scholarly journals Prognostic Role of RASSF1A, SOX17 and Wif-1 Promoter Methylation Status in Cell-Free DNA of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382097327
Author(s):  
Evangelos I. Karamitrousis ◽  
Ioanna Balgkouranidou ◽  
Nikolaos Xenidis ◽  
Kyriakos Amarantidis ◽  
Eirini Biziota ◽  
...  

Epigenetic modification of several genes is a key component in the development of gastric cancer. The methylation status of RASSF1A, SOX17 and Wif-1 genes was evaluated in the cell free circulating DNA of 70 patients with advanced gastric cancer, using methylation-specific PCR. Patients with higher cell-free DNA concentration seem to have lower PFS, than patients with lower cell-free DNA concentration (p = 0.001). RASSF1A was the tumor suppressor gene, most frequently methylated in metastatic gastric cancer patients, followed by SOX17 and Wif-1 (74.3%, 60.0% and 47.1%, respectively). Patients having the SOX17 promoter methylated, had lower progression free survival and overall survival, than unmethylated ones (p < 0.001). Patients having the Wif-1 promoter methylated, had lower progression free survival and overall survival, than unmethylated ones (p = 0.001). Patients having the RASSF1A promoter methylated, had lower progression free survival and overall survival, than unmethylated ones (p = 0.004). Promoter methylation of the examined genes was significantly associated with a decrease in progression free survival and overall survival, comparing to that of patients without methylation. Simultaneous methylation of the above genes was associated with even worse progression free survival and overall survival. The methylation of RASSF1A, SOX-17 and Wif-1 and genes, is a frequent epigenetic event in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5467-5467
Author(s):  
Byung Soo Kim ◽  
Chul Won Choi ◽  
Seok Jin Kim

Abstract Background: New blood vessel formation is a crucial step in the process of tumor growth and systemic metastasis. Recent studies have shown that VEGF expression not in tissues but in serum sample is correlated with tumor vascularity, and the high serum VEGF levels could predict poor prognosis in cancer patients. However there has been no data regarding the clinical and prognostic significance of serum VEGF levels per platelet count in advanced gastric cancer. In this study, we conducted a study to evaluate the prognostic implication of serum VEGF per platelet count in the patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 111 patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer, 35 patients with early gastric cancer were included and control serum samples were acquired from 25 healthy volunteers. The levels of VEGF were measured using human VEGF quantitative enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival comparisons were made by the log rank test in metastatic gastric cancer. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized for multivariate analyses after univariate analysis defined relevant prognostic variables. Results: The mean serum VEGF level was higher in the patients of AGC compared to those with EGC and controls (AGC 465 ± 315.8pg/ml; EGC 306 ± 97.8 pg/ml controls 230.8 ± 53.2 pg/ml, P&lt; 0.033). A trend toward a significant positive correlation between serum VEGF and platelet counts was observed in patients of AGC (r = 0.477, P = 0.000, Fig 2) and there was a significant correlation between serum VEGF levels and differentiation of tumor (p = 0.014), stage (p = 0.036). The overall survival (log rank, p =0.0432) and the progression free survival (median 4.5 vs. 8.9 months; log rank, p =0.0116) were significantly shorter in patients with high VEGF per platelet count (≥1.626 pg/106). In the multivarivate analysis, performance status (P=0.025), the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (P=0.006), serum VEGF per platelet (P=0.005) were found to be significantly associated with the short progression free survival Conclusions: This study demonstrated that serum VEGF per platelet count is correlated with short overall survival and progression free survival in advanced gastric cancer patients. Therefore, serum VEGF per platelet may be a useful marker for predicting the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients.


Author(s):  
Hong Chuyen Nguyen Thi

Purpose:to study clinical and subclinical characteristics in advanced stage gastric cancer patients and to evaluate response rate, overall survival, progression free survival and toxicities on advanced stage gastric cancer patients treated with first line chemotherapy using epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabin Methods: A retrospective case series study with 134 advanced stage gastric cancer patients on first line chemotherapy using epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabin recruited from oncology department, the Hospital of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy and Cancer Center at Hue Central Hospital during January 2015 to June 2019. Results: Patient’s mean age was 54,9; men/women was 2,52/1. The most frequent clinical symptom reported was epigastric pain 81,3%. KPS 80-90% presented in almost patient (93.3%). The most common site of cancer was pyloric antrum (61,9%). 58,2% patients had distant metastasis disease which liver was the most frequent site. The overall response rate, partial response rate, complete response rate were 49,2%, 42,5%, 6,7% respectively. The median progression free survival was 8,6 ± 0,15 months and the overall survival was 10,7 ± 1,1 months. The pathologic type and combined salvage surgery status were response correlated factors. Grade 3, 4 toxicities in term of hematology, liver and kidney function were only exhibited in a few cases. Patients were tolerated well with chemotherapy. No deaths related to chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study shows that EOX regimen was safe and effective. As a results, we can apply this for first line pallative chemotherapy on advanced stage gastric cancer which KPS ≥70%.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-xiang Zhang ◽  
Chuan-hong Li ◽  
Jun Ma ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Zhi-jian Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: This randomized study aims to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome of advanced gastric cancer patients with extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL). Methods: A total of 150 patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in this study, the patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups: the group of surgery alone (non-EIPL group), the group of surgery plus EIPL (EIPL group). The surviving rate analysis was compared by the Kaplan–Meier method. The prognostic factors were carried out using the Cox appropriate hazard pattern. Results: Symptom of ileus and abdominal abscess appeared more frequently in the non-EIPL group(p<0.05). The overall survival (OS) curve and the recurrence free survival (RFS) curve of the EIPL group was better than the non-EIPL group (p<0.05). The EIPL, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage and T stage were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. The independent risk factors of recurrence free survival (RFS) include EIPL and tumor size. Conclusions: The present study revealed that EIPL can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications including ileus and abdominal abscess. Besides, the overall survival curve and recurrence free survival curve are better in the EIPL group. This technique is easy and not-expensive, therefore EIPL can benefit advanced gastric cancer patients a lot and would be a promising therapeutic strategy in the future.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov, identifier: NCT02745509, Registered 28 March2016,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02745509?cond=NCT02745509&draw=2&rank=1.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Zou ◽  
Shuailong Yang ◽  
Liang Zheng ◽  
Shuyi Wang ◽  
Bin Xiong

Objective. We performed a meta-analysis of available studies to assess the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells detected by cytological methods for patients with gastric cancer. Methods. Two authors systematically searched the studies independently with key words in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Cochrane Library (from inception to April 2016). The estimated hazard ratio, risk ratio, odds ratio, and their 95% confidence intervals were set as effect measures. All analyses were performed by STATA 12.0. Results. Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. CTCs-high status was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR=2.23, 95% CI: 1.86–2.66) and progression-free survival (HR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.36–2.99). CTCs-high status was also associated with depth of infiltration (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.16–3.70), regional lymph nodes metastasis (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.26–2.71), and distant metastasis (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.77–4.52). For unresectable gastric cancer patients, CTCs-high status was significantly associated with poor overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease control rate before and during chemotherapy group. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis has evidenced the significant prognostic value of CTCs detected for both PFS and OS in gastric cancer patients. For patients treated with chemotherapy alone, we proved that CTCs detected by cytological method showed a significant prognostic value and poor response to chemotherapy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22031-e22031
Author(s):  
H. Seo ◽  
H. Sung ◽  
I. Choi ◽  
S. Oh ◽  
J. Seo ◽  
...  

e22031 Background: Recent studies have shown that VEGF expression not in tissues but in serum sample is correlated with tumor vascularity, and high serum VEGF levels could predict poor prognosis in cancer patients. However there are limited data regarding the clinical and prognostic significance of serum VEGF levels per platelet count in advanced gastric cancer. In this study, we conducted a study to evaluate the prognostic implication of serum VEGF per platelet count in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 111 patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer, 10 patients with early gastric cancer were included and control serum samples were acquired from 10 healthy volunteers. The levels of VEGF were measured using human VEGF quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival comparisons were made by the log rank test in metastatic gastric cancer. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized for multivariate analyses after univariate analysis defined relevant prognostic variables. Results: A trend toward a significant positive correlation between serum VEGF and platelet counts was observed in patients of AGC (r = 0.477, P = 0.000) and there was a significant correlation between serum VEGF levels and differentiation of tumor (p = 0.014), stage (p = 0.036). The overall survival (log rank, p =0.0432) and the progression free survival (median 4.5 vs. 8.9 months; log rank, p =0.0116) were significantly shorter in patients with high VEGF per platelet count (≥1.626 pg/106). In the multivarivate analysis, performance status (P=0.025), the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (P=0.006), serum VEGF per platelet (P=0.005) were found to be significantly associated with poor progression free survival. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that serum VEGF per platelet count are correlated with poor overall survival and progression free survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Therefore measurement of serum VEGF per platelet might be useful markers for predicting disease progression and prognosis of advanced gastric cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ge ◽  
Ting Liu ◽  
Tianxiang Lei ◽  
Xuan Li ◽  
Kun Song ◽  
...  

Background: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is basically used in the field of postoperative chemotherapy of gastric cancer (GC), the goal of this study was to evaluate improvement of long-term survival rate among GC patients after the 5-FU implants treatment.Methods: The study included 145 patients with gastric cancer who received postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU implants and had complete follow-up information. According to the sex, age and clinical stage of 5-FU implants group, 74 patients were matched as the control group at the same time. In the study, we compared the 5-year overall survival rate with progression-free survival rate in the two groups, and the drug safety for both groups during the treatment was also compared.Results: The median follow-up time was 85 months (range 60–116 months). 31 patients (21.38%) died of tumor recurrence in 5-FU implants group and 21 (28.38%) in control group. In the control group, metastatic lesions were found in the small intestine, left adrenal gland and peritoneum in three patients. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 79.71% in 5-FU group and 67.12% in control (p = 0.0045). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 77.68% in 5-FU implants group and 64.87% in control (p = 0.0159). Both the 5-years OS and PFS rates in 5-FU group were better than control group without significant side effect.Conclusions: 5-FU implants may improve 5-years OS and PFS rates after surgery in gastric cancer patients, while good safety profile suggests it could be reliable.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang-Yang Pu ◽  
Rong Zhang ◽  
Li Xiao ◽  
Yong-You Wu ◽  
Wei Gong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegah Farrokhi ◽  
Alireza Sadeghi ◽  
Mehran sharifi ◽  
Payam Dadvand ◽  
Rachel Riechelmann ◽  
...  

AbstractAimThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and toxicity of common regimens used as perioperative chemotherapy including ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, and FLOT to identify the most effective chemotherapy regimen with less toxicity.Material and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was based on 152 eligible gastric cancer patients recruited in a tertiary oncology hospital in Isfahan, Iran (2014-2019). All resectable gastric cancer patients who had received one of the four chemotherapy regimens including ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, or FLOT, and followed for at least one year (up to five years) were included. The primary endpoint of this study was Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), and R0 resection. We also considered toxicity according to CTCAE (v.4.0) criteria as a secondary endpoint. Cox -regression models were used applied to estimate OS and PFS time, controlled for relevant covariates.ResultsOf included patients, 32(21%), 51(33.7%), 37(24.3%), and 32(21%) had received ECF, DCF, FOLFOX and FLOT, respectively. After the median 25 months follow-up, overall survival was higher with the FLOT regimen in comparison with other regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0. 052). The median OS of the FLOT regimen was not reachable in Kaplan-Meier analysis and the median OS was 28, 26, and 23 months for DCF, FOLOFX, and ECF regimens, respectively. On the other hand, a median PFS of 25, 17, 15, and 14 months was observed for FLOT, DCF, FOLFOX, and ECF regimens, respectively (Log-rank = 0. 021). FLOT regimen showed 84. 4% ORR which was notably higher than other groups (p-value<0. 01).ConclusionsFor resectable gastric cancer patients, the perioperative FLOT regimen seemed to lead to a significant improvement in patients’ OS and PFS in comparison with ECF, DCF, and FOLFOX regimens. As such, the FLOT regimen could be considered as the optimal option for managing resectable gastric cancer patients.


ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. e000488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Hiroshi Imazeki ◽  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
...  

BackgroundNivolumab showed a survival benefit for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, an acceleration of tumour growth during immunotherapy, (hyperprogressive disease, HPD) has been reported in various cancers. This study reviewed the HPD in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan.MethodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were patients with AGC with measurable lesions, and their tumour growth rates (TGR) during nivolumab or irinotecan were compared with those during prior therapy. HPD was defined as an increase in TGR more than twofold.Results34 and 66 patients received nivolumab and irinotecan in third or later line between June 2009 and September 2018 at our hospital; 22 patients receiving nivolumab had prior treatment with irinotecan, and one patient received irinotecan after nivolumab. Nivolumab and irinotecan showed no differences in disease control rates (38.2% and 34.8%) and in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6, p=0.802). The incidence of HPD was slightly higher after nivolumab (29.4%) than after irinotecan (13.5%) (p=0.0656), showing no differences in background between the patients with and without HPD. Compared between HPD and PD other than HPD after nivolumab, the HRs for PFS and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7; p=0.756), and 2.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8; p=0.168), but such clear difference in OS was not observed after irinotecan.ConclusionsHPD was observed more frequently after nivolumab compared with irinotecan, which was associated with a poor prognosis after nivolumab but not so clearly after irinotecan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document