scholarly journals Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Sex (in IR) But were Afraid to Ask: The ‘Queer Turn’ in International Relations

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Richter-Montpetit

Queer International Relations’ momentum in the past four years has made it inconceivable for disciplinary IR to make it ‘appear as if there is no Queer International Theory’. The ‘queer turn’ has given rise to vibrant research programmes across IR subfields. Queer research is not only not a frivolous distraction from the ‘hard’ issues of IR, but queer analytics crack open for investigation fundamental dimensions of international politics that have hitherto been missed, misunderstood or trivialised by mainstream and critical approaches to IR. As queer research is making significant inroads into IR theorising, a fault line has emerged in IR scholarship on sexuality and queerness. Reflecting the tensions between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Studies and Queer Theory in the academy more broadly, the IR literature on (homo)sexuality largely coalesces into two distinct approaches: LGBT and Queer approaches. The article will lay out the basic tenets of Queer Theory and discuss how it diverges from LGBT Studies. The article then turns to the books under review and focuses on the ways in which they take up the most prominent issue in contemporary debates in Queer Theory: the increasing inclusion of LGBT people into international human rights regimes and liberal states and markets. The article finishes with a brief reflection on citation practices, queer methodologies and the ethics of queer research.

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
VASSILIOS PAIPAIS

AbstractThis article is principally concerned with the way some sophisticated critical approaches in International Relations (IR) tend to compromise their critical edge in their engagement with the self/other problematique. Critical approaches that understand critique as total non-violence towards, or unreflective affirmation of, alterity risk falling back into precritical paths. That is, either a particularistic, assimilative universalism with pretensions of true universality or a radical incommensurability and the impossibility of communication with the other. This is what this article understands as the paradox of the politics of critique. Instead, what is more important than seeking a final overcoming or dismissal of the self/other opposition is to gain the insight that it is the perpetual striving to preserve the tension and ambivalence between self and other that rescues both critique's authority and function.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Guilherme Colucci Pereira ◽  
Maria Cecilia Calani Baranauskas

HCI is a well-suited discipline for designing systems intended to support disenfranchised groups. The LGBT population is increasingly gaining visibility, but the range of subjects they are affected by prejudice and exclusion is wide. This work begins by a review on LGBT issues in HCI literature and mobile applications. We point out a lack of consideration of LGBT people as designers and critical approaches, explicitly aiming to not only understand but effectively act on social issues. In addition, few mobile applications disclose a critical goal, despite their potential impact on health, alterity, empathy, safety, and sociability. Then, we describe a semioparticipatory approach for codesign, focusing on the first conducted activities where the relations between mobile applications and LGBT issues were discussed with volunteers interested in the subject. Finally, we present the concept of a novel application aiming at the support and protection of LGBT people.


Author(s):  
Richard Devetak

Whether inspired by the Frankfurt School or Antonio Gramsci, the impact of critical theory on the study of international relations has grown considerably since its advent in the early 1980s. This book offers the first intellectual history of critical international theory. Richard Devetak approaches this history by locating its emergence in the rising prestige of theory and the theoretical persona. As theory’s prestige rose in the discipline of international relations it opened the way for normative and metatheoretical reconsiderations of the discipline and the world. The book traces the lines of intellectual inheritance through the Frankfurt School to the Enlightenment, German idealism, and historical materialism, to reveal the construction of a particular kind of intellectual persona: the critical international theorist who has mastered reflexive, dialectical forms of social philosophy. In addition to the extensive treatment of critical theory’s reception and development in international relations, the book recovers a rival form of theory that originates outside the usual inheritance of critical international theory in Renaissance humanism and the civil Enlightenment. This historical mode of theorising was intended to combat metaphysical encroachments on politics and international relations and to prioritise the mundane demands of civil government over the self-reflective demands of dialectical social philosophies. By proposing contextualist intellectual history as a form of critical theory, Critical International Theory: An Intellectual History defends a mode of historical critique that refuses the normative temptations to project present conceptions onto an alien past, and to abstract from the offices of civil government.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Roelcke

The article describes the emergence of research programmes, institutions and activities of the early protagonists in the field of psychiatric genetics: Ernst Rüdin in Munich, Eliot Slater in London, Franz Kallmann in New York and Erik Essen-Möller in Lund. During the 1930s and well into the Nazi period, the last three had been research fellows at the German Research Institute for Psychiatry in Munich. It is documented that there was a continuous mutual exchange of scientific ideas and practices between these actors, and that in all four contexts there were intrinsic relations between eugenic motivations and genetic research, but with specific national adaptations.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia Juliana de Sousa ◽  
Fátima Maria Da Silva Abrão ◽  
Aurélio Molina da Costa ◽  
Luiz Oscar Cardoso Ferreira

ABSTRACT Objective: to reflect on how nursing may employ the bioethics knowledge inside their practice to assistance and humanize the embracement on primary health care to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender people (LGBT). Methodology: a reflective essay based on extensive literature review and consolidated through discussions during classes, as also seminars and Bioethics readings extracted from the discipline  "Fundamentals of Ethics and Bioethics in Health Care” from Masters of Science in Nursing’s Associate Program of Pernambuco State University and Paraiba State University, Brazil. Results: the bioethics knowledge can subscribe the real recognition of citizenship for all people, especially the most vulnerable ones, providing a space for reflections in the direction of harmony and equal opportunity among LGBT and health professionals. Conclusion: the theoretical framework of bioethics can help and support registered Nurses to promote humanized care for embracement of LGBT people in primary health services, in that it gives them sense of dignity and respect through the tolerance and acceptance of the right of diversity. Descriptors: user embracement; primary health care; homosexuality; bioethics; nursing. RESUMO Objetivo: refletir sobre como a Enfermagem pode utilizar o referencial da Bioética para fundamentar sua prática e assistência em relação à garantia de um acolhimento humanizado a Lésbicas, Gays, Bissexuais, Travestis e Transexuais (LGBT) nos serviços de saúde da atenção básica. Metodologia: ensaio reflexivo baseado em revisão bibliográfica e consolidado por meio de discussões e seminários realizados na disciplina Fundamentos da Ética e Bioética na Saúde e Enfermagem do Programa de Mestrado Associado de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem UPE/UEPB. Resultados: a Bioética contribui para o reconhecimento da plena cidadania de todos os seres humanos principalmente dos mais vulneráveis, deste modo, proporcionando um espaço de reflexão na busca da convivência e da oportunidade entre usuários LGBT e profissionais da saúde. Conclusão: o referencial teórico da Bioética pode ajudar a respaldar e promover o acolhimento humanizado de LGBT pela Enfermagem nos serviços da atenção básica por meio da tolerância com a diversidade e respeito à dignidade humana destes cidadãos. Descritores: acolhimento; atenção básica; homossexualidade; bioética; enfermagem. RESUMEN Objectivo: refletir cómo las enfermeras pueden emplear los conocimientos de bioética dentro de su práctica  para  la asistencia y humanización de la acogida dentro la atención primaria de la salud de lesbianas, gays, bisexuales y personas transgénero. Metodología: ensayo reflexivo basado en  revisión de la literatura y consolidado através de discusiones y seminarios  durante las clases, así como seminarios y lecturas de Bioética extraídos de la disciplina "Fundamentos de la Ética y Bioética en la Atención Sanitaria" del Programa Master en Enfermeria Asociado de las Universades de los estados de Pernambuco y Paraiba, Brazil. resultados: la Bioética puede sostener um reconocimiento real de la ciudadanía de las personas, especialmente los más vulnerables, proporcionando un espacio de reflexión en el sentido de la armonía y la igualdad de oportunidades entre los LGBT y profesionales de la salud. Conclusión: el marco teórico de la bioética puede sustener a las enfermeras  para una atención más humanizada  de la acogida a los LGBT dentro de los servicios de salud primaria, garantizando a estas personas un sentido de dignidad y respeto a través de la tolerancia y la aceptación del derecho de la diversidad. Descriptores: acogimiento; atención primaria de salud; homosexualidad; bioética; enfermería.


Author(s):  
Gabriel Aleksandrs

This chapter details some key considerations for health and human services professionals working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in care relationships. Reflecting on the impacts of stigma and discrimination as well as the social, cultural, and political contexts of LGBT communities and carers, this chapter will explore some of ways these factors (as well as heterosexist and cis-genderist assumptions about families and partners) impact the identification, support, and recognition of LGBT people in care relationships. Finally, this chapter will recommend strategies to reduce poor mental health and wellbeing outcomes among people in care relationships where one or all people involved are LGBT, and explore some key actions that may assist health and human services better support and include LGBT people in care relationships.


2022 ◽  
pp. 593-620
Author(s):  
Gabriel Aleksandrs

This chapter details some key considerations for health and human services professionals working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in care relationships. Reflecting on the impacts of stigma and discrimination as well as the social, cultural, and political contexts of LGBT communities and carers, this chapter will explore some of ways these factors (as well as heterosexist and cis-genderist assumptions about families and partners) impact the identification, support, and recognition of LGBT people in care relationships. Finally, this chapter will recommend strategies to reduce poor mental health and wellbeing outcomes among people in care relationships where one or all people involved are LGBT, and explore some key actions that may assist health and human services better support and include LGBT people in care relationships.


2021 ◽  
pp. 22-38
Author(s):  
Martin Wight

In this essay Wight explained why there is no set of classic works regarding relations among states—what Wight terms ‘international theory’— analogous to the rich political theory literature concerning the state. In addition to works on international law, four categories of effort have populated the field: (a) those of ‘irenists’ advocating mechanisms to promote peace; (b) those of Machiavellians examining raison d’état; (c) incidental works by great philosophers and historians; and (d) noteworthy speeches and other writings by statesmen and officials. International theory works have been ‘marked, not only by paucity but also by intellectual and moral poverty’, because of the focus since the sixteenth century on the modern sovereign state, with the states-system neglected. Moreover, while there has been material and organizational progress within states in recent centuries, international relations have remained ‘incompatible with progressivist theory’. People who recoil from analyses implying that progress in international affairs is doubtful sometimes prefer a Kantian ‘argument from desperation’ asserting the feasibility of improvements and ‘perpetual peace’. Wight concluded that ‘historical interpretation’ is for international relations the counterpart of political theory for the state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document