Comparison of Exit -Site Infections in Disconnect versus Nondisconnect Systems for Peritoneal Dialysis
Objective To determine if disconnect systems reduce the incidence of exit-site infections when compared to nondisconnect systems. Design We prospectively monitored exit-site infections and peritonitis rates in 96 disconnect patients (Yset, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)) and 60 nondisconnect patients (spike, ultraviolet connection device (UVXD)). Setting A freestanding chronic peritoneal dialysis unit staffed by physicians from both a medical school and a private setting. Patients All patients who began peritoneal dialysis at our unit were monitored, regardless of cause of endstage renal disease (ESRD) or age. Intervention Patients were dialyzed using the system (Y-set, spike, etc.) most appropriate for their life-style and their ability to administer self-care. Main Outcome We attempted to follow disconnect and nondisconnect patients for a similar median time on dialysis and compared differences in exit-site infections. Results Peritonitis rates (episodes/pt year) were reduced for disconnect (0.60) versus nondisconnect (0.99) systems (p=0.0006). Despite the marked reduction in peritonitis rates, there was no difference in exit-site infection rates (0.35 vs 0.38), the time to the first exit -site infection, or the time to the first catheter removal for disconnect versus nondisconnect groups. When individual systems were compared, differences in exit-site infection rates (episodes/pt years) were noted (0.62, spike; 0.26,UVXD; 0.32,Y-set; 0.41,APD). Conclusion We found no overall difference in exit site infection rates for disconnect versus nondisconnect systems, despite a reduction in peritonitis rates for disconnect systems.