scholarly journals Dropsonde Observations of the Ageostrophy within the Pre-Cold-Frontal Low-Level Jet Associated with Atmospheric Rivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1389-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reuben Demirdjian ◽  
Joel R. Norris ◽  
Andrew Martin ◽  
F. Martin Ralph
Keyword(s):  
Cold Front ◽  
Geostrophic Wind ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
Field Campaigns

Abstract The pre-cold-frontal low-level jet (LLJ) is an important contributor for water vapor transport within atmospheric rivers, though its dynamics are not completely understood. The present study investigates the LLJ using dropsonde observations from 24 cross-atmospheric river transects taken during the CalWater-2014, 2015 and the AR-Recon 2016, 2018 field campaigns. It is found that the LLJ, located at ~1-km elevation ahead of the cold front, has an average maximum wind speed of 30 m s−1 and is strongly supergeostrophic with an average ageostrophic component of 6 m s−1. The alongfront ageostrophy occurs within the atmospheric layer (750–1250 m) known to strongly control orographic precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers. The ERA5 reanalysis product is used to both validate the observed geostrophic winds and investigate the supergeostrophic jet dynamics. The comparison demonstrates that there is no systematic bias in the observed geostrophic wind but that the ERA5 LLJ total wind field is generally biased low by an amount consistent with the observed ageostrophy. One of the few cases in which the ERA5 produces an ageostrophic LLJ occurs on 13 February 2016, which is used to investigate the dynamical processes responsible for the ageostrophy. This analysis demonstrates that the isallobaric (pressure tendency) term serves to accelerate the ageostrophic jet, and the Coriolis torque and advective tendency terms serve to propagate the jet normal to the LLJ. Therefore, if a model is to accurately represent the LLJ, it must adequately resolve processes contributing toward the pressure tendencies along the cold front.

scholarly journals How Do Atmospheric Rivers Form?

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 1243-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Dacre ◽  
P. A. Clark ◽  
O. Martinez-Alvarado ◽  
M. A. Stringer ◽  
D. A. Lavers
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Cold Front ◽  
High Water ◽  
Water Vapor Content ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Atmospheric River ◽  
Warm Sector

Abstract The term “atmospheric river” is used to describe corridors of strong water vapor transport in the troposphere. Filaments of enhanced water vapor, commonly observed in satellite imagery extending from the subtropics to the extratropics, are routinely used as a proxy for identifying these regions of strong water vapor transport. The precipitation associated with these filaments of enhanced water vapor can lead to high-impact flooding events. However, there remains some debate as to how these filaments form. In this paper, the authors analyze the transport of water vapor within a climatology of wintertime North Atlantic extratropical cyclones. Results show that atmospheric rivers are formed by the cold front that sweeps up water vapor in the warm sector as it catches up with the warm front. This causes a narrow band of high water vapor content to form ahead of the cold front at the base of the warm conveyor belt airflow. Thus, water vapor in the cyclone’s warm sector, not long-distance transport of water vapor from the subtropics, is responsible for the generation of filaments of high water vapor content. A continuous cycle of evaporation and moisture convergence within the cyclone replenishes water vapor lost via precipitation. Thus, rather than representing a direct and continuous feed of moist air from the subtropics into the center of a cyclone (as suggested by the term “atmospheric river”), these filaments are, in fact, the result of water vapor exported from the cyclone, and thus they represent the footprints left behind as cyclones travel poleward from the subtropics.

Atmospheric river sectors: Definition and characteristics observed using dropsondes from 2014-2020 CalWater and AR Recon

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cobb ◽  
A. Michaelis ◽  
S. Iacobellis ◽  
F. M. Ralph ◽  
L. Delle Monache
Keyword(s):  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Wind Speeds ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
Frequency Threshold ◽  
The Vertical Distribution

AbstractAtmospheric rivers (ARs) are responsible for intense winter rainfall events impacting the U.S.West Coast, and have been studied extensively during Cal-Water and AR Recon field programs (2014 - 2020). A unique set of 858 dropsondes deployed in lines transecting 33 ARs are analyzed, and integrated vapor transport (IVT) is used to define five regions: core, cold and warm sectors, and non-AR cold and warm sides. The core is defined as having at least 80 % of the maximum IVT in the transect. Remaining dropsondes with IVT > 250 kg m−1 s−1 are assigned to cold or warm sectors, and those outside of this threshold form non-AR sides. The mean widths of the three AR sectors are approximately 280 km. However, the core contains roughly 50 % of all the water vapor transport (i.e., the total IVT), while the others each contain roughly 25 %. A low-level jet occurs most often in the core and warm sector with mean maximum wind speeds of 28.3 and 21.7 m s−1, comparable to previous studies, although with heights approximately 300 m lower than previously reported. The core exhibits characteristics most favorable for adiabatic lifting to saturation by the California coastal range. On average, stability in the core is moist neutral, with considerable variability around the mean. A relaxed squared moist Brunt Väisälä frequency threshold shows ˜8 – 12 % of core profiles exhibiting near-moist neutrality. The vertical distribution of IVT, which modulates orographic precipitation, varied across AR sectors, with 75 % of IVT residing below 3115 m in the core.

scholarly journals Atmospheric Rivers over the Northwestern Pacific: Climatology and Interannual Variability

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 5605-5619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Kamae ◽  
Wei Mei ◽  
Shang-Ping Xie ◽  
Moeka Naoi ◽  
Hiroaki Ueda
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Interannual Variability ◽  
El Niño ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Boreal Summer ◽  
Northwestern Pacific ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Low Level

Atmospheric rivers (ARs), conduits of intense water vapor transport in the midlatitudes, are critically important for water resources and heavy rainfall events over the west coast of North America, Europe, and Africa. ARs are also frequently observed over the northwestern Pacific (NWP) during boreal summer but have not been studied comprehensively. Here the climatology, seasonal variation, interannual variability, and predictability of NWP ARs (NWPARs) are examined by using a large ensemble, high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) simulation and a global atmospheric reanalysis. The AGCM captures general characteristics of climatology and variability compared to the reanalysis, suggesting a strong sea surface temperature (SST) effect on NWPARs. The summertime NWPAR occurrences are tightly related to El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the preceding winter through Indo–western Pacific Ocean capacitor (IPOC) effects. An enhanced East Asian summer monsoon and a low-level anticyclonic anomaly over the tropical western North Pacific in the post–El Niño summer reinforce low-level water vapor transport from the tropics with increased occurrence of NWPARs. The strong coupling with ENSO and IPOC indicates a high predictability of anomalous summertime NWPAR activity.

Extreme Surface Winds During Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers: The Modulating Role of Near-Surface Stability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence J. Pagano ◽  
Duane E. Waliser ◽  
Bin Guan ◽  
Hengchun Ye ◽  
F. Martin Ralph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Static Stability ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Surface Winds ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Extreme Surface ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Explained Variance

AbstractAtmospheric rivers (ARs) are long and narrow regions of strong horizontal water vapor transport. Upon landfall, ARs are typically associated with heavy precipitation and strong surface winds. A quantitative understanding of the atmospheric conditions that favor extreme surface winds during ARs has implications for anticipating and managing various impacts associated with these potentially hazardous events. Here, a global AR database (1999–2014) with relevant information from MERRA-2 reanalysis, QuikSCAT and AIRS satellite observations are used to better understand and quantify the role of near-surface static stability in modulating surface winds during landfalling ARs. The temperature difference between the surface and 1 km MSL (ΔT; used here as a proxy for near-surface static stability), and integrated water vapor transport (IVT) are analyzed to quantify their relationships to surface winds using bivariate linear regression. In four regions where AR landfalls are common, the MERRA-2-based results indicate that IVT accounts for 22-38% of the variance in surface wind speed. Combining ΔT with IVT increases the explained variance to 36-52%. Substitution of QuikSCAT surface winds and AIRS ΔT in place of the MERRA-2 data largely preserves this relationship (e.g., 44% compared to 52% explained variance for USA West Coast). Use of an alternate static stability measure–the bulk Richardson number–yields a similar explained variance (47%). Lastly, AR cases within the top and bottom 25% of near-surface static stability indicate that extreme surface winds (gale or higher) are more likely to occur in unstable conditions (5.3%/14.7% during weak/strong IVT) than in stable conditions (0.58%/6.15%).

scholarly journals Assessment of Numerical Weather Prediction Model Reforecasts of the Occurrence, Intensity, and Location of Atmospheric Rivers along the West Coast of North America

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (10) ◽  
pp. 3343-3362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle M. Nardi ◽  
Elizabeth A. Barnes ◽  
F. Martin Ralph
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
North America ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
The West ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Landfall Location

AbstractAtmospheric rivers (ARs)—narrow corridors of high atmospheric water vapor transport—occur globally and are associated with flooding and maintenance of the water supply. Therefore, it is important to improve forecasts of AR occurrence and characteristics. Although prior work has examined the skill of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models in forecasting atmospheric rivers, these studies only cover several years of reforecasts from a handful of models. Here, we expand this previous work and assess the performance of 10–30 years of wintertime (November–February) AR landfall reforecasts from the control runs of nine operational weather models, obtained from the International Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Project database. Model errors along the west coast of North America at leads of 1–14 days are examined in terms of AR occurrence, intensity, and landfall location. Occurrence-based skill approaches that of climatology at 14 days, while models are, on average, more skillful at shorter leads in California, Oregon, and Washington compared to British Columbia and Alaska. We also find that the average magnitude of landfall integrated water vapor transport (IVT) error stays fairly constant across lead times, although overprediction of IVT is common at later lead times. Finally, we show that northward landfall location errors are favored in California, Oregon, and Washington, although southward errors occur more often than expected from climatology. These results highlight the need for model improvements, while helping to identify factors that cause model errors.

A Climatological Study of National Weat her Service Watches, Warnings, and Advisories and Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers in the Western U.S. 2006–2018

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel M. Bartlett ◽  
Jason M. Cordeira
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Synoptic Scale ◽  
Flash Flooding ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Central Regions ◽  
Heavy Snow

AbstractAtmospheric rivers (ARs) are synoptic-scale phenomena associated with long, narrow corridors of enhanced low-level water vapor transport. Landfalling ARs may produce numerous beneficial (e.g. drought amelioration and watershed recharge) and hazardous (e.g. flash flooding and heavy snow) impacts that may require the National Weather Service (NWS) to issue watches, warnings, and advisories (WWAs) for hazardous weather. Prior research on WWAs and ARs in California found that 50–70% of days with flood-related and 60–80% of days with winter weather-related WWAs occurred on days with landfalling ARs in California. The present study further investigates this relationship for landfalling ARs and WWAs during the cool seasons of 2006–2018 across the entire western U.S. and considers additional dimensions of AR intensity and duration. Across the western U.S., regional maxima of 70–90% of days with WWAs issued for any hazard type were associated with landfalling ARs. In the Pacific Northwest and Central regions, flood-related and wind-related WWAs were also more frequently associated with more intense and longer duration ARs. While a large majority of days with WWAs were associated with landfalling ARs, not all landfalling ARs were necessarily associated with WWAs (i.e., not all ARs are hazardous). For example, regional maxima of only 50–70% of AR days were associated with WWAs issued for any hazard type. However, as landfalling AR intensity and duration increased, the association with a WWA and the “hazard footprint” of WWAs increased quasi-exponentially across the western U.S.

scholarly journals Linking Atmospheric Rivers and Warm Conveyor Belt Airflows

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1183-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. Dacre ◽  
O. Martínez-Alvarado ◽  
C. O. Mbengue
Keyword(s):  
Moisture Content ◽  
Cold Front ◽  
Moisture Flux ◽  
Conveyor Belt ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Extratropical Cyclones ◽  
High Moisture Content ◽  
High Moisture ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Cyclone Center

Abstract Extreme precipitation associated with extratropical cyclones can lead to flooding if cyclones track over land. However, the dynamical mechanisms by which moist air is transported into cyclones is poorly understood. In this paper we analyze airflows within a climatology of cyclones in order to understand how cyclones redistribute moisture stored in the atmosphere. This analysis shows that within a cyclone’s warm sector the cyclone-relative airflow is rearwards relative to the cyclone propagation direction. This low-level airflow (termed the feeder airstream) slows down when it reaches the cold front, resulting in moisture flux convergence and the formation of a band of high moisture content. One branch of the feeder airstream turns toward the cyclone center, supplying moisture to the base of the warm conveyor belt where it ascends and precipitation forms. The other branch turns away from the cyclone center exporting moisture from the cyclone. As the cyclone travels, this export results in a filament of high moisture content marking the track of the cyclone (often used to identify atmospheric rivers). We find that both cyclone precipitation and water vapor transport increase when moisture in the feeder airstream increases, thus explaining the link between atmospheric rivers and the precipitation associated with warm conveyor belt ascent. Atmospheric moisture budgets calculated as cyclones pass over fixed domains relative to the cyclone tracks show that continuous evaporation of moisture in the precyclone environment moistens the feeder airstream. Evaporation behind the cold front acts to moisten the atmosphere in the wake of the cyclone passage, potentially preconditioning the environment for subsequent cyclone development.

Avalanche Fatalities during Atmospheric River Events in the Western United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1359-1374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Hatchett ◽  
Susan Burak ◽  
Jonathan J. Rutz ◽  
Nina S. Oakley ◽  
Edward H. Bair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Water Vapor ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Western United States ◽  
Snow Avalanche ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Atmospheric Rivers ◽  
Avalanche Forecasting ◽  
Snow Water

Abstract The occurrence of atmospheric rivers (ARs) in association with avalanche fatalities is evaluated in the conterminous western United States between 1998 and 2014 using archived avalanche reports, atmospheric reanalysis products, an existing AR catalog, and weather station observations. AR conditions were present during or preceding 105 unique avalanche incidents resulting in 123 fatalities, thus comprising 31% of western U.S. avalanche fatalities. Coastal snow avalanche climates had the highest percentage of avalanche fatalities coinciding with AR conditions (31%–65%), followed by intermountain (25%–46%) and continental snow avalanche climates (<25%). Ratios of avalanche deaths during AR conditions to total AR days increased with distance from the coast. Frequent heavy to extreme precipitation (85th–99th percentile) during ARs favored critical snowpack loading rates with mean snow water equivalent increases of 46 mm. Results demonstrate that there exists regional consistency between snow avalanche climates, derived AR contributions to cool season precipitation, and percentages of avalanche fatalities during ARs. The intensity of water vapor transport and topographic corridors favoring inland water vapor transport may be used to help identify periods of increased avalanche hazard in intermountain and continental snow avalanche climates prior to AR landfall. Several recently developed AR forecast tools applicable to avalanche forecasting are highlighted.

scholarly journals Pristine Nocturnal Convective Initiation: A Climatology and Preliminary Examination of Predictability

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1613-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Stelten ◽  
William A. Gallus
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Geostrophic Wind ◽  
Formation Mechanisms ◽  
Convective Initiation ◽  
Lower Altitude ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Preliminary Examination ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
The Times

Abstract The prediction of convective initiation remains a challenge to forecasters in the Great Plains, especially for elevated events at night. This study examines a subset of 287 likely elevated nocturnal convective initiation events that occurred with little or no direct influence from surface boundaries or preexisting convection over a 4-month period of May–August during the summer of 2015. Events were first classified into one of four types based on apparent formation mechanisms and location relative to any low-level jet. A climatology of each of the four types was performed focusing on general spatial tendencies over a large Great Plains domain and initiation timing trends. Simulations from five convection-allowing models available during the Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) field campaign, along with four versions of a 4-km Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, were used to examine the predictability of these types of convective initiation. A dual-peak pattern for initiation timing was revealed, with one peak near 0400 UTC and another around 0700 UTC. The times and prominence of each peak shifted depending on the region analyzed. Positive thermal advection by the geostrophic wind was present in the majority of events for three types but not for the type occurring without a low-level jet. Models were more deficient with location than timing for the five PECAN models, with the four 4-km WRF Models showing similar location errors and problems with initiating convection at a lower altitude than observed.

scholarly journals The Impact of the Sierra Nevada on Low-Level Winds and Water Vapor Transport

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 790-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinwon Kim ◽  
Hyun-Suk Kang
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Sierra Nevada ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Northern Region ◽  
Vapor Transport ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Western Slope ◽  
Mountain Range ◽  
Low Level ◽  
The Impact

Abstract To understand the influence of the Sierra Nevada on the water cycle in California the authors have analyzed low-level winds and water vapor fluxes upstream of the mountain range in regional climate model simulations. In a low Froude number (Fr) regime, the upstream low-level wind disturbances are characterized by the rapid weakening of the crosswinds and the appearance of a stagnation point over the southwestern foothills. The weakening of the low-level inflow is accompanied by the development of along-ridge winds that take the form of a barrier jet over the western slope of the mountain range. Such upstream wind disturbances are either weak or nonexistent in a high-Fr case. A critical Fr (Frc) of 0.35 inferred in this study is within the range of those suggested in previous observational and numerical studies. The depth of the blocked layer estimated from the along-ridge wind profile upstream of the northern Sierra Nevada corresponds to Frc between 0.3 and 0.45 as well. Associated with these low-level wind disturbances are significant low-level southerly moisture fluxes over the western slope and foothills of the Sierra Nevada in the low-Fr case, which result in significant exports of moisture from the southern Sierra Nevada to the northern region. This along-ridge low-level water vapor transport by blocking-induced barrier jets in a low-Fr condition may result in a strong north–south precipitation gradient over the Sierra Nevada.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document