Impact of Urgent Chemotherapy in Critically Ill Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Franca de Oliveira ◽  
Juliana Carvalho Ferreira ◽  
Antonio Paulo Nassar Junior ◽  
Aldo Lourenço Abbade Dettino ◽  
Pedro Caruso
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Life Threatening Complication

Objective: Compare the mortality between critically ill patients who received urgent chemotherapy for a cancer-related life-threatening complication with matched patients (controls) who did not received it. Design: Propensity score-matched retrospective study. Setting: Adult intensive care unit in an oncological hospital. Participants: All adults with solid tumor or hematological malignancies who received at least 1 day of urgent intravenous chemotherapy for a cancer-related life-threatening complication. Using the propensity score method adjusted for 10 variables, patients who received urgent chemotherapy were matched to patients who did not. Interventions: None. Main Outcomes Measures: Intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Results: Forty-seven patients (57% with solid tumors and 43% with hematological malignancies) who received urgent chemotherapy were matched to 94 controls. At intensive care unit admission, patients were similar except that those who received urgent chemotherapy were less likely to have received chemotherapy previously (36% vs 85%; P < .01). The intensive care unit (48.9% vs 23.4%; P < .01) and hospital (76.6% vs 46.8%; P < .01) mortality of the patients who received urgent chemotherapy was higher than the controls. The subgroup analysis showed that the higher mortality was limited to patients with solid tumor. Conclusion: The use of urgent chemotherapy is associated with an increase in the intensive care unit and hospital mortality of unselected critically ill patients with solid tumors but not in patients with hematological malignancies.

Abstract 15293: Noninvasive Echocardiographic Cardiac Power Output Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Burstein ◽  
Vidhu Anand ◽  
Bradley Ternus ◽  
Meir Tabi ◽  
Nandan S Anavekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Power Output ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cardiac Power ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cardiac Intensive Care

Introduction: A low cardiac power output (CPO), measured invasively, identifies critically ill patients at increased risk of mortality. CPO can also be measured non-invasively with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), although prognostic data in critically ill patients is not available. Hypothesis: Reduced CPO measured by TTE is associated with increased hospital mortality in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. Methods: Using a database of CICU patients admitted between 2007 and 2018, we identified patients with TTE within one day (before or after) of CICU admission who had data necessary for calculation of CPO. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship between CPO and adjusted hospital mortality. Results: We included 5,585 patients with a mean age of 68.3±14.8 years, including 36.7% females. Admission diagnoses included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 57%, heart failure (HF) in 50%, cardiac arrest (CA) in 12%, and cardiogenic shock (CS) in 13%. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 47±16%, and the mean CPO was 1.0±0.4 W. CPO was inversely associated with the risk of hospital mortality (Figure A), including among patients with ACS, HF, and CS (Figure B). On multivariable analysis, lower CPO was associated with higher hospital mortality (OR 0.96 per 0.1 W, 95% CI 0.0.93-0.99, p=0.03). Hospital mortality was highest in patients with low CPO coupled with reduced LVEF, increased vasopressor requirements, or higher admission lactate. Hospital mortality was higher among patients with a CPO <0.6 W (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.19, p = 0.007), particularly in the presence of admission lactate level >4 mmol/L (50.9%). Conclusions: Echocardiographic CPO was inversely associated with hospital mortality in CICU patients, particularly among patients with increased lactate and vasopressor requirements. Routine measurement of CPO provides important information beyond LVEF and should be considered in CICU patients.

Outcomes of Critically Ill Gynecological Cancer Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio A. Ñamendys-Silva ◽  
María O. González-Herrera ◽  
Julia Texcocano-Becerra ◽  
Angel Herrera-Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score

Purpose: To assess the characteristics of critically ill patients with gynecological cancer, and to evaluate their prognosis. Methods: Fifty-two critically ill patients with gynecological cancer admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. Results: Thirty-five patients (67.3%) had carcinoma of the cervix uteri and 11 (21.2%) had ovarian cancer. The mortality rate in the ICU was 17.3% (9 of 52) and hospital mortality rate were 23%(12 of 52). In the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for hospital mortality were vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR] = 8.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05-36; P = .03) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.09; P = .048). Conclusions: The independent prognostic factors for hospital mortality were the need for vasopressors and the APACHE II score.

scholarly journals Utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients – a challenge for the bedside sonographer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Mielnicki ◽  
Agnieszka Dyla ◽  
Tomasz Zawada
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Fluid Responsiveness ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Dynamic Parameters ◽  
Hemodynamic Assessment ◽  
Life Threatening

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has become one of the most important diagnostic tools in the treatment of critically ill patients. It allows clinicians to recognise potentially reversible life-threatening situations and is also very effective in the monitoring of the fluid status of patients, slowly substituting invasive methods in the intensive care unit. Hemodynamic assessment is based on a few static and dynamic parameters. Dynamic parameters change during the respiratory cycle in mechanical ventilation and the level of this change directly corresponds to fluid responsiveness. Most of the parameters cannot be used in spontaneously breathing patients. For these patients the most important test is passive leg raising, which is a good substitute for fluid bolus. Although TTE is very useful in the critical care setting, we should not forget the important limitations, not only technical ones but also caused by the critical illness itself. Unfortunately, this method does not allow continuous monitoring and every change in the patient’s condition requires repeated examination.Keywords: hypovolaemia; non-invasive monitoring; intensive care unit; transthoracic echocardiography

scholarly journals The Comparison between Sepsis 1.0 and Sepsis 3.0 in Database of Severe Infection in Critical Illness: A Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Juan Gu ◽  
Yan Kang
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Failure Assessment

Abstract Objective To compared the Sepsis 1.0 criterial with the Sepsis 3.0 criteria predict the efficacy of all-caused mortality of in-hospital in critically ill patients with severe infection. Design This is a retrospective and cohort study based on the database of severe infection. Setting A 48-bed general intensive care unit in affiliated hospital of University. Patients Critically ill patients with suspected infection based on the electronic health records from 1 January to 31 December, 2015. Interventions None. Measurements The variables of exposures included: quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). Main outcomes and measures: for predictive validity, we found that the discrimination for hospital mortality was more common with sepsis than with uncomplicated infections. Results are reported as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).Main Results In the primary cohort, 873 patients had suspected infection cohort (n=634), of whom 188 (29.7%) died; and with the non-infection cohort (n=239), 26 patients died (10.9%). Among intensive care unit (ICU) cases in the infection cohort, the predictive validity for hospital mortality was higher for Sepsis 3.0 (SOFA) criteria (AUROC=0.702; 95%CI, 0.665 −0.737; p≤0.01 for both) than for Sepsis 1.0 (SIRS) criteria (AUROC=0.533; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.493−0.572). Conclusions In our study, we found the Sepsis 3.0 criteria is able to accurately predict the prognosis in critically ill patients with severe infection, and its predictive efficacy is superior to Sepsis 1.0 criteria.

scholarly journals Association between Malnutrition and Hospital Mortality and Duration of Intensive Care Unit Admission in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Chin Han Lew ◽  
Gabriel Jun Yung Wong ◽  
Ka Po Cheung ◽  
Ai Ping Chua ◽  
Mary Foong Fong Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Increased Risk

There is limited evidence for the association between malnutrition and hospital mortality as well as Intensive Care Unit length-of-stay (ICU-LOS) in critically ill patients. We aimed to examine the aforementioned associations by conducting a prospective cohort study in an ICU of a Singapore tertiary hospital. Between August 2015 and October 2016, all adult patients with &ge;24 h of ICU-LOS were included. The 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (7-point SGA) was used to determine patients&rsquo; nutritional status within 48 hours of ICU admission. Multivariate analyses were conducted in two ways: 1) presence versus absence of malnutrition, and 2) dose-dependent association for each 1-point decrease in the 7-point SGA. There were 439 patients of which 28.0% were malnourished, and 29.6% died before hospital discharge. Malnutrition was associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality [adjusted-RR 1.39 (95%CI: 1.10&ndash;1.76)], and this risk increased with a greater degree of malnutrition [adjusted-RR 1.09 (95%CI: 1.01&ndash;1.18) for each 1-point decrease in the 7-point SGA]. No significant association was found between malnutrition and ICU-LOS. Conclusion: There was a clear association between malnutrition and higher hospital mortality in critically ill patients. The association between malnutrition and ICU-LOS could not be replicated and hence requires further evaluation.

scholarly journals The Association between Nutritional Status and In-Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 in Critically-Ill Patients in the ICU

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3302
Author(s):  
Michał Czapla ◽  
Raúl Juárez-Vela ◽  
Vicente Gea-Caballero ◽  
Stanisław Zieliński ◽  
Marzena Zielińska
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The impact of poor nutritional status on increased mortality and prolonged ICU (intensive care unit) stay in critically ill patients is well-documented. This study aims to assess how nutritional status and BMI (body mass index) affected in-hospital mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and analysed medical records of 286 COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the University Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw (Poland). Results: A total of 286 patients were analysed. In the sample group, 8% of patients who died had a BMI within the normal range, 46% were overweight, and 46% were obese. There was a statistically significantly higher death rate in men (73%) and those with BMIs between 25.0–29.9 (p = 0.011). Nonsurvivors had a statistically significantly higher HF (Heart Failure) rate (p = 0.037) and HT (hypertension) rate (p < 0.001). Furthermore, nonsurvivors were statistically significantly older (p < 0.001). The risk of death was higher in overweight patients (HR = 2.13; p = 0.038). Mortality was influenced by higher scores in parameters such as age (HR = 1.03; p = 0.001), NRS2002 (nutritional risk score, HR = 1.18; p = 0.019), PCT (procalcitonin, HR = 1.10; p < 0.001) and potassium level (HR = 1.40; p = 0.023). Conclusions: Being overweight in critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation increases their risk of death significantly. Additional factors indicating a higher risk of death include the patient’s age, high PCT, potassium levels, and NRS ≥ 3 measured at the time of admission to the ICU.

scholarly journals Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement and In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhou ◽  
Liang-Ying Lin ◽  
Xiao-Ai Liu ◽  
Ye-Sheng Ling ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Invasive Blood Pressure

Background: Invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement is common in the intensive care unit, although its association with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with hypertension is poorly understood.Methods and Results: A total of 11,732 critically ill patients with hypertension from the eICU-Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received IBP. The primary outcome in this study was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighing (IPTW) models were used to balance the confounding covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between IBP measurement and hospital mortality. The IBP group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the no IBP group in the primary cohort [238 (8.7%) vs. 581 (6.5%), p &lt; 0.001]. In the PSM cohort, the IBP group had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than the no IBP group [187 (8.0%) vs. 241 (10.3%), p = 0.006]. IBP measurement was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in the PSM cohort (odds ratio, 0.73, 95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.92) and in the IPTW cohort (odds ratio, 0.81, 95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.99). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results in the subgroups with high body mass index and no sepsis.Conclusions: In conclusion, IBP measurement was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with hypertension, highlighting the importance of IBP measurement in the intensive care unit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document