scholarly journals Resident Involvement in Shoulder Arthroscopy Is Not Associated With Short-term Risk to Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711881629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryce A. Basques ◽  
Bryan M. Saltzman ◽  
Erik N. Mayer ◽  
Bernard R. Bach ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Error Variance ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Resident Involvement ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Perioperative Risks

Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is a commonly performed, critical component of orthopaedic residency training. However, it is unclear whether there are additional risks to patients in cases associated with resident involvement. Purpose: To compare shoulder arthroscopy cases with and without resident involvement via a large, prospectively maintained national surgical registry to characterize perioperative risks. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The prospectively maintained American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried to identify patients who underwent 1 of 12 shoulder arthroscopy procedures from 2005 through 2012. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to compare the rates of postoperative adverse events and readmission within 30 days between cases with and without resident involvement. Multivariate linear regression was used to compare operative time between cohorts. Results: A total of 15,774 patients with shoulder arthroscopy were included in the study, and 12.3% of these had a resident involved with the case. The overall rate of adverse events was 1.09%. On multivariate analysis, resident involvement was not associated with increased rates of any aggregate or individual adverse event. There was also no association between resident involvement and risk of readmission within 30 days. Resident involvement was not associated with any difference in operative time ( P = .219). Conclusion: Resident involvement in shoulder arthroscopy was not associated with increased risk of adverse events, increased operative time, or readmission within 30 days. The results of this study suggest that resident involvement in shoulder arthroscopy cases is a safe method for trainees to learn these procedures.

scholarly journals Resident Involvement in Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Is Not Associated With Increased Short-term Risk to Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096746
Author(s):  
Bryce A. Basques ◽  
Bryan M. Saltzman ◽  
Shane S. Korber ◽  
Ioanna K. Bolia ◽  
Erik N. Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Knee Surgery ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Resident Involvement ◽  
Arthroscopic Knee

Background: Whether resident involvement in surgical procedures affects intra- and/or postoperative outcomes is controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare operative time, adverse events, and readmission rate for arthroscopic knee surgery cases with and without resident involvement. We hypothesized that resident involvement would not negatively affect these variables. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed. Patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to compare the rates of postoperative adverse events and readmission within 30 days between cases with and without resident involvement. Multivariate linear regression was used to compare operative time between cohorts. Because of multiple statistical comparisons, a Bonferroni correction was used, and statistical significance was set at P < .004. Results: A total of 29,539 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery were included in the study, and 11.3% of these patients had a resident involved with the case. The overall rate of adverse events was 1.62%. On multivariate analysis, resident involvement was not associated with increased rates of adverse events or readmission. Resident cases had a mean 6-minute increase in operative time ( P < .001). Conclusion: Overall, resident involvement in arthroscopic knee surgery was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events or readmission. Resident involvement was associated with only a mean increased operative time of 6 minutes, a difference that is not likely to be clinically significant. These results support the safety of resident involvement with arthroscopic knee surgery.

The Effect of Obesity on Achilles Rupture Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery S. Hillam ◽  
Neil Mohile ◽  
Niall Smyth ◽  
Jonathan Kaplan ◽  
Amiethab Aiyer
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Tendon Ruptures

Introduction. Obesity is an increasingly common comorbidity that may negatively affect outcomes following orthopaedic surgery. It is valuable to determine whether obese patients are vulnerable for postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to analyze data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) to determine the effect of obesity on surgical treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Methods. Patients who underwent a surgical repair of the Achilles tendon were retrospectively identified through the ACS NSQIP. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts (obese and nonobese), then perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated for association with obesity. Results. A total of 2128 patients were identified, of whom 887 (41.7%) were classified as obese. Obesity correlated with an increased operative time, 60.9 versus 56.1 minutes. The only postoperative complication associated with obesity was wound dehiscence. Logistic regression adjusted for comorbid conditions demonstrated that obesity was not associated with an increased risk of wound dehiscence. Conclusion. A large segment of the patient population undergoing Achilles tendon repair is obese. Obesity was found to have an increased association with wound dehiscence, likely related to comorbid conditions, following Achilles tendon repair. Obesity was not significantly associated with any other complication. Levels of Evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study

scholarly journals Morbidity of First Rib Resection in the Surgical Repair of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 636-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Jubbal ◽  
Dmitry Zavlin ◽  
Joshua D. Harris ◽  
Shari R. Liberman ◽  
Anthony Echo
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Medical Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Cervical Rib ◽  
Rib Resection ◽  
First Rib ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Rib Resection

Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex entity resulting in neurogenic or vascular manifestations. A wide array of procedures has evolved, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. The authors hypothesized that treatment of TOS with first rib resection (FRR) may lead to increased complication rates. Methods: A retrospective case control study was performed on the basis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2014. All cases involving the operative treatment of TOS were extracted. Primary outcomes included surgical and medical complications. Analyses were primarily stratified by FRR and secondarily by other procedure types. Results: A total of 1853 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common procedures were FRR (64.0%), anterior scalenectomy with cervical rib resection (32.9%), brachial plexus decompression (27.2%), and anterior scalenectomy without cervical rib resection (AS, 8.9%). Factors associated with increased medical complications included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of 3 or greater and increased operative time. The presence or absence of FRR did not influence complication rates. Conclusions: FRR is not associated with an increased risk of medical or surgical complications. Medical complications are associated with increased ASA scores and longer operative time.

What Is the Relationship between Operative Time and Adverse Events after Colon and Rectal Surgery?

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 712-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Poles ◽  
Caitlin Stafford ◽  
Todd Francone ◽  
Patricia L. Roberts ◽  
Rocco Ricciardi
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Rectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Colon And Rectal Surgery ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Tract Infections

We propose that prolonged colorectal surgery operative times are associated with increased 30-day adverse events. We identified a cohort from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from January 2005 through December 2012. Patients who underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis were selected using CPT codes. Operative time was categorized into short, average, and long based on mean operative times 61 SD. NSQIP-approved multivariate models were used to identify associations between operative time and 30-day adverse events. A total of 113,615 patients underwent colorectal resection of which 46 per cent were laparoscopic and 12 per cent were identified as long operative times. Patients with long operative procedures had 34 per cent more superficial surgical site infections, 65 per cent more organ space infections, 69 per cent more abdominal dehiscences, 44 per cent more thrombotic complications, 45 per cent more urinary tract infections, 40 per cent more returns to the operating room, and 36 per cent more prolonged lengths of stay ( P < 0.05 for all analyses). The multivariable analysis revealed an association between long operative times and increased adverse events despite adjustment for all NSQIP recommended covariates. Our results reveal increased 30-day adverse events with increased operative time. We propose that operative time may serve as a proxy for surgical complexity in colorectal surgery.

Same-day and delayed hospital discharge are associated with worse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Nowak ◽  
E. H. Schemitsch
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Total Knee

Aims To evaluate the influence of discharge timing on 30-day complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods We identified patients aged 18 years or older who underwent TKA between 2005 and 2016 from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. We propensity score-matched length-of-stay (LOS) groups using all relevant covariables. We used multivariable regression to determine if the rate of complications and re-admissions differed depending on LOS. Results Our matched cohort consisted of 76 246 TKA patients (mean age 67 years (sd 9)). Patients whose LOS was zero and four days had an increased risk of major complications by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 3.2) and 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), respectively, compared with patients whose LOS was two days. Patients whose LOS was zero, three, and four days had an increased risk of minor complications (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.7), 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), and 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.9), respectively), compared with patients whose LOS was two days. In addition, a LOS of three days increased the risk of re-admission by an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3), and a LOS of four days increased the risk of re-admission by an OR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6), compared with a LOS of two days. Conclusion Patients discharged on days one to two postoperatively following TKA appear to have reduced major and minor complications compared with discharge on the day of surgery, or on days three to four. Prospective clinical data are required to confirm these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):70–76

Peripheral Nerve Injury during Abdominal-Pelvic Surgery: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1214-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J.D. Wallis ◽  
Sarah Peltz ◽  
James Byrne ◽  
Jamie Kroft ◽  
Paul Karanicolas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Injury ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Preventable Complication

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a rare but preventable complication of surgery. We sought to assess whether the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) affects the occurrence of PNI. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we examined rates of PNI among patients undergoing appendectomy, hysterectomy, colectomy, or radical prostatectomy between 2005 and 2012. We assessed the effect of MIS, as compared with open surgery, on PNI occurrence using logistic regression. Among 297,532 patients, of whom 175,884 (59.1%) underwent MIS, the rate of PNI was 0.03 per cent. Forty-four patients treated using MIS had PNI (0.03%) as compared with 63 who underwent open surgery (0.05%; P = 0.0002). There was a significant decrease in the proportion of surgeries resulting in PNI (P < 0.0001) over time. In univariate analysis, MIS was associated with a decreased occurrence of PNI (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.33–0.71), but this became nonsignificant on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.47–1.09). Increased operative time and smoking status were the only factors independently associated with an increased risk of PNI on multivariable analysis. MIS techniques during common abdominal-pelvic surgeries do not appear to increase the risk of PNI. Prolonged operative time and smoking are independently associated with an increased risk of PNI. Quality improvement initiatives to increase awareness of PNI and identify patients at increased risk of this preventable complication should be considered.

Timing of Complications following Hand Surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Daniel D. Bohl ◽  
Robert W. Wysocki
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Event Timing

Abstract Introduction Our purposes were to (1) characterize the timeline of eight postoperative complications following hand surgery, (2) assess complication timing for the procedures that account for the majority of adverse events, and (3) determine any differences in complication timing between outpatient and inpatient procedures. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm procedures from 2005 to 2016 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Timing of eight adverse events was characterized. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare adverse event timing between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Results A total of 59,040 patients were included. The median postoperative day of diagnosis for each adverse event was as follows: myocardial infarction 1, pulmonary embolism 2, acute kidney injury 3, pneumonia 8, deep vein thrombosis 9, sepsis 13, urinary tract infection 15, and surgical site infection 16. Amputations, fasciotomies, and distal radius open reduction internal fixation accounted for the majority of adverse events. Complication timing was significantly earlier in inpatients compared with outpatients for myocardial infarction. Conclusion This study characterizes postoperative adverse event timing following hand surgery. Surgeons should have the lowest threshold for testing for each complication during the time period of greatest risk. Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic, Level III study.

scholarly journals Morbidity of Diverting Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1034-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehraneh D. Jafari ◽  
Wissam J. Halabi ◽  
Fariba Jafari ◽  
Vinh Q. Nguyen ◽  
Michael J. Stamos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Septic Complications ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

There is controversy regarding the potential benefits of diverting ileostomy after low anterior resection (LAR). This study aims to examine the morbidity associated with diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer. A retrospective review of LAR cases was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005 to 2011). Patients who underwent LAR with and without diversion were selected. Demographics, intraoperative events, and postoperative complications were reviewed. Among the 6337 cases sampled, 991 (16%) received a diverting ileostomy. Patients who were diverted were younger (60 vs 63 years), predominantly male (64 vs 53%), and more likely to have received pre-operative radiation (39 vs 12%). There was no significant difference in steroid use, weight loss, or intraoperative transfusion. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in length of stay, rate of septic complications, wound infections, and mortality. The rate of reoperation was lower in the diverted group (4.5 vs 6.9%). Diversion was associated with a higher risk-adjusted rate of acute renal failure (OR 2.4; 95% CI (1.2, 4.6); P < 0.05). The use of diverting ileostomy reduces the rate of reoperation but is associated with an increased risk of acute renal insufficiency. These findings emphasize the need for refinement of patient selection and close follow-up to limit morbidity.

scholarly journals Impact of resident involvement in neurosurgery: an analysis of 8748 patients from the 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 962-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seokchun Lim ◽  
Andrew T. Parsa ◽  
Bobby D. Kim ◽  
Joshua M. Rosenow ◽  
John Y. S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Independent Effect ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Resident Involvement ◽  
American College Of Surgeons

OBJECT This study evaluates the impact of resident presence in the operating room on postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and identified all cases treated in a neurosurgery service in 2011. Propensity scoring analysis and multiple logistic regression models were used to reduce patient bias and to assess independent effect of resident involvement. RESULTS Of the 8748 neurosurgery cases identified, residents were present in 4529 cases. Residents were more likely to be involved in complex procedures with longer operative duration. The multivariate analysis found that resident involvement was not a statistically significant factor for overall complications (OR 1.116, 95% CI 0.961–1.297), surgical complications (OR 1.132, 95% CI 0.825–1.554), medical complications (OR 1.146, 95% CI 0.979–1.343), reoperation (OR 1.250, 95% CI 0.984–1.589), mortality (OR 1.164, 95% CI 0.780–1.737), or unplanned readmission (OR 1.148, 95% CI 0.946–1.393). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study, the authors demonstrated that resident involvement in the operating room was not a significant factor for postoperative complications in neurosurgery service. This analysis also showed that much of the observed difference in postoperative complication rates was attributable to other confounding factors. This is a quality indicator for resident trainees and current medical education. Maintaining high standards in postgraduate training is imperative in enhancing patient care and reducing postoperative complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document