scholarly journals The Historical Oppression Scale: Preliminary conceptualization and measurement of historical oppression among Indigenous peoples of the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-303
Author(s):  
Catherine E McKinley ◽  
Shamra Boel-Studt ◽  
Lynette M Renner ◽  
Charles R Figley ◽  
Shanondora Billiot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Acceptable Model ◽  
Unidimensional Construct ◽  
Item Scale

Indigenous peoples of the United States are distinct from other ethnic minorities because they have experienced colonization as the original inhabitants. Social and health disparities are connected to a context of historical oppression—the chronic, pervasive, and intergenerational experiences of oppression that, over time, may be normalized, imposed, and internalized into the daily lives of many Indigenous peoples (including individuals, families, and communities). As part of the critical Framework of Historical Oppression, Resilience, and Transcendence (FHORT), in this article, we introduce the Historical Oppression Scale (HOS), a scale assessing internalized and externalized oppression. Our study reports on survey data ( N = 127) from a larger convergent mixed-methodology study with scale items derived from thematic analysis of qualitative data ( N = 436), which informed the resultant 10-item scale. After six cases were removed from the 127 participants who participated in the quantitative component to the study due to missing data across two tribes, the sample size for analysis was 121. Confirmatory factor analysis testing of the hypothesized unidimensional construct indicated acceptable model fit ( X2 = 58.10, [Formula: see text] 1.94, CFI = .98, TLI = .97, RMSEA = .088, 90% CI = .05, .12). Reliability of the 10-item scale was excellent (α = .97) and convergent and discriminant validity were established. The HOS explicates complex associations between historical oppression and health and social disparities and may be an important clinical and research tool in an understudied area.

scholarly journals Measurement of Sustainment of Prevention Programs and Initiatives: The Sustainment Measurement System Scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Palinkas ◽  
Chih-Ping Chou ◽  
Suzanne E. Spear ◽  
Sapna J. Mendon ◽  
Juan A. Villamar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Measurement System ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Determinant Factors ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Principal Axis Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Scale

Abstract Background A large knowledge gap exists regarding the measurement of sustainability of evidence-based prevention programs for mental and behavioral health. This paper describes an instrument that is a component of the Sustainment Measurement System (SMS), designed to assess both determinants and outcomes of efforts to sustain prevention programs and initiatives. Methods A 42-item scale was administered to 186 representatives of 145 programs funded by 7 SAMHSA prevention grant initiatives. Scale items were identified from qualitative data collected from 45 representatives of 10 programs and 8 SAMHSA program officers and organized into 9 categories of sustainment determinants and sustainment outcomes. Factor structure identified from principal axis factor analysis and elimination of items with CFA coefficients less than .300 resulted in a 35-item scale with 8 determinant factors and 1 outcome factor. Results Confirmatory Factor Analysis provided support for a 35-item model fit to the data. The SMSS demonstrated good inter-item reliability and all determinant factors were significantly associated with sustainment outcome individual and global measures. Conclusions The SMSS is easy to use and demonstrates good reliability and convergent and discriminant validity in assessing likelihood of sustainment of SAMHSA funded prevention programs and initiatives upon termination of original funding. The measure demonstrates potential in identifying predictors of program sustainment and as a tool for enhancing the likelihood of successful sustainment through ongoing evaluation and feedback.

The Teacher Expectations and Values for Suicide Prevention Scale

Crisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jaimie Stickl Haugen ◽  
Claudia C. Sutter ◽  
Jessica L. Tinstman Jones ◽  
Laurie O. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Suicide Prevention ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Teacher Expectations ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
The United States ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Abstract. Background: Teachers play a critical role in youth suicide prevention, yet few psychometrically sound instruments exist to measure teachers' expectations and values regarding suicide prevention. Aims: This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Teacher Expectations and Values for Suicide Prevention (TEVSP) Scale. Method: The TEVSP was administered to 500 teachers in the United States. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the factor structure and bivariate correlations were used to investigate convergent and discriminant validity. Mann–Whitney U tests investigated group differences in TEVSP scores between participants who had received suicide training and those who had not. Results: Results support a three-factor hierarchical model with strong internal consistency and evidence of validity. Significant differences were found in TEVSP scores between groups. Limitations: There is a need to further explore the psychometric properties of the scale across samples and face-to-face methods. Conclusion: The TEVSP is a sound instrument that can be used to measure teachers' expectations and values for suicide prevention.

Construct validity and generalizability of the Kirton Adaption–Innovation Inventory

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Bagozzi ◽  
Gordon R. Foxall
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Postgraduate Students ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Identical Factor ◽  
Three Factor

The factor structure of the Kirton (1976) Adaption–Innovation inventory was examined by use of confirmatory factor analysis. A three‐factor structure was found, characterized by distinct, yet positively associated, facets, thereby challenging the oft‐assumed unidimensional conceptualization of adaption–innovation. The measures were found to achieve satisfactory levels of reliability for the separate facets and to exhibit strong evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. This was demonstrated for the full 32‐item inventory, as well as 20‐item and 13‐item abridgments. Subjects were postgraduate students from the United Kingdom (N = 149), Australia (N = 142), and the United States (N = 131). The three‐factor solution was found to generalize across all three samples in the sense of yielding identical factor loadings, error variances, and correlations among facets. Differences in the means of factors were found across samples.

From Freud to Android: Constructing a scale of uncanny feelings

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachele Benjamin ◽  
Steven Heine
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Uncanny Valley ◽  
Clear Definition ◽  
The Uncanny ◽  
Experimental Psychologist ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Item Scale

The uncanny valley is a topic for engineers, animators, and experimental psychologist, yet uncanniness is without a clear definition. Across 3 studies, we developed a 16-item scale measuring uncanny feelings, finding that uncanniness is discriminable from other emotions. In Study 1, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis of uncanny feelings. In Study 2, we measured the convergent and discriminant validity of our 16-item scale, establishing that participants who watched an uncanny video responded with more uncanny feelings than those who watched a disgusting, fearful, or neutral video. In Study 3, we conducted a high-powered confirmatory factor analysis to assess the reliability of the 2-factor model on a new sample. These studies contribute to the psychological and interdisciplinary understanding of this strange, eerie phenomenon of being confronted with what looms just beyond our understanding.

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Demands of Immigration Scale

1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen J. Aroian ◽  
Anne E. Norris ◽  
Thanh V. Tran ◽  
Nancy Schappler-Morris
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Soviet Union ◽  
Former Soviet Union ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The Demands of Immigration Scale (DI) measures demands associated with immigration, including loss, novelty, occupational adjustment, language accommodation, discrimination, and not feeling at home in the resettlement country. The DI scale was evaluated in a sample of 1,647 immigrants from the former Soviet Union who had resided in the United States from a few months to 20 years. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the proposed factor model. The DI subscales were internally consistent and had good test-retest reliability. Support for concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations in the expected direction between the DI total and subscale scores and measures of depression and somatization. Support for discriminant validity was demonstrated by mean group differences in some or all of the DI dimensions according to age and years in the United States.

scholarly journals Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Family Expressiveness Questionnaire (FEQ-GR)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaela I. Zehtner ◽  
Cosima L. Baeurle ◽  
Bertram Walter ◽  
Rudolf Stark ◽  
Andrea Hermann
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Growing Up ◽  
German Version ◽  
Family Expressiveness ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Reliability Estimates ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Family ◽  
Acceptable Model

Abstract. Background: This study aimed to develop a German version of the Family Expressiveness Questionnaire (FEQ; Halberstadt, 1983 , 1986 ), which investigates emotional expressiveness within the family context while growing up. While a theoretically derived four-factor structure was postulated, 2- and 3-scale versions have been applied in research. Methods: In Study 1 ( N = 650), these existing models were tested against each other. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for the solution that best fitted the data with half of the sample, and results were cross-validated in the other half. Construct validation was investigated in Study 2 ( N = 225). Results: An acceptable model fit for a three-factor solution was attained in Study 1. In Study 2, correlation patterns indicated a good convergent and discriminant validity. Reliability estimates in both studies were in an acceptable to excellent range. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the FEQ German version is a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing expressiveness within the family.

Two Exercise Programs for People with Diabetes and Visual Impairment

1993 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 365-367
Author(s):  
J. Dods
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Exercise Programs ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Basic Model ◽  
Blood Glucose Levels ◽  
Exercise Regimen

This article describes two programs—one in Australia and one in the United States—that teach people with diabetes and visual impairment to incorporate proper diets and exercise into their daily lives and hence to gain better control of their blood glucose levels. It also presents a basic model of an exercise regimen that clients can perform at home.

A Behavioral-Analytic Model for Assessing Stress in Firefighters

2021 ◽  
pp. 014544552098613
Author(s):  
Bailee B. Schuhmann ◽  
Sarah N. Henderson ◽  
Ryan A. Black ◽  
Vincent B. Van Hasselt ◽  
Kristin Klimley Margres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Reduction ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fire Service ◽  
Analytic Model ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Using Data

Research has documented a number of acute and chronic stressors unique to the fire service. Due to the rise in mental health concerns in firefighters, there has been increased awareness of the negative effects of unmanaged stress. The present study employed a behavioral-analytic model to construct a brief screening measure of stress for this population: the Firefighter Assessment of Stress Test (FAST). Psychometric properties of the FAST were evaluated using data from active-duty firefighters throughout the United States. Results indicated the FAST has good internal reliability ( α = 0.89), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity. Also, the factor structure of the FAST revealed three significant subscales reflective of stress associated with responding to calls, administrative difficulties, and being overworked. Scoring and interpretation guidelines were established to suggest when further assessment is warranted. The FAST offers a brief and valid method of self-assessment of current stress levels in firefighters. Information obtained from the FAST (i.e., overall stress level and domains) has the potential to facilitate more immediate identification and recognition of stress in firefighters than what has been possible to date. Moreover, heightened awareness of stress and its effects will hopefully culminate in expanded efforts directed toward stress reduction and intervention for firefighters and their families.

scholarly journals Measuring Forgiveness: Psychometric Properties of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale in the Spanish Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Karla Gallo-Giunzioni ◽  
María Prieto-Ursúa ◽  
Cristina Fernández-Belinchón ◽  
Octavio Luque-Reca
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Dispositional Forgiveness ◽  
Scale Reduction ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Acceptable Internal Consistency

Given the scarcity of instruments in Spanish to measure forgiveness, two studies were conducted in this population to obtain validity evidence of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS), an instrument that measures dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. In the first study, 203 students (65% women) participated. After ensuring the linguistic adequacy and clarity of the wording of the items, a lack of congruence was found between the factors obtained in the exploratory factor analysis and the original theoretical structure of the HFS. A sample of 512 participants (63.9% women) attended the second study. This study aimed to analyze the construct validity of the HFS using confirmatory factor analysis through structural equation modelling and to explore convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity. Of the different factorial configurations tested (including the original), only a scale reduction to eight items, grouped into three factors, showed an appropriate fit. The HFS eight-item version also showed acceptable internal consistency, adequate convergent and discriminant validity, and criterion validity with respect to related variables. These findings suggest that the eight-item version of the HFS may be a valid and reliable tool for assessing forgiveness for self, others, and situations in Spanish adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document