Abstract TP10: Selection Criteria, Is The Clue To Successful Thrombectomy?

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Cardona ◽  
Helena Quesada ◽  
Luis Cano ◽  
Lucia Aja ◽  
De Miquel MA. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment

In our comprehensive stroke center we analyze correct selection criteria to use self-expandable retrievable intracranial stents for acute stroke treatment. The criteria for intervention were the onset of neurological symptoms, a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) ≥9 at presentation, large vessel occlusion stroke demonstrated by angio-CT, and failure of intravenous thrombolysis or exclusion criteria to administrate it. METHODS: We performed an retrospective analysis of 512 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke candidates for thrombectomy, from April of 2010 to June of 2012, that met inclusion criteria for intervention. Experienced vascular neurologists selected 171 patients to undergoing endovascular therapy using retrievable stents (Solitaire,Trevo). Successful recanalization results were assessed by follow-up angiography immediately after the procedure (TIMI 2-3/TICI 2b-3 score), and good functional outcome was considered when ≤2 mRankin score (mRS) was achieved at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were treated, 87% with anterior circulation stroke. The mean age was 67.5 years (range 32-87); 58% men. The median NIHSS at presentation was 17 (range 6-26). Recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 73% of patients. Symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 8%. Ninety-day mortality was 19, 5% and good 90-day functional outcome (mRS ≤2) was achieved by 45%. Unsuccessful recanalization (TICI 0-2a) was a significant predictor of poor outcome (mRS≤2: 9%). When we analyzed these patients according to inclusion criteria of IMS trial, 101 patients who met strict criteria achieved good neurological outcome more frequently (51% versus 34%) and significant lower mortality rates (17% vs 28%) compared with the group of 70 patients with IMS exclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy in recanalization, safety of thrombectomy and its consequent good clinical outcome is sufficiently established. It is important an experienced vascular neurologist to select possible candidates (proportion of evaluated/treated patients 3:1). Inclusion criteria for acute stroke trials do not always represent real population of stroke patients as well as their clinical results.

scholarly journals In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha-Pekka Pienimäki ◽  
Jyrki Ollikainen ◽  
Niko Sillanpää ◽  
Sara Protto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Stroke Center

Abstract Purpose Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO. Materials and Methods We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients. Conclusions MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

scholarly journals Predictors for affected stroke territory and outcome of acute stroke treatments are different for posterior versus anterior circulation stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Handelsmann ◽  
L. Herzog ◽  
Z. Kulcsar ◽  
A. R. Luft ◽  
S. Wegener
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Outcome Predictors ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
The University ◽  
Median Admission

AbstractDistinct patient characteristics have been proposed for ischaemic stroke in the anterior versus posterior circulation. However, data on functional outcome according to stroke territory in patients with acute stroke treatment are conflicting and information on outcome predictors is scarce. In this retrospective study, we analysed functional outcome in 517 patients with stroke and thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy treated at the University Hospital Zurich. We compared clinical factors and performed multivariate logistic regression analyses investigating the effect of outcome predictors according to stroke territory. Of the 517 patients included, 80 (15.5%) suffered a posterior circulation stroke (PCS). PCS patients were less often female (32.5% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.031), received thrombectomy less often (28.7% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.001), and had lower median admission NIHSS scores (5 vs. 10, p < 0.001) as well as a better median three months functional outcome (mRS 1 vs. 2, p = 0.010). Predictors for functional outcome were admission NIHSS (OR 0.864, 95% CI 0.790–0.944, p = 0.001) in PCS and age (OR 0.952, 95% CI 0.935–0.970, p < 0.001), known symptom onset (OR 1.869, 95% CI 1.111–3.144, p = 0.018) and admission NIHSS (OR 0.840, 95% CI 0.806–0.876, p < 0.001) in ACS. Acutely treated PCS and ACS patients differed in their baseline and treatment characteristics. We identified specific functional outcome predictors of thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy success for each stroke territory.

Abstract TP9: Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Uphaus ◽  
Oliver C Singer ◽  
Joachim Berkefeld ◽  
Christian H Nolte ◽  
Georg Bohner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Male Patients

Introduction: The endovascular treatment (EVT) of cerebral ischemia in the case of large vessel occlusion has been established over recent years. Randomized trials showed a positive impact on the clinical outcome of endovascular treatment in addition to thrombolysis with respect to clinical outcome and safety, so that this therapeutic option will be implemented in future guidelines. The role of EVT in patients treated with oral anticoagulants remains uncertain. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that application of EVT is safe with regard to the occurrence of intracranial bleeding and clinical outcome in patients taking anticoagulants. Methods: The ENDOSTROKE-Registry is a commercially independent, prospective observational study in 12 stroke centers in Germany and Austria launched in January 2011. An online tool served for data acquisition of pre-specified variables concerning endovascular stroke therapy. Results: Data from 815 patients (median age 70, 57% male) undergoing EVT and known anticoagulation status were analyzed. A total of 85 (median age 76, 52% male) patients (10.4%) took oral anticoagulants prior to EVT. Anticoagulation status as measured with INR was 2.0-3.0 in 24 patients (29%), <2.0 in 52 patients (63%) and above 3.0 in 7 patients (8%) of 83 patients with valid INR data prior to EVT. Patients taking anticoagulants were significantly older (median age 76 vs. 69, p < 0.001). Comparing those patients taking anticoagulants and those not, there were no differences concerning NIHSS at admission (with anticoagulants Median-NIHSS 17 vs. without Median-NIHSS 15, p = 0.492, Mann Whitney Test) and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage after intervention (with anticoagulants 11.8% vs. without 12.2%, p = 0.538). After adjustment for age and NIHSS at admission there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to good clinical outcome, as measured with the modified ranking scale (mRS, 90d-mRS 0-2, 39.2% of patients not receiving anticoagulants; 25.9% of those receiving anticoagulants). Conclusion: The application of endovascular treatment in patients taking oral anticoagulants is safe and should be considered in acute stroke treatment as an important alternative to contraindicated intravenous thrombolysis.

scholarly journals Direct transfer to angiosuite for patients with severe acute stroke treated with thrombectomy: the multicentre randomised controlled DIRECT ANGIO trial protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e040522
Author(s):  
Nolwenn Riou-Comte ◽  
François Zhu ◽  
Aboubaker Cherifi ◽  
Sébastien Richard ◽  
Lionel Nace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Intracerebral Haemorrhage ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Direct Transfer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

IntroductionMechanical thrombectomy (MT) increases functional independence in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO), and the probability to achieve functional independence decreases by 20% for each 1-hour delay to reperfusion. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether direct angiosuite transfer (DAT) is superior to standard imaging/emergency department-based management in achieving 90-day functional independence in patients presenting with an acute severe neurological deficit likely due to LVO and requiring emergent treatment with MT.Methods and analysisDIRECT ANGIO (Effect of DIRECT transfer to ANGIOsuite on functional outcome in patient with severe acute stroke treated with thrombectomy: the randomised DIRECT ANGIO Trial) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study. Eligibility requires a patient ≤75 years, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2, presenting an acute severe neurological deficit and admitted within 5 hours of symptoms onset in an endovascular-capable centre. A total of 208 patients are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to DAT or standard management. The primary outcome is the rate of patients achieving a functional independence, assessed as mRS 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary endpoints include patients presenting confirmed LVO, patients eligible to intravenous thrombolysis alone, patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and stroke-mimics, intrahospital time metrics, early neurological improvement (reduction in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale by ≥8 points or reaching 0–1 at 24 hours) and mRS overall distribution at 90 days and 12 months. Safety outcomes are death and intracerebral haemorrhage transformation. Medico-economics analyses include health-related quality of life and cost utility assessment.Ethics and disseminationThe DIRECT ANGIO trial was approved by the ethics committee of Ile de France 1. Study began in April 2020. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal.Trial registration numberNCT03969511.

scholarly journals Is the Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Sex-Related

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia Carvalho ◽  
André Cunha ◽  
Tiago Gregório ◽  
Ludovina Paredes ◽  
Henrique Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Real World ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Different Response

Background: Several reports refer to differences in stroke between females and males, namely in incidence and clinical outcome, but also in response to treatments. Driven by a recent analysis of the MR CLEAN trial, which showed a higher benefit from acute stroke endovascular treatment (EVT) in males, we intended to determine if clinical outcomes after EVT differ between sexes, in a real-world setting. Methods: We analyzed 145 consecutive patients submitted to EVT for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion, between January 2015 and September 2016, and compared the outcomes between sexes. Results: Our population was represented by 81 (55.9%) females, with similar baseline characteristics (pre-stroke disability, baseline NIHSS, and ASPECTS), rate of previous intravenous thrombolysis, time from onset to recanalization, and rate of revascularization; with the exception that women were on average 4 years older and had more hypertension, and men in turn had more tandem occlusions and atherosclerotic etiology (all p < 0.05). Even after adjusting for these statistically significant variables and for intravenous thrombolysis (as some studies advocate a different response to this treatment between sexes), there were no differences in intracranial hemorrhage, functional independence (mRS ≤2 in 60.9% males vs. 66.7% in females, p = 0.48; adjusted p = 0.36), or mortality at 3 months. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, we found no sex differences in clinical and safety outcomes after acute stroke EVT. Our results support the idea that women are equally likely to achieve good outcomes as men after acute stroke EVT.

Management of a wake-up stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-331
Author(s):  
Xuya Huang ◽  
Vafa Alakbarzade ◽  
Nader Khandanpour ◽  
Anthony C Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Ct Perfusion ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Ischaemic Brain

Current national guidelines advocate intravenous thrombolysis to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke presenting within 4.5 hours from symptom onset, and thrombectomy for patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke from large vessel occlusion presenting within 6 hours from onset. However, a substantial group of patients presents with acute ischaemic stroke beyond these time windows or has an unknown time of onset. Recent studies are set to revolutionise treatment for these patients. Using MRI diffusion/FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) mismatch, it is possible to identify patients within 4.5 hours from onset and safely deliver thrombolysis. Using CT perfusion imaging, it is possible to identify subjects with a middle cerebral artery syndrome who have an extensive area of ischaemic brain but as yet have only a small area of infarction who may benefit from urgent thrombectomy in up to 24 hours. Here, we highlight the recent advances in late window stroke treatment and their potential contribution to clinical practice.

Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcome after failed mechanical thrombectomy: ETIS registry analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017867
Author(s):  
Claire Rozes ◽  
Benjamin Maier ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
Romain Bourcier ◽  
Maeva Kyheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Shift Analysis ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
The Difference

BackgroundDespite constant improvements in recent years, sufficient reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not reached in up to 15% of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). The outcome of patients with unsuccessful reperfusion after MT especially after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use is not known. We investigated the influence of initial IVT in this particular group of patients with failed intracranial recanalization.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients presenting with LVOS of the anterior circulation and final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (mTICI) of 0, 1 or 2a were included. Posterior circulation, isolated cervical carotid occlusions and successful reperfusions (mTICI 2b, 2c or 3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) after 3 months. Secondary endpoints were safety outcomes including mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates.ResultsAmong 5076 patients with LVOS treated with MT, 524 patients with insufficient recanalization met inclusion criteria, of which 242 received IVT and 282 did not. Functional outcome was improved in the MT+IVT group compared with the MT alone group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (23.0% vs 12.9%; adjusted OR=1.82; 95% CI 0.98 to 3.38; p=0.058). However, 3 month mRS shift analysis showed a significant benefit of IVT (adjusted OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54). ICH and sICH rates were similar in both groups, although PH rate was higher in the MT+IVT group (adjusted OR=3.20; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54).ConclusionsAmong patients with LVOS in the anterior circulation and unsuccessful MT, IVT was associated with improved functional outcome even after unsuccessful MT. Despite recent trials questioning the place of IVT in the LVOS reperfusion strategy, these findings emphasize a subgroup of patients still benefiting from IVT.

scholarly journals Regular hours vs. on-call endovascular interventions for acute stroke treatment: initial single-center experience by interventional cardiologists

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Piayda ◽  
M Hornung ◽  
I Grunwald ◽  
K Sievert ◽  
S Bertog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment ◽  
Area Product

Abstract Background Endovascular treatment for acute stroke with large vessel occlusion became the mainstay therapy but remains limited due to lack of trainees and specialized centers. To offer this therapeutical option to a vast population, interventional cardiologists joined interdisciplinary stroke teams. Because of limited experience, it remains unclear if the timing of the procedure (i.e., regular hours vs. on-call time) may influence quality, time-effectiveness and outcomes. Purpose To investigate if the timing of the procedure (i.e., regular hours vs. on-call time) significantly influences procedural parameters and outcomes of patients undergoing acute endovascular stroke treatment. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing acute endovascular stroke treatment from 07/2012 – 10/2020, treated by cardiologists, were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, procedural aspects and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected. Cases were divided into two groups, depending on the timing of the procedure: on-call time (OC, i.e., weekend days, public holidays and documented “call in” of the on-call service) vs. regular hours (RH, i.e., all other procedures) and outcomes subsequently compared. Results One-hundred-thirteen consecutive patients underwent endovascular treatment for acute stroke; of those 77 (68.1%) during regular hours and 36 (31.9%) during on-call time. Patients were in their early 70ies and risk factors such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and atrial fibrillation were evenly distributed. Modified Ranking Scale (mRS) at presentation was 5 in both groups and decreased to 3 at discharge. The anterior circulation was most often affected (RH: 90.9% vs. OC: 94.4%, p=0.518) and a stent retriever only strategy commonly chosen (RH: 42.8% vs. OC: 30.5%, p=0.211), followed by a combined approach of stent retriever use and aspiration (RH: 25.9% vs. OC: 27.7%, p=0.752). Door-to-needle time (RH: 0:55h IQR [0:45–1:22] vs. OC: 1:05h IQR [0:54–1:30], p=0.237) and procedure duration (RH: 0:48h IQR [0:30–1:25] vs. OC: 0:58h IQR [0:35–1:46], p=0.214) were comparable. Contrast agent use and radiation time (RH: 17.6 min IQR [11.7–29.3] vs. OC: 17.6 min IQR [12.1–33.6]) did not differ between groups, however patients in the OC group experienced a higher dose area product (RH: 4827mGy cm2 IQR [1567–14092] vs. 12727mGy cm2 [6732–18889], p&lt;0.001). The combined quality endpoint, comprising of TICI IIb/III flow after the procedure, no embolization to new territory and no symptomatic intracranial bleeding during in hospital stay was met in 85.5% of patients in the RH group and 80.5% of the on-call group (p=0.485). Death during in-hospital stay was observed in 22% of patients in the RH group and 11.1% of the OC group (p=0.163). Conclusions Endovascular intervention for acute stroke treatment during on-call time is as effective and safe as if performed during regular hours but associated with a higher dose area product. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Acute stroke treatment and outcome in the oldest old (90 years and older) at a tertiary care medical centre in Germany-a retrospective study showing safety and efficacy in this particular patient population

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jil Kauffmann ◽  
Daniel Grün ◽  
Umut Yilmaz ◽  
Gudrun Wagenpfeil ◽  
Klaus Faßbender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Oldest Old ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment

Abstract Background Stroke is among the most common causes of death and disability worldwide. Despite the relevance of stroke-related disease burden, which is constantly increasing due to the demographic change in industrialized countries with an ageing population and consecutively an increase in age-associated diseases, there is sparse evidence concerning acute stroke treatment and treatment-related outcome in the elderly patient group. This retrospective study aimed at analysing patient characteristics, therapy-related complications and functional outcome in stroke patients aged 90 years or older who underwent acute stroke treatment (i.e. intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both). Methods We identified files of all inpatient stays at the Department of Neurology at Saarland University Medical Center (tertiary care level with a comprehensive stroke unit) between June 2011 and December 2018 and filtered for subjects aged 90 years or older at the time of admission. We reviewed patient files for demographic data, symptoms upon admission, (main) diagnoses, comorbidities, and administered therapies. For patients admitted due to acute stroke we reviewed files for therapy-related complications and functional outcome. We compared the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores upon admission and at discharge for these patients. Results We identified 566 inpatient stays of subjects aged 90 years or older. Three hundred sixty-seven of the 566 patients (64.8%) were admitted and discharged due to symptoms indicative of stroke. Two hundred eleven patients received a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke. These 211 patients were analysed subsequently. Sixty-four patients qualified for acute stroke treatment (intravenous thrombolysis n = 22, mechanical thrombectomy n = 26, intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy n = 16) and showed a significant improvement in their functional status as measured by change in mRS score (admission vs. discharge, p 0.001) with 7 (10.9%) observed potentially therapy-related complications (relevant drop in haemoglobin n = 2, subarachnoidal haemorrhage n = 1, cerebral haemorrhage n = 3, extracranial bleeding n = 1). One intravenous thrombolysis was stopped because of an uncontrollable hypertensive crisis. Patients who did not qualify for these treatments (including those declining acute treatment) did not show a change of their functional status between admission and discharge (p 0.064). Conclusion Our data indicate that acute stroke treatment is effective and safe in the oldest old. Age alone is no criterion to withhold an acute intervention even in oldest old stroke patients.

scholarly journals Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽  
Álvaro García-Tornel ◽  
Mònica Millán ◽  
Marc Ribó ◽  
Sergi Amaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Prehospital Delays ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], <i>p</i> 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], <i>p</i> 0.015) during the pandemic period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document