scholarly journals Immigration Status and Sex Differences in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Retrospective Study of 5 Million Adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manav V. Vyas ◽  
Amy Y. X. Yu ◽  
Anna Chu ◽  
Bing Yu ◽  
Hibo Rijal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Disease Prevention ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention ◽  
Immigration Status ◽  
The Impact

Background We evaluated whether immigration status modified the association between sex and the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention in Ontario, Canada. Methods and Results We used a population‐based administrative database‐derived cohort of community‐dwelling adults (aged ≥40 years) without prior cardiovascular disease residing in Ontario on January 1, 2011. In the preceding 3 years, we evaluated screening for hyperlipidemia and diabetes in those not previously diagnosed; diabetes control (HbA 1c <7%); and medication use to control hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes in those with previous diagnosis. We calculated the absolute prevalence difference (APD) between women and men for each metric stratified by immigration status and then determined the difference‐in‐differences for immigrants compared with long‐term residents. Our sample included 5.3 million adults (19% immigrants), with receipt of each metric ranging from 55% to 90%. Among immigrants, women were more likely than men to be screened for hyperlipidemia (APD, 10.8%; 95% CI, 10.5–11.2) and diabetes (APD, 11.5%; 95% CI, 11.1–11.8) and to be treated with medications for hypertension (APD, 3.5%; 95% CI, 2.4–4.5), diabetes (APD, 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.7–3.6) and hyperlipidemia (APD, 1.8%; 95% CI, 0.5–3.1). Among long‐term residents, findings were similar except poorer medication use for diabetes (APD, −2.8%; 95% CI, −3.4 to −2.2) and hyperlipidemia (APD, −3.5%; 95% CI, −4.0 to −3.0]) in women compared with men. Conclusions The overall quality of primary preventive care can be improved for all adults, and future research should evaluate the impact of observed equal or better care in women than men, irrespective of immigration status, on cardiovascular disease incidence.

scholarly journals INTEREST GROUP SESSION—RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF CARE: LIVING IN AND LEAVING NURSING HOMES: THE FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO QUALITY OF LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OUTCOMES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S359-S359
Author(s):  
Nancy Kusmaul ◽  
Mercedes Bern-Klug
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Nursing homes house some of the most vulnerable older adults. They often have complex medical conditions and/or cognitive impairments that put them at risk for negative outcomes and poor quality of life. These outcomes can be altered through incorporating evidence-based practices aimed to improve care and residents’ life experiences. In this symposium we will explore factors that are shown to influence outcomes and quality of life for people that live in and are discharged from, long term care settings. Amy Roberts and colleagues will explore the influences of nursing home social service staff qualifications on residents’ discharge outcomes. Colleen Galambos and colleagues will present findings on advance directives and their impact on reducing potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Kelsey Simons and colleagues will discuss the potential for unmet needs for mental health services as part of nursing home care transitions, and will discuss a model of quality improvement that addresses this gap in care. Vivian Miller will present findings on the impact transportation access has on the ability of community-dwelling family members to visit and provide social support to their family member residents in long-term care. Finally, Nancy Kusmaul and Gretchen Tucker report the findings of their study comparing perceptions of nursing home residents, direct care staff, management, and families on the care practices that influence resident health and quality of life while they live in a long term care setting.

A Review of Five Major Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Programs. Part I: Rationale, Design, and Theoretical Framework

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Shea ◽  
Charles E. Basch
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Disease Prevention ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention ◽  
Blood Cholesterol ◽  
Community Based

Major community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programs have been conducted in North Karelia, Finland; the state of Minnesota; Pawtucket, Rhode Island; and in three communities and more recently in five cities near Stanford, California. These primary prevention programs aim to reduce cardiovascular disease incidence by reducing risk factors in whole communities. These risk factors are smoking, high blood cholesterol, diet high in cholesterol and saturated fat, hypertension, sedentary lifestyle, and obesity. This strategy may be contrasted with secondary prevention programs directed at patients who already have symptomatic cardiovascular disease and “high risk” primary prevention programs directed at individuals found through screening to have one or more risk factors. The design of the five major programs is similar in that intervention communities are matched for purposes of evaluation with nearby comparision communities. Underlying these programs are theories of community health education, social learning, communication, social marketing, and community activation, as well as more traditional biomedical and public health disciplines. This is Part I of a two-part article.

scholarly journals Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Among Community-Dwelling Elderly

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1945-1952
Author(s):  
Michael E. Ernst ◽  
Enayet K. Chowdhury ◽  
Lawrence J. Beilin ◽  
Karen L. Margolis ◽  
Mark R. Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

High office blood pressure variability (OBPV) in midlife increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the impact of OBPV in older adults without previous CVD is unknown. We conducted a post hoc analysis of ASPREE trial (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) participants aged 70-years and older (65 for US minorities) without history of CVD events at baseline, to examine risk of incident CVD associated with long-term, visit-to-visit OBPV. CVD was a prespecified, adjudicated secondary end point in ASPREE. We estimated OBPV using within-individual SD of mean systolic BP from baseline and first 2 annual visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for associations with CVD events. In 16 475 participants who survived to year 2 without events, those in the highest tertile of OBPV had increased risk of CVD events after adjustment for multiple covariates, when compared with participants in the lowest tertile (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.08–1.70]; P =0.01). Similar increased risk was observed for ischemic stroke (HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.04–2.33]; P =0.03), heart failure hospitalization, or death (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.07–2.79]; P =0.02), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.04–1.54]; P =0.02). Findings were consistent when stratifying participants by use of antihypertensive drugs, while sensitivity analyses suggested the increased risk was especially for individuals whose BP was uncontrolled during the OBPV estimation period. Our findings support increased OBPV as a risk factor for CVD events in healthy older adults with, or without hypertension, who have not had such events previously. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT01038583; URL: https://www.isrctn.com ; Unique identifiers: ISRCTN83772183.

scholarly journals Quality of care for cardiovascular disease prevention in rheumatoid arthritis: compliance with hyperlipidemia screening guidelines

Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1789-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Schmidt ◽  
J Antonio Aviña-Zubieta ◽  
Eric C Sayre ◽  
Michal Abrahamowicz ◽  
John M Esdaile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Disease Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention ◽  
Screening Guidelines

scholarly journals The quality of cardiovascular disease prevention in rural primary care

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Allenby ◽  
Leigh Kinsman ◽  
Rachel Tham ◽  
Julie Symons ◽  
Mike Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Disease Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention ◽  
Rural Primary Care

scholarly journals Impact of disasters, including pandemics, on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course: a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e047152
Author(s):  
Vanessa De Rubeis ◽  
Jinhee Lee ◽  
Muhammad Saqib Anwer ◽  
Yulika Yoshida-Montezuma ◽  
Alessandra T Andreacchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Life Course ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Cardiometabolic Health ◽  
Obesity And Diabetes ◽  
The Life Course ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundDisasters are events that disrupt the daily functioning of a community or society, and may increase long-term risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, obesity and diabetes. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the impact of disasters, including pandemics, on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course.DesignA systematic search was conducted in May 2020 using two electronic databases, EMBASE and Medline. All studies were screened in duplicate at title and abstract, and full-text level. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the association between a population-level or community disaster and cardiometabolic outcomes ≥1 month following the disaster. There were no restrictions on age, year of publication, country or population. Data were extracted on study characteristics, exposure (eg, type of disaster, region, year), cardiometabolic outcomes and measures of effect. Study quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.ResultsA total of 58 studies were included, with 24 studies reporting the effects of exposure to disaster during pregnancy/childhood and 34 studies reporting the effects of exposure during adulthood. Studies included exposure to natural (n=35; 60%) and human-made (n=23; 40%) disasters, with only three (5%) of these studies evaluating previous pandemics. Most studies reported increased cardiometabolic risk, including increased cardiovascular disease incidence or mortality, diabetes and obesity, but not all. Few studies evaluated the biological mechanisms or high-risk subgroups that may be at a greater risk of negative health outcomes following disasters.ConclusionsThe findings from this study suggest that the burden of disasters extend beyond the known direct harm, and attention is needed on the detrimental indirect long-term effects on cardiometabolic health. Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, these findings may inform public health prevention strategies to mitigate the impact of future cardiometabolic risk.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020186074.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document