs. Results indicated disproportionate minority contact was present among juveniles with non-sexual offenses and JSOs in Alabama. In addition, offense category and risk scores differed between African American and European American JSOs. Finally, registration classifications were predicted by offending characteristics, but not race/ethnicity. Implications and future directions regarding disproportionate minority contact among JSOs and social and legal policy affecting JSOs are discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1577-1577
Author(s):  
A. M. Mendizabal ◽  
W. F. Anderson ◽  
P. Garcia-Gonzalez ◽  
P. H. Levine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document