scholarly journals Interpreting Observed Temperature Probability Distributions Using a Relationship between Temperature and Temperature Advection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-53
Author(s):  
Marianna Linz ◽  
Gang Chen

Abstract The non-normality of temperature probability distributions and the physics that drive it are important due to their relationships to the frequency of extreme warm and cold events. Here we use a conditional mean framework to explore how horizontal temperature advection and other physical processes work together to control the shape of daily temperature distributions during 1979-2019 in the ERA5 reanalysis for both JJA and DJF. We demonstrate that the temperature distribution in mid- and high- latitudes can largely be linearly explained by the conditional mean horizontal temperature advection with the simple treatment of other processes as a Newtonian relaxation with a spatially-variant relaxation time scale and equilibrium temperature. We analyze the role of different transient and stationary components of the horizontal temperature advection in affecting the shape of temperature distributions. The anomalous advection of the stationary temperature gradient has a dominant effect in influencing temperature variance, while both that term and the covariance between anomalous wind and anomalous temperature have significant effects on temperature skewness. While this simple method works well over most of the ocean, the advection-temperature relationship is more complicated over land. We classify land regions with different advection-temperature relationships under our framework, and find that for both seasons the aforementioned linear relationship can explain ~30% of land area, and can explain either the lower or the upper half of temperature distributions in an additional ~30% of land area. Identifying the regions where temperature advection explains shapes of temperature distributions well will help us gain more confidence in understanding the future change of temperature distributions and extreme events.

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 4395-4415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek M. Lemoine

Abstract Uncertainty about biases common across models and about unknown and unmodeled feedbacks is important for the tails of temperature change distributions and thus for climate risk assessments. This paper develops a hierarchical Bayes framework that explicitly represents these and other sources of uncertainty. It then uses models’ estimates of albedo, carbon cycle, cloud, and water vapor–lapse rate feedbacks to generate posterior probability distributions for feedback strength and equilibrium temperature change. The posterior distributions are especially sensitive to prior beliefs about models’ shared structural biases: nonzero probability of shared bias moves some probability mass toward lower values for climate sensitivity even as it thickens the distribution’s positive tail. Obtaining additional models of these feedbacks would not constrain the posterior distributions as much as narrowing prior beliefs about shared biases or, potentially, obtaining feedback estimates having biases uncorrelated with those impacting climate models. Carbon dioxide concentrations may need to fall below current levels to maintain only a 10% chance of exceeding official 2°C limits on global average temperature change.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. He ◽  
V. Beck

This paper presents a simple method for calculation of the pressure distribution and the neutral plane position in a high rise building. Non-uniform temperature distributions in the stairshaft of the building and discrete door openings are taken into account. The method has been incor porated into a network model for calculating smoke spread in multi-storey buildings. Computational results are compared with experimental data ob tained by other researchers.


1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Femenias

The calculation of reduced radii, which connect standard deviations to physical errors, is revisited. A new and simple method, which takes into account the number of random variables, the exact confidence probability, and the correlation is presented in the normal case and in the case of unknown probability distributions. It is shown that correlation effects on radii are much less important than on standard deviations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Hammer

Adhesive dynamics (AD) is a method for simulating the dynamic response of biological systems in response to force. Biological bonds are mechanical entities that exert force under strain, and applying forces to biological bonds modulates their rate of dissociation. Since small numbers of events usually control biological interactions, we developed a simple method for sampling probability distributions for the formation or failure of individual bonds. This method allows a simple coupling between force and strain and kinetics, while capturing the stochastic response of biological systems. Biological bonds are dynamically reconfigured in response to applied mechanical stresses, and a detailed spatio-temporal map of molecules and the forces they exert emerges from AD. The shape or motion of materials bearing the molecules is easily calculated from a mechanical energy balance provided the rheology of the material is known. AD was originally used to simulate the dynamics of adhesion of leukocytes under flow, but new advances have allowed the method to be extended to many other applications, including but not limited to the binding of viruses to surface, the clustering of adhesion molecules driven by stiff substrates, and the effect of cell-cell interaction on cell capture and rolling dynamics. The technique has also been applied to applications outside of biology. A particular exciting recent development is the combination of signaling with AD (so-called integrated signaling adhesive dynamics, or ISAD), which allows facile integration of signaling networks with mechanical models of cell adhesion and motility. Potential opportunities in applying AD are summarized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 117269
Author(s):  
Sérgio C. Angulo ◽  
Natalia V. Silva ◽  
David A. Lange ◽  
Luís Marcelo Tavares

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Sheshadri ◽  
R. Alan Plumb ◽  
Daniela I. V. Domeisen

Abstract The authors test the hypothesis that recent observed trends in surface westerlies in the Southern Hemisphere are directly consequent on observed trends in the timing of stratospheric final warming events. The analysis begins by verifying that final warming events have an impact on tropospheric circulation in a simplified GCM driven by specified equilibrium temperature distributions. Seasonal variations are imposed in the stratosphere only. The model produces qualitatively realistic final warming events whose influence extends down to the surface, much like what has been reported in observational analyses. The authors then go on to study observed trends in surface westerlies composited with respect to the date of final warming events. If the considered hypothesis were correct, these trends would appear to be much weaker when composited with respect to the date of the final warming events. The authors find that this is not the case, and accordingly they conclude that the observed surface changes cannot be attributed simply to this shift toward later final warming events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document