scholarly journals Medication Management Apps: Usable by Older Adults?

Author(s):  
Rachel E. Stuck ◽  
Amy W. Chong ◽  
L. Mitzner Tracy ◽  
Wendy A. Rogers

For older adults, managing medications can be a burden and could lead to medication non-adherence. To decrease risks associated with medication non-adherence, healthcare providers may recommend medication reminder apps as an assistive tool. However, these apps are often not designed with consideration of older adults’ needs, capabilities, and limitations. To identify whether available apps are suitable for older adults, we conducted an in-depth cognitive walkthrough and a heuristic evaluation of the most commonly downloaded medication reminder app. Findings revealed three main issues: 1) difficulty in navigation, 2) poor visibility, and 3) a lack of transparency. We also selected the top five downloaded medication reminder apps and categorized user reviews to assess app functionality and usability problems. The results of our analysis provide guidance for app design for older adult users to provide effective tools for managing medications and supporting patient/user health.

2021 ◽  
pp. 678-684
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Parker ◽  
Smita C. Banerjee ◽  
Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki

The older adult population continues to increase. Among all known risk factors for developing cancer, the most important is growing old. Thus, caring for older adults with cancer is of increasing importance. This chapter describes important considerations involved in communicating with cancer patients including sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, multiple morbidity, polypharmacy, and psychological distress. It also describes how stereotyping and ageism affect communication with older adults with cancer. Finally, the chapter discusses ways to facilitate communication with older adult cancer patients and their families and provides an example of a training program that was created specifically to enhance communication between healthcare providers and older adult cancer patients and their families.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e025606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie Sun ◽  
Farah Tahsin ◽  
Caroline Barakat-Haddad ◽  
Justin P Turner ◽  
Cheryl Reid Haughian ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to explore the barriers and enablers of deprescribing from the perspectives of home care nurses, as well as to conduct a scalability assessment of an educational plan to address the learning needs of home care nurses about deprescribing.MethodsThis study employed an exploratory qualitative descriptive research design, using scalability assessment from two focus groups with a total of 11 home care nurses in Ontario, Canada. Thematic analysis was used to derive themes about home care nurse’s perspectives about barriers and enablers of deprescribing, as well as learning needs in relation to deprescribing approaches.ResultsHome care nurse’s identified challenges for managing polypharmacy in older adults in home care settings, including a lack of open communication and inconsistent medication reconciliation practices. Additionally, inadequate partnership and ineffective collaboration between interprofessional healthcare providers were identified as major barriers to safe deprescribing. Furthermore, home care nurses highlighted the importance of raising awareness about deprescribing in the community, and they emphasised the need for a consistent and standardised approach in educating healthcare providers, informal caregivers and older adults about the best practices of safe deprescribing.ConclusionTargeted deprescribing approaches are important in home care for optimising medication management and reducing polypharmacy in older adults. Nurses in home care play a vital role in medication management and, therefore, educational programmes must be developed to support their awareness and understanding of deprescribing. Study findings highlighted the need for the future improvement of existing programmes about safer medication management through the development of a supportive and collaborative relationship among the home care team, frail older adults and their informal caregivers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S566-S566
Author(s):  
Gwen Bergen

Abstract Over one in four U.S. older adults (age 65+) reports falling each year with fall-related medical costs estimated at $50 billion. The American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons recommends that healthcare providers assess and manage their patients’ fall risk. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative helps healthcare providers incorporate these guidelines by providing tools on how to screen, assess, and intervene to reduce risk. Evaluations of fall prevention have focused on the clinical process and outcomes. Understanding clinical activities is important in fall prevention but a better understanding of older adult characteristics that increase fall-risk, and attitudes that may affect their adoption of evidence-based interventions could improve the effectiveness of prevention strategies. The five presentations in this session include: 1. Demographic, health and functional characteristics of older adults with increased fall risk. 2. Caregivers of people with chronic conditions or disability as a group with increased fall risk. 3. The most effective and efficient ways of identifying older adults with increased fall risk. 4. Facilitators and barriers to older adults’ adherence to evidence-based fall interventions. 5. Applying knowledge of older adult attitudes to improving an implementation of STEADI-based fall prevention. Multifactorial fall prevention strategies such as STEADI focus on the clinical aspects of fall prevention but their success depends on understanding and incorporating older adult characteristics and attitudes. The information presented in this session can inform fall prevention strategies and improve health.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S710-S710
Author(s):  
Winnie Sun

Abstract The aim of this study is to explore the barriers and enablers of deprescribing from the perspectives of home care nurses, as well as to conduct a scalability assessment of an educational plan to address the learning needs of home care nurses about deprescribing. This study employed an exploratory qualitative descriptive research design, using scalability assessment from two focus groups with a total of eleven home care nurses in Ontario, Canada. Thematic analysis was used to derive themes about home care nurse’s perspectives about barriers and enablers of deprescribing, as well as learning needs in relation to deprescribing approaches. Home care nurse’s identified challenges for managing polypharmacy in older adults in home care settings, including a lack of open communication and inconsistent medication reconciliation practices. Additionally, inadequate partnership and ineffective collaboration between inter-professional healthcare providers were identified as major barriers to safe deprescribing. Further, home care nurses highlighted the importance of raising awareness about deprescribing in the community, and they emphasized the need for a consistent and standardized approach in educating healthcare providers, informal caregivers, and older adults about the best practices of safe deprescribing. Nurses in home care play a vital role in medication management and, therefore, educational programs must be developed to support their awareness and understanding of deprescribing. Study findings highlighted the need for the future improvement of existing programs about safer medication management through the development of a supportive and collaborative relationship among the home care team, frail older adults and their informal caregivers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 431-432
Author(s):  
Rachel O’Conor ◽  
Morgan Eifler ◽  
Andrea Russell ◽  
Lauren Opsasnick ◽  
Julia Yoshino Benavente ◽  
...  

Abstract Many older adults manage multiple chronic conditions (MCC) that require adherence to complex medication regimens. Few studies have investigated the degree to which caregivers support medication-related behaviors. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 caregivers of older adults with MCC to characterize caregiver medication assistance. Two coders used content and constant comparative analysis to analyze transcripts. The mean age of caregivers was 61 years; the majority were female (68%) and identified as non-white (Black, 52%; Hispanic, 8%). Caregivers were predominantly spouses (n=10), or children (n=11). Older adults were on average 73 years old, managing 5 chronic conditions and prescribed 7 medications. Caregivers acknowledged the importance of medications to the older adult’s health, but their involvement in daily medication management was limited. Some caregivers preferred that the older adult continue these tasks to maintain autonomy, especially when caring for older adults who valued maintaining independence. Caregivers assumed medication responsibilities after older adults experienced sudden changes in health or upon observing non-adherence (e.g. full pill bottles). Older adults with higher medication burden (12+ medicines) adopted inefficient, cumbersome medication management practices; caregivers suggested simplified strategies, but the older adults refused to adopt recommended strategies. To combat resistance from the older adult, caregivers disguised assistance and deployed workaround strategies to monitor medication-taking behaviors. These findings suggest older adults and caregivers share a value of promoting independence of medication management, up until safety is seriously questioned. Additionally, there is a breakdown in communication at the time when older adults may benefit from increased caregiver involvement.


SEMINASTIKA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Gracella Tambunan ◽  
Lit Malem Ginting

Usability is a factor that indicates the success of an interactive product or system, such as a mobile application. The increasing use of smartphones demands a more accurate and effective usability evaluation method to find usability problems, so that they can be used for product improvement in the development process. This study compares the Cognitive Walkthrough method with Heuristic Evaluation in evaluating the usability of the SIRS Del eGov Center mobile application. Evaluation with these two methods will be carried out by three evaluators who act as experts. Finding problems and recommending improvements from each method will produce an improvement prototype made in the form of a high-fidelity prototype. Each prototype will be tested against ten participants using the Usability Testing method, which will generate scores through the SUS table. From the test scores, the percentage of Likert scale and the success rate of each prototype will be found. The results show that between the two usability evaluation methods, the Heuristic Evaluation method is the more effective method, finds more usability problems, and has a higher Likert scale percentage, which is 66.5%, while Cognitive Walkthrough is 64.75%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 945-946
Author(s):  
Sophia Sheikh ◽  
Natalie Spindle ◽  
Jennifer Brailsford ◽  
Jason Beneciuk ◽  
Monika Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Successful health outcomes in older patients are linked to the quality of the patient-provider relationship. Our study objective was to further understand the role of this relationship specific to pain management through perspectives from older adults and healthcare providers. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 9 older adults and 11 multidisciplinary healthcare providers. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Three main concepts emerged: (1) defining pain management goals — differences in providers and patients’ goals for pain and function, with sub-themes of realistic goal setting and a shift in pain treatment to minimize opioids as a first-line medication; (2) communication — perceived gap in providers communicating and coordinating across disciplines and with patients, with sub-themes of improving positive communication and inconsistent messaging among providers; and (3) therapeutic alliance — all parties feel that developing a relationship is built on consistent trust and open dialogue. Although providers and older adults often expressed similar perspectives, there were several areas of misalignment identified within each concept, representing areas of disconnect within the patient-provider pain management relationship. Our findings indicate providers could benefit from education on improving communication around realistic goals and patient-centered outcomes and incorporation of more holistic pain management approaches when working with older adult patients. Further study should focus on developing educational interventions to address the identified shortcomings.


Author(s):  
Terence S. Andre ◽  
H. Rex Hartson ◽  
Robert C. Williges

Despite the increased focus on usability and on the processes and methods used to increase usability, a substantial amount of software is unusable and poorly designed. Much of this is attributable to the lack of cost-effective usability evaluation tools that provide an interaction-based framework for identifying problems. We developed the user action framework and a corresponding evaluation tool, the usability problem inspector (UPI), to help organize usability concepts and issues into a knowledge base. We conducted a comprehensive comparison study to determine if our theory-based framework and tool could be effectively used to find important usability problems in an interface design, relative to two other established inspection methods (heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough). Results showed that the UPI scored higher than heuristic evaluation in terms of thoroughness, validity, and effectiveness and was consistent with cognitive walkthrough for these same measures. We also discuss other potential advantages of the UPI over heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough when applied in practice. Potential applications of this work include a cost-effective alternative or supplement to lab-based formative usability evaluation during any stage of development.


Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Morey ◽  
Rachel E. Stuck ◽  
Amy W. Chong ◽  
Laura H. Barg-Walkow ◽  
Tracy L. Mitzner ◽  
...  

With smartphone use among older populations on the rise, older adults have increased access to health-focused mobile apps. Despite their potential benefits for managing health, currently no guidelines exist for designing these apps specifically for older adult users. We evaluated the usability of one medication management app and two congestive heart failure management apps using cognitive walkthroughs, heuristic analysis, and user testing. We identified design issues that may affect usability for older users, including poor navigation, small button sizes, and inadequate data visualizations. We provide guidelines for developers of health apps to facilitate use by older adults.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S206-S206
Author(s):  
Julia Burgdorf ◽  
Julia Burgdorf ◽  
Judith D Kasper ◽  
Jennifer L Wolff

Abstract Family caregivers play a crucial role in supporting older adults through home health (HH) episodes; yet no prior research examines factors affecting the adequacy of caregiver support during HH. We use a novel dataset linking nationally-representative survey data with HH assessment data for community-dwelling older adults (n=2,128) to identify older adult characteristics associated with adequate caregiver support in four task categories (Activities of Daily Living, medication management, medical tasks, and safety/oversight) during a subsequent HH episode. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression is used to model the likelihood of adequate caregiver support in each category. Multiple older adult characteristics prior to the HH episode were associated with greater likelihood of adequate caregiver support during HH, including: prior caregiver assistance with mobility, self-care, and health care tasks, living with others, and cognitive impairment. These findings reveal new risk factors for consideration in risk assessment and payment adjustments related to social determinants of health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document