Caseload in Special Education: An Integration of Research Findings

2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Russ ◽  
Berttram Chiang ◽  
Billie Jo Rylance ◽  
Joyce Bongers
1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTONIS KATSIYANNIS ◽  
GREG CONDERMAN ◽  
DAVID J. FRANKS

Inclusion, which promotes educating all students with disabilities in the general education classroom setting, has triggered an intense debate in the field of special education. the purposes of this study were to highlight issues regarding inclusion, present findings on state practices on inclusion, and explore implications for practice and further research. findings from state surveys indicated great variety in state policy, acceleration in inclusion activity, a commitment to providing inservice and technical assistance, emerging teacher certification guidelines specific to inclusion, and minimal empirical research regarding the benefits of inclusion.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-180
Author(s):  
Bryan G. Cook ◽  
Lysandra Cook ◽  
Timothy J. Landrum

Although researchers in special education have made significant advances in defining and identifying evidence-based practices, scholars often constitute an insular group that disseminates research findings primarily through outlets and venues targeting like-minded researchers using traditional approaches. Thus, despite tangible results in determining what works, using dissemination approaches that fail to resonate with or influence practitioners represents an important but often overlooked contributor to the ongoing research-to-practice gap in special education. The authors argue that empirical and theoretical literature outside of special education may offer insight into how ideas take hold, which may be especially relevant to the effective dissemination of evidence-based practices. Drawing on Heath and Heath's (2008) model, the authors describe 6 characteristics of messages that are likely to “stick”: (a) simple, (b) unexpected, (c) concrete, (d) credible, (e) emotional, and (f) stories. The authors consider each in terms of implications for dissemination of special education research findings, and urge special education researchers to consider researching, refining, and applying dissemination strategies that can make special education research matter on a broader scale.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Maria Saridaki ◽  
Constantinos Mourlas

The attention to learners with special needs, in particular those with intellectual disabilities, is an area of continuous development. It is considered important to develop adaptive educational solutions for the integration of people with educational difficulties according to their needs. Digital games provide an attractive and direct platform in order to approach students of every intellectual level. However, practical game based learning application in the special education classroom is still regarded with skepticism by educators, or has been treated solely as an extrinsic reinforcement. Moreover, the design and usage of digital games as a motivational tool for students with intellectual disabilities has not been thoroughly documented. This paper presents a review of the motivational theories and research findings regarding the usage of digital games in the educational experience of users with intellectual disabilities, with a scope to define the potentials, prerequisites and possible limitations of such an intervention.


1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara K. Keogh ◽  
Donald L. Macmillan

This article focuses on sampling problems related to the use of system-identified subjects in special education research. Differences in school district criteria and procedures for selection of pupils into special education programs for the mildly handicapped have resulted in limited generalizability of research findings across studies. Overlap between samples identified as LD and EMR is particularly noticeable. Suggested approaches to deal with these sampling problems are identified. These include the use of rationally defined subgroups, the statistical procedure of cluster analysis, and marker variables.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Sullivan

The debate surrounding disproportionality in the identification of culturally and linguistically diverse students for special education, and in the category of emotional disturbance in particular, remains highly contentious, particularly as scholars grapple with the meaning and causes of disproportionality. In this article, I discuss assumptions underpinning this line of scholarship and implications for the meaning we make of research findings related to disparities in special education and students’ needs. Efforts to understand and address inequity must be juxtaposed with the imprecise, and at times inscrutable, conceptual, psychometric, procedural, and causal issues surrounding identification and potential disproportionality, even while maintaining a fundamental desire to benefit students.


Author(s):  
Maria Saridaki ◽  
Constantinos Mourlas

The attention to learners with special needs, in particular those with intellectual disabilities, is an area of continuous development. It is considered important to develop adaptive educational solutions for the integration of people with educational difficulties according to their needs. Digital games provide an attractive and direct platform in order to approach students of every intellectual level. However, practical game based learning application in the special education classroom is still regarded with skepticism by educators, or has been treated solely as an extrinsic reinforcement. Moreover, the design and usage of digital games as a motivational tool for students with intellectual disabilities has not been thoroughly documented. This paper presents a review of the motivational theories and research findings regarding the usage of digital games in the educational experience of users with intellectual disabilities, with a scope to define the potentials, prerequisites and possible limitations of such an intervention.


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Trussell ◽  
Helen Hammond ◽  
Lawrence Ingalls

The field of special education has a historical precedent for establishing ethical practices for professionals. These practices have evolved through legal mandates, scientific inquiry, professional research, professional organizations, and consumer concerns and input. A pivotal component of special education ethics focuses on the involvement of parents and/or family members as equal partners within the special education process. The purpose of this article is to examine the ethics of parental involvement in special education from a primarily rural special education perspective. This article reviews current research to date and discusses implications of the disconnect between the ethical responsibility of assuring equal parent participation and research findings. This article provides specific recommendations for future directions in promoting parental involvement in rural special education contexts.


1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo A. Mastropieri ◽  
Thomas E. Scruggs ◽  
Mary E. S. Whittaker ◽  
Jeffrey P. Bakken

This paper reports the results of two classroom applications of mnemonic instruction with students with mild mental disabilities (see note). These applications were developed based upon previous research findings and implemented by special education teachers in their classrooms over extended time periods. In both applications, regularly assigned curricula were adapted to include the use of mnemonic strategies. In the first application, the strategies were supplied by the teacher to facilitate the learning of social studies content. In the second application, students first used teacher-made strategies and later assisted the teacher in generating “class” mnemonic strategies for learning science content. Results of both applications suggest that students successfully learned content using the mnemonic strategies and reported enjoying instruction when the strategies were used. Findings are discussed in relation to future applications by teachers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (XIV) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Nirsantono Hasnul

The purposes of this research were to compare the curriculum of Special Education (PLB) Faculty of Education (FIP), State University of Jakarta (UNJ) with special education curriculum of HNU Programs, China, and to obtain an international curriculum for majors sujects in PLB FIP UNJ in 2010. The research which was conducted at FIP and HNU employed descriptive method and the data were collected using observation and interviews. The comparison between the two universities indicated that the special education curriculum of FIP UNJ is more comprehensive and student’s competency to be achieved consists of five areas: personality development, knowledge and skills, working skills, working behaviors, and social life. The research findings indicate that the international curriculum of Special Education Programs (PLB), FIP, UNJ, can be used for overseas students particularly China who are interested in special education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document