Book Review: Cancer Chemoprevention. Volume I. Promising Cancer Chemopreventive Agents

2004 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-637
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents

scholarly journals Role of Phytochemicals in Cancer Prevention

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Ranjan ◽  
Sharavan Ramachandran ◽  
Nehal Gupta ◽  
Itishree Kaushik ◽  
Stephen Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Natural Agents ◽  
Anticancer Effects ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
High Risk Populations

The use of synthetic, natural, or biological agents to minimize the occurrence of cancer in healthy individuals is defined as cancer chemoprevention. Chemopreventive agents inhibit the development of cancer either by impeding DNA damage, which leads to malignancy or by reversing or blocking the division of premalignant cells with DNA damage. The benefit of this approach has been demonstrated in clinical trials of breast, prostate, and colon cancer. The continuous increase in cancer cases, failure of conventional chemotherapies to control cancer, and excessive toxicity of chemotherapies clearly demand an alternative approach. The first trial to show benefit of chemoprevention was undertaken in breast cancer patients with the use of tamoxifen, which demonstrated a significant decrease in invasive breast cancer. The success of using chemopreventive agents for protecting the high risk populations from cancer indicates that the strategy is rational and promising. Dietary components such as capsaicin, cucurbitacin B, isoflavones, catechins, lycopenes, benzyl isothiocyanate, phenethyl isothiocyanate, and piperlongumine have demonstrated inhibitory effects on cancer cells indicating that they may serve as chemopreventive agents. In this review, we have addressed the mechanism of chemopreventive and anticancer effects of several natural agents.

scholarly journals Chemoprevention of cancer: current evidence and future prospects

F1000Research ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vassiliki Benetou ◽  
Areti Lagiou ◽  
Pagona Lagiou
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Prospects ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
Long Latency ◽  
The Future ◽  
Vegetables And Fruits ◽  
Genetic Profiles

Cancer chemoprevention refers to the use of agents for the inhibition, delay, or reversal of carcinogenesis before invasion. In the present review, agents examined in the context of cancer chemoprevention are classified in four major categories—hormonal, medications, diet-related agents, and vaccines—and the main representatives of each category are presented. Although there are serious constraints in the documentation of effectiveness of chemopreventive agents, mainly stemming from the long latency of the condition they are addressing and the frequent lack of intermediate biomarkers, there is little disagreement about the role of aspirin, whereas a diet rich in vegetables and fruits appears to convey more protection than individual micronutrients. Among categories of cancer chemopreventive agents, hormonal ones and vaccines might hold more promise for the future. Also, the identification of individuals who would benefit most from chemopreventive interventions on the basis of their genetic profiles could open new prospects for cancer chemoprevention.

scholarly journals New Enlightenment of Skin Cancer Chemoprevention through Phytochemicals:In VitroandIn VivoStudies and the Underlying Mechanisms

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhulika Singh ◽  
Shankar Suman ◽  
Yogeshwer Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Comprehensive Knowledge ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Skin cancer is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Skin overexposure to ultraviolet irradiations, chemicals, and several viruses has a capability to cause severe skin-related disorders including immunosuppression and skin cancer. These factors act in sequence at various steps of skin carcinogenesis via initiation, promotion, and/or progression. These days cancer chemoprevention is recognized as the most hopeful and novel approach to prevent, inhibit, or reverse the processes of carcinogenesis by intervention with natural products. Phytochemicals have antioxidant, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, and carcinogen detoxification capabilities thereby considered as efficient chemopreventive agents. Considerable efforts have been done to identify the phytochemicals which may possibly act on one or several molecular targets that modulate cellular processes such as inflammation, immunity, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. Till date several phytochemicals in the light of chemoprevention have been studied by using suitable skin carcinogenicin vitroandin vivomodels and proven as beneficial for prevention of skin cancer. This revision presents a comprehensive knowledge and the main molecular mechanisms of actions of various phytochemicals in the chemoprevention of skin cancer.

scholarly journals Indoles Derived From Glucobrassicin: Cancer Chemoprevention by Indole-3-Carbinol and 3,3'-Diindolylmethane

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Estrogen Metabolism ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
Brussels Sprouts ◽  
Aryl Hydrocarbon ◽  
Breast And Prostate Cancer ◽  
Aflatoxin B ◽  
Direct Acting

Hydrolysis of glucobrassicin by plant or bacterial myrosinase produces multiple indoles predominantly indole-3-carbinol (I3C). I3C and its major in vivo product, 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM), are effective cancer chemopreventive agents in pre-clinical models and show promise in clinical trials. The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of DIM have been studied in both rodents and humans and urinary DIM is a proposed biomarker of dietary intake of cruciferous vegetables. Recent clinical studies at Oregon State University show surprisingly robust metabolism of DIM in vivo with mono- and di-hydroxylation followed by conjugation with sulfate or glucuronic acid. DIM has multiple mechanisms of action, the most well-characterized is modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling. In rainbow trout dose-dependent cancer chemoprevention by dietary I3C is achieved when given prior to or concurrent with aflatoxin B1, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrosamines or direct acting carcinogens such as N-methyl-N'-nitro-nitrosoguanidine. Feeding pregnant mice I3C inhibits transplacental carcinogenesis. In humans much of the focus has been on chemoprevention of breast and prostate cancer. Alteration of cytochrome P450-dependent estrogen metabolism is hypothesized to be an important driver of DIM-dependent breast cancer prevention. The few studies done to date comparing glucobrassicin-rich crucifers such as Brussels sprouts with I3C/DIM supplements have shown the greater impact of the latter is due to dose. Daily ingestion of kg quantities of Brussels sprouts is required to produce in vivo levels of DIM achievable by supplementation. In clinical trials these supplement doses have elicited few if any adverse effects. Sulforaphane from glucoraphanin can act synergistically with glucobrassicin-derived DIM and this may lead to opportunities for combinatorial approaches (supplement and food-based) in the clinic.

scholarly journals Cancer Chemoprevention: Preclinical In Vivo Alternate Dosing Strategies to Reduce Drug Toxicities

2019 ◽  
Vol 170 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altaf Mohammed ◽  
Jennifer T Fox ◽  
Mark Steven Miller
Keyword(s):  
Drug Efficacy ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Drug Dosing ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals

AbstractCancer chemopreventive agents inhibit the formation of precursor lesions and/or the progression of these lesions to late stage disease. This approach to disease control has the potential to reduce the physical and financial costs of cancer in society. Several drugs that have been approved by the FDA for other diseases and have been extensively evaluated for their safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics have the potential to be repurposed for use as cancer chemopreventive agents. These agents often mechanistically inhibit signaling molecules that play key roles in the carcinogenic process. The safety profile of agents is a primary concern when considering the administration of drugs for chemoprevention, as the drugs will be given chronically to high-risk, asymptomatic individuals. To decrease drug toxicity while retaining efficacy, several approaches are currently being explored. In this short review, we describe studies that use preclinical in vivo models to assess efficacy of alternative drug dosing strategies and routes of drug administration on chemopreventive drug efficacy. In vivo drug dosing strategies that reduce toxicity while retaining efficacy will pave the way for future cancer prevention clinical trials.

scholarly journals Cancer Chemoprevention: Current State of the Art

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CGM.S11288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin R. Landis-Piwowar ◽  
Neena R. Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Cancer Chemoprevention ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Chemopreventive Agents ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Current State

The aim of cancer chemoprevention is disruption or delay of the molecular pathways that lead to carcinogenesis. Chemopreventive blocking and/or suppressing agents disrupt the molecular mechanisms that drive carcinogenesis such as DNA damage by reactive oxygen species, increased signal transduction to NF-κB, epigenomic deregulation, and the epithelial mesenchymal transition that leads to metastatic progression. Numerous dietary phytochemicals have been observed to inhibit the initiation phase of carcinogenesis, and therefore are useful in primary chemoprevention. Moreover, phytochemicals are capable of interfering with the molecular mechanisms of metastasis. Likewise, numerous synthetic compounds are relevant and clinically viable as chemopreventive agents during the fundamental stages of carcinogenesis. While molecularly targeted anti-cancer therapies are in constant stages of development, superior patient outcomes are observed if carcinogenic processes are prevented altogether. This article reviews the role of chemopreventive compounds in inhibition of cancer initiation and their ability to reduce cancer progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document