Exploring the Relationships Between Problem Gambling and ADHD: A Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1427-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Theule ◽  
Kylee E. Hurl ◽  
Kristene Cheung ◽  
Michelle Ward ◽  
Brenna Henrikson
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Problem Gambling ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Adhd Symptoms ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Problem Gamblers ◽  
Gambling Severity ◽  
Meta Analyses

Objective: At present, there are inconsistencies in the literature pertaining to the association between ADHD and problem gambling. This study utilized meta-analytic techniques to clarify the association between symptoms of problem gambling and symptoms of ADHD. Method: Several meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model. PsycINFO, PubMed, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. Results: The weighted mean correlation between ADHD symptomology and gambling severity was r = .17, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.12, 0.22], p < .001. Mean age of the sample was the only moderator to approach significance, with greater age being linked to a stronger relationship between symptoms of ADHD and gambling severity. Conclusion: Clinicians needs to be cognizant of the greater risk of ADHD symptoms when working with problem gamblers and vice versa.

IL-17A in COVID-19 Cases: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1630-1639
Author(s):  
Sukayna Fadlallah ◽  
Marcel S Sham Eddin ◽  
Elias A Rahal
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Proinflammatory Cytokine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Disease Pathogenesis ◽  
Mean Differences

Introduction: Numerous reviews, commentaries and opinion pieces have suggested targeting IL-17A as part of managing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the notorious pandemic caused by the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). IL-17A is a proinflammatory cytokine attributed with homeostatic roles but that is also involved in autoimmune disease pathogenesis. While some studies have reported an increase in IL-17A in COVID-19 cases, no significant associations were found by others. Hence, we undertook this meta-analysis to study serum IL-17A levels in COVID-19 patients in relation to disease severity. Methodology: Multiple databases were systematically reviewed for literature published on the topic from January 1, 2019 to April 30, 2021. A random effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) as well as the

Systematic Review of Second Primary Oropharyngeal Cancers in Patients With p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982095117
Author(s):  
Craig A. Bollig ◽  
David S. Lee ◽  
Angela L. Mazul ◽  
Katelyn Stepan ◽  
Sidharth V. Puram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Alive With Disease ◽  
Medical Librarian ◽  
Meta Analyses

Objective To systematically review the literature to determine the prevalence and clinical outcomes of second primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Data Sources Search strategies created with a medical librarian were implemented using multiple databases in October 2019. Review Methods The population of interest included adults age >18 years with a p16+ or human papillomavirus-positive OPSCC. The outcome was a synchronous or metachronous second primary OPSCC. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to capture all study designs. In total, 685 records were identified by the search strategy. Two reviewers independently performed the review, extracted data, and performed a quality assessment. Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results A total of 2470 patients with 35 second primary OPSCCs from 15 studies were identified. The pooled prevalence of second primary OPSCC was 1.4% (range, 0%-14.3%). In the random-effects model, the prevalence was estimated at 1.3% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.3%; P = .51, I2 = 52%). Of the 30 patients with treatment information, 26 (86.7%) received surgical treatment, while 4 (13.3%) underwent nonsurgical therapy. Of the 29 patients with available survival information, 22 (75.9%) had no evidence of disease at last follow-up, 5 (17.2%) ultimately died of disease, and 2 (6.9%) were alive with disease. Conclusion Overall, the rate of second primary OPSCC in patients with an index p16+ OPSCC is low, and most patients are successfully treated. Insufficient evidence currently exists to recommend routine elective tonsillectomy during surgical treatment of p16+ OPSCC.

Effects of Quercetin Supplementation on Endurance Performance and Maximal Oxygen Consumption: A Meta-Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis M. Pelletier ◽  
Guillaume Lacerte ◽  
Eric D.B. Goulet
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Maximal Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Endurance Performance ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Meta Regression

Lately, the effect of quercetin supplementation (QS) on endurance performance (EP) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) has been receiving much scientific and media attention. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to determine QS’s ergogenic value on these variables. Studies were located with database searches (PubMed and SPORTDiscus) and cross-referencing. Outcomes represent mean percentage changes in EP (measured via power output) and VO2max between QS and placebo. Random-effects model meta-regression, mixed-effects model analog to the ANOVA, random-effects weighted mean effect summary, and magnitudebased inferences analyses were used to delineate the effects of QS. Seven research articles (representing 288 subjects) were included, producing 4 VO2max and 10 EP effect estimates. Mean QS daily intake and duration were, respectively, 960 ± 127 mg and 26 ± 24 d for the EP outcome and 1,000 ± 0 mg and 8 ± 23 d for the VO2max outcome. EP was assessed during exercise with a mean duration of 79 ± 82 min. Overall, QS improved EP by 0.74% (95% CI: 0.10–1.39, p = .02) compared with placebo. However, only in untrained individuals (0.83% ± 0.78%, p = .02) did QS significantly improve EP (trained individuals: 0.09% ± 2.15%, p = .92). There was no relationship between QS duration and EP (p = .69). Overall, QS increased VO2max by 1.94% (95% CI: 0.30–3.59, p = .02). Magnitude-based inferences suggest that the effect of QS on EP and VO2max is likely to be trivial for both trained and untrained individuals. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that QS is unlikely to prove ergogenic for aerobic-oriented exercises in trained and untrained individuals.

Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (01) ◽  
pp. 54-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Menke
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Meta Analyses

Summary Objectives: Meta-analysis allows to summarize pooled sensitivities and specificities from several primary diagnostic test accuracy studies. Often these pooled estimates are indirectly obtained from a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) analysis. This article presents a generalized linear random-effects model with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX that obtains the pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity directly. Methods: Firstly, the formula of the bivariate random-effects model is presented in context with the literature. Then its implementation with the new SAS PROC GLIMMIX is empirically evaluated in comparison to the indirect HSROC approach, utilizing the published 2 x 2 count data of 50 meta-analyses. Results: According to the empirical evaluation the meta-analytic results from the bivariate GLIMMIX approach are nearly identical to the results from the indirect HSROC approach. Conclusions: A generalized linear mixed model with PROC GLIMMIX offers a straightforward method for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

scholarly journals High burden of acute kidney injury in COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-207023
Author(s):  
Camila Barbosa Oliveira ◽  
Camilla Albertina Dantas Lima ◽  
Gisele Vajgel ◽  
Antonio Victor Campos Coelho ◽  
Paula Sandrin-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

AimsHospitalised patients with COVID-19 have a variable incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) according to studies from different nationalities. The present systematic review and meta-analysis describes the incidence of AKI, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality among patients with COVID-19-associated AKI.MethodsWe systematically searched electronic database PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify English articles published until 25 May 2020. In case of significant heterogeneity, the meta-analyses were conducted assuming a random-effects model.ResultsFrom 746 screened publications, we selected 21 observational studies with 15 536 patients with COVID-19 for random-effects model meta-analyses. The overall incidence of AKI was 12.3% (95% CI 7.3% to 20.0%) and 77% of patients with AKI were critically ill (95% CI 58.9% to 89.0%). The mortality among patients with AKI was 67% (95% CI 39.8% to 86.2%) and the risk of death was 13 times higher compared with patients without AKI (OR=13.3; 95% CI 6.1 to 29.2). Patients with COVID-19-associated AKI needed for RRT in 23.4% of cases (95% CI 12.6% to 39.4%) and those cases had high mortality (89%–100%).ConclusionThe present study evidenced an incidence of COVID-19-associated AKI higher than previous meta-analysis. The majority of patients affected by AKI were critically ill and mortality rate among AKI cases was high. Thus, it is extremely important for health systems to be aware about the impact of AKI on patients’ outcomes in order to establish proper screening, prevention of additional damage to the kidneys and adequate renal support when needed.

Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Primary Sinonasal Malignancy: A Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor M. Lu ◽  
Krishnan Ravindran ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Jamie J. Van Gompel ◽  
Timothy R. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Random Effects ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Open Resection ◽  
Sinonasal Malignancies ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Risk Ratios ◽  
Indirect Comparisons

Background Endoscopic resection (ER) for uncommon sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) has been reported to confer superior surgical outcomes compared to open resection (OR) based on indirect comparisons of limited evidence. Objective The aim of this study was to pool all direct comparative studies in the literature to validate this potential superior association. Methods Systematic searches of 7 electronic databases from their inception to April 2019 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1001 articles identified for screening. Outcomes of interest were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and mean difference (MD) and analyzed using a random-effects model. Results There were 10 studies included in this meta-analysis, with 900 SNM patients in total where ER and OR were utilized in 399 (44%) and 501 (56%) cases, respectively. Compared to OR, random-effects (RE) modeling indicated ER resulted in statistically comparable complications (RR = 0.68; P-effect = .12) and recurrence (RR = 0.84; P-effect = .35). ER was associated with significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to OR (MD = −2.9 days; P-effect <.01). Conclusions The use of ER to manage SNM was associated with significantly favorable reduction in LOS compared to OR. However, with respect to other surgical outcomes and recurrence, the current literature does not indicate either ER or OR as statistically superior. Therefore, until greater validation of these associations can be proven, expectations that ER for SNMs confers superior surgical outcomes compared to OR should be tempered.

scholarly journals 325The incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bewket Tadesse Tiruneh ◽  
Gayle McLelland ◽  
Virginia Plummer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Postpartum Haemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Preventive Strategies ◽  
Heterogeneity Test ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Hospital Births

Abstract Background Although primary postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality, in the wider literature, there is inconsistent results in studies about its incidence. This study was designed to determine the pooled incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage among women following in-hospital births. Methods This review used a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. We systematically searched electronic databases of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Emcare, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Studies reporting the incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births were included. The pooled incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage with a 95% confidence interval was calculated using random-effects model. Heterogeneity test between studies, and publication bias were assessed with I-square statistics and Egger’s test respectively. Results Ten of the 1548 studies were found to be eligible and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births was nearly 12% (95% CI: 7.74- 17.61), with no evidence of between studies heterogeneity. Conclusions The incidence of primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births was high, and suggest that preventive strategies implemented to reduce its occurrence needs further strengthening using training. Key messages The result of this review suggests that globally at least one in ten women experience a primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births. This is higher than anticipated. The application of the recommended strategies for the prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage should be re-emphasized.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Corticosteroids in Patients with SARS, MERS and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keum Hwa Lee ◽  
Sojung Yoon ◽  
Gwang Hun Jeong ◽  
Jong Yeob Kim ◽  
Young Joo Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Coronavirus Infections

(1) Background: The use of corticosteroids in critical coronavirus infections, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), or Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been controversial. However, a meta-analysis on the efficacy of steroids in treating these coronavirus infections is lacking. (2) Purpose: We assessed a methodological criticism on the quality of previous published meta-analyses and the risk of misleading conclusions with important therapeutic consequences. We also examined the evidence of the efficacy of corticosteroids in reducing mortality in SARS, MERS and COVID-19. (3) Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were used to identify studies published until 25 April 2020, that reported associations between steroid use and mortality in treating SARS/MERS/COVID-19. Two investigators screened and extracted data independently. Searches were restricted to studies on humans, and articles that did not report the exact number of patients in each group or data on mortality were excluded. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) under the fixed- and random-effect model. (4) Results: Eight articles (4051 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Among these selected studies, 3416 patients were diagnosed with SARS, 360 patients with MERS, and 275 with COVID-19; 60.3% patients were administered steroids. The meta-analyses including all studies showed no differences overall in terms of mortality (OR 1.152, 95% CI 0.631–2.101 in the random effects model, p = 0.645). However, this conclusion might be biased, because, in some studies, the patients in the steroid group had more severe symptoms than those in the control group. In contrast, when the meta-analysis was performed restricting only to studies that used appropriate adjustment (e.g., time, disease severity), there was a significant difference between the two groups (HR 0.378, 95% CI 0.221–0.646 in the random effects model, p < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in mortality when steroids were used in severe cases, there was a difference among the group with more underlying diseases (OR 3.133, 95% CI 1.670–5.877, p < 0.001). (5) Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis providing the most accurate evidence on the effect of steroids in coronavirus infections. If not contraindicated, and in the absence of side effects, the use of steroids should be considered in coronavirus infection including COVID-19.

Staphylococcus aureus Colonization before Infection Is Not Associated with Mortality among S. aureus-infected Patients: A Meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 796-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marin L. Schweizer ◽  
Ann Bossen ◽  
Jennifer S. McDanel ◽  
Leslie K. Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Attributable Mortality ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Background and Objective.The literature is conflicted as to whether people colonized with Staphylococcus aureus are at an increased risk of mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to review and analyze the current literature to determine whether prior history of S. aureus colonization is associated with mortality among S. aureus-infected patients.Methods.The PUBMED databases were searched with keywords related to S. aureus colonization and mortality. After reviewing 380 article abstracts and 59 articles in detail, only 7 studies had data on the association between S. aureus colonization and mortality among S. aureus-infected patients. Crude estimates of study odds ratios (ORs) were calculated on the basis of data from subset analyses. We pooled crude ORs from the 7 studies using a random-effects model. Woolf's test for heterogeneity was assessed.Results.When all studies were pooled in a random-effects model, no association between S. aureus colonization and mortality among S. aureus-infected patients was seen (pooled OR, 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32–3.66]; n = 7; heterogeneity P = .05). When the analyses were restricted to infection-attributable mortality, the association between colonization and mortality among S. aureus-infected patients was not statistically significant (pooled OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.15–1.21]; n = 4; heterogeneity P = .28).Conclusions.S. aureus colonization was not associated with mortality among patients who developed an S. aureus infection. Interventions to decolonize S. aureus carriers may prevent S. aureus infections but may not be sufficient to prevent mortality.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis to Determine if Lower Extremity Muscle Strengthening Should Be Included in Military Knee Overuse Injury-Prevention Programs

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 919-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger O. Kollock ◽  
Corey Andrews ◽  
Ashlyn Johnston ◽  
Teresa Elliott ◽  
Alan E. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Overuse Injury ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Overuse Injuries ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Muscle Strengthening ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
External Rotator

Context: Knee overuse injuries are the most common musculoskeletal complaints in military trainees and are common in active-duty warfighters. Muscle strengthening is usually recommended; however, research is conflicting in this area, which makes it difficult to develop effective screening, prevention, and training interventions for warfighters. Objective: To determine if lower extremity muscular weakness contributes to knee overuse injuries and identify specific muscular involvement. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Military & Government Collection and reference lists of relevant articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2013. Study Selection: For inclusion, requirements were uninjured and injured groups; provision of the sample size, means, and standard deviations for all groups; identification of the specific muscles assessed; and clearly defined knee injury. Data Extraction: Sample size, sex, and muscle strength means and standard deviations. Data Synthesis: Twenty-five studies met these criteria. We used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network algorithm to determine the appropriate tool for appraising article quality. Unweighted random-effects model meta-analyses were conducted. Separate meta-analyses were performed for the moderators of strength measurement scale (absolute or normalized muscle strength), muscle group, and sex. A weighted random-effects model with a Hedges g effect metric and 95% confidence intervals were used for comparison across studies. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that individuals with symptoms of a knee overuse injury have lower absolute and normalized hip muscle strength. Specifically, they had lower absolute hip external-rotator, knee-extensor, and knee-flexor strength, as well as lower normalized hip external-rotator, hip-extensor, and hip-abductor strength, compared with asymptomatic control participants. The findings suggest a possible link between lower hip and thigh strength and knee overuse injuries. Further research is needed to determine if weakness is a cause or a result of knee overuse injuries before screening and intervention can be developed for at-risk warfighters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document