Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Potential Etiology of Multisystem Organ Failure in a Burn Patient

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482094524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Ficarino ◽  
Michael Z. Caposole ◽  
S. Noelle Davis ◽  
Mackenzie N. Krebsbach ◽  
Emily F. McGowin ◽  
...  

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is described in the medical literature but rarely seen among acutely ill trauma patients. A 44-year-old man with burns to the hands and back after a chemical explosion was transported to an outside facility where he received treatment for presumed acute coronary syndrome after developing ventricular tachycardia and elevated serum troponins after the exposure. His cardiac catheterization was unremarkable, but an echocardiogram revealed severe cardiomyopathy, and he was also in multisystem organ failure. He was transferred to our facility after hospital day 2 for treatment of his multisystem organ failure and 2% total body surface area burns. His laboratory results were remarkable for a creatine kinase of >100 000 units/L, and he required 14 g of intravenous calcium. Upon further investigation, the patient reported taking ziprasidone for his bipolar disorder, and he had a core temperature of 103.5 °F on his initial presentation to the outside facility. As he convalesced, the unifying diagnosis was NMS. NMS is a side effect of antipsychotic therapy and is manifested by hyperpyrexia, rigidity, autonomic instability, and altered consciousness. An elevated creatine kinase >100 000 units/L is almost pathognomonic for NMS. Patients can also present with leukocytosis, organ failure, and electrolyte disturbances including hypocalcemia. We hypothesized that dehydration, the warm environmental conditions at our patient’s job, and immense stress resulting in a catecholamine surge following his trauma were inciting triggers to this event. This case highlights the importance of considering alternate diagnoses in patients whose clinical presentation does not fit the most “obvious cause.”

Author(s):  
Akshar Jaglan ◽  
Tarek Ajam ◽  
Steven C Port ◽  
Tanvir Bajwa ◽  
A Jamil Tajik

Abstract Background Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare anomaly that can present at any age. Predisposing risk factors include Kawasaki disease in a younger population and atherosclerosis in the older generation. We present a unique case of the management of a young woman diagnosed with multivessel CAE with aneurysmal changes in the setting of acute coronary syndrome and subsequently during pregnancy. Case summary A 23-year-old woman presented with acute onset chest pain. Electrocardiogram revealed no ischaemic changes; however, troponin I peaked at 16 ng/mL (reference range 0–0.04 ng/mL). Echocardiogram showed apical dyskinesis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Coronary angiography showed multivessel CAE along with significant thrombus burden in an ectatic lesion of the left anterior descending artery. Since the patient was haemodynamically stable, conservative management with dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation was started. On follow-up, coronary computed tomographic angiogram illustrated resolution of the coronary thrombi and echocardiogram showed improvement to the apical dyskinesis. It was presumed that Kawasaki disease was the most likely aetiology of her disease. Subsequently the patient reported that, contrary to medical advice, she was pregnant, adding another layer of complexity to her case. Discussion Coronary artery ectasia can be discovered as an incidental finding or can present with an acute coronary syndrome. Management is challenging in the absence of randomized trials and large-scale data. Treatment options include medications, percutaneous intervention, and surgical revascularization. Close surveillance is required in these patients to assess progression of disease. Here we discuss treatment options during acute coronary syndrome and pregnancy.


Author(s):  
Won Tae Bae ◽  
Jae Hui Kim ◽  
Eun Sil Park ◽  
Ji Hyun Seo ◽  
Jae Young Lim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Steven Nshuti ◽  
Steven Nshuti ◽  
Beryl Guterman ◽  
David Hakizimana ◽  
Eric Buramba ◽  
...  

Background: We conducted a systematic evaluation of neurological, functional, quality of life and pain outcomes of patients who underwent spine surgery in our neurosurgery unit using patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment tools. Methods: The study was performed by assessing outcome of all the patients who underwent spine surgery at our department in a cross-sectional fashion using a 5-year operative database. This was an all-inclusive spine outcome study with 2 main groups; a trauma group composed of spinal cord injured patients and a non-trauma group composed of patients with spinal degenerative diseases, spinal tumors, deformity, infection, and vascular malformations. Results: Our analysis included 197 patients who met inclusion criteria for the study. The overall study population was mainly dominated by spinal cord injured patients and spinal degenerative disease patients; 34 % and 60.9 % respectively. The average age was 42 years (range: 15-78 years) with patients in the trauma group being substantially younger than the rest of the cohort. Eighty five percent of trauma patients presented with spinal cord injury causing neurological deficit, of which 58% had no preservation of motor function below the level of injury; ASIA IS A and B (35.8% and 22% respectively). Additionally, 68% of patients in the non-trauma group underwent surgery with severe disability. Overall, 60% of all trauma patients showed improvement of their neurological status as per ASIA IS. Of note, 40% of patients with preoperative ASIA IS B and 8% of patients with preoperative ASIA IS A gained full neurological recovery postoperatively (ASIA IS E). Using the Core outcome measurement Index (COMI) from patient’s perspective, 78.6% of patients reported to have no pain significant enough to make them stop their normal daily activities. Rate of overall return to work (RTW) in the non-trauma group was 77% with 52% of patients being fully functional without condition-related work interruptions. Conclusion: Careful selection of patients for surgery is key for good outcome of patients undergoing spine surgery. In contradiction to most other patients’ groups, patients with severe disability with spinal degenerative conditions might benefit most from surgery. Postoperative outcome of spinal cord injured patients with severe neurological deficits might be better than commonly believed. Controlled prospective data is likely to draw stronger conclusions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document