scholarly journals Pembrolizumab in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: clinical trial evidence and experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175628721983928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Crist ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Miles Hsu ◽  
William C. Huang ◽  
Arjun V. Balar
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Inhibitory Interaction ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Clinical Trial Evidence ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

The treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has dramatically changed with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors that disrupt the T-cell inhibitory interaction between the programmed cell death (PD)-1 receptor and its ligand (PD-L1). Pembrolizumab, a highly specific, monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1, has demonstrated clinical efficacy as well as a favorable toxicity profile, and has emerged as a new standard of care in the treatment of advanced UC. This review will summarize clinical efficacy from recent trials that led to the approval of pembrolizumab in treating platinum-refractory advanced UC as well as treating patients who are ineligible for first-line cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibition has reinvigorated the treatment landscape of advanced UC and generated a great deal of optimism, only a minority of patients benefit. Combination strategies with the goal of increasing response rates are desperately needed as are biomarkers predictive of response.

scholarly journals Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of the Current Evidence

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5517
Author(s):  
Sara Elena Rebuzzi ◽  
Giuseppe Luigi Banna ◽  
Veronica Murianni ◽  
Alessandra Damassi ◽  
Emilio Francesco Giunta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Concomitant Medications ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

In recent years, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has significantly changed due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are the standard of care for second-line treatment and first-line platinum-ineligible patients with advanced disease. Despite the overall survival improvement, only a minority of patients benefit from this immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers or models to select patients who will benefit from ICIs, especially in view of novel therapeutic agents. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and clinical readiness, of clinical and tumour factors, including new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics for patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. A classification of these factors according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation currently indicates both a prognostic and predictive value for ctDNA and a prognostic relevance only for concomitant medications and patients’ characteristics.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer: recent data and perspectives

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Volkova ◽  
Ya. V. Gridneva ◽  
A. S. Ol’shanskaya
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Programmed Death 1 ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors blocking the programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have shown a prominent anti-tumor activity with long-term responses and an acceptable toxicity profile  in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab are anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents that redefine the standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma. CTLA-4 inhibitors are also under investigation in this setting. Phase III trial KEYNOTE-045 has demonstrated significant survival benefit in patients treated with pembrolizumab comparing with the standard second-line chemotherapy. Atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab were also recommended for platinum-pretreated urothelial carcinoma patients based on phase II data. Following investigations of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression are needed to determine high-responders to immunotherapy. This review article describes the advances in immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals First-Line Chemotherapy Response Is a Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma, a Real World Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ri Li ◽  
Shian-Shiang Wang ◽  
Kevin Lu ◽  
Chuan-Shu Chen ◽  
Chen-Li Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The Other ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become important tools for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). However, the clinical strategy using ICIs and chemotherapy is still controversy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of clinical parameters in aUC patients with ICIs treatment.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed aUC patients who received atezolizumab and pembrolizumab between January 2015 and October 2020. The associations between baseline demographics and clinical outcomes were evaluated.Results: Of the 74 included patients, the median age was 67 years. Among them, 53 patients received atezolizumab and the other 21 received pembrolizumab. There were 50 patients receiving first line ICIs therapy and the other 24 received second line monotherapy. Fifty-two (83.87%, 52/62) received cisplatin among all chemotherapy patients. The median progression free survival was 10.94 months and the overall survival was 28.44 months. Poor chemotherapy response or no chemotherapy, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with higher risk of diseases progression (HR=5.70, 95% CI 2.04-15.90, p=0.001, HR=6.08, 95% CI 1.79-20.57, p=0.004; HR=5.40, 95% CI 1.76-16.57, p=0.003; HR=6.08, 95% CI 2.56-14.44, p<0.001 and HR= 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P=0.002 respectively). Liver metastases and WBC before ICI were associated with increased death risk (HR=11.95, 95%CI 3.22-44.34, p<0.001; HR=1.0001, 95% CI 1.00001-1.00002, p=0.036 respectively) while ICI response was associated with decreased death (HR=0.22, 95%CI 0.08-0.62, p=0.004). Chemotherapy responders were associated with better ICI treatment response (OR=6.52, 95%CI 1.45-29.24, p=0.014) while lymph node metastases and poor ECOG was associated with poor ICI response (OR=0.31, 95%CI 0.10-0.94, p=0.038; OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.11-0.95, p=0.040).Conclusions: Our data showed predictive role of first-line chemotherapy response to ICIs treatment efficacy in aUC patients as well as other prognostic factors, such as ECOG status, serum white blood cell count or NLR and liver metastases.

The effect of antibiotic use on immune-checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17116-e17116
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khan ◽  
Nathan Radakovich ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Omar Y. Mian ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

e17116 Background: There is emerging evidence that antibiotic (Abx) use may be associated with poor response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients (pts) with some solid tumors. However, this has not been studied in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). We examined the effect of Abx use on outcomes in pts receiving ICIs for mUC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult pts receiving ICIs for mUC treated at Cleveland Clinic between 2015 and 2020. Pts included in the study received > / = 3 cycles of ICI therapy with either azetolizumab or pembrolizumab. Abx use was defined as at least 3 days of Abx in the 60 days preceding or following ICI initiation. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 69 pts with mUC receiving ICI therapy were included. The Abx-treated group consisted of 22 pts (32%) and the Abx-untreated group was 47 pts (68 %). 30 pts had Abx 60 days prior to ICI initiation and 20 patients had Abx within 60 days of ICI initiation. Abx use 60 days prior to ICI was not associated with PFS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.42-1.95) or OS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.33-1.68). Abx use during the first 60 days of ICI use was associated with decreased PFS (HR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.03-4.86) but not OS (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 0.89-4.53). Notably, there was no effect on response rates. The most commonly used Abx prior to treatment were: fluoroquinolones (30%); cephalosporins (26%); non-cephalosporin beta lactams (17%); and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxasole (13%). The most commonly used Abx after treatment initiation were: fluoroquinolones (17% of patients); cephalosporins (13%); non-cephalosporin beta lactams (12%); and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxasole (9%). Our study was insufficiently powered to address the effect of different antibiotic classes on outcomes. Conclusions: In our study, Abx use within first 60 days of treatment with ICIs was associated with decreased PFS and a trend toward decreased OS in pts with mUC but not in pts receiving Abx 60 days prior to ICI therapy. While the numbers are small, this is the first report exploring the effect of Abx on ICI response in mUC and further studies in larger databases are warranted.

scholarly journals Integration of Immunotherapy Into the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Ghatalia ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Line Setting

Five new PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and avelumab. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the recommended frontline option for cisplatin-eligible patients with metastatic UC, immunotherapy is now an available option in the second-line setting as well as the frontline setting for selected cisplatin-ineligible patients who are either unable to tolerate chemotherapy or PD-L1–positive. This review describes the updated clinical efficacy of these checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced UC and suggests how they can be sequenced in the context of available chemotherapeutic options.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4341
Author(s):  
Jonathan Thouvenin ◽  
Nieves Martínez Chanzá ◽  
Omar Alhalabi ◽  
Hervé Lang ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Upper Tract ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Urothelial Carcinomas

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a rare and aggressive malignancy arising from the renal pelvis or ureter. It can develop sporadically or have a hereditary origin, such as Lynch syndrome, caused by DNA mismatch repair deficiency, leading to microsatellite instability phenotype. According to molecular characterization studies, UTUC presents different mutational profiles as compared to urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. In particular, it has been reported that UTUC harbored a higher level of FGFR3 alterations associated with a T-cell depleted immune microenvironment. The therapeutic landscape in urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving, with immune checkpoint inhibitors forming part of the standard of care. A greater understanding of the molecular alterations and immune microenvironment leads to the development of new treatment combinations and targeted therapy. This review summarizes the available evidence concerning the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the biological rationale underlying their use in high-grade UTUC.

Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 519-519
Author(s):  
Seung-Hoon Beom ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Joong Bae Ahn ◽  
Sang Joon Shin
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

519 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are active in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma which progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recent data suggest that exposure to ICI improves response to salvage chemotherapy (SCT) in several cancer types. Here we evaluated whether PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors affect the antitumor effects of SCT after ICI in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Yonsei Cancer Center. Eligibility criteria were patients who received at least one SCT as 3rd-line or beyond, following progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI and for whom efficacy data were available between January 2017 and September 2019. We evaluated efficacy outcomes to each therapy, including ORR by RECIST version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 35 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. ICIs were given as monotherapy and they were administrated as second-line in 48% and as later line in 52%. Twenty-six patients (74%) received a anti-PD-L1 inhibitor and 9 (26%) did a anti-PD-1 inhibitor. SCT included single paclitaxel (60%), MVAC (26%), gemcitabine/platinum combination (9%), and pemetrexed (6%). The ORR to SCT was 26%. Among 9 patients who received MVAC, 5 (55.5%) achieved a partial response. Median progression-free survival was 2.5 months and median overall survival was 7.8 months. A number of prior chemotherapy regimens was associated with response to SCT on univariate analysis. Conclusions: In urothelial cancer patients, the confirmed ORR (26%) to SCT after ICI exposure was higher as compared to historical data from the pre-ICI era. These data indicate that anti–PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could make tumors more vulnerable to subsequent chemotherapy.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Standards and Treatment Considerations

2018 ◽  
pp. 342-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Dietrich ◽  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Evan Y. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Treatment Considerations ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Urothelial carcinoma is the sixth most common malignancy in the United States. Although most are diagnosed with non–muscle-invasive malignancy, many patients will develop recurrent disease within 5 years, with 10% to 20% developing advanced muscle-invasive or more distant incurable disease. For such patients, clinical outcomes have remained suboptimal, although recent therapeutic advances have brought new hope to the field. Here, we discuss the main systemic treatment options available for the treatment of patients with advanced disease. This review begins with traditional chemotherapy, which remains a first-line treatment option for many patients. The second section focuses on the evolving landscape of immunotherapy, specifically on approved checkpoint inhibitors and future challenges. Last, we address advances in targeted treatments, including angiogenesis and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors as well as antibody-drug conjugates. As the number of available treatment options continues to expand, ongoing trials to investigate the best sequence and combination strategies to incorporate these drugs into clinical practice will help delineate the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document