Association Between the Duration of Hearing Loss and Hearing Outcomes in Surgery for Otosclerosis

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982096472
Author(s):  
Alexander L. Luryi ◽  
Amy Schettino ◽  
Seilesh C. Babu ◽  
Dennis I. Bojrab ◽  
Elias M. Michaelides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Stapes Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Hearing Outcomes

Introduction Hearing loss due to otosclerosis is effectively treated with surgery. The association between duration of hearing loss and surgical outcomes is unknown. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Large otology referral center. Methods Patients undergoing primary stapes surgery for otosclerosis from 2005 to 2017 were evaluated according to their self-reported duration of hearing loss. Closure of the air-bone gap (ABG) was the primary outcome measure. Results A total of 580 stapes operations were included. Sixteen percent of patients reported hearing loss for ≤1 year; 25%, >1 to ≤5 years; 24%, >5 to ≤10 years; 24%, >10 to ≤20 years; and 12%, >20 years, respectively. Average pre- and postoperative ABGs were 26.1 and 9.6 dB ( P < .0005). Patients with longer duration of hearing loss had worse preoperative ABGs ( P < .0005). After surgery, patients with longer duration of hearing loss had a greater reduction in their ABGs ( P < .0005) such that the remaining ABG was not associated with duration of hearing loss ( P > .05). There were no significant associations between the duration of hearing loss and complication rates or the need for revision surgery. Conclusion Otosclerosis is effectively treated with surgery even after a long duration of hearing loss, provided that sensorineural hearing and word recognition are favorable. Although far-advanced otosclerosis has known poorer hearing outcomes after stapes surgery, a long duration of hearing loss is an unreliable surrogate for this.

Audiological outcome of stapes surgery for far advanced cochlear otosclerosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
pp. 961-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Heining ◽  
R Banga ◽  
R Irving ◽  
C Coulson ◽  
P Monksfield
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Stapes Surgery ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Suitable Treatment ◽  
Conductive Component ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Hearing Outcomes

AbstractBackground:Patients with advanced otosclerosis can present with hearing thresholds eligible for cochlear implantation. This study sought to address whether stapes surgery in this patient group provides a clinically significant audiological benefit.Objectives:To assess pre- and post-operative hearing outcomes of patients with advanced otosclerosis, and to determine what proportion of these patients required further surgery including cochlear implantation.Methods:Between 2002 and 2015, 252 patients underwent primary stapes surgery at our institution. Twenty-eight ears in 25 patients were deemed to have advanced otosclerosis, as defined by pure audiometry thresholds over 80 dB. The patients’ records were analysed to determine audiological improvement following stapes surgery, and assess whether any further surgery was required.Results:The audiological outcome for most patients who underwent primary stapes surgery was good. A minority of patients (7 per cent) required revision surgery. Patients who underwent cochlear implantation after stapes surgery (10 per cent) also demonstrated a good audiological outcome.Conclusion:Stapes surgery is a suitable treatment option for patients with advanced otosclerosis, and should be considered mandatory, before offering cochlear implantation, for those with a demonstrable conductive component to their hearing loss. A small group of patients get little benefit from surgery and subsequently a cochlear implant should be considered.

scholarly journals Stapes Surgery in Patients with a Small Air-Bone Gap

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 198-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Lavy ◽  
Fiona McClenaghan
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Stapes Surgery ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ktp Laser ◽  
Secondary Outcome Measure ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Hearing Outcomes

The objective of this study was to determine hearing outcomes in patients undergoing stapes surgery with a preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) <21.25 dB. Patients with a unilateral or bilateral preoperative ABG <21.25 dB undergoing primary stapes surgery were identified from a database of all stapes surgeries performed in a tertiary center over 15 years. A total of 254 ears met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was the degree of closure of the preoperative ABG. A secondary outcome measure was improvement in bone-conduction thresholds at 4 kHz. All patients underwent stapes surgery under local anesthesia. Ossicular reconstruction was achieved using a SMart 360 nitinol fluoroplastic piston (Gyrus ACMI, Inc.; South-borough, Mass.), and complete posterior crurotomy was performed with a KTP laser. Hearing was assessed with clinical voice testing immediately postoperatively and with pure-tone audiometry at 6 weeks postoperatively. A total of 248 ears (97.6%) demonstrated ABG closure to <10 dB. Bone-conduction thresholds showed an increase in 114 (44.9%), no change 74 (29.1%), and a decrease in 66 (26.0%). There is a slight increase in the risk of stapes mobilization in ears with a small ABG when compared to those with larger ABGs; however, this can be overcome by using a laser-assisted technique in combination with good surgical experience. The benefit in terms of hearing aid avoidance and the restoration of symmetrical hearing is both achievable and significant for the patient.

Revision Stapes Surgery: Hearing Symptoms and Associations With Intraoperative Findings and Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110620
Author(s):  
Alexander L. Luryi ◽  
Amy Schettino ◽  
Elias M. Michaelides ◽  
Seilesh Babu ◽  
Dennis I. Bojrab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Scar Tissue ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Stapes Surgery ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Revision Stapes Surgery ◽  
Hearing Outcomes ◽  
Conductive Hearing

Objective Stapes surgery for otosclerosis occasionally requires revision due to recurrent or persistent conductive hearing loss (CHL). This study examines outcomes after revision stapes surgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Single tertiary neurotology center. Methods Patients undergoing revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs) were the primary outcome measure. Results During the study period, 150 patients underwent revision stapes surgery. One hundred patients (67%) had gradually progressive recurrent CHL; 16 (11%), sudden recurrent CHL; 13 (9%), persistent CHL; and 21 (14%), no CHL. For 129 patients with CHL, the mean ABG improved from 23.7 to 9.3 dB ( P < .0005). The most common intraoperative findings for these patients were prosthesis displacement with incus necrosis (38%) or without it (43%), normal anatomy with seemingly good prosthesis placement (6%), and abundant scar tissue (6%). Patients with recurrent hearing loss achieved lower mean ABGs than patients with persistent hearing loss (8.8 vs 13.2 dB, P = .02). There were no associations between onset pattern of CHL or intraoperative findings and hearing outcomes ( P > .05). Four patients (2.7%) developed sensorineural hearing loss after revision, defined as an increase in bone conduction pure tone average ≥15 dB, all of whom had previous replacement of a malpositioned prosthesis. Conclusions Revision stapes surgery confers significant improvement in hearing for patients with persistent and recurrent CHL, although patients with persistent CHL after initial surgery see less improvement with revision.

scholarly journals Intracameral Bevacizumab Versus Sub-Tenon’s Mitomycin C as Adjuncts to Trabeculectomy: 3-Year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2054
Author(s):  
Gerasimos Kopsinis ◽  
Dimitrios Tsoukanas ◽  
Dimitra Kopsini ◽  
Theodoros Filippopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Filtration Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Exfoliative Glaucoma

Conjunctival wound healing determines success after filtration surgery and the quest for better antifibrotic agents remains active. This study compares intracameral bevacizumab to sub-Tenon’s mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy. Primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients were randomized to either bevacizumab (n = 50 eyes) or MMC (n = 50 eyes). The primary outcome measure was complete success, defined as Intraocular Pressure (IOP) > 5 mmHg and ≤ 21 mmHg with a minimum 20% reduction from baseline without medications. Average IOP and glaucoma medications decreased significantly in both groups at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.001), without significant difference between groups at 3 years (IOP: bevacizumab group from 29 ± 9.4 to 15 ± 3.4 mmHg, MMC group from 28.3 ± 8.7 to 15.4 ± 3.8 mmHg, p = 0.60; Medications: bevacizumab group from 3.5 ± 0.9 to 0.5 ± 1, MMC group from 3.6 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.70). Complete success, although similar between groups at 3 years (66% vs. 64%), was significantly higher for bevacizumab at months 6 and 12 (96% vs. 82%, p = 0.03; 88% vs. 72%, p = 0.04, respectively) with fewer patients requiring medications at months 6, 9 and 12 (4% vs. 18%, p = 0.03; 6% vs. 20%, p = 0.04; 8% vs. 24%, p = 0.03, respectively). Complication rates were similar between groups. In conclusion, intracameral bevacizumab appears to provide similar long-term efficacy and safety results as sub-Tenon’s MMC after trabeculectomy.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of left and right axis deviations with narrow QRS complex on 3-year outcomes in a hospital-based population in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Seko ◽  
Takao Kato ◽  
Yuhei Yamaji ◽  
Yoshisumi Haruna ◽  
Eisaku Nakane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Conduction Block ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Excess Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Axis Deviation ◽  
The Right

AbstractWhile the prognostic impact of QRS axis deviation has been assessed, it has never been investigated in patients without conduction block. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic impact of QRS-axis deviation in patients without conduction block. We retrospectively analyzed 3353 patients who had undergone both scheduled transthoracic echocardiography and electrocardiography in 2013 in a hospital-based population, after excluding patients with a QRS duration of ≥ 110 ms, pacemaker placement, and an QRS-axis − 90° to − 180° (northwest axis). The study population was categorized into three groups depending on the mean frontal plane QRS axis as follows: patients with left axis deviation (N = 171), those with right axis deviation (N = 94), and those with normal axis (N = 3088). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the left axis deviation group (26.4% in the left axis deviation, 22.7% in the right axis deviation, and 18.4% in the normal axis groups, log-rank P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of primary outcome measure remained significant in the left axis deviation group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.95; P = 0.02), while the excess risk of primary outcome measure was not significant in the right axis deviation group (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.76–1.96; P = 0.41). Left axis deviation was associated with a higher risk of a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events in hospital-based patients without conduction block in Japan.

scholarly journals Computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy for adults with intellectual disability: randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Cooney ◽  
Catherine Jackman ◽  
David Coyle ◽  
Gary O'Reilly
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundDespite the evidence base for computer-assisted cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) in the general population, it has not yet been adapted for use with adults who have an intellectual disability.AimsTo evaluate the utility of a CBT computer game for adults who have an intellectual disability.MethodA 2 × 3 (group × time) randomised controlled trial design was used. Fifty-two adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability and anxiety or depression were randomly allocated to two groups: computerised CBT (cCBT) or psychiatric treatment as usual (TAU), and assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Forty-nine participants were included in the final analysis.ResultsA significant group x time interaction was observed on the primary outcome measure of anxiety (Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability), favouring cCBT over TAU, but not on the primary outcome measure of depression (Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability). A medium effect size for anxiety symptoms was observed at post-treatment and a large effect size was observed after follow-up. Reliability of Change Indices indicated that the intervention produced clinically significant change in the cCBT group in comparison with TAU.ConclusionsAs the first application of cCBT for adults with intellectual disability, this intervention appears to be a useful treatment option to reduce anxiety symptoms in this population.

scholarly journals Telephone-guided self-help for mental health difficulties in neurological conditions: a randomised pilot trial

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2019-318577
Author(s):  
Sophie D Bennett ◽  
Isobel Heyman ◽  
Anna E Coughtrey ◽  
Sophia Varadkar ◽  
Terence Stephenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Young People ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Mental Health Difficulties ◽  
Neurological Conditions

ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct a randomised pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effect of telephone-guided self-help for the treatment of mental health difficulties in children with neurological conditions.DesignPreliminary RCT. The primary outcome measure was the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.SettingNeurology clinics in a national tertiary paediatric hospital.PatientsYoung people attending neurology clinics who met criteria for mental health difficulties according to the Development and Wellbeing Assessment.Interventions12 weeks of telephone-guided self-help based on a modular approach to psychological therapy for children delivered to children and/or their parents (n=17; eight males; mean age 12.04 years, SD=3.34) or a waiting list for telephone-guided self-help with no additional intervention over 12 weeks (n=17; nine males; mean age 10.53 years, SD=3.14).Results124 participants completed the DAWBA, and 34 children and young people were entered into the trial. 65% of those randomised to the intervention arm completed the full intervention, and the intervention was acceptable to those completing it. However, there were significant problems related to lack of data completion (38% data loss for primary outcome measure), choice of control comparator and outcome measures. Due to significant loss of data at follow-up, the effect size findings are considered unreliable.ConclusionsFurther feasibility work should be conducted to improve data completeness before progression to a definitive trial of guided self-help for mental health problems in children with neurological conditions can be recommended.Trial registration numberISRCTN21184717.

scholarly journals COMPARISON RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT LOCALIZED AND EXTENDED UTERINE CANCER

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
I I Ushakov ◽  
E A Artoshina ◽  
P G Brousov ◽  
I V Nazvantsev ◽  
S A Levakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Peritoneal Washing ◽  
Comparison Results

We selected 145 patients with endometrial carcinoma who had been treated with standard surgery (hysterectomy and BSO, peritoneal washing, palpation pelvic and para-aortic nodes) and with complete systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=30 patients) or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=30). Patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence were offered adjuvant radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was results of the surgical therapy.

scholarly journals Change in timed walk as primary outcome measure of treatment response in HAMLET-P: HAM/TSP MuLticentre Efficacy trial-Prednisolone

Retrovirology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola Martin ◽  
Eisuke Inoue ◽  
Maria Fernanda Rios Grassi ◽  
Ramon de Almeida Kruschewsky ◽  
Irene Cortese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Efficacy Trial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document