The Early Outcomes of BeGraft Peripheral Plus in Branched Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110250
Author(s):  
Said Abisi ◽  
Panos Gkoutzios ◽  
Michelle Carmichael ◽  
Sanjay Patel ◽  
Morad Sallam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Index Procedure ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Vessel Patency ◽  
Instability Rate ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Objective No bridging stent-graft (BSG) has been specifically designed for branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) and therefore different “off-label” stent-grafts have been used. Recently, a third generation of balloon-expandable stent-graft has become available. Here we evaluate the outcomes of the BeGraft Peripheral Plus (B+) used as a BSG for internal/externalor inner branches during BEVAR. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients undergoing BEVAR using B+ as a BSG since its release in 2017 were included into the study. The primary endpoints were technical success and target vessel patency during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the need for adjunct extension and relining of the BSG, branch instability rate, including occlusion, reinterventions for restonosis, kink, fracture, or endoleak (types 1 and 3). Results A total of 163 visceral branches in 46 patients were included with a median follow-up 15 months (4–36 months). Primary technical success was achieved in all visceral branches (69 inner branches and 94 internal/external branches) with the exception of 1 BSG that required serial dilatation until full expansion was achieved with overall branch patency was 98% at 2 years. An additional stent-graft was necessary in 35 branches (21%) following deployment of a B+ BSG to cover a longer bridging distance and optimize the distal and proximal sealing. Relining of B+ BSG was not routinely carried out during the index procedure and a self-expanding uncovered nitinol stent was necessary in only 3% of branches to smooth the distal transition zone between the BSG and target vessel. There were 4 events (2.4%) of branch related instability, including 2 occlusions and 2 late reinterventions for a partial in-stent-graft thrombosis. Conclusion Our study findings show satisfactory early outcomes of B+ as a BSG in BEVAR with low occlusion and reintervention rates. Extensions of BSG might be required to achieve adequate seal in the target vessels but routine relining BSG in branches was not required.

Operative and Midterm Outcomes of the Fenestrated Anaconda Stent-Graft in the Endovascular Treatment of Juxtarenal, Suprarenal, and Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drosos Kotelis ◽  
Karina Schleimer ◽  
Christina Foldenauer ◽  
Houman Jalaie ◽  
Jochen Grommes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Mesenteric Arteries ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Aortic Pathology ◽  
Vessel Patency ◽  
Overall Mortality

Purpose: To report operative and midterm outcomes of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with the Anaconda device. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 39 consecutive patients (median age 74 years; 36 men) treated with the fenestrated Anaconda stent-graft between July 2011 and December 2015 at a single center. Indications for FEVAR were abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with neck anatomy unsuitable for a standard stent-graft. Median infrarenal neck length was 4 mm (range 0–9). Four (10%) patients presented with type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), 12 (31%) with suprarenal aneurysms, and 23 (59%) with juxtarenal aneurysms. Four (10%) patients had previous infrarenal aortic repair. Five (13%) patients had an infrarenal neck angulation >60°. A total of 106 fenestrations were incorporated into the stent-grafts (73 renal arteries, 25 superior mesenteric arteries, and 8 celiac trunks). Technical success, perioperative and midterm mortality and morbidity, target vessel patency, endoleaks, and reinterventions were documented. Results: Technical success was 95% (37/39). Three (8%) patients died in-hospital from mesenteric embolism in 2 and renal artery rupture with consequent multiorgan failure in 1. Two (5%) patients suffered an intraoperative embolic stroke. During a median follow-up of 33 months (range 4–55), adjunctive maneuvers were performed in 9 (23%) patients, including reintervention for type II endoleak with enlarged aneurysm sac in 2 (5%). Four additional patients died of causes unrelated to the aortic pathology (overall mortality 18%). In 34 (94%) of the 36 patients seen in follow-up, aneurysm sac size was stable or decreased. Target vessel stent patency was 99% (95/96). Conclusion: FEVAR with the Anaconda device delivers satisfactory short-term technical and clinical success rates in patients with juxtarenal, suprarenal, and type IV TAAA. Midterm efficacy and durability with respect to aneurysm sac regression and target vessel patency appear very good. Overall mortality and the need for reintervention were significant in this patient cohort.

One-year outcomes of radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins using the radiofrequency stylet device: Cohort study from East Asia

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552097348
Author(s):  
Chang-Ming Wang ◽  
Shi-Lu Zhao ◽  
Qi-Chen Feng ◽  
Shuo Gai ◽  
Xuan Li
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Sonographic Evaluation ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
One Year

Objectives The present study was designed to assess outcomes of patients undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for their incompetent perforator veins (IPVs) with ClosureFast stylets. Methods Data of 165 IPVs in 138 limbs of 117 consecutive patients between July 2017 to Nov. 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoints (technical success rate, complications) and secondary endpoints (VCSS) were analyzed. Results The immediate technical success rate was 100%. There were no major complications. The rate of ecchymosis and induration was 5.8%. 129/165 IPVs in 79.5% (93/117) patients had achieved sonographic evaluation at 1 year followed-up, in which 3 perforators were recanalized. VCSS scores at pre-operation and 1-year follow-up were 5.77 ± 1.88 and 2.70 ± 1.39, respectively ( t= 29.644, P= .000). Conclusions In conclusion, RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of IPVs. At the 1-year follow-up, the RFA of IPVs showed a low recanalization rate and had a satisfactory improvement on VCSS.

scholarly journals Graft Complexity–Related Outcomes of Fenestrated Endografting for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Oikonomou ◽  
Piotr Kasprzak ◽  
Wilma Schierling ◽  
Reinhard Kopp ◽  
Karin Pfister
Keyword(s):  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vessel Patency

Purpose: To report the outcomes of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and compare early and midterm results in relation to stent-graft complexity. Methods: Between August 2006 and December 2014, 141 consecutive patients (mean age 72±7.6 years, range 50–89; 120 men) were treated electively with FEVAR for short-neck, juxtarenal, or suprarenal aortic aneurysms. Forty-five patients treated with stent-grafts featuring renal-only fenestrations were assigned to group A, while 96 patients receiving additional fenestrations for the superior mesenteric and/or celiac arteries were assigned to group B. Technical success, operative mortality and morbidity, target vessel patency, endoleak, reintervention, and survival were compared between the groups. Survival, target vessel stent patency, and reintervention during follow-up were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; the estimates are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Technical success was achieved in 135 (95.7%) patients. Overall 30-day operative mortality was 3.5% (5/141). Perioperative complications occurred in 16 (12.1%) patients. Mean follow-up was 33±23 months. Overall estimated survival was 85.1% (95% CI 79.1% to 91.1%) at 1 year and 75.8% (95% CI 68.2% to 83.5%) at 3 years. Freedom from reintervention was 90.6% (95% CI 85.6% to 95.6%) at 1 year and 79.2% (95% CI 71% to 87.5%) at 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of perioperative mortality or morbidity, endoleak, survival, target vessel patency, or reintervention. Conclusion: The use of FEVAR for juxta- and suprarenal aneurysms is associated with low 30-day mortality/morbidity and high midterm efficacy. So far, perioperative and midterm results are not affected by the use of more complex fenestrated designs.

One-Year Results of ZBIS Iliac Branch Device With an Off-Label Connection Limb

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110547
Author(s):  
Jose Torrealba ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
Thomas Gandet ◽  
Catharina Gronert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Patency ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
One Year

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to study 1-year results of Zenith branch iliac endovascular graft (ZBIS) with the off-label use of a 13 mm spiral Z limb to connect to the aortic main body. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review from 2015 to 2019 of all iliac branch devices (IBDs) was performed at 1 institution that were connected to an aortic main body with a 13 mm spiral Z limb and had at least 1-year follow-up with computed tomography (CT). Primary endpoints are freedom from ZBIS separation from the connection limb, endoleak (EL), or reintervention at 1 year. Secondary endpoints are primary and secondary ZBIS patency, presence of any EL, and aortic reinterventions. Results: Of 149 IBDs implanted in this period, 45 ZBIS in 35 patients were connected with a 13 mm limb and had a 1-year CT; 97% of patients had common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms, 7% of patients had hypogastric artery (HA) aneurysms, and 30% of patients had bilateral ZBIS implantation. Technical success was 98%. In 84% of cases, the Advanta V12 was used as the HA mating stent; 56% of patients had an EL, mostly type II, which resolved spontaneously in 70% at 1 year, and 9% of ZBIS required reinterventions at 1 year (2 for thrombosis, 2 for type Ic EL from HA mating stent). One-year ZBIS primary patency and secondary patency were 96% and 100%, respectively. No EL was noted to be related to the 13 mm connection limb. No migration or separation of the devices occurred. Conclusions: The use of 13 mm spiral Z limb to connect a ZBIS with the main body in our series yields a high technical success rate and good 12-month outcomes without device separation or migration.

scholarly journals Technical approach and outcomes of failed infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repairs rescued with fenestrated and branched endografts

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Manunga ◽  
Larissa I. Stanberry ◽  
Peter Alden ◽  
Jason Alexander ◽  
Nedaa Skeik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Graft Patency ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Type I ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Vessel Patency ◽  
Major Adverse Events

Abstract Background Endovascular rescue of failed infrarenal repair (EVAR) has emerged as an attractive option to stent graft explantation. The procedure, however, is underutilized due to limited devices accessibility and the challenges associated with their implantation in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to report our outcomes and discuss our approach to rescuing previously failed infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) with fenestrated/branched endografts (f/b-EVAR). Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with failed EVAR rescued with f/b-EVAR at our institution from November 2013 to March 2019 was conducted. The study primary end point was technical success; defined as the implantation of the device with no type I a/b or type III endoleak or conversion to open repair. Secondary endpoints included major adverse events (MAEs), graft patency and reintervention rates. Results During this time, 202 patients with complex aortic aneurysms were treated with f/b-EVAR. Of these, 19 patients (Male: 17, mean age 79 ± 7 years) underwent repair for failed EVAR. The median time from failed repair to f/b-EVAR was 48 (30, 60) months. Treatment failure was attributed to stent graft migration in 9 (47.4%) patients, disease progression in 5 (26.3%), short initial neck in 3 (15.8%) and unable to be determined in 2 (10.5%). Three patients were treated urgently with surgeon modified stent graft. Technical success was achieved in 18 patients (95%), including two who had undergone emergent repair for rupture. Seventy-two targeted vessels (97.3%) were successfully incorporated. Sixteen (84.2%) patients required a thoracoabdominal repair to achieve a durable seal. Major adverse events (MAEs) occurred in 3 patients (15.7%) including paralysis and death in one (5.3%), compartment syndrome and temporary dialysis in another and laparotomy with snorkeling of one renal and bypass of the other in the third patient. Median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 3 (2, 4) days. Late reintervention, primary target vessel patency and primary assisted patency rates were 5.3%, 98.6% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion Implantation of f/b-EVAR in patients with failed previous EVAR is a challenging undertaking that can be performed safely with a high technical success and low reintervention rates.

Aortic endograft and bridging stent-graft remodeling after branched endovascular aortic repair

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812098369
Author(s):  
Stefano Fazzini ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
Martin Austermann ◽  
Efthymios Beropoulis ◽  
Roberta Munaò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Instability Rate ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Objectives The results of branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms are mainly dependent on durability of the graft used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling, and their impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year. Methods Computed tomoangiographies of 43 patients (43 aortic main body mated with 171 bridging stent-grafts) were analyzed before and after branched endovascular repair as well as after a follow-up of 12 months. Primary endpoint was aortic main body remodeling (migration >5 mm, shortening >5 mm, scoliosis >5° or lordosis >5°). Shortening was defined as a reduced length in the long axis, scoliosis as left-right curvature, and lordosis as antero-posterior curvature. Aortic main body remodeling, aneurysm sac changes, and bridging stent-graft tortuosity were evaluated to study their correlations and the impact on the bridging stent-graft instability. Results At 12 months, aortic main body remodeling was observed in 72% of the cases, migration in 39.5% (mean 5.21 mm), shortening in 41.9% (mean 5.79 mm), scoliosis in 58.1%, (mean 10.10°), lordosis in 44.2% (mean 5.78°). Migration, shortening, and scoliosis were more frequent in patients with larger aneurysms ( p = .005), while scoliosis was significantly more frequent in type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm ( p = .019). Aortic main body remodeling was significantly associated to bridging stent-graft remodeling (r: 0.3–0.48). The bridging stent-graft instability rate was 9.3%. Despite a trend toward significance ( p = .07), none of the evaluated aortic main body and bridging stent-graft changes were associated with bridging stent-graft instability at 12 months. Conclusions Aortic main body remodeling is frequent especially in large and extended thoracoabdominal aneurysm aneurysms. Aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling was significantly correlated. While these geometric changes had no significant impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year, a close long-term follow-up after branched endovascular repair could predict bridging stent-graft failures.

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) and Chimney EVAS in the Treatment of Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Youssef ◽  
Sebastian Zerwes ◽  
Rudolf Jakob ◽  
Oroa Salem ◽  
Fritz Dünschede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Chimney Graft ◽  
Bifurcated Graft

Purpose: To assess the technical success and clinical outcome of reinterventions using the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System to treat complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients (mean age 79 years; 14 men) with prior EVAR were treated with EVAS between March 2014 and December 2015 at 2 institutions. The failed prior EVARs included 13 bifurcated endografts, 1 bifurcated graft plus fenestrated cuff, and 1 tube endograft. Endoleaks were the predominant indications: type Ia in 10 and type III in 5 (3 type IIIa and 2 type IIIb). All patients presented with progressive aortic aneurysms (median 7.85-cm diameter; range 6.5–11). Eight patients were treated on an urgent or emergency basis (6 symptomatic aneurysms and 2 contained ruptures). All patients underwent Nellix relining of the failed stent-graft; 10 had chimney (Ch) procedures in combination with EVAS (chEVAS) because the proximal landing zones were inadequate. Results: Technical success was 100%. All endoleaks were successfully sealed, and no additional intervention was required. No further endoleak after EVAS or chEVAS was recorded. Endobag protrusion occurred in 1 case without sequelae. One elderly patient with ruptured aneurysm died from multiple organ failure 2 months postoperatively. One renal artery guidewire injury led to nephrectomy because of active bleeding. No reinterventions, aneurysm-related mortalities, graft thrombosis, endoleaks, or chimney graft occlusions were observed during a median follow-up of 8 months (range 3–24). Conclusion: The present preliminary experience demonstrates that the use of EVAS/chEVAS is feasible for treatment of failed EVAR. This technique may be used as bailout or an alternative treatment when other established methods are infeasible or not available.

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar Davidovic ◽  
Momcilo Colic ◽  
Igor Koncar ◽  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Dusan Kostic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Stent ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Introduction. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the 90's of the last century. Because of economic, political and social problems during the last 25 years, the introduction of this procedure in Serbia was not possible. Objective. The aim of this study was to present preliminary experiences and results of the Clinic for Vascular Surgery of the Serbian Clinical Centre in Belgrade in endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods. The procedure was performed in 33 patients (3 female and 30 male), aged from 42 to 83 years. Ten patients had a descending thoracic aorta aneurysm (three atherosclerotic, four traumatic - three chronic and one acute as a part of polytrauma, one dissected, two penetrated atherosclerotic ulcers), while 23 patients had the abdominal aortic aneurysm, one ruptured and two isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The indications for EVAR were isthmic aneurismal localisation, aged over 80 years and associated comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary and cerebrovasular diseases, previous thoracotomy or multiple laparotomies associated with abdominal infection, idiopatic thrombocitopaenia). All of these patients had three or more risk factors. The diagnosis was established using duplex ultrasonography, angiography and MSCT. In the case of thoracic aneurysm, a Medtronic-Valiant? endovascular stent graft was implanted, while for the abdominal aortic aneurysm Medtronic-Talent? endovascular stent grafts with delivery systems were used. In three patients, following EVAR a surgical repair of the femoral artery aneurysm was performed, and in another three patients femoro-femoral cross over bypass followed implantation of aortouniiliac stent graft. Results. During procedure and follow-up period (mean 1.6 years), there were: one death, one conversion, one endoleak type 1, six patients with endoleak type 2 that disappeared during the follow-up period, one early graft thrombosis. No other complications, including aneurysm expansion, collapse, deformity and migration of the endovascular stent grafts, were registered. Conclusion. According to all medical and economic aspects, we recommend EVAR to treat acute traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm, as well as in elderly and high-risk patients with abdominal or thoracic aneurysms, when open surgery is related to a significantly higher mortality and morbidity.

Abstract 509: Comparison of Drug Elluting Stent and Per Cutenaeous Transluminal Angioplasty in Patients With Infra-Popliteal Peripheral Arterial Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Vasudev ◽  
MeetKumar Sheth ◽  
Priyank Shah ◽  
Upamanyu Rampal ◽  
Hiten Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Vessel Patency

Introduction: Drug-eluting Stent(DESs) have demonstrated improved patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization compared with Bare-Metal stents or Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty(PTA); however, the effect on clinical outcome parameters, such as limb salvage and wound healing, remains unidentified. We present a direct comparison of clinical outcomes in patients who underwent DES vs PTA. Methods: We collected data of patients who underwent infra-popliteal arterial interventions at our institution. Clinical end points analyzed were all cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, primary vessel patency, and target limb major and minor amputations. Differences between two groups were analyzed by chi square for categorical variables and t test for continuous variables. Statistical significance was considered for P values less than .05 in a 2-sided test. Results: Total of 83 cases, n=42 in DES group and n=41 in PTA group were analyzed. Mean age was 71.6 years (range 49-95). Out of the total 83 patients in the study 45 had a history of diabetes (54%) and 51 (61%) were current /past smokers. Average follow up period of 14 months for both the groups. Primary vessel patency was defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis on follow up. During the follow up period vessel patency in DES group [69% (n=29/42)] was significantly higher as compared to 36% (15/41) in PTA group (P=0.04, odds ratio 3.867, 95% Confidence interval: 1.5 - 9.6). Target vessel revascularization in DES group was 24% (10/42) as compared to 32% (13/28) in PTA group (P=0.47, odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.26 - 1.77). Target limb amputation was 10% (4/42) in DES group as compared to 24% (10/41) in PTA group (P = 0.085), odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.09 - 1.14). All cause mortality in both the groups were at 10%, 4/42 in DES group and 4/41 in PTA group (P=1, odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.23 - 4.19). Conclusion: To conclude primary vessel patency was superior in DES group as compared to PTA group. Target limb amputation rates were higher in PTA group but not statistically significant. Target vessel revascularization and all cause mortality were similar in both the groups. Thus primary treatment with DES should be considered in patients with infra-popliteal PAD.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Aorta-Iliac Aneurysms with a Flared Iliac Limb

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (01) ◽  
pp. 057-063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Balezantis ◽  
Stevo Duvnjak
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Abdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Hospital Institution ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Type 3

Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) relies on the quality of the proximal and distal landing zone. Reinterventions are higher in patients with suboptimal landing zone. The study aimed to evaluate reintervention rate after endovascular treatment of an aorta-iliac aneurysm using the flared iliac limbs.The retrospective study included 179 patients treated with EVAR at a single university hospital institution from January 2011 to January 2014 of which 75 patients (42%) were treated with flared iliac limb stent graft and 104 patients (58%) were treated with a nonflared iliac limb stent graft. There were 165 male patients (92%), mean age was 75.8 ± 6.6 years.Thirty-six patients underwent secondary treatment accounting for overall reintervention rate of 20%. Endoleak type 1b occurred in 13 patients (7%), followed by endoleak type 1a in six patients (3%). Endoleak type 2 occurred in seven patients (4%) requiring the treatment due to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement, endoleak type 3 in three patients (2%), and leg stent graft thrombosis in seven patients (4%). In 143 patients (80%), there were no secondary interventions during the follow-up period. Reintervention due to endoleak type 1b was statistically significantly higher in a flared iliac limb group (p < 0.02) with the rate of 7.2% compared with 1.9% rate in nonflared iliac limb group. The mean follow-up was 44.3 ± 20.4. Overall mortality was 33%.Flared iliac limb with a distal diameter of ≥ 20 mm, show a higher rate of iliac limb reintervention in a follow-up period due to endoleak type 1b.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document