scholarly journals Impact of Respiratory Viral Panel Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay Turnaround Time on Length of Stay and Antibiotic Use in Patients With Respiratory Viral Illnesses

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 640-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Choi ◽  
Rubiya Kabir ◽  
Pranisha Gautam-Goyal ◽  
Prashant Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background: Respiratory viral illnesses account for many hospitalizations and inappropriate antibiotic use. Respiratory viral panels by polymerase chain reaction (RVP-PCR) provide a reliable means of diagnosis. In 2015, the RVP-PCR assay at our institution was switched from respiratory viral panel (RVP) to rapid respiratory panel (rapid RP), which has a faster turnaround time (24 hours vs 12 hours, respectively). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of RVP-PCR tests on duration of antibiotic use and length of stay (LOS) in hospitalized patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who had a RVP-PCR ordered within a 1-year time period before and after the assay switch. Patients who were pregnant, had received antibiotics within 30 days prior to admission, were not discharged, or had not completed antibiotics by end of study period were excluded. Results: Data were obtained from a total of 140 patients (70 in each group). Of these, 25 (35.7%) in the RVP group and 28 (40.0%) in the rapid RP group had a positive result. The median LOS was 4.5 days (IQR, 3-9 days) in the RVP group and 5 days (IQR, 3-9 days) in the rapid RP group ( P = .78). The median duration of antibiotic use was 4 days (IQR, 2-7 days) in the RVP group and 5 days (IQR, 1-7 days) in the rapid RP group ( P = .8). Conclusion: Despite faster turnaround time, there was no significant difference in duration of antibiotic use, or LOS between the RVP and rapid RP groups.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Time Period for which Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detects Dead Bacteria

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
HYONMIN CHOE ◽  
YUTAKA INABA ◽  
NAOMI KOBAYASHI ◽  
YUSHI MIYAMAE ◽  
HIROYUKI IKE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Bacterial Dna ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently widely used for the diagnosis of infections. We evaluated the time after treatment during which real-time PCR can detect dead bacteria. The presence of bacterial DNA was identified by real-time PCR through methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS)-PCR and universal PCR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli were each killed with alcohol, antibiotics, or heat treatment in vitro. The detection periods of MRS-PCR for MRSA treated by alcohol, vancomycin, linezolid, and heat were found to be less than 16, 8, 12, and 8 weeks, respectively. The detection period of universal PCR for S. epidermidis treated by alcohol, cefazolin, and heat was less than 20, 20, and 4 weeks, whereas that for E. coli was 8, 20, and 4 weeks, respectively. The presence of detectable bacterial DNA in infected arthroplasty patients before and after successful treatment was also assessed by MRS- and universal PCR. MRS-PCR was positive in 6 patients before treatment and all became negative after a mean interval of 20.8 weeks (95% confidential interval, 13.2 to 33.7) after treatment. Universal PCR detected remnant bacterial DNA in 4 patients at a mean of 15.2 weeks (95% CI, 12.4 to 18.0) after treatment and was negative in 7 patients at a mean of 17.3 weeks (95% CI, 10.6 to 24.0) after treatment. Our studies revealed that real-time PCR detects dead bacteria for several weeks, but this capability decreases with time and is likely lost by 20 weeks after treatment.

scholarly journals Critical analysis: use of polymerase chain reaction to diagnose leprosy

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flaviane Granero Maltempe ◽  
Vanessa Pietrowski Baldin ◽  
Mariana Aparecida Lopes ◽  
Vera Lúcia Dias Siqueira ◽  
Regiane Bertin de Lima Scodro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Molecular Biology Technique ◽  
Pcr Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Techniques

ABSTRACT Leprosy is a neglected tropical disease and an important public health problem, especially in developing countries. It is a chronic infectious disease that is caused by Mycobacterium leprae, which has a predilection for the skin and peripheral nerves. Although it has low sensitivity, slit-skin smear (SSS) remains the conventional auxiliary laboratory technique for the clinical diagnosis of leprosy. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular biology technique that holds promise as a simple and sensitive diagnostic tool. In the present study, the performance of two PCR methods, using different targets, PCR-LP and PCR-P, were compared with SSS with regard to leprosy diagnosis in a reference laboratory. M. leprae DNA was extracted from 106 lymph samples of 40 patients who had clinical suspicion of leprosy. The samples were subjected to both PCR techniques and SSS. Amplification of the human b-globin gene was used as PCR inhibitor control. The specificity of both PCR techniques was 100%, and sensitivity was 0.007 and 0.015 µg/ml for PCR-LP and PCR-P, respectively. No significant difference was found between either the PCR-LP or PCR-P results and SSS results (p > 0.05). Although PCR is not yet a replacement for SSS in the diagnosis of leprosy, this technique may be used as an efficient auxiliary tool for early detection of the disease, especially in endemic regions. This strategy may also be useful in cases in which SSS results are negative (e.g., in paucibacillary patients) and cases in which skin biopsy cannot be performed.

scholarly journals Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Marques da Silveira ◽  
Stéfhano Luis Cândido ◽  
Karin Rinaldi dos Santos ◽  
Maerle Oliveira Maia ◽  
Roberto Lopes de Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Suspected Sepsis ◽  
Fungal Dna ◽  
Polymerase Chain

ABSTRACT: Sepsis is characterized by the presence of organ dysfunction secondary to the dysregulated systemic inflammatory response associated with an infection, and has high mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic techniques based on non-microbiological isolation are time-consuming and may delay treatment. Thus, this study aimed to compare bacterial and fungal broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in dogs. Blood samples from 88 dogs with suspected sepsis were analyzed by blood culture, and PCR to detect bacterial and fungal DNA. On blood culture, 20 (22.7%) samples tested positive for bacterial isolates; however, none tested positive for fungi. Through PCR analysis, bacterial DNA was detected in 46 (52.3%) animals, whereas fungal DNA was present in one (1.1%) sample. Our results showed that PCR-based testing has important diagnostic value for canine blood infections because it has a shorter turnaround time and higher sensitivity than traditional blood culture.

scholarly journals Longest reported case of symptomatic COVID-19 reporting positive for over 230 days in an immunocompromised patient in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110400
Author(s):  
Bilal Chaudhry ◽  
Lidiya Didenko ◽  
Maaria Chaudhry ◽  
Andrew Malek ◽  
Kirill Alekseyev
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Immunocompromised Patient ◽  
The United States ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia was first noted in Wuhan, China. Since the start of the pandemic, there have been millions of cases diagnosed. The average time from onset of symptoms to testing negative SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is roughly 25 days. In patients who continually test positive for COVID-19, it is essential to determine precisely which risk factors contribute to the increase in viral shedding duration. We present a case about a 62-year-old man who has persistently tested positive for COVID-19 for more than 230 days. We followed his treatment course, in which he had been hospitalized multiple times since the onset of symptoms back in April 2020. We have determined that patients with immunosuppression, especially those taking corticosteroids, are at increased risk of prolonged viral shedding. It is essential to continually monitor these immunocompromised patients as they required a greater time period in order to have an appropriate immune response in which antibodies are created.

Study of the HLA-DPβ1 Locus by the Polymerase Chain Reaction Technique in Patients with Hodgkin's Disease

1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guseppe Pellegris ◽  
Claudia Lombardo ◽  
Annelisa Cantoni ◽  
Liliana Devizzi ◽  
Monica Balzarotti
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Method ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Reaction Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background A number of reports have studied associations between Hodgkin's disease and HLA. Some of them established correlation between several antigens and Hodgkin's disease, and others found no correlations. Methods The HLA DP locus was determined by the polymerase chain reaction method in 31 Hodgkin's disease patients and 58 healthy controls. Results No significant difference between patients and controls was noted. Conclusions Further investigations are needed to confirm the hypothesis of a possible role of the HLA complex as one of the factors involved in Hodgkin's disease.

scholarly journals Comparison of Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel and Conventional Stool Testing for Evaluation of Patients With HIV Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Sobczyk ◽  
Sonia Jain ◽  
Xiaoying Sun ◽  
Maile Karris ◽  
Darcy Wooten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Stool Culture ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Viral Pathogens ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing ◽  
Gastrointestinal Pathogen ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal pathogen panels (GPPs) are increasingly used to identify stool pathogens, but their impact in people with HIV (PWH) is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing GPP and conventional stool evaluation in PWH. Methods We included all PWH who underwent GPP (Biofire Diagnostics; implemented September 15, 2015) or conventional testing, including stool culture, Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction testing, fluorescent smears for Cryptosporidium or Giardia, and ova and parasite exams (O&P) from 2013 to 2017. A total of 1941 specimens were tested, with 169 positive specimens detected in 144 patients. We compared result turnaround time, pathogen co-infection, antibiotic treatment, and treatment outcomes between positive specimens detected by conventional testing vs GPP. Results Overall, 124 patient samples tested positive by GPP, compared with 45 patient specimens by conventional testing. The GPP group demonstrated a higher co-infection rate (48.4% vs 13.3%; P < .001) and quicker turnaround time (23.4 vs 71.4 hours; P < .001). The GPP identified 29 potential viral infections that were undetectable by conventional stool tests. Unnecessary anti-infective therapy was avoided in 9 of 11 exclusively viral infections. Exclusively nonpathogenic parasites (n = 13) were detected by conventional stool tests, the majority of which were treated with metronidazole. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups. Conclusions In PWH, GPP implementation improved antibiotic stewardship through shorter turnaround times and detection of enteric viral pathogens.

Detection of the Escherichia coli pathogenic geneeaewith three real-time polymerase chain reaction methods

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne  Karen McCrea ◽  
Chenyi Liu ◽  
Lai-King Ng ◽  
Gehua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Detection Limit ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Sybr Green ◽  
Sybr Green I ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Culture Techniques ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Several real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods are currently available to rapidly detect the presence of a specific DNA sequence. When used for detection of pathogenic organisms, the turnaround time for PCR-based methods is much lower than for traditional culture techniques. This study compared the sensitivity of three real-time PCR methods when detecting the Escherichia coli pathogenic gene eae to determine which method is most effective in identifying very low levels of the organism. The three methods were used to detect the eae gene over a range of DNA concentrations. The differences in sensitivity were statistically significant (p < 0.05), and SYBR Green I PCR was found to have the lowest detection limit of the three; LUX primers had the highest detection limit. Therefore, using a defined DNA concentration for detecting the eae gene, SYBR Green I is the best alternative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document