AbstractDetermining tissue biomechanical material properties from mechanical test data is frequently required in a variety of applications, e.g. tissue engineering. However, the validity of the resulting constitutive model parameters is the subject of debate in the field. Common methods to perform fitting, such as nonlinear least-squares, are known to be subject to several limitations, most notably the uniqueness of the fitting results. Parameter optimization in tissue mechanics often comes down to the “identifiability” or “uniqueness” of constitutive model parameters; however, despite advances in formulating complex constitutive relations and many classic and creative curve-fitting approaches, there is no accessible framework to study the identifiability of tissue material parameters. Our objective was to assess the identifiability of material parameters for established constitutive models of fiber-reinforced soft tissues, biomaterials, and tissue-engineered constructs. To do so, we generated synthetic experimental data by simulating uniaxial tension and compression tests, commonly used in biomechanics. We considered tendon and sclera as example tissues, using constitutive models that describe these fiber-reinforced tissues. We demonstrated that not all of the model parameters of these constitutive models were identifiable from uniaxial mechanical tests, despite achieving virtually identical fits to the stress-stretch response. We further show that when the lateral strain was considered as an additional fitting criterion, more parameters are identifiable, but some remain unidentified. This work provides a practical approach for addressing parameter identifiability in tissue mechanics.Statement of SignificanceData fitting is a powerful technique commonly used to extract tissue material parameters from experimental data, and which thus has applications in tissue biomechanics and engineering. However, the problem of “uniqueness” or “identifiability” of the fit parameters is a significant issue, limiting the fit results’ validity. Here we provide a novel method to evaluate data fitting and assess the uniqueness of results in the tissue mechanics constitutive models. Our results indicate that the uniaxial stress-stretch experimental data are not adequate to identify all the tissue material parameters. This study is of potential interest to a wide range of readers because of its application for the characterization of other engineering materials, while addressing the problem of uniqueness of the fitted results.
Likely striping in stochastic nematic elastomers
