scholarly journals Risk factors for delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110652
Author(s):  
Imogen Featherstone ◽  
Trevor Sheldon ◽  
Miriam Johnson ◽  
Rebecca Woodhouse ◽  
Jason W Boland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Context Specific

Background: Delirium is common and distressing for patients receiving palliative care. Interventions targetting modifiable risk factors in other settings have been shown to prevent delirium. Research on delirium risk factors in palliative care can inform context-specific risk-reduction interventions. Aim: To investigate risk factors for the development of delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42019157168). Data sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO (1980-2021) were searched for studies reporting the association of risk factors with delirium incidence/prevalence for patients receiving specialist palliative care. Study risk of bias and certainty of evidence for each risk factor were assessed. Results: Of 28 included studies, 16 conducted only univariate analysis, 12 conducted multivariate analysis. The evidence for delirium risk factors was limited with low to very low certainty. Potentially modifiable risk factors: Opioids and lower performance status were positively associated with delirium, with some evidence also for dehydration, hypoxaemia, sleep disturbance, liver dysfunction and infection. Mixed, or very limited, evidence was found for some factors targetted in multicomponent prevention interventions: sensory impairments, mobility, catheter use, polypharmacy (single study), pain, constipation, nutrition (mixed evidence). Non-modifiable risk factors: Older age, male sex, primary brain cancer or brain metastases and lung cancer were positively associated with delirium. Conclusions: Findings may usefully inform interventions to reduce delirium risk but more high quality prospective cohort studies are required to enable greater certainty about associations of different risk factors with delirium during specialist palliative care.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Delirium in the Palliative Care Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duan Guo ◽  
Taiping Lin ◽  
Chuanyao Deng ◽  
Yuxia Zheng ◽  
Langli Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Case Control Studies

Objective: Delirium is common and highly distressing for the palliative care population. Until now, no study has systematically reviewed the risk factors of delirium in the palliative care population. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate delirium risk factors among individuals receiving palliative care.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database to identify relevant observational studies from database inception to June 2021. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. We estimated the pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for individual risk factors using the inverse variance method.Results: Nine studies were included in the review (five prospective cohort studies, three retrospective case-control studies and one retrospective cross-section study). In pooled analyses, older age (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04, I2 = 37%), male sex (aOR:1.80, 95% CI: 1.37–2.36, I2 = 7%), hypoxia (aOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77–0.99, I2 = 0%), dehydration (aOR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.75–5.94, I2 = 18%), cachexia (aOR:3.40, 95% CI: 1.69–6.85, I2 = 0%), opioid use (aOR: 2.49, 95%CI: 1.39–4.44, I2 = 0%), anticholinergic burden (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07–1.30, I2 = 9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.56–4.14, I2 = 21%) were statistically significantly associated with delirium.Conclusion: The risk factors identified in our review can help to highlight the palliative care population at high risk of delirium. Appropriate strategies should be implemented to prevent delirium and improve the quality of palliative care services.

scholarly journals Incidence, risk factors and prognostic effect of imaging right ventricular involvement in patients with COVID-19: a dose–response analysis protocol for systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e049866
Author(s):  
Chenghui Zhou ◽  
Baohui Lou ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Hushan Ao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Incidence Risk

IntroductionEmerging evidence has shown that COVID-19 infection may result in right ventricular (RV) disturbance and be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarise the incidence, risk factors and the prognostic effect of imaging RV involvement in adult patients with COVID-19.MethodsA systematical search will be performed in PubMed, EMBase, ISI Knowledge via Web of Science and preprint databases (MedRxiv and BioRxiv) (until October 2021) to identify all cohort studies in adult patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome will be the incidence of RV involvement (dysfunction and/or dilation) assessed by echocardiography, CT or MRI. Secondary outcomes will include the risk factors for RV involvement and their association with all-cause mortality during hospitalisation. Additional outcomes will include the RV global or free wall longitudinal strain (RV-GLS or RV-FWLS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and RV diameter. Univariable or multivariable meta-regression and subgroup analyses will be performed for the study design and patient characteristics (especially acute or chronic pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension). Sensitivity analyses will be used to assess the robustness of our results by removing each included study at one time to obtain and evaluate the remaining overall estimates of RV involvement incidence and related risk factors, association with all-cause mortality, and other RV parameters (RV-GLS or RV-FWLS, TAPSE, S’, FAC and RV diameter). Both linear and cubic spline regression models will be used to explore the dose–response relationship between different categories (>2) of RV involvement and the risk of mortality (OR or HR).Ethics and disseminationThere was no need for ethics approval for the systematic review protocol according to the Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital. This meta-analysis will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal for publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021231689.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19–Infected Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Han Han ◽  
Tianhui He ◽  
Kristen E Labbe ◽  
Adrian V Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fatality Rate ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with cancer have a high fatality rate. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported fatalities in COVID-19 patients with cancer. A comprehensive meta-analysis that assessed the overall case fatality rate and associated risk factors was performed. Using individual patient data, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for each variable with outcomes. Results We included 15 studies with 3019 patients, of which 1628 were men; 41.0% were from the United Kingdom and Europe, followed by the United States and Canada (35.7%), and Asia (China, 23.3%). The overall case fatality rate of COVID-19 patients with cancer measured 22.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.3% to 28.0%). Univariate analysis revealed age (OR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.80 to 7.06), male sex (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.13), and comorbidity (OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.04 to 3.85) were associated with increased risk of severe events (defined as the individuals being admitted to the intensive care unit, or requiring invasive ventilation, or death). In multivariable analysis, only age greater than 65 years (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.45 to 6.88) and being male (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.87) were associated with increased risk of severe events. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrated that COVID-19 patients with cancer have a higher fatality rate compared with that of COVID-19 patients without cancer. Age and sex appear to be risk factors associated with a poorer prognosis.

scholarly journals Modifiable risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (22) ◽  
pp. 632-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Ji ◽  
Xin-Yi Leng ◽  
Yi Dong ◽  
Ya-Hui Ma ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carotid Atherosclerosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors

Global risk factors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Liu ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
S Chen ◽  
E.Y.M Chung ◽  
L Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Funding Source

Abstract Background Administration of iodinated contrast is common but may be associated with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), particularly in at-risk patients. There is no recent systematic review of potentially modifiable risk factors. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to 30 th June 2019) for observational studies assessing risk factors associated with CI-AKI. Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors were finally included in this thematic review and meta-analysis. Random or fixed meta-analysis was performed to derive the adjusted odds ratio (aOR), and the population attributable risk (PAR) was calculated for each risk factor globally and by region. Findings We included 157 studies (2,297,863 participants). The global incidence of CI-AKI was 5.4%. The potentially modifiable risk factors included high contrast volume (PAR 33%), eight cardiovascular risk factors (diuretic use, multivessel coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, hypertension, hypotension, heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and intra-aortic balloon pump use) (combined PAR 76.2%) and three noncardiovascular risk factors (renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus and anaemia) (combined PAR 47.4%) with geographical differences. Bubble chart of the 12 risk factors Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Science Foundation of China

P62 RISK FACTORS AND OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS (AL) FOLLOWING OESOPHAGECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kamarajah Sivesh ◽  
Lin Aaron ◽  
Tharmaraja Thahesh ◽  
Bharwada Yashvi ◽  
R Bundred James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Anastomotic Leaks ◽  
Patient Counselling ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Abstract Introduction Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after oesophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. Methods This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31st December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). Results This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 - 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n=79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99 - 6.89, p<0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77 - 3.37, p<0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10 - 21 days, p<0.001 and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41 - 24.79, p=0.015). Conclusion AL are a major complication following oesophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL which can be a target for interventions to reduce anastomotic leak rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counselling and informed consent.

scholarly journals Burnout in Palliative Care Nurses, Prevalence and Risk Factors: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 7672
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Gómez-Urquiza ◽  
Luis Albendín-García ◽  
Almudena Velando-Soriano ◽  
Elena Ortega-Campos ◽  
Lucía Ramírez-Baena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Personal Accomplishment ◽  
Work Stressors ◽  
Psychological Variables ◽  
Prevalence Estimation

Palliative care nurses are exposed to hard situations, death, and duel feelings in their daily practice. These, and other work stressors, can favor burnout development. Thus, it is important to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of burnout in palliative care nurses and estimate its prevalence. A systematic review and meta-analysis was done with quantitative primary studies. n = 15 studies were included with n = 6 studies including information for the meta-analysis. The meta-analytic prevalence estimation of emotional exhaustion was 24% (95% CI 16–34%), for depersonalization was 30% (95% CI 18–44%) and for low personal accomplishment was 28% with a sample of n = 693 palliative care nurses. The main variables related with burnout are occupational variables followed by psychological variables. Some interventions to improve working conditions of palliative care nurses should be implemented to reduce burnout.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document