Effect of Fenticonazole in Vaginal Candidiasis: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial versus Clotrimazole

1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl Brewster ◽  
Piero Monici Preti ◽  
Ralf Ruffmann ◽  
John Studd

Fenticonazole is an imidazole derivative which possesses a broad spectrum antimycotic activity, including activity against Candida albicans. Its therapeutic activity and tolerability have been evaluated, in a double-blind clinical trial versus clotrimazole, in 54 patients affected by mycologically confirmed symptomatic vaginal candidiasis. Both drugs were administered intravaginally as a cream once a day for 7 days. Assessment was by laboratory mycological investigations and symptomatic evaluation. Patients ‘cured’ at the end of the trial were re-evaluated after 4–6 weeks for possible relapses. Both treatments resulted in a progressive, statistically significant reduction in vaginal symptoms (itching and discharge) and in elimination of Candida in more than 95% of patients. When ‘cured’ patients were reassessed 4–6 weeks after therapy, relapses occurred in four patients after fenticonazole treatment, but in none following clotrimazole treatment. This apparent difference between treatments is far from being statistically significant and, therefore, may have been a chance occurrence. It should also be noted that patients from the fenticonazole group had a previous history of significantly more frequent episodes of candidiasis suggesting that they may have been at greater risk of re-infection than patients from the control group. The tolerance of both treatments was excellent since no local or systemic signs or symptoms of toxicity were reported. An equally high efficacy and safety for both drugs in the elimination of symptoms and objective evidence of vaginal candidiasis is indicated.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naser Gharebaghi ◽  
Rahim Nejadrahim ◽  
Seyed Jalil Mousavi ◽  
Seyyed-Reza Sadat-Ebrahimi ◽  
Reza Hajizadeh

Abstract Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected people in many countries worldwide. Discovering an effective treatment for this disease, particularly in severe cases, has become the subject of intense scientific investigation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with severe COVID-19 infection.Methods: This study was conducted as a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Fifty-nine patients with severe COVID-19 infection who did not respond to initial treatments were randomly assigned into two groups. One group received IVIg (human)—four vials daily for three days (in addition to initial treatment), while the other group received a placebo. Patients’ demographic, clinical, and select laboratory test results, as well as the occurrence of in-hospital mortality, were recorded.Results: Among total study subjects, 30 patients received IVIg and 29 patients received a placebo. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory tests were not statistically different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVIg group compared to the control group (6 [20.0%] vs. 14 [48.3%], respectively; P = 0.022). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that administration of IVIg did indeed have a significant impact on mortality rate (aOR = 0.003 [95% CI: 0.001–0.815]; P = 0.042).Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the administration of IVIg in patients with severe COVID-19 infection who did not respond to initial treatment could improve their clinical outcome and significantly reduce mortality rate. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are nonetheless required to confirm the appropriateness of this medication as a standard treatment.Trial registration: A study protocol was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (www.IRCT.ir), number IRCT20200501047259N1. It was registered retrospectively on May 17th, 2020.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
HasanAli Karimpour ◽  
Behzad Hematpour ◽  
Saeed Mohammadi ◽  
Javad Aminisaman ◽  
Maryam Mirzaei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pneumonia caused by the ventilator is the most common acquired infection in the intensive care unit, which increases the morbidity and mortality of the patients. Eucalyptus plant has antiseptic properties. Therefore, the present study investigates the effect of eucalyptus incense on prevention of pneumonia in patients with endotracheal tube in the intensive care unit. Methods: This clinical trial study was performed on 100 patients under ventilation in two intervention and control groups in Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran in 2018. The patients in the intervention group, Eucalyptus solution 2% and in the control group received 10 cc distilled water as an inhaler three times a day. The results of the two groups were compared to the incidence of pulmonary infections based on CPIS criteria and compared with SPSS version 19 software. Results: The incidence of late pneumonia was significantly lower in the intervention group (P=0.02). The onset of pneumonia significantly later in the intervention group than the control group (P=0.01). The prevalence of Klebsiella, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus was significantly decreased in the intervention group (P=0.02) (P=0.04) (P=0.01). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that eucalyptus inhalation is effective in reducing the incidence of pulmonary infection in patients under ventilation. It is recommended that these products be used to prevent pulmonary infections in these patients.


1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phongjan Hathirat ◽  
Aree Valyasevi ◽  
Nittaya J. Kotchabhakdi ◽  
Nipa Rojroongwasinkul ◽  
Ernesto Pollitt

A double-blind clinical trial was conducted among 9- to 11-year-old children in sixteen schools in the Chon Buri province of Thailand to assess the effects of an iron supplement combined with an anthelminthic agent (i.e. albendazole). In addition to the albendazole, Fe or placebo tablets were distributed to 2268 children enrolled in grades three to five without knowledge of the Fe status of the children. Criteria for case inclusion were: (a) absence of A E Bart's or haemoglobin (Hb) H disease, (b) absence of abnormal Hb EE, and (c) age, 108–144 months. The results showed a significant improvement in the Fe status of the children after 16 weeks of treatment. The increments were: Hb from 124 to 128 g/l, serum ferritin from 34.54 to 104.72 μg/l, transferrin saturation from 24.09 to 35.05%; free erythrocyte protoporphyrin decreased from 444.7 to 281.4 μg/l erythrocytes. These changes were significantly greater than in the control group that received only the anthelminthic agent. However, the administration of albendazole only also resulted in significant changes in the same Fe indicators.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Mendes Pannuti ◽  
Joyce Pereira de Mattos ◽  
Paula Nini Ranoya ◽  
Alberto Martins de Jesus ◽  
Roberto Fraga Moreira Lotufo ◽  
...  

The aim of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of the Paradontax dentifrice on the reduction of plaque and gingivitis. Subjects were randomly allocated into either the test group (n = 15, Paradontax) or the control group (n = 15, standard dentifrice with fluoride). Plaque levels were measured using the Turesky modification of the Quigley & Hein Plaque Index (PI), and gingivitis was evaluated with the Gingival Index (GI). Subjects were asked to brush their teeth with the allocated dentifrice, three times a day, for 21 days. There was no significant difference between groups in relation to the PI and GI medians, at baseline and at the end of the 21-day period. There was no significant reduction in PI in either the test or control groups. There was a significant decrease in GI in the test group. The authors concluded that there was no difference between the dentifrices in the reduction of plaque and gingivitis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naser Gharebaghi ◽  
Rahim Nejadrahim ◽  
Seyed Jalil Mousavi ◽  
Seyyed-Reza Sadat-Ebrahimi ◽  
Reza Hajizadeh

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected people in many countries worldwide. Discovering an effective treatment for this disease, particularly in severe cases, has become the subject of intense scientific investigation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Methods This study was conducted as a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Fifty-nine patients with severe COVID-19 infection who did not respond to initial treatments were randomly assigned into two groups. One group received IVIg (human)—four vials daily for 3 days (in addition to initial treatment), while the other group received a placebo. Patients’ demographic, clinical, and select laboratory test results, as well as the occurrence of in-hospital mortality, were recorded. Results Among total study subjects, 30 patients received IVIg and 29 patients received a placebo. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory tests were not statistically different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVIg group compared to the control group (6 [20.0%] vs. 14 [48.3%], respectively; P = 0.025). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that administration of IVIg did indeed have a significant impact on mortality rate (aOR = 0.003 [95% CI: 0.001–0.815]; P = 0.042). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that the administration of IVIg in patients with severe COVID-19 infection who did not respond to initial treatment could improve their clinical outcome and significantly reduce mortality rate. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are nonetheless required to confirm the appropriateness of this medication as a standard treatment. Trial registration A study protocol was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (www.IRCT.ir), number IRCT20200501047259N1. It was registered retrospectively on May 17th, 2020.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholamreza Askari ◽  
Babak Alikiaii ◽  
Davood Soleimani ◽  
Amirhossein Sahebkar ◽  
Mahdiye Mirjalili ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives This study aims to investigate the efficacy of curcumin-piperine co-supplementation on oxidative stress factors, clinical symptoms, and mortality rate in patients with coronavirus (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Trial design This study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm clinical trial. Participants The study participants will be recruited from patients admitted to the ICU of Al-Zahra hospital with a definitive diagnosis of COVID-19. The inclusion criteria are aged between 20 and 75 years, confirmation of COVID-19 based on the PCR test, and admitted to the ICU. The exclusion criteria include the present use of parenteral nutrition support, a history of underlying diseases such as congenital disorders, immune diseases, renal and hepatic insufficiency, and pancreatitis, a history of sensitivity to herbal remedies such as turmeric and pepper, and regular use of anticoagulant drugs such as warfarin. This study will be performed in the Al-Zahra hospital, an academic hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Intervention and comparator Sixty eligible patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive curcumin-piperine capsules (three capsules/day; each capsules containing 500 mg curcumin plus 5 mg piperine; in total 1500 mg curcumin and 15 mg piperine/daily) for seven days (n=30) or matching placebo capsules (three capsules/day; each capsules containing 505 mg maltodextrin; totally 1515 mg, maltodextrin/ daily) for same duration (n=30). Capsules will be administered after oral or enteral feeding at 9, 15 and 21 o’clock. Main outcomes The primary outcome is the time from initiation of supplementation (curcumin-piperine or placebo) to normalization of fever, respiratory rate, and blood oxygen saturation. The secondary outcomes are the mortality rate, length of stay in ICU, temperature, levels of blood oxygen saturation, ventilator dependency, respiratory rate, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), levels of liver markers (ALT, AST, LDH), and levels of kidney function markers (BUN, Creatinine). Follow up All of the parameters will be assessed at baseline and end of the study (7 days intervention). In addition, the rate of mortality will be collected after 4 weeks (28 days’ mortality in the ICU, 4 weeks follow up). Randomisation Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (Curcumin-piperine) or the control group (Placebo). Randomization sequences will be generated using an electronic table of random numbers to allocate the included participants into either control or intervention groups (in a 1:1 ratio) using the stratified block randomization method. Stratification was conducted according to sex (male and female), with a block size of four. The allocation sequences will be prepared by an independent statistician and will be kept inside sealed, opaque, and consecutively numbered envelopes. Participants, investigators, nurses, and physicians will be unaware of the trial-group assignment. Blinding (masking) This study is a double-blind clinical trial (participants, investigators, nurses, and physicians). The curcumin-piperine and placebo supplements will be similar in the terms of texture, taste, color, odor, and weight. Both tablets will be provided in containers that are completely identical in weight, shape, labeling, and packaging. All participants, investigators, nurses, and physicians will be unaware of the trial-group assignment. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) The sample size is estimated at 60 participants, including 30 patients in the intervention group and 30 patients in the placebo group. Trial Status The protocol is Version 2, registered on May 13, 2021. Recruitment began May 20, 2021, and is anticipated to be completed by September 20, 2021. Trial registration This trial has been registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the title of “Evaluation of the effect of curcumin-piperine supplementation in patients with coronavirus admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU): a double-blind clinical trial study”. IRCT registration number is IRCT20121216011763N52. The registration date was May 13, 2021. Full Protocol The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (File 1). In the interest of expediting the dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e03-e03
Author(s):  
Saeed Mardani ◽  
Farzaneh Kadkhodaei-Elyaderani ◽  
Ali Momeni ◽  
Maryam Saeedi

Introduction: Diabetic nephropathy (diabetic kidney disease) is the most common cause of renal failure. Objectives: Regarding the role of allopurinol in the improvement of diabetic kidney disease, this study aimed to investigate the ameliorative effect of allopurinol in diabetic nephropathy patients. Patients and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was performed on 60 patients with diabetic kidney disease referenced to nephrology clinic during 2019-2020. Patients were divided into case (treated with allopurinol 100 mg/d) and control (received placebo pill) groups. Three and six months of intervention, complete blood count (CBC), fasting blood sugar levels (FBS), serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, creatinine (Cr) and uric acid (UA) levels, 24 hours urinary protein, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were measured and compared between the two groups. Results: After six months, reduction of UA and 24 hours urinary protein were not significant in the control group (P > 0.05) but it was significant in the allopurinol group (P < 0.05). In the allopurinol group, NLR and PLR levels decreased significantly during the six months (P < 0.01) however there was no significant change in the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Low dosage of allopurinol (100 mg/d) reduces UA, proteinuria, NLR and PLR in patients after six months. Therefore it can be used for diabetic nephropathy patients as a supplementary, inexpensive and safe treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 880-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Supreetha ◽  
KN Abhishek ◽  
S Nubesh Khan ◽  
KH Chaithanya ◽  
Nishad Abdul

ABSTRACT Aim The present study was designed to assess the effect of toothpaste containing neem on plaque and gingivitis. Materials and methods Randomized, double blind clinical trial was designed. Thirty first year dental students volunteered to participate in the study. Neem containing tooth paste was used as an intervention. Clinical examination was carried out using Silness and Loe plaque index (PI) and Loe and Silness gingival index (GI). Independent t-test and paired t-test was used for the intergroup and the intragroup comparison. Results Out of 30 participants, 22 (73.3%) were females and eight (26.7%) were males. A statistically significant difference was found between the test and control group after intervention with respect to the PI and GI. Conclusion Neem containing toothpaste can be used as an adjunct for maintenance of oral hygiene. Clinical significance Regular brushing with neem toothpaste might act as an adjunct to maintenance of good oral hygiene, and thus improve oral health. How to cite this article Abhishek KN, Supreetha S, Sam G, Khan SN, Chaithanya KH, Abdul N. Effect of Neem containing Toothpaste on Plaque and Gingivitis—A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(11):880-883.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaf Akram Abdulhameed ◽  
Natheer Hashim Al-Rawi ◽  
Asmaa Tahseen Uthman ◽  
Ab Rani Samsudin

Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of bone texture fractal dimension (FD) analysis method in predicting implant stability from intraoral periapical radiographs using two implant protocols. Materials and Methods. A double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 22 subjects who needed dental implants. The participants were randomized into two groups, the control group with standard implant protocol treatment and the intervention group with added low-intensity power ultrasound treatment (LIPUS) besides the standard implant protocol. The FD values of bone density were carried out on the mesial and distal sides of the implant on digital intraoral radiographs using the box-counting method. Both resonance frequency (RF) and fractal dimension (FD) were assessed in three time intervals: after surgery and before and after loading. Results. FD on both the mesial and distal sides serve as very good-to-excellent tests with high validity (ROC area exceeding 0.8) in predicting high implant stability (ISQ ≥ 70). The mesial side measurements were consistently better than the distal side among the intervention groups. The optimum cutoff value for the FD-mesial side that predicts a highly stable implant (ISQ ≥ 70) is ≥1.505. At this optimum cutoff value, the mesial side FD is associated with a perfect sensitivity (100%) and fairly high specificity (86.5%). Conclusion. The FD analysis could be recommended as an adjunctive quantitative method in prediction of the implant stability with very high sensitivity and specificity. This trial is registered with ISRCTN72648040.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document