scholarly journals Noise Induced Hearing Loss

AAOHN Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oi Saeng Hong ◽  
Shu-Pi C. Chen ◽  
Karen M. Conrad
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hearing Conservation ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Record Review ◽  
Continuous Use

The purposes of this study of airport workers were to a) determine the prevalence and symptoms of hearing loss, and b) identify compliance in using hearing protective devices (HPDs) and its relationship with hearing loss. This cross sectional epidemiological study was conducted with 255 noise exposed and 195 non-noise exposed, full time, male workers at a large metropolitan airport in Seoul, Korea. The three measures used were the self administered Occupational Hearing Questionnaire (OHQ), an audiological assessment, and a record review of baseline hearing and noise levels of locations in which the employee worked. The results showed a significant difference in prevalence of hearing loss (more than 25dB) between the noise and the non-noise exposed groups ( p < .05). About 60.8% of noise exposed workers reported continuous use of the HPDs. The continuous HPD users had significantly lower rates of hearing loss than the occasional users or non-users. The major symptom for workers with low frequency hearing loss was trouble in communication, whereas tinnitus and fullness in the ear were the most common symptoms for the workers with high frequency hearing loss. The airport workers exposed to excessive noise had a great deal of high frequency hearing loss. The degree of hearing loss present reinforces the need for aggressive hearing conservation programs among airport workers exposed to noise.

scholarly journals Hearing threshold levels and hearing loss among people in Zhejiang, China: a population-based cross-sectional study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e027152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahui Wang ◽  
Huai Zhang ◽  
Haiyan Ma ◽  
Long Zhang ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Zhejiang Province ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss

Hearing loss (≥26 dB threshold in the better ear), as a common chronic condition in humans, is increasingly gaining attention. Relevant research in China is relatively scarce, so we conduct a population-based study to investigate the prevalence of hearing loss among age groups, genders and ears in Zhejiang province, China, from September 2016 to June 2018.Study designPopulation-based cross-sectional studyParticipantsA total of 3754 participants aged 18–98 years and living in Zhejiang province, China.Outcome measuresPure-tone audiometric thresholds were measured at frequencies of 0.125–8 kHz for each subject. All participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire, in the presence of a healthcare official.ResultsThe prevalence of speech-frequency and high-frequency hearing loss was 27.9% and 42.9%, respectively, in Zhejiang. There were significant differences in auditory thresholds at most frequencies among the age groups, genders (male vs female: 31.6%vs24.1% at speech frequency; 48.9% vs 36.8% at high frequency) and ears. In addition to the common factors affecting both types of hearing loss, a significant correlation was found between personal income and speech-frequency hearing loss (OR=0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.92), and between hyperlipidaemia and high-frequency hearing loss (OR=1.45, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.07).ConclusionThe prevalence of hearing loss was high among people living in Zhejiang, particularly males, and in the left ear. Moreover, hearing thresholds increased with age. Several lifestyle and environment factors, which can be influenced by awareness and education, were significantly associated with hearing loss.

The Effects of High-Frequency Hearing Loss on Low-Frequency Components of the Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (09) ◽  
pp. 525-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen D. Murnane ◽  
John K. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Otoacoustic Emission ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Basal Region ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Frequency Components

Click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) input/output (I/O) functions were measured in ears with normal hearing and in ears with sensorineural hearing loss above 2000 Hz. The low- to midfrequency CEOAEs obtained from the ears with high-frequency hearing loss were significantly reduced in level compared to the CEOAEs obtained from the ears with normal hearing even though there were no significant group differences in the 250–2000 Hz pure-tone thresholds. The findings are discussed within the context of two hypotheses that explain the low- to midfrequency reduction in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) magnitude: (1) subclinical damage to the more apical regions of the cochlea not detected by behavioral audiometry, or (2) trauma to the basal region of the cochlea that affects the generation of low-frequency emissions. It is proposed that localized damage at basal cochlear sites affects the generation of low- to midfrequency CEOAE energy.

Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jace Wolfe ◽  
Sara Neumann ◽  
Erin Schafer ◽  
Megan Marsh ◽  
Mark Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Real World ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Sentence Recognition ◽  
Acoustic Hearing ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Sound Processor

Background: A number of published studies have demonstrated the benefits of electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) over conventional electric stimulation for adults with functional low-frequency acoustic hearing and severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss. These benefits potentially include better speech recognition in quiet and in noise, better localization, improvements in sound quality, better music appreciation and aptitude, and better pitch recognition. There is, however, a paucity of published reports describing the potential benefits and limitations of EAS for children with functional low-frequency acoustic hearing and severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss. Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the potential benefits of EAS for children. Research Design: A repeated measures design was used to evaluate performance differences obtained with EAS stimulation versus acoustic- and electric-only stimulation. Study Sample: Seven users of Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid, Nucleus 24 Freedom, CI512, and CI422 implants were included in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: Sentence recognition (assayed using the pediatric version of the AzBio sentence recognition test) was evaluated in quiet and at three fixed signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (0, +5, and +10 dB). Functional hearing performance was also evaluated with the use of questionnaires, including the comparative version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities, the Listening Inventory for Education Revised, and the Children’s Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties. Results: Speech recognition in noise was typically better with EAS compared to participants’ performance with acoustic- and electric-only stimulation, particularly when evaluated at the less favorable SNR. Additionally, in real-world situations, children generally preferred to use EAS compared to electric-only stimulation. Also, the participants’ classroom teachers observed better hearing performance in the classroom with the use of EAS. Conclusions: Use of EAS provided better speech recognition in quiet and in noise when compared to performance obtained with use of acoustic- and electric-only stimulation, and children responded favorably to the use of EAS implemented in an integrated sound processor for real-world use.

scholarly journals Absence of Relationship between Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroups and Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Graterol ◽  
C. Mir ◽  
C. Garcia-Vaquero ◽  
I. Braña ◽  
A. N. Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Treatment ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Determining Factor

Background. Many drugs used for cancer chemotherapy produce reactive oxygen species, thus leading to various complications including nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and ototoxicity. Objective. We have provided a haplogroup analysis of a cohort of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and compared factors associated with associated hearing loss. Study Design and Methods. This observational cohort study includes a pure-tone audiometry of the patients who underwent chemotherapeutic treatment. Medical history, presence of risk factors for hearing loss, toxic habits, and association with haplogroups have been determined. Results. 40% of patients developed hearing loss after administration of cisplatin, which was bilateral and symmetrical and of high frequencies. The most frequent haplogroup was H with a slight overexpression of groups V and K and a low frequency of groups J and T. No association of the haplogroup types with the hearing loss has been found; however age was revealed as an important determining factor. Conclusions. Ototoxicity caused by cisplatin is manifested as bilateral, symmetrical, and predominantly high frequency hearing loss. Although we did not find a strong correlation of haplogroups with ototoxicity, our results revealed the existence of a risk group of elderly patients over 60, which are more susceptible to hearing loss induced by cisplatin, than young adults, regardless of preexisting hearing loss.

Tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss in train drivers in China

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Peng ◽  
Chaojie Fan ◽  
Lin Hu ◽  
Shuangling Peng ◽  
Pengpeng Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Health Examination ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Occupational Environment ◽  
Train Drivers ◽  
The Relationship

ObjectiveHearing loss caused by high levels of noise is a potential occupational health disorder among train drivers around the world. This study aims to investigate the relationship between tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss in train drivers, to provide some insights into helping reduce hearing loss among train drivers.MethodsThis study analysed cross-sectional data for 1214 train drivers who work at China Railway Guangzhou Group. Health examination was taken by physicians with professional licences, and audiometric testing was performed by health technicians in a sound-isolated room. T/R is defined as the ratio of the length of the tunnels to the length of the railway along drivers’ work routes. Different multivariate models and stratified models were established for sensitivity analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate the ORs of hearing loss associated with tunnel driving occupational environment.ResultsThe adjusted OR for high-frequency hearing loss in association with the highest T/R levels (30%–45%) versus the lowest T/R levels (<15%) was 3.72 (95% CI 1.43 to 9.69). The corresponding OR for speech-hearing loss was 1.75 (95% CI 0.38 to 8.06). The sensitivity analysis shows our results are suitable for various alternative models.ConclusionsThis study found that there was a significant association between tunnel driving occupational environment and hearing loss. Train drivers who work in a higher T/R environment have worse hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document