Social Justice Versus Social Equality

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-498
Author(s):  
Otis B. Grant
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Xiao Zhang

English language teaching (ELT) plays a vital role in promoting social equality and societal transformation. Thus, social justice education has been given attention as one of ELT purposes. Textbooks, as the most significant teaching materials of English teachers, pose significant effects on English learners’ awareness of social justice issues that touch upon their daily lives. However, there is little empirical research investigating integrated social justice topics in ELT textbooks. This study addressed the gap through identifying and comparing social justice topics of grade 10 English textbooks used in Chinese and German high school classrooms. Results of this study revealed that German English textbooks encompassed a much more diversity of social justice topics than Chinese English textbooks. Besides, this study offered a significant capacity for English textbooks to stimulate English learners’ social responsibility and awareness of social justice. This study has implications for improving social justice education in the ELT classroom.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 580-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Burris ◽  
Evan D. Anderson

A decade ago, Jonathan Mann made a powerful case that human rights could provide a vocabulary and mode of analysis for understanding and advancing health. He made the case well, and put the idea into inspired practice, but the idea was neither new nor his alone. The idea that social justice — and henceforth in this article we will use that term loosely (and with obvious imprecision) to embrace goods like human rights, social equality, and distributive justice — was intrinsically important to health resonated with the social epidemiology already gathering force (not to mention an enduring theme running through the history of public health work). That social structure and relations of power explain a great deal about the level and distribution of population health was implicit in the work of pioneers like Geoffrey Rose, evident in Marmot’s seminal Whitehall studies, explicit in the writings of Mervyn Susser, and the main thrust of scholars like Nancy Krieger and Meredeth Turshen. Although researchers tend to avoid using a term with such normative weight, it is safe to say that Mann — and Susser, and Marmot and Krieger among others — were right: social justice is central to the proper understanding of health.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Akbar ◽  
Moh. Idil Ghufron

AbstractThis study discusses the concept of Pancasila economics and Islamiceconomics which have basic and not conflicting similarities. Both of theseeconomic concepts share the goal of realizing social justice for allIndonesian people and social equality in prosperity and prosperity asstated in the five precepts of the Pancasila, as well as imbued with the firstprinciple of the One Godhead Pancasila as its basis.In this study also explained that between the Pancasila economicconcepts and Islamic economics are two economic concepts whose basicprinciples, characteristics and systems are in accordance with theteachings in the Qur'an which is the holy book of Muslims. So that this canstrengthen the confidence of the Indonesian people to not hesitate toimplement the Pancasila economy which is the noble heritage of thefounding fathers of the nation.The method used in this study is library research, which refers to primalmaterials from two components which are the subject of discussion,namely the study of Pancasila economics and Islamic economics. Andadded with other books relating to the problems studied. While the writingmethod used is descriptive analytical, namely by collecting actualinformation in detail and thoroughly from the data obtained, to thendescribe the exact problem under study, then analyze it directly to becompiled as needed in this study by using data content analysis analysis.Kata Kunci: Ekonomi, Pancasila, Islam, Al-Qur‟an, Keadilan,Kesejahteraan.


Author(s):  
Sarah L. Swan

The article imagines what tort law might look like if it more fully embraced feminist reforms. Despite decades of compelling feminist advocacy and scholarship, tort law has largely resisted attempts to orient it toward pursuing goals of social justice or equality. Nevertheless, some feminist redirection has laid the groundwork for further development. Focusing on four foundational concepts in tort law—duty, third-party liability, harm, and damages—this article uses the tools, insights, and arguments of modern feminist tort scholarship to envision the doctrinal landscape of a tort law rooted in gender justice and social equality. It explores how reconceptualizing the duty of care, expanding third-party liability, recognizing a broader range of intimate and harassment-based harms, and eliminating gender and racial bias from damage awards could transform tort from an instrument that perpetuates social inequalities into a mechanism of social justice offering recompense and remedy to all who are wrongfully injured.


1983 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Selden

The issue of student classification was historically tied to the popular eugenics movement in the early 20th century. Supporters of this movement envisioned the ideal society as a biological meritocracy. They assumed that human betterment could take place only through controlled breeding. Biology would determine the human future. In the 1920's and 1930's this belief in biological determinism was joined with the assumption of differential biological worth. This combination of ideas supported programs of racial discrimination, immigration restriction, and student classification. The paper focuses upon the ways in which notions of differential biological worth were repeated, refined, and reintroduced as a basis for educational policy and for student classification. The work and influence of the eugenists and student classifiers Alfred E. Wiggam, H. H. Goddard, and Leta Hollingworth are analyzed. The paper proposes that the contemporary educator's emphasis upon student classification generally ignores the historical relationship between biological determinism, student classification, and the broader political issues of social justice and social equality. They are issues that are ignored at society's peril.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 766-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneliese A. Singh ◽  
Christy D. Hofsess ◽  
Elizabeth M. Boyer ◽  
Agnes Kwong ◽  
Allison S. M. Lau ◽  
...  

The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand counseling psychology doctoral trainees’ perceptions of social justice training in their academic programs. Participants ( N = 66) completed an online social justice survey with open-ended questions. Researchers identified major themes of participants’ responses (e.g., promotion of social equality, infusion across training contexts, training opportunities outside of programs, importance of “walking the talk”). Implications, future directions, and limitations of the study are presented.


Author(s):  
Christian Schemmel

This chapter introduces the key features and motivations of liberal relational egalitarianism. It notes that social justice and social equality have mostly been treated as separate values in the history of modern Western political thought, and that contemporary liberal egalitarianism is traditionally thought to require a form of distributive equality. It then argues that weaving social justice and social equality together in an account of relational equality as an urgent and stringent demand of liberal social justice is therefore a novel project worth attempting. It goes on to outline the overall argument of the book and the contribution of each chapter, as well as the different literatures and rival theories it draws on, and concludes by delineating the social scenario it is a theory for: primarily, for a society characterized by a reasonably well-functioning institutional structure capable of organizing social cooperation by enabling and sustaining a complex division of labour.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Nielsen

This article claims that the protection of children’s capability for play is a central social-political goal. It provides the following three-premise argument in defense of this claim: (i) we have strong and wide-ranging normative reasons to be concerned with clusters of social deficiency; (ii) particular fertile functionings play a key role for tackling clusters of social deficiency; and finally (iii) the capability for childhood play is a crucial, ontogenetic prerequisite for the development of those particular fertile functionings. Thus, in so far as we consider it a central political goal to tackle social deficiency, we should be concerned with protection of childhood play capability. This conclusion raises new insights on the importance – for global development policy as well as for welfare states’ aim to secure social justice – of protecting children’s capability to engage in playful activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document